Previous Page Table of Contents


Table 1
PRECIPITATION AT GELANG PATAH
(29 Nov.81–9 Dec.81)
Date*TimeVol.(m)Precipitation (mm)
29 Nov.81start--
30 Nov.8108.3071.4
1 Dec.8108.3000
2 Dec.8110.00275.4
3 Dec.8108.0000
4 Dec.81
5 Dec.81
6 Dec.8108.007615.2
7 Dec.8108.0000
8 Dec.8108.00326.4
9 Dec.81

* Collector usually left for 24 hours before emptying, except for 2.12–5.12.81 (70 h) and 7.12–9.12.81 (48 h).
† Collector had a diameter of 8 cm (500 m glass beaker) and a cross sectional area of 50 cm2



Table 2 (a)
GELANG PATAH - WATER ALKALINITIES AND TOTAL IRON
(meq/: 28.11.81–6.12.81)
DateSamplepHAlkalinity (meq/)Iron (mg/)
28.11.81P-29 (draining)7.501.58-
28.11.81P-29 (draining)7.351.53-
28.11.81P-29 (draining)7.331.52 
29.11.81P-29 (empty)7.283.68 
29.11.81P-17.031.052.0
29.11.81P-27.101.630.5
29.11.81P-37.271.550.7
29.11.81P-46.801.260.6
29.11.81P-57.021.201.0
29.11.81P-66.991.151.4
29.11.81P-76.651.081.5
29.11.81P-86.931.142.0
29.11.81P-97.011.302.0
29.11.81P-107.231.501.3
29.11.81P-117.251.621.3
29.11.81P-106.981.61-
29.11.81P-236.650.664.1, 2.8
29.11.81P-256.530.542.4
29.11.81P-267.301.530.6
29.11.81P-276.931.011.2
29.11.81P-286.971.431.7
29.11.81P-297.501.532.1
29.11.81P-29 (PM)7.501.83-
29.11.81P-336.931.552.0
29.11.81SG-27.301.380.7
29.11.81PG-86.831.21-
29.11.81PG-257.311.401.3
29.11.81Canal opp P-17.171.660.1
29.11.81Stream opp MG-17.101.640.2
30.11.81P-16.220.682.4
30.11.81P-36.681.172.4
30.11.81P-106.541.119.2
30.11.81P-116.801.532.4
30.11.81P-147.331.67-
30.11.81P-187.131.601.6
30.11.81P-197.451.651.2
30.11.81P-236.720.671.2
30.11.81P-247.221.461.4
30.11.81P-257.221.470.8
30.11.81P-287.511.625.0
30.11.81P-297.391.850.7
30.11.81P-307.231.382.4
30.11.81P-326.921.391.0
30.11.81P-337.231.663.6
30.11.81Stream opp PG 307.351.67-


Table 2(b)
DateSamplepHAlkalinity (meq/)Iron (mg/)
1.12.81P-1 (North end)7.531.12 
1.12.81P-1 (South end)7.51.15 
1.12.81P-107.021.541.6
1.12.81P-236.900.83(0.5)
1.12.81P-257.201.740.5
1.12.81P-287.121.511.4
1.12.81P-297.511.780.8
1.12.81Stream7.421.700.4
2.12.81P-1 (AM)7.451.151.1
2.12.81P-3 (AM)7.431.560.6
2.12.81P-10 (AM)7.471.570.9
2.12.81P-18 (AM)7.481.680.5
2.12.81P-20 (PM)7.401.71-
2.12.81P-21 (PM)7.581.52-
2.12.81P-23 (AM)6.730.62-
2.12.81P-23 (PM)(bubbled)7.080.69-
2.12.81P-23 (PM)(bubbled)7.880.72-
2.12.81P-24 (AM)7.401.640.9
2.12.81P-25 (AM)7.281.620.6
2.12.81P-28 (PM)7.361.65-
2.12.81P-29 (PM)7.501.72-
2.12.81P-32 (PM)7.461.58-
2.12.81P-33 (AM)7.341.660.7
2.12.81P-33 (PM)7.421.70-
5.12.81P-37.511.590.6
5.12.81P-107.391.570.6
5.12.81P-117.201.652.4
5.12.81P-147.421.710.4
5.12.81P-147.361.700.8
5.12.81P-157.101.520.7
5.12.81P-166.741.404.6
5.12.81P-216.561.345.1
5.12.81P-287.021.531.1
5.12.81P-306.551.18-
5.12.81P-307.331.44-
5.12.81Stream7.501.600.5
5.12.81Stream7.501.74-


