3. FUEL SUPPLY, DEMAND AND CONSUMPTION TREND
3.1. Woodfuel Review and Assessment
Fuelwood represents the major source of domestic energy in the Gambia. Electricity production and supply are limited to the coastal urban regions and selected Growth Centres of the rural areas. It is relatively expensive. Despite official efforts to increase the viability and attractiveness of natural gas this remains a relatively expensive, and unpopular from of energy. Based on household activities alone, it has been estimated that, on the average, per capita consumption of fuelwood in the Gambia equals around 0.17 cubic meters of wood per annum. This translates to the equation that each person consumes the sustainable harvest of between 1- 2 hectares of forest (Steiner, 1994).
3.2. Fuelwood Production and Supply in the Rural Areas
Around 70% of the population live in the rural areas. They obtain their fuelwood locality from farmland, fallowland, bush, or the collection of deadwood from nearby forest.
There is limited commercialisation of the fuels used for local consumption. Where high quality fuelwood is not available rural people tend to rely on small or less popular species. Experience else where, even under considerably more severe environmental condition suggest that as long as the agricultural system remains productive the locally available biomass resources can meet local cooking fuel needs on a continuing basis. Under these conditions, low-income families have no financial incentive to shift to commercial fuels or to invest in energy saving metal stoves.
3.3. Commercial Fuelwood Production for Urban Centres
The collection of fuelwood, especially for supply in the urban areas, causes additional pressure on the country's wood resources. The population of the Greater Banjul Area (GBA: Banjul and Kanifing Municipality) and Brikama is about 38% of the national total. A considerable proportion of the fuelwood supply in this area is commercialised.
The supply system works at number of different levels. Firewood is produced by individual license holders, employing assistants or by producers organised under community licenses. The licenses allow the exploitation and production of five lorry loads per month each with a load of 10 tons, which amounts to 600 tons per year. According to Danso et al (1994), only few producers are able to use the license fully.
The fuelwood license holders and their assistants are authorised to collect deadwood from land within the Administrative Divisions they are located, except from forest parks, community forests or from village lands that have a community license.
The production process is done by using compound saws, felling and cross cutting to various sizes (one meter or fifty-centimetre logs or quarter splits). The wood is split near the collection area, either inside the forest, on the main road or in the nearest village to the production site. The average time taken to produce 40 m3 (a lorry load of 10 ton) is noted to be 2 weeks, the producers assisted by three assistants. The production factor is 1:4, that is, for one m3 firewood, which is sold in the urban areas about 4 m3 of wood, is required. This rate is a rough estimate considering that forests are burnt to generate enough dead logs by which process valuable wood is being burnt for nothing.
Fuelwood dealers, based in the urban areas, are responsible for most of the fuelwood brought in by truck. Small teams of fuelwood-cutters working for the dealers gather 10-ton truck loads of fuel in the forest area and then hire transport to take it to the Greater Banjul Areas (GBA) where it is distributed to local whole sale or retail dealers.
The trucks are owned by shippers and are usually hired while returning from a trip to distribute goods up country, thus providing an opportunity for low cost transport. The system appears to be competitive and provides customers with a reliable supply of wood at a moderate price.
Fuelwood dealers operate under license and pay royalties to the Forestry Department and to local authorities. No payments are made to the local communities in the areas from which wood is collected. The Forestry Department, in co-operation with the Gambia Police, monitors the traffic in truckloads of fuel along the only first class (tarmac) road leading into the GBA. The monitoring system appears to be working effectively and there is no evidence of large-scale evasion of the checking system by the shippers. Transport of small loads of bundled fuelwood into the GBA is unrestricted. Considerable amounts of small loads of the bundles of fuelwood are brought into the GBA by pickup trucks and private cars.
Analysis has suggested that up to 90% of the woody vegetation harvested in the Gambia is used for fuelwood (Trolldaden, 1986). In an attempt to govern this process and to increase the efficiency of the wood utilised for energy purposes, the Government of the Gambia banned the production of charcoal in all regions of the country in 1980. It has been estimated that 1kg of unconverted wood is equivalent, in terms of energy content, to 2.5kg of charcoal (Trolldaden 1986), suggesting the use of charcoal represents the inefficient use of scarce forest resources.
3.5. Main Type of Fuel Used for Cooking
From above, fuelwood usage is said to be related to other socio-economic variables such as income, populate growth and forest cover available. These dynamics culminate to determining the rate of firewood consumption. The rate of fuelwood consumption has been quite steady despite the high rate of population growth. Rapid urbanisation can retard growth as wood is generally purchased in urban set-ups.
