Back to contents - Previous file - Next file
An Optimal Spatial Resource Allocation Model has been developed for integrating livestock, crop and fuelwood production sectors within the framework of AEZ Land Productivity Assessment and its application to Potential Population Supporting Capacity and Development Planning in Kenya. This Appendix gives a mathematical description of the Linear Programming model used for formulating district level scenarios. Like with any model of this kind, the formulation gets revised and improved as new insights, needs or quantified information becomes available. The strength of the approach lies in its extensive and consistent use of spatial information for assessing agricultural land use options within the context of district development planning.
B.1 GLOSSARY
Activity:
In the
context of land use, a process using a technology that combines
inputs to generate particular outputs for sale, barter or
household consumption. An activity is considered to be a
subsystem of a farm system.
Agro-ecological Cell:
Basic unit of physical analysis in the AEZ study. Data records
are unique in terms of the combination of soil, landform and
climate attributes included in land resourcesinventory.
Agro-ecological Zone:
A relatively extensive area consisting of an aggregate of
agroecological cells defined in terms of climatic conditions,
major landform, hydrological regime, major soil groupings and/or
(semi-) natural vegetation, which is suitable for a certain range
of crops and cultivars.
Agro-ecological suitability:
The fitness of a given type of land for a specified land use
type.
Algorithm:
A set of rules for solving a problem.
Crop Combination:
In areas where temperature and moisture allow to produce more
than one crop per year, the multiple cropping activities are
defined as sequential crop combinations.
Crop Combination Filter:
In addition to agronomic feasibility, a filter mechanism, testing
for economic and/or nutritional value, is used to identify the
most productive crop combinations in each agro ecological cell.
Crop Cultivation Factor:
Many soils cannot be continuously cultivated with annual food
crops without undergoing some degradation. The crop cultivation
factor expresses the number of years crop cultivation can take
place within a hundred year cycle.
Crop Group:
For the purpose of formulating feed mix and nutrition
constraints, crops can be grouped according to common
characteristics into crop groups, e.g. cereals, root crops,
oilseeds, etc.
Feed Item:
the term feed item is used to refer to products useful for
feeding to animals and related to cultivation of a particular
crop, grasses or forage legumes. In this study the following feed
items have been considered: primary product, crop residues, and
crop by-products (e.g. bran of wheat).
Feeding Period:
For the purpose of formulating feed balance and nutrition
constraints and to take into account the distribution of feed
supplies throughout the year, the calendar year can be sub
divided into several seasons. In this study two feeding periods
have been distinguished: wet season and dry season. The length of
the wet season is assumed to equal the applicable LGP.
Feed Utilization Factor:
Not all potential feed supplies are actually available for
feeding due to accessibility, ecological reasons, seasonality of
supply, etc. Feed utilization factors are used to estimate the
share of potential feed supply that is available for feeding by
crop, feed item and feeding period.
Feed Depreciation Factor:
Feed supplies, when not used up entirely within a season, can
potentially be carried over to the next season. To allow for
modeling LUT related constraints to carrying over feed supplies
as well as losses in feed storage, the model requires the
specification of feed depreciation factors that express the share
of unused feed supplies that is lost by carrying over to the next
season. Specification is by crop, feed item and season.
GIS:
Geographical Information System; software system and specialized
computer hardware to input, manipulate, analyze and present
spatial information.
LGP:
Length of growing period; reference LGP is defined as duration
(in days) of the period when temperature permits crop growth and
soil moisture supply exceeds half potential evapotranspiration;
it includes the time required to evapotranspire up to 100 mm of
soil moisture storage (FAO, 1978-81). Growing periods which
include a sub-period when precipitation exceeds potential
evapotranspiration are termed 'normal' LGPs as compared to
'intermediate' LGPs with no such humid sub-period.
LGP, Pattern of:
Number of separate length of growing periods within a year,
summarized as a historical profile of pattern of length of
growing periods per year.
Livestock System:
Quantified description of livestock production activities,
relating to animal type, feed requirements (quantity and
quality), herd structure and management aspects.
LP:
Linear program; optimization problem involving a linear objective
function and a set of linear constraints.
LRI:
Land Resources Inventory; the land resources inventory brings
together several layers of information on physical environmental
resources and allows the creation of unique ecological land units
(agro-ecological cells) within which landform, soil and climate
conditions are quantified and considered nearly homogenous.
