Previous Page Table of Contents


V. Appendix

APPENDIX 1

Training exercise of matrix scoring

Group #1. Group consisted of head of governor’s office, population inspector, doctor and bag herders

Best institution for supporting poor in Chuluut sum

Criteria

Institution

Relatives

Social assistance fund

Collective of poor

Company

International agency

Khot ail

Bank

Red cross

Good understanding

5

3

3

1

2

4

1

2

High trust

5

3

3

2

3

4

1

2

Financial capacity

1

4

1

1

4

3

5

3

High capacity to provide needs

5

4

1

1

4

3

5

3

Capacity for long-term support

5

2

2

1

1

3

1

2

Total

21

16

10

6

12

16

9

12

Note: These participants concluded that the best institution for supporting the poor is relatives”. Next were the social assistance fund and khot ail. During the discussion they identified one new institution, this was groups or collectives of poor people. It was felt that if poor people built their own groups or collectives, this would provide useful support When asked why, they answered that the poor can understand each other and their own situation more clearly than others. In future, if people combine the supportive activities of khot ail and relatives with groups they will be successful. In their opinion, support to the poor should be given directly and not through intermediate levels.

APPENDIX 2

Group #2. Group consisted of governor, deputy governor, accountant, tax inspector and herder.

Source of income generating in Chuluut sum

Note: Participants in this group were mostly sum officials. They identified the general resources of income generating in the sum and concluded that livestock and natural resources had the highest potentials for income generating activities. Before doing the matrix analysis they felt that tourism had a lot of potential, but after identifying important criteria, they found that livestock, natural resources and hunting were preferable.

APPENDIX 3

Group #3. The group consisted of: 3 bag governors and 3 herders

What institution can best facilitate restocking

Note: Other workshop participants stated that most of the participants in this group were bag governors and herders, and for this reason they gave importance to the bag level. The sum governor summarised, “Previously, we restocked the poor twice through the company, using the capital of the negdel. But now the government is responsible for the poor not the company, and for this reason the restocking must be organised by government Sum and bag are both local institutions of government, but the sum has more potential for organising, monitoring, and managing. The best institution is sum level”.

APPENDIX 4

Household income generating activities identified by poor household in bag # 5 of Chuluut sum

Criteria

Activities

Rope making

Broom making

Dairy products selling

Cashmere selling

Sewing

Making Mongolian boots

Berries

Selling skin

Low price of raw material

10

9

10

14

8

4

8

10

Easier to make

1

5

1

4

1

1

5

6

More benefit

3

3

1

4

5

5

1

5

Have good market

8

4

2

9

4

7

3

6

Less labour required

3

8

2

3

8

2

2

8

Total

25

29

16

34

26

19

19

35

Note: This matrix, drawn by a poor but skilled and active family, clearly shows the importance of supplementary skills to the income of poor herders. Rope, broom and boot-making, sewing and berry picking, can all be undertaken by rural families without substantial technical or material inputs. In contrast, a second level of income-generating activity covering carpentry, blacksmithing and hunting require higher inputs and are therefore practiced by better-off households.

APPENDIX 5

Workshop exercise: Mapping Poverty in Ulziit bag

APPENDIX 6

Workshops participants Arkhangai aimag. Chuluut sum from 28 to 30 august.

1.

Dashzeveg

governor

2.

Balgansuren

head of governor’s office

3.

Baljinnyam

deputy governor

4.

Machgalsuren

bag 1 governor

5.

Mijiddorj

bag 3 governor

6.

Biziadorj

bag 2 governor

7.

Ganbaatar

bag 4 governor

8.

Tsetsejmaa

doctor

9.

Batdorj

nature protection inspector

10.

Byambasuren

social insurance inspector

11.

Selenge

representative of poor in sum centre

12.

Davaasuren

herder

13.

Zul-Ochir

herder

14.

Mijiddorj. O

tractor driver

15.

Batjargal

accountant

16.

Tsetsgee

tax inspector

17.

Dulmaa

population inspector

18.

Khandsuren

herder

19.

Batbaatar. C

herder

20.

Danzansambuu

herder

APPENDIX 7

PRA Workshop Agenda (2 1/2 days)

Day 1

· Introductions - Sum Governor; participants
· Objectives and context of workshop
· Introduction to PRA:
history
features
principles
methods
context of PRA in Mongolia
· Practical Session: Attitudes and Behaviour
· Practical Session: Semi-structured Interviewing skills
Day 2
· Review of previous day
· Practical Session: Mapping
· Practical Session: Matrix scoring
Day 3
· Session: Seasonal calendar and daily routine on gender
· Practical Session: SWOT analysis group exercise
· Final discussion and summary


Previous Page Top of Page