Previous PageTable Of ContentsNext Page


8. Concluding remark

Considerable work has been done over the last decades and quite some progress has been achieved in harmonizing forest-related terms and definitions. Over the last decade, and increasingly over the last years, countries have pointed out the need for reducing the reporting burden on countries. In addition there is need for better and more comprehensive information on forest-related matters, including the identification and documentation of changes and trends in the sustainable management of forests over time. This calls for strongly increased efforts to further harmonize terms, classifications and definitions used for monitoring, assessment and reporting, and their repeated use over time. While considerable progress has been made in identifying and agreeing on the most important component that constitutes sustainable forest management, enhanced efforts are needed to comply with these requests by countries at all levels, from the local to the international level.

List of references

1. Braatz S. (2002): National reporting to forest-related international instruments: mandates, mechanisms, overlaps and potential synergies. Secretariat of the United Nations Forum on Forests, New York

2. CBD (2002), Review of the status and trends of, and major threats to, the forest biological diversity. Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity, Montreal, SCBD, 164p. (CBD Technical Series no. 7)

3. FAO (2001), Global Forest Resources Assessment 2000 Main Report; FAO Forestry Paper 140, FAO, Rome , 2001

4. FAO (2001a): State of the world's forests 2001; FAO, Rome, Italy

5. FAO (2002a): Expert meeting on harmonizing forest-related definitions for use by various stakeholders. Proceedings, Rome, 22-25 January 2002; Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, Italy

6. FAO (2002b): Second expert meeting on harmonizing forest-related definitions for use by various stakeholders. Proceedings, Rome, 11-13 September 2002; Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, Italy

7. FAO, 2000. FRA 2000: On definitions on forests and forest change. Forest Resources Assessment Programme Working Paper No33. FAO, Rome.

8. Holmgren P. & Persson R. (2002): Why did we end up here? The evolution of global forest assessments; Paper presented at Kotka IV: Expert consultation on global forest resources assessments – linking national and international efforts; 1-5 July 2002, Kotka, Finland,

9. ITTO (2002): ITTO guidelines for the restoration, management and rehabilitation of degraded and secondary tropical forests; ITTO in collaboration with CIFOR, FAO, IUCN and WWF; ITTO Policy Development Series No. 13, Yokohama, Japan

10. Kotka III (1996), Proceedings of FAO expert consultation on global forest resources assessment 2000 in cooperation with ECE and UNEP with the support of the Government of Finland (Kotka III). Kotka, Finland, 10-14 June 1996. Finnish Forest Research Institute. Research Papers 620, Helsinki 1996. pp 36-49)

11. Kotka IV (2003) Kotka IV. Expert consultation on global forest resources assessment – linking national and international efforts. Report of the FAO, UNEP, UNECE meeting. Kotka, Finland, 1-5 July 2002.

12. MCPFE (2003): “The state of Europe's forests 2003 – The MCPFE report on sustainable forest management in Europe”. Ministerial Conference on the Protection of Forests in Europe, Vienna, Austria

13. Puustjärvi E. & Simula M. (2002): Forest-related definitions: issues and development needs. Discussion paper prepared for the expert meeting on harmonizing forest-related definitions for use by various stakeholders, Rome, 22-25 January 2002.

14. Puustjärvi E. & Simula M. (2002), Development of common framework for forest-related definitions, Discussion paper presented at the second expert meeting on harmonizing forest-related definitions for use by various stakeholders, jointly organized by FAO and the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), in collaboration with the Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR), the International Union of Forestry Research Organizations (IUFRO) and the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) at FAO Headquarters, Rome, from 11 to 13 September 2002.

15. TBFRA (2000), Forest resources of Europe, CIS, North America, Australia, Japan and New Zealand (industrialized temperate/boreal countries). UN-ECE/FAO contribution to the global forest resources assessment 2000; Geneva Timber and Forest Study Papers No. 17; UNECE, Geneva,

16. UNEP-WCMC/CIFOR (1997): Iremonger, S., C. Ravilious & T. Quinton (Eds.) A global overview of forest conservation. Including: GIS files of forests and protected areas, version 2. CD-ROM. CIFOR and WCMC, Cambridge, U.K

17. UNFF (2001), Report of the Secretary General on monitoring, assessment and reporting, including concepts, terminology and definitions, 20 December 2001


Previous PageTop Of PageNext Page