Appropriateness of Existing Forestry Financing Approaches
It is not a coincidence that project documents for projects dealing with du Haut Atlas, Plan Directeur de Reboisement, PNABV, Aires Protégées, and others present similar strategies for their funding. Most invariably resort to a combination of similar approaches for prospective financing, including:
self-financing to some extent (invariably small) by local beneficiaries
increased financial support from existing user groups
new domestic (private and public sector) partners and their financing
new bilateral and international donor assistance
new taxes.
A brief summary of the financial requirements for a sample of programmes and their proposed funding sources is presented in tables immediately following.
Table 4.1: Plan Directeur de Reboisement - proposed financing |
||||
Coût total |
700 M DH/an |
|||
Réparation |
collectivetés et secteur privé: |
Etat: |
||
coût total sur buget des forêt: |
autres administrations: |
|||
600 MDH/an |
||||
"fonds propres" du Maroc: |
financements internationaux: |
|||
Somme |
70 MDH/an |
180 M à 240 M DH/an |
360 M à 420 M DH/an |
60 M DH/an |
Source: Plan Directeur de Reboisement, AEFCS 1997 (p 99) |
Table 4.2: Stratégie Nationale - Aires Protégées Interventions |
|||
project |
bailleur de fonds |
site |
montants '000 000 USD |
Gestion des Resources Naturelles |
GTZ/BMZ Allemange |
PN Souss Massa, Toubkal, Tazekka |
1,2 |
Development participatif des zones forestiéres de la Prov de Chaouen |
Unione Européenne |
PN Talassemtane |
3,0 |
Development participatif des zones forestiéres de la Prov d'Ifrane |
Agence Fran çaise de Dévelopment / FFEM |
PN Ifrane |
2,0 |
Conservation de la diversité bilogoique du versant sud de Haut-Atlas |
PNUD / FEM |
SIBE du Jbel Sagho |
2,2 |
Gestion des Resources Naturelles dans la Province de Taza |
Coopérations italienne / FAO |
PN Tazekka |
1,0 |
Project de Gestion des aires protégées au Maroc |
Banque Mondiale / FEM |
PN Toubkal, Haut Atlas Oriental, Al Hociema, 13 SIBES Réserves |
18,8 |
total |
28,20 |
||
Source: Synthese (provisoire), Project de Gestion des Aires Protégées, MCEF, Février 1999 (p 8) |
Table 4.3: Project Gestion AP, Reparation de financement |
||||||||
Gouvernment |
FEM |
Bénéficiares |
total |
|||||
Composante |
M USD |
% |
M USD |
% |
M USD |
% |
M USD |
% |
Renforcement de capacités |
1,304 |
30 |
3,091 |
70 |
-- |
-- |
4,395 |
23 |
Gestion des SIBE et PN |
3,506 |
15 |
4,598 |
35 |
754 |
9 |
8,859 |
47 |
Aménagement des SIBE RV |
2,091 |
45 |
2,376 |
51 |
161 |
3 |
4,628 |
25 |
Sensibilisation et Communication |
224 |
25 |
687 |
75 |
-- |
-- |
911 |
5 |
Source: Synthese (provisoire), Project de Gestion des Aires Protégées, MCEF, Février 1999 (p 25) |
The basic approach to funding programmes according to the above schemes is not unsound. However, the practical issues surrounding the application of this approach warrants review. The issues surrounding the distribution of cost amongst beneficiaries and stakeholders are discussed in sections 3 and 5 of this report and must be considered in respect of each of the Ministry's programmes - as well as those of other ministries where such programmes are in any way related to, overlapping with, or otherwise influencing forest land and environmental management and development.
Three key areas of concern with respect to all programme funding are:
maximising the efficiency, for Morocco as a nation, of all programmes combined
maximising overall programme benefits
minimising overall programme administrative, management, implementation, infrastructure and monitoring, etc., costs
The Programme funding factors requiring the most immediate attention in respect of assigning user costs and funding responsibilities deal fundamentally with:
establishing the distribution of the benefits amongst social partners - within the context of all of Moroccan society
assigning user costs in an equitable manner in recognition of both direct (e.g. grazing fees) indirect (e.g. soil and water conservation taxes) resource consumption and use patterns
limiting resource development and use where the net results are negative and unsustainable (e.g. degrading of the environment, wasteful of resources, etc.); inadequate funding cannot be used as a reason to justify continued unsustainable practices
leveraging donor funding as much as possible through the use of "high internal inputs" and "low external inputs" approaches (e.g. local labour and other inputs and techniques and technology)
monitoring the performance of all of Morocco's forest land and environment Programmes to adjust their implementation, as required, to maximise overall benefits consistent with the above factors.