Tables 5 through 11 give the trend of fuel usage for cooking by Local Government Area (LGA). These tables support the dominance of firewood as the Gambian source of fuel for domestic use. The individual fuel-usage trend, except firewood, has not been as steady. Five years ago however, relatively more households used firewood than today. In addition, the proportion of households using Butane-gas (LPG) has increased.
TABLE 5: PERCENTAGE DISTRIBUTION OF MAIN FUEL USED FOR COOKING NOW BY LGA
LGA |
TYPE OF FUEL |
TOTAL |
||
Firewood |
Charcoal |
Gas |
||
Banjul |
88.0 |
12.0 |
100.0 |
|
Kanifing |
93.2 |
2.9 |
3.9 |
100.0 |
Brikama |
96.5 |
3.5 |
100.0 |
|
Mansakonko |
100.0 |
100.0 |
||
Kerewan |
93.4 |
6.6 |
100.0 |
|
Kuntaur |
100.0 |
100.0 |
||
Janjanbureh |
97.2 |
2.8 |
100.0 |
|
Basse |
100.0 |
100.0 |
||
Total |
95.6 |
1.0 |
3.4 |
100.0 |
Source: (Keita/NCC, 1999) |
TABLE 6: PERCENTAGE DISTRIBUTION OF MAIN FUEL USED FOR COOKING TWO YEARS AGO
LGA |
TYPE OF FUEL |
Total |
|||
Firewood |
Charcoal |
Gas |
Electricity |
||
Banjul |
100.0 |
100.00 |
|||
Kanifing |
98.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
100.00 |
|
Brikama |
97.5 |
1.3 |
1.3 |
100.00 |
|
Mansakonko |
100.0 |
100.00 |
|||
Kerewan |
96.7 |
3.3 |
100.00 |
||
Kuntaur |
100.0 |
100.00 |
|||
Janjanbureh |
97.1 |
2.9 |
100.00 |
||
Basse |
95.0 |
5.0 |
100.00 |
||
Total |
97.7 |
0.3 |
1.6 |
0.4 |
100.00 |
Source: Domestic Energy Consumption Survey Report 1999 by Malang Keita |
TABLE: 7 PERCENTAGE DISTRIBUTION OF MAIN FUEL USED FOR COOKING FIVE YEARS AGO
LGA |
TYPE OF FUEL |
Total |
|||
Firewood |
Charcoal |
Gas |
Electricity |
||
Banjul |
100.0 |
100.00 |
|||
Kanifing |
99.0 |
1.0 TD> |
100.00 |
||
Brikama |
98.7 |
1.3 |
100.00 |
||
Mansakonko |
100.0 |
100.00 |
|||
Kerewan |
100.0 |
100.00 |
|||
Kuntaur |
100.0 |
100.00 |
|||
Georgetown |
97.1 |
2.9 |
100.00 |
||
Basse |
100.0 |
100.00 |
|||
Total |
99.2 |
0.3 |
0.3 |
0.2 |
100.00 |
Different studies were carried out in the past but most of the estimates arrived at appear incorrect as suggested by the consumption patterns revealed by the studies. Also given our population density and wood availability, some figures reported are simply high. Below, are some results from past studies. The per capita wood consumption presented by both Openshaw and ORGATEC are on the high side. The most reasonable is that of Von Bulow and Cowi Consult, which are similar to the figures in tables 8 through 11.
3.7. Fuelwood Consumption and Trade
It is estimated that firewood account for about 84% of the total primarily energy consumption of the country (MTIE, 1992) and it is exclusively produced from the Gambia forest. Production, excluding that from mangrove forests, represents about 40,000 m3/year.
However, firewood consumption in the country has been estimated at various levels by different authors with a range of 0.65 to 0.85m3 per capita per annum. Of recent however consumption estimates have been placed at the lower limit of the range with an average annual volume in cement of about 1.1 million ha (Forster, 1983). Annual fuelwood consumption surpasses wood production by more than 100,000 m3.
There were several studies that were conducted to estimate the fuelwood demand of the country. The results were quite different. The consumption rate per capita varies from 1.44 m3 (Openshaw, 1973) to 0.34 m3 (Foley, 1994). However, the consumption rate for firewood decreased considerably with time when the various studies were prepared. Forster and Zohrer (1982) pointed out the statistical estimation methods used in the studies as the main cause of the variations.
The decrease of the consumption rate until the late 1980s is rather an effect of more precise and accurate analysis than it is a real reduction in the consumption. But then, firewood prices increased due to diminished resources and people started to save firewood by, for example, using improved cooking stoves, changing cooking habits sharing cooking facilities or using alternative fuel (butane gas).