Table 2(c)
DateSamplepHAlkalinity (meq/)Iron (mg/)
6.12.81P-17.701.150.3
6.12.81P-77.201.161.9
6.12.81P-187.391.560.8
6.12.81P-197.491.600.2
6.12.81P-236.820.672.0
6.12.81P-23-0.430.8
6.12.81P-23 (bubbled)7.580.680.7
6.12.81P-23 (bubbled)7.830.690.6
6.12.81P-247.351.437.2
6.12.81P-257.231.350.2
6.12.81P-297.621.541.0
6.12.81P-297.581.581.0
6.12.81P-29 (bubbled)8.121.56-
6.12.81P-327.011.390.3
6.12.81P-337.461.602.0
6.12.81Stream7.461.63-


Table 3
SUMMARY OF GELANG PATAH POND WATER NUTRIENT, SULFIDE AND MANGANESE MEASUREMENTS - NOVEMBER, DECEMBER 1981
Chemical SpeciesConcentration
NH4P-1024 μM
P-2349 μM
P-2531 μM
P-2815 μM
P-2911 μM
Stream14 μM
NO-2Several ponds<0.1 μM
PO4Several ponds<0.3 μM
HS-Several ponds<0.01 μM
MnSeveral ponds<0.05 ppm

Rust colored flocculant precipitate in Pond 23 (0.15 gm from 50 m volume): 63% Fe, by weight.



Table 4
SEDIMENTINTERSTITIAL WATER COMPOSITION - POND 29 - CENTER

 Cell No.*Fe+2, +3
(ppm)
HS-
(μM)
SO4=
(ppm)
NH4+
(μM)
PO43
(μM)
      
11.2 130025<1
2 <6   
31.1 1400-<1
H2O4 6   
Sed55.3 110066<1
 6 <6   
O2713 1200-<1
No
O2
8 <6   
 940 1200-<1
10 6   
1138 120041<1
12 117   
132.3 1300-<1
14 117   
159.3 1300147<1
16 31   
171.4 1000140<1
18 55   
 193.2 900487<1

* Cells were located at approximately 1 cm intervals, with the first four above the sediment-water interface.



Table 5 SEDIMENT INTERSTITIAL WATER COMPOSITION - POND 29 - MARGIN
 Cell No.*Fe+2, +3
(ppm)
HS-
(μM)
SO4=
(ppm)
NH4+
(μM)
11 200016
2    
H2O32 220082
Sed4 <6  
 55 200031
6 <6  
76 190038
8 <6  
97 190062
10 <6  
117 -82
12 <6  
137 190078
14 <6  
1529 190088
16 <6  
1711 1800140
18 <6  
1914 1900160
20 6  
2112 1900160
22 6  
2313 1900150
24 <6  
25<1 1900 
26 <6  
27<1   
28 <6  

* Cells were located at approximately 1 cm intervals, with the first three above the sediment-water interface.



Table 6
AIR BUBBLING EXPERIMENTS GATE I, POND 23 (2.12.81)
Time
(h)
ControlBubbled
Fe
(ppm)
pHAlkalinity
(meq/)
Fe
(ppm)
pHAlakalinity
(meq/)
0---4.96.810.67
---2.6(F)--
24.3--3.0--
2.6(F)*--0.7(F)--
4.35.66.80-3.07.800.68
1.6(F)--0.7(F)--
Pump off overnight
03.46.85-1.57.35-
1.5(F)--0.4(F)--
23.36.96-3.17.790.69
0.5(F)--0.3(F)--
II Stream Water (3.12.81)
00.56.95-0.56.961.6
0.1(F)--0.1(F)--
0.5-7.10--8.21-
1-7.13--8.25-
20.37.14-0.38.26-
0.0(F)--0.2(F)--
2.50.27.20-0.58.261.6
0.1(F)--0.3(F)--
III Pond 29 (6.12.81)
01.17.49-0.87.491.58
0.1(F)--0.2(F)--
0.61.17.51-0.78.11-
0.1(F)--0.1(F)--
2.50.87.55-0.68.12-
0.1(F)--0.1(F)--
30.87.59-0.68.181.56
0.2(F)--0.1--

* Sample filtered before analysis for iron.

