Table 7: Wild harvesting versus cultivation of medicinal and aromatic plants: A summary of advantages and disadvantages |
|
For species and ecosystems it is better to ... |
|
wild harvest because ... |
cultivate because ... |
it puts wild plant populations in the continuing interest of local people it provides an incentive to protect and maintain wild populations and their habitats and the genetic diversity of MAP populations but ... uncontrolled harvest may lead to the extinction of ecotype and even species common access to the resource makes it difficult to adhere to quotas and the pre-cautionary principle in most cases knowledge about the biology of the resource is poor and the annual sustained yields are not known in most cases resource inventories and accompanying management plans do not exist |
it relieves harvesting pressure on very rare and slow-growing species which are most susceptible to threat but ... devaluates wild plant resources and their habitats economically and reduces incentive to conserve ecosystems narrows genetic diversity of gene pool of the resource because wild relatives of cultivated species become neglected it may lead to conversion of habitat for cultivation cultivated species may become invasive and have negative impacts on ecosystem reintroducing plants can lead to genetic pollution of wild populations |
The market demands ... |
|
wild harvested plants because ... |
cultivated material because ... |
it is cheaper since it does not require infrastructure and investment many species are only required in small quantities that do not make cultivation economically viable for some plant parts extra-large cultivation areas are required (e.g.Arnicaproduction for flowers) successful cultivation techniques do not exist, e.g. for slow growing, habitat specific taxa no pesticides are used it is often believed that wild plants are more powerful but ... there is a risk of adulterations there is a risk of contaminations through non-hygienic harvest or post-harvest conditions |
it guarantees continuing supply of raw material it makes reliable botanical identification possible genotypes can be standardized or improved quality standards are easy to maintain controlled post-harvest handling is possible production volume and price can be agreed for longer periods resource price is relatively stable over time certification as organic production is possible but ... it is more expensive than wild harvest it needs substantial investment before and during production |
From a perspective of the people it is better to ... |
|
wild harvest because ... |
cultivate because ... |
it provides access to cash income without prior investment it provides herbal medicines for health care needs it maintains the resources for rural populations on a long-term basis (if done sustainably) but ... unclear land rights create ownership problems this income and health care resource is becoming scarce through over-harvesting |
it secures steady supply of herbal medicines (home gardens) it provides in-country value-adding but ... capital investment for small farmers is high competition from large scale production puts pressure on small farmers and on wild harvesters benefits are made else-where and traditional resource users have no benefit return (IPR) |
Table 8: Selected plant families characterized by high numbers of species used for medicinal purposes showing the number and proportion of threatened species. Data on proportion of threatened species per family according to the IUCN criteria from Walter and Gillett (1998) |
|||||
Family |
No. genera |
No. species |
% of total species threatened |
Main uses |
Examples of over-harvested species |
Stangeriaceae |
1 |
1 |
100 |
Traditional medicine, symbolic |
Stangeria eriopus |
Zamiaceae |
8 |
144 |
90.3 |
Horticultural collection & traditional medicine |
Encephalartosspecies (56 listed as threatened) |
Canellaceae |
6 |
20 |
35 |
Traditional medicine, Molluscides |
Warburgia elongata. W. salutaris |
Leguminosae |
590 |
12 000-14 200 |
18 |
Multiple-uses: timber, medicinal, forage & food |
Dalbergia odorifera, D. tonkinensis; Afzeliaspecies |
Araliaceae |
47-70 |
700 |
16.3 |
Medicinal & carving |
Panaxspecies |
Rosaceae |
100 |
3 000 |
14.4 |
Stone fruit crops & medicinals |
Prunus africana |
Guttiferae |
50 |
1 200 |
13.3 |
Dyes, medicines, fruits, chewing sticks |
West AfricanGarciniaspeciesoverexploited for chewing sticks |
Lauraceae |
35-50 |
2 000 |
13 |
Timber, medicines, cinnamon |
Ocotea bullata |
Menispermaceae |
70 |
400 |
9.5 |
Medicines, dyes |
Stephania (several species in SE Asia) |
Apocynaceae |
168-200 |
2 000 |
7.5 |
Medicines |
Holarrhena floribunda |