Previous PageTable Of ContentsNext Page


Annex I: National Plant Breeding Survey

The objective of this survey is to develop a plant breeding country profile to provide decision makers with the means to strengthen national programme capacity to respond to needs and priorities on sustainable use of Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture (PGRFA). The information provided will be managed as confidential; under no circumstance will information about individual breeding programmes be disclosed. Only country average will be presented and discussed in published reports

This survey intent to cover the period 1985-2004 using mainly five-year interval data, but if information is available for every single year or only for years different than the ones indicated, it should be included.

1) What kind of organization are you representing?

2) How many years has your organization been involved in

If there was change in name or structure of the organization, please consider the full period length.

3) Number and educational level of scientists of your organization involved in plant breeding and biotechnology in the period 1985 to 2004. This information should be reported in Full Time Equivalent (FTE) to allow capturing the activities of scientists who work only part-time in plant breeding and/or biotechnology (see the definition of FTE in the definitions section). If there are plant breeders or biotechnologists working in administrative positions they must be included in the table.

Plant breeding

Education level

1985

1990

1995

2000

2004

B.Sc.

         

M.Sc.

         

Ph.D.

         

Obs: this information may be completed on crop and/or crops-group basis by replicating the table.

Plant biotechnology

Education level

1985

1990

1995

2000

2004

B.Sc.

         

M.Sc.

         

Ph.D.

         

4) Please indicate your organization’s total budget and the proportion that was allocated to plant breeding activities in the period 1985 to 2004 (please use current local currency, do not transform to US$ or any other currency). Please indicate if the budget includes salaries. If there is no data for the specified years, but they are available for other years, please include the information and specify the year it refers to.

Financial resources

1985

1990

1995

2000

2004

Total research budget

         

Plant breeding

         

%1

         

1 In cases where there is no breakdown by activities, use the percentage line to provide an idea of the allocation for plant breeding.

5) Considering the total organization’s resource allocation (human and financial) for plant breeding activities what would be the percentage distribution by crops and/or crops-group? Each column should sum to 100%.

Crops

1985

1990

1995

2000

2004

Wheat

         

Rice

         

Maize

         

Sorghum and Millet

         

Others small grains (e.g. Barley and Oats)

         

Oilseeds (e.g. Soybeans, Groundnuts)

         

Fiber crops (e.g. Cotton)

         

Roots and Tubers

         

Forages

         

Others grain legumes (e.g. Chickpea, Cowpea, Phaseolus)

         

Vegetables and Fruits

         

Miscellaneous

         

Total

100

100

100

100

100

6) Taking into account the total organization’s resource allocation (human and financial) for different crops and/or crops-group improvement activities. What would be the present percentage allocation considering the current base-year. Please, also indicate what the trend is over the previous decade for the three major areas proposed (assign number 1 if it is increasing, 2 if it remains the same and 3 if it is decreasing since 1990). To help with your answer we are providing the following example: in the 1990’s the programme invested 10% of its total resources to “germplasm enhancement”, 30% to “line development” and 60% to “line evaluation”. In 2004 the investments were 10% of its resources to “germplasm enhancement”, 50% to “line development” and 40% to “line evaluation”. Therefore, the number indicating the trends are 2 for “germplasm enhancement”, 1 for “line development” and 3 for “line evaluation”. If there is an increase in one area there must be a decrease in another. It is important to understand that the amount of resources in 2004 may have increased or decreased in relation to the 1990’s, but that does not influence the trends; the programme may have less resources in 2004, but out of the available resources a greater percentage will go to “line development”.

Crops

Allocation

% must add to

Germplasm enhancement1

Line development1

Line evaluation1

%

Trend

%

Trend

%

Trend

Wheat

           

100

Rice

           

100

Maize

           /td>

100

Sorghum and Millet

           

100

Others small grains (e.g. Barley and Oats)

           

100

Oilseeds (e.g. Soybeans, Groundnuts)

           

100

Fiber crops (e.g. Cotton)

           

100

Roots and Tubers

           

100

Forages

           

100

Others grain legumes (e.g. Chickpea, Cowpea, Phaseolus)

           

100

Vegetables and Fruits

           

100

Miscellaneous

           

100

1 See the definitions in the appropriate section.

7) Considering the total resources available in the organization, what is the proportion (%) going to the different research areas? Each column should sum to 100%.