Table 7
CARBON DIOXIDE PARTIAL PRESSURE CALCULATIONS

  1. [H+] × [HCO3-] = [H2CO3] × K1

  2. [H2CO3] = pCO2 × KCO 2

  3. pCO2 = [H+] × [HCO3-]/K1 × KCO2

at S = 25 (Chlorinity = 13.8)

T = 25°C

K1 = 10-6.052 moles/liter

KCO2 = 3.12 × 10-2 moles/liter-atmosphere

Bubbling
Experiment
Water
Source
Alkalinity
(meq/)
pHpCO2
(x10-6 atm)
I-BeginPond 230.676.813700
I-EndPond 230.697.79400
II-BeginStream1.67.0-7.51800-5800
II-EndStream1.68.26320
III-BeginPond 291.587.491800
III-EndPond 291.568.18370


Table 8
SOIL AND SEDIMENT POTENTIAL ACIDITY AFTER H2 O2 OXIDATION VS. pH*
(PLOTTED AS “×'s” in FIGURE 6)
Samplemeq/100gInitial pH
T-1(10)3.29
M-2a103.22
M-3a203.75
T-1 + 4.76% FeS2702.00
M-411052.24
M-3a + 4.76% FeS21391.82
M-41 + 4.76% FeS21561.89
T-1 + 9.09% FeS21641.68
M-2a + 4.76% FeS21671.70
M-3a + 9.09% FeS22371.57
M-2a + 9.09% FeS22551.49

* Sample weights of 0.5g were oxidized with 20 m of 30% H2O2, transferred to centrifuge tubes with a final liquid volume of 25 m: a subsample of 10 m of clear solution was titrated to pH 7 within a few hours.

† All other samples of T-1 which were analyzed previously had potential acidities of <1 meq/100g.



Table 9
PEROXIDE OXIDATION EXPERIMENTS
SampleSample weight
(g)
Final Solution volume
(m)
pHAcidity (pH 7)
(meq/100g)
M-2a*5403.0210
M-2a*126.23.139.6
M-2a*0.524.93.2210
M-2b*5402.828.6
M-2b*522.42.3514
M-2c*5402.859.0
M-2c*125.93.139.5
M-3a+5403.896.2
M-3a+138.33.9218
M-3a+0.525.43.7520
M-3b+137.23.7917
M-3c+5403.837
M-3c+124.63.8916
M-3e§5404.484.6
M-45402.2330
M-4121.62.08151
M-40.531.42.51136
M-40.520.42.24105
T-1Δ5404.990
T-1Δ118.15.400.4
T-1Δ0.528.23.2910
T-25406.710
T-2119.66.100.3
T-2128.46.600.1

* Replicate soil samples from a large sample collected on the south dike of Pond 29.
+ Replicate sediment samples from a large sample collected near the south end of Pond 29.
§ Sample source as for other M-3 samples, but only particles >400 microns in size included.
† Dike soil from a new private pond facility in southeastern Johore State.
Δ Dike soil from a government aquaculture research station in Thailand.
Dike soil from a traditional aquaculture pond in Thailand.



Table 10
PYRITE ADDITION EXPERIMENTS*
(PEROXIDE OXIDATION)
SampleInitial Acidity (meq/100g)Final Acidity (meq/100g)Δ
(meq/100g) measured
Δ (meq/100g) theoreticalΔ measured theoretical
T-1+4.76% FeS2107060159.38
T-1+9.09% FeS210164154303.51
M-2a+4.76% FeS210167157159.99
M-2a+9.09% FeS210255245303.81
M-3a+4.76% FeS220139119159.75
M-3a+9.09% FeS220237217303.72
M-4'+4.76% FeS210515651159.32

* Samples (0.5g dry weight) were oxidized in 30% H2O2 (20m), with heating to destroy residual H2O2 and titrated with NaOH (0.1N) to pH 7. Known amounts of FeS2 powder were added to duplicates of samples T-1, M-2a, M-3a and M-4' and then carried through the same procedure.

† Maximum theoretical production of acidity was assumed to be 4 meq of H+ for each mM of FeS2.