LUT:
Land Utilization Type; to define the fundamental objects of
analysis which comprise the set of alternative activities
available to reach specified objectives, the first step in an AEZ
application is the selection and description of land utilization
types (LUT) to be considered in the study. FAO (FAO, 1984)
defines LUT as follows: 'A Land Utilization Type consists of a
set of technical specifications within a socio-economic setting.
As a minimum requirement, both the nature of the produce and the
setting must be specified'. There is a similarity between
cropping system, livestock system and land use type.
Scenario:
A scenario comprises of a set of exogenous quantitative inputs to
the model system that relate to the mode of operation, the levels
of constraints and targets, etc. In the Kenya AEZ study, it is
the description of a district planning problem to be solved using
LP, in terms of specifying the objective function and the levels
of constraints and targets.
Soil Mapping Unit:
Delineated area on a soil map representing an association of soil
units which are grouped according to certain patterns.
The Exploratory Soil Map of Kenya (Sombroek et al., 1982), at a scale of 1:1 million, was used to compile the soil resources inventory in the Kenya study. Three hundred and ninety-two different soil map units are distinguished, describing soil associations or soil complexes composed of dominant soils, associated soils and inclusions (390 map units) or relate to water bodies and major urban areas (2 map units). A mapping unit composition table has been provided (van der Pouw, 1983) containing percentage allocation of the soil units by soil type, slope class, soil texture and soil phases. It also contains information derived from the legend of the soil map regarding landform and geology/parent material.
Thermal zone:
A classification based on the quantification of heat attributes,
used to represent the prevailing termperature regime of an area.
The quantification of temperature attributes has been achieved by
defining reference thermal zones. As temperature seasonality
effects of latitude are minor, temperature zones are closely
correlated to altitude ranges (Braun, 1982). To cater for
differences in temperature adaptability of crops, pasture and
fuelwood species, nine thermal zones have been distinguished,
based on ranges of 2.5° Celsius.
B.2 LIST OF SYMBOLS:
g | index of environmental qualities monitored (g= 1,....,G) |
h | crop group index (h= 1,.......,H) |
i | crop index (i=1,.....,N) |
j | cell index (j = 1,.......,J) |
k | cropping activity index (k=1,.....,K) |
I | feed item index (I=1,.......,L) |
m | index of crop production inputs, e.g. Iabor, fertilizer, plant protection, draught power, manure (m= 1,. ..,M) |
r | region index (r=1, ...,R) |
s | livestock system index (s=1,......,S) |
t | feeding period index (t= 1,......,T) |
z | livestock zone index (z=1,........,Z) |
Cr | index set of agro-ecological cells belonging to region r |
Cz | index set of agro-ecological cells belonging to livestock zone z |
G | number of environmental status indicators |
H | number of crop groups, e.g. cereals, pulses, etc. |
J | number of land units (agro-ecological cells) |
K | number of feasible cropping activities |
L | number of feed items (e.g. residue, by-product, primary product, etc.) |
M | number of crop production inputs |
N | number of crops |
Nh | index set of crops belonging to crop group h |
R | number of regions considered |
S | number of livestock systems |
T | number of seasons |
Z | number of livestock zones |
Zr | index set of livestock zones belonging to region r |
Akj | area cultivated with activity k in cell j |
ALhr | lower limit on land harvested with crops from commodity group h, region r |
Auhr | upper limit on land harvested with crops from commodity group h, region r |
CALr | maximum tolerable calorie/protein ratio in human diet, region r |
CEilt | metabolizable energy content per unit of feed supply item FSilt |
CPilt | crude protein content per unit of feed item FSilt |
DLh | lower limit on demand for commodity group h |
DUh | upper limit on demand for commodity group h |
DCPtsz | digestible crude protein contained in feed diet supplied to livestock system s, in season t, livestock zone z |
DM | dry matter |
DP | digestible protein |
Ej | extent of cell j |
Filtz | utilizable production of feed item I (in DM) from crop i, in season t, livestock zone z |
FSiltz | supply of feed item I (in DM) from crop i in season t of livestock zone z, i.e. utilizable production plus carry-over from previous season |
Lsz | number of reference livestock system units (RLSU) of system s in livestock zone z |
LLsz | lower bound on number of RLSU of system s in livestock zone z |