The data provided in these studies need to be treated with great caution. The surveys provided by Von Bulow and Cowi Consult are reasonably accurate measurements of the weights of wood consumed (see Table 8). There is some evidence of strong price effects on the consumption of wood in The Gambia over the past decade and a half. The figures given above and in Table 8, show the corresponding results of the Openshaw (1972/3), ORGATEC (1981); and Von Bulow/Cowi Consult Surveys (1983/4). Apart from the data difficulties in fuel consumption, additional errors resulted since all calculations were on per capita basis because of the lack of knowledge of the Sinkiro Sizes (household cooking units). This created an over estimation.
ORGATEC (1981) argued that Openshaw (1973) results must be incorrect because
he obtained a higher per capita figure for the Urban areas and
The total Gambia Fuelwood consumption appeared to decrease between 1972/3 and 1981, despite a population increase (ORGATEC, 1983).
There appears to be a legitimate doubt about the methodologies of Openshaw (1973) and ORGATEC) studies. The results of Openshaw and ORGATEC suffer from gross conversion inaccuracies because they had to rely on peoples’ responses of bundles and sticks and did not actually weigh the firewood. The results of Von Bulow and Cowi Consult are based on small samples, weighing was done in only 5 households in rural areas.
Table 8: Per Capita Fuelwood Consumption based on Various Studies
STUDY |
PER CAPITA CONSUMPTION (KG PER CAPITA) |
|
Urban |
Rural |
|
Openshaw (1973) |
2.96 |
2.72 |
ORGATE (1981) |
1.60 |
1.80 |
Von Bulow (1983) |
0.85 |
1.17 |
COWI (1984) |
0.85 |
1.17 |
NCC (1993) |
0.76 |
1.09 |
NCC (1999) |
Table 9: Estimated Fuelwood Consumption in The Gambia 1984 (1000 tons) (COWI Consult 1984)
REGIONS |
CONSUMPTION |
Banjul/Kombo/St. Mary's |
45.2 |
Western Division |
26.5 |
Northern Bank Division |
52.9 |
Maccarthy Island Division |
59.2 |
Upper River Division |
50.8 |
Total |
300.8 |
3.8. Fuelwood Supply and Demand
The lack of precision in the estimates of both supply and more particularly, demand of fuelwood in the Gambia makes the estimation of "Shortfalls" and "Surpluses" an exercise clouded by uncertainty. Anecdotal evidence suggests that shortages are developing around certain Growth Centres in the rural areas of the country where the demand for wood is the greatest. In the 1981 survey, ORGATEC suggested that both the areas around Basse and Farrafenni were fuelwood deficit areas.
The following analysis concentrates on Banjul area for three reasons. Firstly, the area is likely to be the only region susceptible to policy intervention as:
almost all wood used is bought and
the geography of the area is such that all woods enter Banjul by the same route.
Secondly, existing data on the consumption of wood are probably more accurate for this area. Thirdly, the potential exists for collecting reasonably accurate data for this area.
In order to assess whether the supply of wood to the Greater Banjul Area is sustainable it is necessary to determine its source. It is quite difficult to establish all areas wood is produced. However, it has widely believed that most of the fuelwood arriving in Banjul comes from the rural areas. Fuelwood is also illegally coming from Cassamance region of the Republic of Senegal.
Table 10 presents the yearly fuel consumption from 1994 to 1999 in cubic metres. The rate of fuel consumption in recent years has been quite steady, growing at a rate of one (1%) per annum. This low rate of growth is partly the result of scarcity of firewood in most parts of the country. Today, firewood is increasingly commanding a price in almost all parts of The Gambia. The limitation of its supply has, among other things, necessitated its importation from neighbouring countries. Increasing urbanisation, low per capita income and improved cooking devices are among factors that reduce the rate of growth of fuelwood consumption despite our fast growing population. This is also depicted by the figure below. Table 10 through Table 12 were derived from the 1993 Fuelwood Survey conducted by the National Climate Committee (NCC) and the 1999 Energy Survey, also by the NCC and the reference document provided by FAO. Table 10B is derived from the reference data supplied by FAO, which can be compared with Table: 10A. There is no information on the methodology and purpose of the FAO study. The figures, however, are relatively high for domestic energy consumption.