Research Area

1985

1990

1995

2000

2004

Line development 1 and evaluation 1

         

Plant biotechnology 1

         

Germplasm enhancement 1

         

Total allocation (%)

100

100

100

100

100

1 See the definitions in the appropriate section.

8) Please, mark which are the biotechnology areas the organization is working on?

9) Considering the organization’s breeding programme, write the average numbers managed for every crop and/or crop-group. Consider 2004 as the present base-year to provide this information.

Crops

Activity

Number of crosses made1

Number of segregating populations considering all generations2

Number of trials3

Number of locations used for field trials

Wheat

       

Rice

       

Maize

       

Sorghum and Millet

       

Others small grains (e.g. Barley and Oats)

       

Oilseeds (e.g. Soybeans, Groundnuts)

       

Fiber crops (e.g. Cotton)

       

Roots and Tubers

       

Forages

       

Others grain legumes (e.g. Chickpea, Cowpea, Phaseolus)

       

Vegetables and Fruits

       

Miscellaneous

       

1 In self-pollinated crops the number of crosses refers to the number of parental combinations made and not to the number of crosses made to insure parent A by B combination.
2 Please consider that a single cross may produce 100 F3 segregating populations, 300 F4, and so on. The question is asking for the total number regardless of their segregating cycle.
3 Please provide the sum of all trials the programme carries out, including segregating materials, observational and yield trials, as well as demonstration trials.

10) For each major crop and/or crop-group, what are the main sources of germplasm used in the breeding programme of your organization? Consider 2004 as the base-year to provide this crop information. Please indicate the percentage obtained from each source. Each row should sum to 100%.

Crops

Germplasm source

Local germplasm bank1

National germplasm bank

Introduction through bi or multilateral agreements

Introduction through participation in germplasm evaluation networks

CGIAR gene banks

Public organizations in industrialized country

Private sector

Farmers material

Total

Wheat

               

100

Rice

               

100

Maize

               

100

Sorghum and Millet

               

100

Others small grains (e.g. Barley and Oats)

               

100

Oilseeds (e.g. Soybeans, Groundnuts)

               

100

Fiber crops (e.g. Cotton)

               

100

Roots and Tubers

               

100

Forages

               

100

Others grain legumes (e.g. Chickpea, Cowpea, Phaseolus)

               

100

Vegetables and Fruits

               

100

Miscellaneous

               

100

1 This column is only to be completed by institutions which have local gene banks, in addition to the national one.

11) For the following crops and/or crops-group indicate the environment breeding priority for your organization during the 1980’s (or more recently in case your Organization did not exist at that time) and today (1 = high priority; 2 = medium priority, 3 = low priority).

Crop

Targeted environment

Priority

1980

2004

Wheat

Highly favourable

   

With abiotic1 stress

   

With biotic2 stress

   

Rice

Highly favourable

   

With abiotic stress

   

With biotic stress

   

Maize

Highly favourable

   

With abiotic stress

   

With biotic stress

   

Sorghum and Millet

Highly favourable

   

With abiotic stress

   

With biotic stress

   

Others small grains (e.g. Barley and Oats)

Highly favourable

   

With abiotic stress

   

With biotic stress

   

Oilseeds (e.g. Soybeans, Groundnuts)

Highly favourable

   

With abiotic stress

   

With biotic stress

   

Fiber crops (e.g. Cotton)

Highly favourable

   

With abiotic stress

   

With biotic stress

   

Roots and Tubers

Highly favourable

   

With abiotic stress

   

With biotic stress

   

Forages

Highly favourable

   

With abiotic stress

   

With biotic stress

   

Others grain legumes (e.g. Chickpea, Cowpea, Phaseolus)

Highly favourable

   