Table 11
COMPUTED POTENTIAL ACIDITY AS A FUNCTION OF END POINT pH*
SampleTitration Volume (m)
pH 7
Titration volume (m)
pH 8
Titration volume (m)
pH 8.5
T-10.02-0.034-
T-20.0040.020.05-
M-2c0.366-0.5211.42
M-2a0.368-0.5191.60
M-42.172.672.871.32
M-3a0.4740.6470.8631.82
M-3b0.4520.6120.7711.71
M-3c0.6510.895>1.0>1.54

* Base (0.1 N NaOH) was added from a microburet to a sample volume of 10 m.



Table 12
GELANG PATAH - POND 29
(WEIGHT PERCENTAGES - XRF)
ElementDike SoilPond Sediment
M-2a*M-2b*M-2c*M-3aM-3bM-3cM-3d
Si34353429282727
Al11.312.211.910.210.09.29.9
Fe3.13.03.15.04.64.64.2
Mg0.20.20.20.30.40.30.4
Ca<0.05<0.05<0.050.230.300.270.16
Na0.10.10.084797
K1.51.31.41.41.21.21.0
P0.010.010.010.020.020.020.02
Mn-0.030.02-0.020.020.02
S1.001.031.001.201.381.311.02
51.353.051.851.348.352.950.7
Organic matter Δ5.15.45.56.55.95.75.5

* Replicate dike soil samples from a large sample from on site.
† Replicate sediment samples from a large sample from one site.
Δ Organic matter measured by oxidation overnight at 375°C after drying at 130°C.



Table 13
OTHER AQUACULTURE SYSTEM DIKE SOILS
(WEIGHT PERCENTAGES - XRF)
Santee Estates Dike SoilThailand Dike Soil
Johore, Malaysia 

ElementM-4*M-4'*T-1T-lc§T-2+
Si242411729
Al7.78.22.61.88.4
Fe3.73.375.68.2
Mg0.80.70.40.22.5
Ca0.820.810.150.120.96
Na0.70.840>300.3
K1.61.31.00.51.8
P0.040.040.050.040.08
Mn-0.030.30.20.3
S4.064.100.50.81.8
Organic MatterΔ32.731.84.8-5.2

* Replicate dike soil samples from one site.
† Aquaculture station soil particles ground to fine powder.
§ Aquaculture station soil particles <400 μ.
+ Dike soil from traditional aquaculture farm near aquaculture research station.
Δ Organic matter measured by oxidation overnight at 375° C after drying at 130°C.



Table 14
GELANG PATAH - MISCELLANEOUS SAMPLES
(WEIGHT PERCENTAGES - XRF)
ElementResinous Yellow dike materialsRed dike materialsPond water hydroxide precipitateAsh from Johore brick kilns
M-1M-6M-7M-8M5aM5b
Si20.760.5119
Al0.70.23.80.032.74
Fe0.60.6280.11.51.2
Mg<0.1<0.1<0.11465.7
Ca0.04<0.050.070.51919
Na0.030.020.03270.030.04
K0.10.060.10.073.75.6
P0.0050.0050.010.0051.21.2
Mn0.20.3<.010.010.10.1
S0.60.30.943.15.2
4.42.239464951


Table 15
EXCESS ACIDITY, SULPHUR AND IRON IN SOILS AND SEDIMENTS
 Potential Excess Acidity
(meq/100g)
Equivalent* FeS2
(wt %)
ΣS by XRF
(wt %)
ΣFe by XRF
(wt %)
M-2100.301.03.0
M-3§200.611.34.6
M-4Δ1303.94.13.5
T-10.40.010.57
T-2+0.2<0.011.88

* Assuming 4 meq H+ for each mM FeS2 = 33 meq H+/100g of sample.
† Gelang Patah dike soil (P-29).
§ Gelang Patah sediment (P-29).
Δ Santee Estates dike soil.
Thailand aquaculture research station dike soil.
+Thailand traditional aquaculture dike soil.