Table 10a: Yearly Fuelwood Consumption by LGA in cubic metres (m3)
LGA |
1994 |
1995 |
1996 |
1997 |
1998 |
1999 |
BANJUL |
9897 |
9997 |
9997 |
10098 |
10098 |
10200 |
KANIFING |
99902 |
100912 |
100912 |
101931 |
101931 |
102960 |
BRIKAMA |
112365 |
113500 |
113500 |
114647 |
114647 |
115805 |
M/KONKO |
35076 |
35430 |
35430 |
35788 |
35788 |
36149 |
KEREWAN |
63570 |
64212 |
64212 |
64860 |
64860 |
65516 |
G/TOWN |
27656 |
27935 |
27935 |
28218 |
28218 |
28503 |
KUN TAUR |
50093 |
50599 |
50599 |
51110 |
51110 |
51626 |
BASSE |
91304 |
92226 |
92226 |
93158 |
93158 |
94099 |
THE GAMBIA |
489863 |
494811 |
494811 |
499809 |
499809 |
504858 |
Source: National Climate Committee Household Energy Survey, (1999).
Table 10b: Yearly Fuelwood Consumption in cubic metres (m3)
Year |
1990 |
1991 |
1992 |
1993 |
1994 |
1995 |
1996 |
Consumption |
769054 |
791577 |
814759 |
838621 |
859743 |
879618 |
859137 |
Source: FAO data
Table 11: Yearly Fuelwood Consumption by LGA in equivalent of Lower Heating Value (LHV) in Giga joules
LGA |
1994 |
1995 |
1996 |
1997 |
1998 |
1999 |
BANJUL |
99017 |
100017 |
100017 |
101027 |
101027 |
102048 |
KANIFING |
999524 |
1009620 |
1009620 |
1019819 |
1019819 |
1030120 |
BRIKAMA |
1124215 |
1135570 |
1135570 |
1147041 |
1147041 |
1158627 |
M/KONKO |
350933 |
354478 |
354478 |
358059 |
358059 |
361675 |
KEREWAN |
636014 |
642439 |
642439 |
648928 |
648928 |
655483 |
G/TOWN |
276698 |
279493 |
279493 |
282316 |
282316 |
285168 |
KUNTAUR |
501177 |
506239 |
506239 |
511353 |
511353 |
516518 |
BASSE |
913499 |
922726 |
922726 |
932046 |
932046 |
941461 |
THE GAMBIA |
4901077 |
4950583 |
4950583 |
5000589 |
5000589 |
5051100 |
Source: National Climate Committee Household Energy Survey, 1999.
Table 12: Yearly Fuelwood Consumption by LGA and wood type in equivalent of Lower Heating Value (LHV) in Giga joules
LGA |
Pterocarpus Erinaceus (Keno) |
Prosopis Africana (Kembo) |
Combretum Glutinosum (Jambakatang) |
Terminalia Macroptera (Wolo) |
Others |
TOTAL |
BANJUL |
102048 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
102048 |
KANIFING |
738596 |
123614 |
14422 |
26783 |
126705 |
1030120 |
BRIKAMA |
361492 |
129766 |
76469 |
166842 |
424057 |
1158627 |
M/KONKO |
116821 |
40508 |
74143 |
20977 |
109226 |
361675 |
KEREWAN |
119298 |
23597 |
188779 |
51128 |
272681 |
655483 |
G/TOWN |
81558 |
8555 |
167964 |
9981 |
17110 |
285168 |
KUNTAUR |
213322 |
26859 |
139460 |
38739 |
98138 |
516518 |
BASSE |
189234 |
29185 |
543223 |
109209 |
70610 |
941461 |
THE GAMBIA |
1922368 |
382085 |
1204460 |
423659 |
1118527 |
5051100 |
Table 13: Yearly Fuelwood Consumption by LGA and wood type in cubic metres (m3)
LGA |
Pterocarpus Erinaceus (Keno) |
Prosopis Africana (Kembo) |
Combretum Glutinosum (Jambakatang) |
Terminalia Macroptera (Wolo) |
Others |
TOTAL |
BANJUL |
10200 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
10200 |
KANIFING |
73823 |
12355 |
1441 |
2677 |
12664 |
102960 |
BRIKAMA |
36131 |
12970 |
7643 |
16676 |
42385 |
115805 |
M/KONKO |
11676 |
4049 |
7411 |
2097 |
10917 |
36149 |
KEREWAN |
11924 |
2359 |
18868 |
5110 |
27254 |
65516 |
G/TOWN |
8152 |
855 |
16788 |
998 |
1710 |
28503 |
KUNTAUR |
21322 |
2685 |
13939 |
3872 |
9809 |
51626 |
BASSE |
18914 |
2917 |
54295 |
10915 |
7057 |
94099 |
THE GAMBIA |
192141 |
38189 |
120386 |
42345 |
111797 |
504858 |
3.9. Consumption of Fuelwood in Fish Smoking
The widespread processing of fish in the artisan sector also exert a substantial demand for fuel wood (Saine and Willman 1994) calculated that fish smokers in the coastal communities of the Gambia may utilise between 0.7 and 1.1kg of wood per 1kg of Bonga fish smoked, and annually 7,800 tones of fuelwood is used in smoking Bonga alone, representing the sustainable harvest of around 9,400 hectares of healthy forest clearly the smoking of Bonga is only one component of a substantially larger smoking enterprise both along the Atlantic Coast and the River Gambia, and total fuelwood consumption by smokers is likely to be considerably higher than reported.