With abiotic stress

   

With biotic stress

   

Vegetables and Fruits

Highly favourable

   

With abiotic stress

   

With biotic stress

   

Miscellaneous

Highly favourable

   

With abiotic stress

   

With biotic stress

   

1 Abiotic stress – drought, heat, cold, etc
2 Biotic stress – diseases, insects, etc

12) How can the international community (FAO, CGIAR Centers, World Bank, IFAD, multilateral or bilateral development agencies, etc) assist your organization in increasing efficient use of PGRFA? Please rate them using the following numbers: 1 = high, 2 = medium high, 3 = medium, 4 = medium low, 5 = low priority. Do not repeat the number and leave blank where priority is lower than 5.

13) Indicate the number of varieties released each period by your organization for each crop and/or crop-group.

Crop

Number of varieties released1

1980- 1984

1985-1989

1990-1994

1995-1999

2000-2004

Wheat

         

Rice

         

Maize

         

Sorghum and Millet

         

Others small grains (e.g. Barley and Oats)

         

Oilseeds (e.g. Soybeans, Groundnuts)

         

Fiber crops (e.g. Cotton)

         

Roots and Tubers

         

Forages

         

Others grain legumes (e.g. Chickpea, Cowpea, Phaseolus)

         

Vegetables and Fruits

         

Miscellaneous

         

1 If the country does not have a varietal release system in place, provide the number of varieties made available to farmers.

14) Indicate the aspects the Organization considers the most limiting for the success of the plant breeding programmes. In the first column identify the ones that are current relevant and in the second column indicate the ones important in the 1980s. Please, only write the main five and put them in order of importance, given the number “1” to the most important and “5” to the least important. Do not repeat the number and leave blank where priority is lower than 5.

Aspects

Actual

1980s

Inadequate number of breeders for each crop

   

Inadequate experimental fields conditions

   

Inadequate access to recent literature

   

Inadequate knowledge level of the general plant breeding strategies

   

Limited access to international genetic resources

   

Limited access to national public and/or private genetic resources

   

Lack of knowledge about participatory plant breeding techniques

   

Lack of knowledge about the use of molecular technique support plant breeding programmes

   

Inadequate availability of laboratory infrastructure to carry out experiments using advanced plant breeding techniques

   

Lack of financial resources to carry out field and laboratory experiments

   

Lack of support from the international community, including organizations like Centres of the CGIAR system, FAO, etc

   

Others (specify)

   



Definitions

Biotechnology – means any technological application that uses biological systems, living organisms, or derivatives thereof, to make or modify products or process for specific use (Convention on Biological Diversity, June 1992). It includes different molecular technologies such as gene manipulation and gene transfer. For this exercise tissue culture also is included.

Plant Breeding – research that includes any activities related to the application of plant breeding methodologies, going from germplasm enhancement (pre-breeding) to line development and evaluation.

Full Time Equivalent (FTE) – is the work done by a person who has any responsibility linked to plant breeding (genetic enhancement, line development, line evaluation or genetic studies) during one year (365 days). This information should not include support personal (technicians, laboratory and field workers, students, etc).

Public sector – any organization (national and state research organizations, universities, special funded programmes, etc) that relays on public resources to carry on their regular breeding activities.

Private sector – any organization that uses only private resources to carry on their regulars breeding activities.

Scientist – only include personal who are directly involved in plant breeding, including scientists responsible for varietal trials of introduced materials such as those from CGIAR centers, do not include other areas of expertise, field labor or technicians.

Germplasm enhancement – Any activity that includes: a) gene transfer via sexual or asexual means from germplasm accessions; b) increasing the frequencies of desirable genes in crop pools that will be used for developing parents or cultivars (Frey, 1996); and c) germplasm characterization.

Line development – Any activity of crossing and selection that has the direct purpose of developing or releasing varieties.

Line evaluation – Any activity of evaluating advanced breeding lines or introduced varieties with the direct purpose of releasing varieties, including on-station and on-farm evaluation.


Previous PageTop of PageNext Page