fao.gif (912 bytes)

 

TCP/NIR/7822(E)

TECHNICAL COOPERATION PROGRAMME

EMERGENCY ASSISTANCE ON CONTROL AND ERADICATION OF AN OUTBREAK OF AFRICAN SWINE FEVER IN WESTERN NIGERIA

REPORT OF THE FAO CONSULTANCY MISSION TO NIGERIA

October 9 to November 11, 1998

Khaled EL HICHERI,FAO INTERNATIONAL CONSULTANT (ASF CONTROL)

Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations

Rome, December 1998

Table of Contents

Abbreviations Used in the Report

SUMMARY

INTRODUCTION

PIG PRODUCTION

EPIDEMIOLOGY

SOCIO-ECONOMICAL EFFECTS

CONTROL/ERADICATION MEASURES

ASF ERADICATION STRATEGY FOR NIGERIA

REPOPULATION

FUNDING

FAO ASSISTANCE

RECOMMENDATIONS

CONCLUSION

Annex 1: Letter to the Director FMANR

Annex II:

Annex III: Investigation Form

Annex IV: STRATEGY FOR THE CONTROL/ERADICATION OF AFRICAN SWINE FEVER IN NIGERIA

Annex V: ASF VIDEO-FILM

Annex VI: A programme for sentinellisation

Annex VII: Itinerary


Abbreviations Used in the Report

ASF African Swine Fever

DVS Director (Direction) of Veterinary Services

ECOWAS Economical Organisation of West African States

EMPRES Emergency Prevention System for Transboundary Plant Pests and Animal diseases

ELISA Enzyme Linked Immuno-sorbent Assay

EU European Union

FAO Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations

FDL&PCS Federal Department (Director) of Livestock and Pest control Services (Nigeria)

IFAT Immuno-Fluorescence Antibody Test

IITA International Institute of Tropical Agriculture

LG Local Government

MANR Ministry (Minister) of Agriculture and Natural Resources

NADEP National Animal Disease Emergency preparedness

NGO Non Governmental Organisation

NVRI National Veterinary Research Institute

PS Permanent Secretary

PTF Petrolium Trust Fund

RFLP Restriction Fragment Length Polymorphism

SP Sentinel Pig

TCP Technical Cooperation Programme

UNDP United Nation Development Programme

SUMMARY

African Swine Fever (ASF) outbreaks were first confirmed in Nigeria in November 1997. In spite of the proximity of the infection in the neighbouring countries, a great delay has been noticed between the probable primary outbreak and the recognition of the disease, although early and accurate recognition of ASF is extremely important for the containment and eradication of the disease. In addition, from the first outbreaks, it appeared that the Nigerian reporting system was not efficient enough and could not serve as an early warning system. That suggests that the links between States and Federal services are loose, creating therefore an information gap.

The EMPRES system's approach has not been applied and ASF is presently spreading in all directions. The spread of this devastating transboundary disease could have been avoided if the FAO recommended actions had been undertaken in time. A trend of high mortality levels has been recorded throughout the country between September 1997 and October 1998. The total number of declared dead pigs in that period reached 125 000 in 9 States of the Federal Republic: Lagos State, Ogun State, Kaduna State, Benue State, Enugu State, Akwa Ibom State, Rivers state, Plateau State and Delta State. Data are not normally collected on the field and we still ignore the real extension and spread of ASF, the limit of the infected areas and the precise location of the foci.