Table: 14 Fuelwood used in Fish Smoking (in cubic metres) by Type of Wood
WOOD TYPE |
1995 |
1996 |
1997 |
1998 |
1999 |
Palm tree |
438 |
455 |
473 |
492 |
512 |
Netto |
1368 |
1423 |
1480 |
1539 |
1601 |
Fara |
581 |
604 |
628 |
653 |
679 |
Mampato |
1491 |
1551 |
1613 |
1678 |
1745 |
Wolo |
331 |
345 |
359 |
373 |
388 |
Jalo |
56 |
59 |
61 |
63 |
66 |
Keno |
53 |
55 |
58 |
60 |
62 |
Tamba |
34 |
36 |
37 |
38 |
40 |
Mampato |
166 |
173 |
180 |
187 |
195 |
Machincharo |
337 |
350 |
364 |
379 |
394 |
Santango |
158 |
165 |
171 |
178 |
185 |
Yeri Nghanya |
78 |
81 |
84 |
88 |
91 |
Talo |
590 |
614 |
638 |
664 |
690 |
Others |
5682 |
5910 |
6146 |
6392 |
6647 |
Total |
11365 |
11820 |
12292 |
12784 |
13295 |
In 1970s, the Government of the Gambia developed great concern in conversion of wood into charcoal. It has been noted that the natural vegetation cannot sustain the rate of charcoal production. The consumer switch from fuelwood to charcoal was widely regarded with great concern because one ton of charcoal requires about five tones of fuelwood as input and replaces around 3 tons of end-use consumption. It has been estimated that 1kg of unconverted wood is equivalent in terms of energy content to 2.5kg of charcoal (Trolldaden 1986), suggesting the use of charcoal represents the in efficient use of scarce forest resources.
In 1980, the production of charcoal was banned in the Gambia and this ban was instituted through a proclamation made by the president of the Republic.
Groundnut shell briquetting was introduced to avoid acceleration in deforestation but this has not been popular. Because the amount of groundnut shell usually available depends on the annual groundnut production and due to the Sahelian drought production has decreased markedly and use of the shells as source of energy is negligible.
The Forest Act and Regulations of 1998, section 108 (1) prohibited the production of charcoal in any parts of the country but provision are made for the importation and sale of charcoal in the Gambia (Forest Act 1998). Currently charcoal is imported in bags from neighbouring Senegal and sold commercially. The use of charcoal in the Gambia is restricted to irony and making tea or heating snacks on a small metal stove. There are only few households using charcoal for cooking. The extent of charcoal use in Banjul is still difficult to verify. FAO estimates 54,000 tones in 1992 in all of Gambia and presumably a large part would be consumed in the capital area. However, this number has been extrapolated from the 40,000 tones reported for 1981.
3.11. Electricity usage in The Gambia
Tables 15 give the details of electricity usage in The Gambia. Less than half the population has electricity supply in their homes in The Gambia. In the capital city, Banjul, 95.5% of the population has electricity. This is followed by Kanifing, where a little over three-quarters of the community are enjoying electricity facility. These can be compare to Kuntaur, where only 8.7% of the households have electricity supply.
Table 15: Availability of Electricity supply in households
AVBL OF ELECT. |
LOCAL GOVERNMENT AREA |
TOT. |
||||||||
Banjul |
Kanifing |
Brikama |
Mansakonko |
Kerewan |
Kuntaur |
Georgetown |
Basse |
|||
Yes |
Count |
21.0 |
81.0 |
27.0 |
10.0 |
21.0 |
2.0 |
10.0 |
10.0 |
182.0 |
% |
95.5 |
77.1 |
31.8 |
33.3 |
34.4 |
8.7 |
27.8 |
23.8 |
45.0 |
|
No |
Count |
1.0 |
24.0 |
58.0 |
20.0 |
40.0 |
21.0 |
26.0 |
32.0 |
222.0 |
% |
4.5 |
22.9 |
68.2 |
66.7 |
65.6 |
91.3 |
72.2 |
76.2 |
55.0 |
|
Total |
% |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
Source: NCC (1999)