LUsz | upper bound on number of RLSU of system s in livestock zone z |
MEtsz | metabolizable energy contained in feed diet supplied to livestock systems, inseason t, livestock zone z |
Qijt | total production of crop i, in cell j, in season t |
Qiz | total production of livestock product i, in zone z |
QLir | lower limit on production of crop i, region r |
QUir | upper limit on production of crop i, region r |
RDst | dry matter (DM) feed requirements per RLSU of livestock system s in feeding season t |
RDAs | average annual dry matter requirement per RLSU of livestock system s |
RDLst | minimum DM intake per RLSU of livestock system s in feeding season t in relation to specified requirement RDst |
RDUst | maximum DM intake per RLSU of livestock system s in feeding season t in relation to specified requirement RDst |
REst | required metabolizable energy (ME) in feed diet of livestock system s in feeding season t |
REAs | required average annual ME in feed diet of livestock system s |
RELst | minimum ME in feed diet of livestock system s in feeding season t in relation to specified requirement REst |
REUst | maximum ME in feed diet of livestock system s in feeding season t in relation to specified requirement REst |
RLSU | reference livestock system unit |
RPst | digestible protein (DP) required per unit of livestock system s in feeding season t |
RPAs | required average annual DP in feed diet of livestock system s |
RPLst | minimum DP content in feed diet of livestock system s in feeding season t in relation to specified requirement RPst |
RPUst | maximum DP content in feed diet of livestock system s in feeding season t in relation to specified requirement RPst |
Sg | tolerable environmental impact of type g per ha of cultivated land |
TAr | upper limit on arable land use in region r |
Vmr | availability of production input m in region r |
Xkj | level of activity k in cell j, i.e. share of cell j allocated to cropping activity k |
XUk | upper limit on cropping activity level |
ajkj | area harvested with crop type i, cultivated as part of cropping activity k, in cell j |
cm | cost/weight per unit of production input m |
cfkj | cultivation factor, activity k, in cell j; i.e. the number of years (in percent) that a piece of arable land can be used for cropping, the remainder of years being under fallow |
dikt | share of production from crop i, activity k, harvested in season t |
ekjg | environmental impact of type g, e.g. soil erosion, from activity k in cell j |
filtsz | feed use from crop i, feed item 1, allocated to livestock system s in season t, in livestock zone z |
pis | price of livestock product i from livestock system s |
qjkj | production of crop i, from activity k, in cell j |
rilt | production of feed item I from crop activity i relative to production of primary produce of crop i, i.e. kg of feed item I produced per kg of primary produce |
uilt | feed utilization factors, by crop i, feed item 1, and season t. |
Vikjm | amount of input type m required per ha of crop i cultivated as part of activity k in cell j |
vsm | amount of input type m required per reference livestock unit of livestock system s (negative coefficient are used in case of net output, e.g. of power or manure) |
wi | waste share, i.e. share of crop production i wasted in harvesting, marketing and storage |
yikj | average yield of crop i produced per unit of cropping activity k in cell j |
yLikj | expected yield of crop i produced per unit of cropping activity k in cell j in 'bad' years |
yis | output of livestock product i per RLSU of livestock system s |
a Lr | minimum share of livestock units supported in region r in total number of livestock units |
a Ur | maximum share of livestock units supported in region r in total number of livestock units |
b Lsz | minimum share of livestock system s in total number of livestock units supported in zone z |
b Usz | maximum share of livestock system s in total number of livestock units supported in zone z |
e I | extraction rate, i.e. conversion of produce of crop/livestock product i to food product |
k i | calorie content per unit of food item i |
l h | level of self-sufficiency in product group |
p i | protein content per unit of food item i |
m ilt | feed depreciation factor related to carry-over of feed supplies from crop i, item 1, from season t-1 into season t |
r Lhr | minimum share of area harvested with crops from crop group h in total harvested area of region r |
r Uhr | minimum share of area harvested with crops from crop group h in total harvested area of region r |
t r | risk acceptance factor applied in region r |
v i | weight of produce of crop i in objective function |
v s | weight of livestock system s in objective function |
v Li | weight of produce of crop i risk evaluation |