Previous PageTable Of ContentsNext Page

Appropriateness of Existing Forestry Financing Approaches

It is not a coincidence that project documents for projects dealing with du Haut Atlas, Plan Directeur de Reboisement, PNABV, Aires Protégées, and others present similar strategies for their funding. Most invariably resort to a combination of similar approaches for prospective financing, including:

self-financing to some extent (invariably small) by local beneficiaries

increased financial support from existing user groups

new domestic (private and public sector) partners and their financing

new bilateral and international donor assistance

new taxes.

 

Programme Funding Approaches

A brief summary of the financial requirements for a sample of programmes and their proposed funding sources is presented in tables immediately following.

Table 4.1: Plan Directeur de Reboisement - proposed financing

Coût total

700 M DH/an

 

 

 

Réparation

 

 

collectivetés et secteur privé:

Etat:

coût total sur buget des forêt:

 

autres administrations:

600 MDH/an

"fonds propres" du Maroc:

financements internationaux:

Somme

70 MDH/an

180 M à

240 M DH/an

360 M à

420 M DH/an

60 M DH/an

Source: Plan Directeur de Reboisement, AEFCS 1997 (p 99)

Table 4.2: Stratégie Nationale - Aires Protégées Interventions

project

bailleur de fonds

site

montants

'000 000 USD

Gestion des Resources Naturelles

GTZ/BMZ Allemange

PN Souss Massa, Toubkal, Tazekka

1,2

Development participatif des zones forestiéres de la Prov de Chaouen

Unione Européenne

PN Talassemtane

3,0

Development participatif des zones forestiéres de la Prov d'Ifrane

Agence Fran

çaise de Dévelopment / FFEM

PN Ifrane

2,0

Conservation de la diversité bilogoique du versant sud de Haut-Atlas

PNUD / FEM

SIBE du Jbel Sagho

2,2

Gestion des Resources Naturelles dans la Province de Taza

Coopérations italienne / FAO

PN Tazekka

1,0

Project de Gestion des aires protégées au Maroc

Banque Mondiale / FEM

PN Toubkal, Haut Atlas Oriental, Al Hociema, 13 SIBES Réserves

18,8

total

28,20

Source: Synthese (provisoire), Project de Gestion des Aires Protégées, MCEF, Février 1999 (p 8)

 

 

Table 4.3: Project Gestion AP, Reparation de financement

 

Gouvernment

FEM

Bénéficiares

total

Composante

M USD

%

M USD

%

M USD

%

M USD

%

Renforcement de capacités

1,304

30

3,091

70

--

--

4,395

23

Gestion des SIBE et PN

3,506

15

4,598

35

754

9

8,859

47

Aménagement des SIBE RV

2,091

45

2,376

51

161

3

4,628

25

Sensibilisation et Communication

224

25

687

75

--

--

911

5

Source: Synthese (provisoire), Project de Gestion des Aires Protégées, MCEF, Février 1999 (p 25)

The basic approach to funding programmes according to the above schemes is not unsound. However, the practical issues surrounding the application of this approach warrants review. The issues surrounding the distribution of cost amongst beneficiaries and stakeholders are discussed in sections 3 and 5 of this report and must be considered in respect of each of the Ministry's programmes - as well as those of other ministries where such programmes are in any way related to, overlapping with, or otherwise influencing forest land and environmental management and development.

Three key areas of concern with respect to all programme funding are:

maximising the efficiency, for Morocco as a nation, of all programmes combined

maximising overall programme benefits

minimising overall programme administrative, management, implementation, infrastructure and monitoring, etc., costs

The Programme funding factors requiring the most immediate attention in respect of assigning user costs and funding responsibilities deal fundamentally with:

establishing the distribution of the benefits amongst social partners - within the context of all of Moroccan society

assigning user costs in an equitable manner in recognition of both direct (e.g. grazing fees) indirect (e.g. soil and water conservation taxes) resource consumption and use patterns

limiting resource development and use where the net results are negative and unsustainable (e.g. degrading of the environment, wasteful of resources, etc.); inadequate funding cannot be used as a reason to justify continued unsustainable practices

leveraging donor funding as much as possible through the use of "high internal inputs" and "low external inputs" approaches (e.g. local labour and other inputs and techniques and technology)

monitoring the performance of all of Morocco's forest land and environment Programmes to adjust their implementation, as required, to maximise overall benefits consistent with the above factors.

Previous PageTop Of PageNext Page