Table 16
LEACHING EXPERIMENTS*
SamplepHAlkalinity (meq/)
Distilled H2O leach of P-29 dike soil - First3.64-6.2
Distilled H2O leach of P-29 dike soil - Second3.98-2.5
Distilled H2O leach of P-29 dike soil - First & Second3.90-3.9
Distilled H2O leach of P-29 dike soil - large particles3.93-3.4
Stream H2O leach of P-29 sediment4.78+0.1
Distilled H2O leach of Ash9.23+1.7
Distilled H2O leach of Ash mixed with distilled H2O leach P-29 dike soil - large particles4.78-1.4
Distilled H2O leach of Ash, followed by leach of P-29 dike soil (two step leach experiment)4.02-10.6
Stream H2O stored with P-31 dike soil for 1 week4.36-0.1

* All experiments involved equal weights of solids and liquids.
† 1254 ml of H2O were added to 1254g of dry soil yielding 465m of leach-first; then 1489 ml of H2O were added to the same wet soil yielding 660 ml of leach-second; the two leach H2O's were pooled after 50 ml of each portion was withdrawn to measure alkalinity.



Table 17
OTHER WATER SAMPLE ALKALINITIES
DateSamplepHAlkalinity
(meq/)
12/7/81Puddle in laterite following rain shower4.46+0.1
12/7/81Puddle on dike near P-30,31 following rain shower2.87-11.8
12/7/81Runoff from dike following rain shower2.74-15.3
12/7/81P-20 following rain shower, prior to stocking with shrimp7.30+1.30
12/8/81Pond filled for 6 months at Sante Estates*5.120.01
12/8/81Pond A filled for 1 week at Sante Estates*6.880.83
12/8/81Pond B filled for 1 week at Sante Estates*7.060.74

* Samples collected from brackish water ponds (=25) at new private aquaculture project in southeastern Johore State.



Table 18
ALKALINITY (meq/-1) and pH of INCUBATED POND WATER/SOIL LEACHATE MIXTURES
DayLeachate strengthWater only alkalinitypHWater over sediment alkalinitySediment
pH
 01.837.501.837.50
0200.926.550.926.55
 500.034.770.034.77
 100-3.913.90-3.913.90
 02.108.290.496.70
3200.877.420.226.40
 500.164.700.256.20
 100-0.134.030.074.66
 0-1.443.210.426.64
8200.637.390.195.08
 50-0.014.690.215.59
 100-0.023.880.069.17


Table 19

ESTIMATES OF TOTAL POTENTIAL ACIDITY IN DIKES OF GELANG PATAH AQUACULTURE SYSTEM

  1. Area = 10 ha = 105m2

    Soil Depth = 1 m (assumed thickness which can react with the water).

    ∑ Volume = 105 m3
    ∑ Mass     = 105 t (assumed density = 1g/lm)
    If potential acidity = 10 meq/100g
    then total moles of acid available = 10 7

    If potential acidity = 100 meq/100g
    then total moles of acid available = 108

  2. Use same ∑ mass as above,
        assume 1% by weight pyrite
        then total pyrite present = 103t

    If 4 moles of H+ produced per mole of pyrite
    then total moles of acid available = 3 × 107

    Total Acid Potential: 107 – 108 moles

Table 20

ESTIMATES OF RATES OF REMOVAL OF ACIDITY AT GELANG PATAH AQUACULTURE SYSTEM

  1. Exchange of Pond Water by Present Practices

    10 ha × (102m) 2/ha × 1 m/4 days = 2 × 104 m3/day If 20% of alkalinity in water is removed (1.6 meq/→1.3 meq/)

  2. Leaching of Dike Soils by Precipitation

  3. III. Maximum Leaching of Dike Soils by Filling Entire System with Stream Water-Acidity from leaching experiments (-6 meq/ of alkalinity) 20 × as effective per unit volume of water as present pond water exchange.

    If filled to 2 meters depth (8 × daily exchange depth) 20 × 8 = 160 160 × 6 × 103 moles of acid = 106 moles of acid per fill

  4. 1 ton of Limestone = 2 × 104 moles of alkalinity

  5. 1 ton of Magnesium Limestone = 2.2 × 104 moles of alkalinity

  6. 1 ton of Ash = 2 moles of alkalinity

Figure 1
Gelang Patah Pond Layout

Figure 1

Figure 2
Gelang Palah Water Alkalinities

Figure 2

Figure 3
Gelang Palah Water Iron Concentrations (Total)

Figure 3

Figure 4
Sediment Interstitial Water Pond 29-Center

Figure 4

Figure 5
Sediment Interstitial Water Pond 29-Margin

Figure 5

Figure 6
Potential Acidity vs. pH

Figure 6

Figure 7
GELANG PATAH WATER-SEDIMENT INCUBATION EXPERIMENTS

Figure 7

Previous Page Top of Page