Previous PageTable Of ContentsNext Page

3. Contribution to broad-leaved species cultivation:
trees and shrubs

Background: many plantations and shelterbelts in the Korqin Sandy Lands have been established by the TNSP, but most of them are pure stands with weak stability, susceptible to pests and diseases and shortened growth periods. Increased bio-diversity and the diversification of the production base through the introduction of trees other than poplars and conifers, including shrubs and fodder species, is deemed essential to the long-term stability of the productive system. Native species are thought to be better suited to increase bio-diversity, and are given priority over introduced species, if performance equals the one from exotic species. However, due to the severe environmental conditions in the Korqin, and the relative lack of viable alternatives, each additional species that can be planted and that survives and grows, be it native or exotic, is an important contribution.

Activities range from information gathering and initial screening trials through to more detailed provenance collection and testing with species which have already shown their value such as the native Ulmus and Salix species.

 

When dealing with new species, the very process of seed collection, introduction, nursery production and planting-out results in selection through the failure of weaker individuals which cannot survive their new

conditions. Those individuals, which do survive, are more adapted to the new location and are planted in secure locations to ensure their survival for future use. Planting is done in blocks to facilitate cross- pollination and fertile seed production.

 

Several species, that were common in the past, are becoming very rare in the Korqin Sandy Lands, and it is thought that their conservation is not only necessary out of historical reasons, but that their genetic material holds promise for future development. These species have been subjected to years of negative selection, so that the remaining individuals are of bad form and slow growth.

 

Realizations by the Project:

 

3. 1 Nursery Trials

Native broadleaved species

In 1998, seeds from nine broadleaved species was recollected from the Daqinggou Valley and seedlings raised at the Xinglongzhao Forest Farm. Table 3.1.1 lists the species and the seed treatments applied.

Table 3.1.1 : Species recollected from Daqingguo Nature Reserve

and seed-treatments applied

Introduced broadleaved species

In November 1997, after a studytour, the Project brought broadleaf seeds from Canada. (See Table 3.1.2)

Table 3.1.2 : Seedling Treatment Methods applied to introduced broadleaved species

3. 2 Afforestation Trials

Baotuyingzi

In April 1999, seeds of seven broadleaved species, recollected by the Xinglongzhao Forest Farm in the Daqingguo Valley, were planted in moving dunes at Baotuyingzi. After the two-year long drought from 1999 to 2001, the plants of Morus alba, Acer mono and Armeniaca sibirica survived in large numbers, indicating that indigenous species had a strong adaptability and could grow in barren sandy soil and dry conditions.

Plantation at Xinglongzhao

Similar results (with the exception of Acer mono) were obtained from a trial plantation of fifteen broadleaves done in April 2000 at the periphery of the nursery at the Xinglongzhao Forest Farm. When in October 2000, 259 plants of 15 species survived, in August 2001 only 156 plants of 10 species survived. The survival of local species like Morus alba and Celastrus articulatus was relatively good; among the newly introduced trees, only Rhus trilobata and Fraxinus americana survived better. (See Table 3.2.2).

Table 3.2.1 : Survival rates of broadleaved species (established April 2000)

Afforestation Trials in Section Three of the Xinglongzhao Forest Farm

In April 2001, containerised and bare-rooted nursery stock from 1998 and 1999 production seasons was used at the Xinglongzhao Forest Farm in an afforestation trial. A total of 14 species was used. During planting, 0.5 kg water-preserving agent and 10 l water was applied per plant. No further irrigation was given. The survival rate (July 2001) was relatively good, taken into consideration that soil humidity over June and July (normally rainy months) was reduced to only 2%. This shows that Morus alba, Armeniaca sibirica, Fraxinus americana, Ulmus spp. and Acer mono have a high drought resistance. (See Table 3.2.3).

