Previous Page Table of Contents Next Page


Section 7: Notes on two tillage systems


Minimum and zero tillage

Minimum and zero tillage systems are very similar in that the ground is worked very little or not at all before the seed is sown. This approach has increased in use over recent years with, for example, 8 million hectares in Brazil and a major swing towards the technology in Asia.

The most important advantage of minimum tillage is that crops can be sown almost immediately the previous crop has been harvested and commonly approaching the optimum sowing time This is not possible with conventional tillage as that is time consuming. So it is highly suited to areas where two or more crops are rotated on the same land within the year. In much of south Asia yield in wheat reduces rapidly as sowing time is delayed beyond the optimum date for the area (see Hobbs et al., 1997 for details). So delay costs yield. Minimum tillage in addition to shortening turn-around time between crops can be much cheaper than conventional tillage.

Conventional tillage on smallholdings in some parts of Asia can be very exhausting and slow. A common practice in Bangladesh is six ploughings with cattle and 11 plankings, or two passes with a rototiller and four plankings. Only then is the crop sown. Using a minimum till approach the land can be tilled and seeds sown directly in one pass. In that pass, using accessories for example to the Chinese Hand Tractor, a 2” (5 cm) deep seedbed is tilled, the seed is sown and then covered with soil (CA Meisner pers comm.). An even less demanding single pass system is ‘strip till’, which is close to zero tillage, only tilling strips 10 cm wide and 5 cm deep.

Two crops sown after rice in Bangladesh. The 4 passes of normal tillage took 3 weeks, delaying sowing beyond the optimum date. Estimated yield < 2t/ha. The more advanced, minimal tillage crop was sown within 5 days of the rice harvest. Estimated yield 4t/ha.

 

Minimal tillage
shortens turn
around time
between crops
and thereby can
increase yield

 

 

 

H Gomez Macpherson

Another major advantage of minimum tillage is that land that may be inaccessible for conventional tillage because of wet conditions is usually accessible for direct drilling the wheat crop. For example in eastern UP, Bihar (Northern India) and West Bengal the monsoon rain can extend to October or November when the preceding rice crop is ready to harvest. Consequently, the rice must be removed when the soil is very wet, occasionally with water lying in the fields. Drainage is difficult because the regions are flat. Ploughing and discing prior to planting the wheat is not an option as the soil is too wet and too much time would be lost waiting for drying.

Raised beds for irrigated wheat

Wheat can be planted on preformed beds of any length, 60-90 cm wide by 15 to 30 cm high, with 2 (or 3) defined planting rows per bed. In some regions such beds are called hills. The channels between the beds supply the irrigation water and drainage, the access for humans for hand operations such as weeding, and the tracks for wheels of machinery for weeding, fertilizer applications and harvesting. The beds are retained over many seasons for successive wheat crops and rotation crops. Machinery wheels do not go on the beds but in the channels. You can find more information in Sayre and Moreno Ramos (1997) and Sayre (2000).

Advantages

A crop in India grown on raised beds separated by irrigation/access channels

H Gomez Macpherson

Disadvantages


Previous Page Top of Page Next Page