Table 3.2.2 : Comparisson per species of survival rates of containerised vs. bare-rooted stock.
(July 2001)

Containerisedl Stock

Bare-rooted Stock

Species

Established plants

Surviving Plants

Species

EstablishedPlants

Surviving Plants

Quercus mongolica

43

1

Quercus mongolica

147

30

Celastrus articulatus

0

0

Celastrus articulatus

17

0

Rhus trilobata

26

19

Rhus trilobata

0

0

Rhamnus davuricus

79

28

Armeniaca sibirica

330

62

Robinia pseudoacacia

77

60

Robinia pseudoacacia

0

0

Fraxinus pennsylvanica

99

60

Fraxinus pennsylvanica

681

273

Morus mongolica

99

70

Morus mongolica

333

339

Ulmus pumila

92

54

Ulmus pumila

124

53

U. macrocarpa

78

12

Celtis bungeana

0

0

Acer mono

0

0

Acer mono

122

96

Celtis bungeana

38

0

Acer truncatum

162

11

Hemiptelea davidii

50

24

Rhamnus davuricus

131

0

Provenance trials with Robinia pseudoacacia introduced from North America

In 1998, seeds of 33 provenances of R. pseudoacacia were introduced from North America. A provenance trial was established in 1999 at the Liaoning Sand Fixation Research Institute with 26 surviving provenances.At the beginning of July, 2001, only 27 plants of 5 provenances survived. (See Table 3.2.4).

Table 3.2.4 : Survival rates of remaining provenances of Robinia pseudo-acacia

Broadleaved afforestation trials in co-operation with the BFU1

In 1999 and 2000, a total of 37 broadleaved species (and 8 coniferous species) were introduced from abroad and nursery and afforestation trials established at Zhangguttai of the Liaoning Sand Fixation Research Institute. The results are presented in Table 3.2.5.

Several species did not survive nursery production, due to low germination rates or other reasons. It has to be observed that one reason might be that propagation/cultivation techniques are not sufficiently soffisticated, and that it is too early to completely write off any of the species that did not make it through the propagation stage.

Several species showed high mortality after the first winter, which may indicate that they are not winter-hardy enough to resist the low temperatures in the region.

3. 3 Preliminar conclusions regarding broad-leaved species trials

On a preliminary basis the following species should be further considered: Fraxinus americana and Celtis occidentalis selected at Zhanggutai Forest Farm; and Morus alba and Rhus trilobata selected at Xinglongzhao Forest Farm.

From May 1999 to the beginning of 2002, the Region was affected by an exceptionnal and severe drought. During winter of 2000-2001, temperatures were extremely low, which made a large number of introduced tree species that had survived sofar, die. In general, indigenous species are showing a better survival than introduced species. However, this may be partially due to the fact that the nursery and planting requirements for the native species are better known than for the introduced speices.

Table 3.3.1 : Nursery and field survival of introduced broadleaved speices at Zhangguttai
(including 8 coniferous species)

Botanical Names

Number of plants obtained in nursery

Established plants

Surviving Plants (September. 2001)

Mahonia aguifolium

0

0

 

Shepherdia argentea

100

81

20

Berberis thunbergii Atropurrurea

2

7

1

Cydonia japonica

35

32

12

Contoneaster horizontalis

5

25

2

Berberis veichii

1

1

0

Amelac hier

21

18

0

Rosa woodsii

20

10

8

Caragana arborescens

4

20

18

Amorpha fruticosa

10

16

13

Lonicera tartarica

2

2

1

Purshia tridentata

4

0

 

Amelanchiev sp.

0

0

 

Elaeagnus umbellata

20

0

 

Hibiscus syriacus

1

0

 

Robinia hispida

10

0

 

Shepherdia argentea

1

0

 

Symphoricarpos albus

0

0

 

Pyracantha cotcinea

0

0

 

Halus baceata

0

0

 

Rhus aromatica v. Sero

0

0

 

Syringa vulgaris

18

7

 

Cotoneaster intergerimus

0

0

 

Fraxinus pennsylvanica

6

6

5

Symphoricarpos albus

0

0

 

Crataegus araoldiana

0

0

 

Ribes odoratum

10

15

13

Rhus trilobata

30

32

6

Cornus amomum

0

0

 

Celtis occidentalis

15

21

16

Euonymus bungeanus

20

16

0

Prunus virginiana

0

0

 

Prunus ussuriensis

6

7

6

Prunus americana

5

5

9

Prunus hesseyi

8

12

0

Acer ginnala

14

12

0

Elaegnus angustifolia

20

15

5

Coniferous species:

Abies concolor

0

0

 

Cedrus deodora

0

0

 

Picea pungens

0

0

 

Pinus sylvestris

7

7

1

Pinus ponderosa

9

9

 

Pinus nigra

0

0

 

Juniperus scopularum

0

0

 

Juniperus sp.

0

0

 

1 Realised through Prof. Shen Xihuan of the Beijing Forestry University.

Previous PageTop Of PageNext Page