0083-B1

Management Strategies on Territories with Special Status of Protection in the Czech Republic

Jaroslav Simon[1]


ABSTRACT

About 15% of the area of the Czech Republic is classified as territories with special status of protection, most of which is covered with forests. At present, at the time of integration of the country into the European structures, an increase in the area of such territories by approximately 20% is expected. The territories show significant variation of protection objectives, management restrictions, profound differentiation in natural conditions, structure of ownership and different levels of damage, especially that caused by anthropogenic pressure. This situation requires the formulation of long-term management strategies. The problem can be solved in the following successive steps:

- formulation of variants and alternatives of management strategies based on a retrospective analysis of forest development;

- prognosis of the forest condition development after application of the individual management strategies on the basis of growth and development simulations;

- addition of technological and economical bases;

- selection of optimal variants and alternatives from the viewpoint of the fulfilment of the owner’s management goals, in accordance with the principles of forest policy and from the viewpoint of the fulfilment of the protection objective formulated for a specific territory with special status of protection.

A set of methods for following the above-mentioned steps is specified in the presented contribution.


Introduction

In the Czech Republic, territories with the special statute of protection include about 15% of the country area predominating part being formed by forest regions. At present in the time of integration of the CR into European structures, increase in the area of these regions by about 20% is expected. The regions are characterized by considerable heterogeneity of the objectives of protection, management limitations, marked differentiation of natural conditions, ownership structure and various level of damage particularly due to overall anthropogenic impacts. These factors require objectification of the management strategy formulation with a necessary long-term prognostic level. The problems can be studied in the following steps:

The study of particular steps (problem fields) requires to use an integrated set of methods (study of the analytical base) and a synthesis resulting in a particular strategy.

1. Formulation of the protection objective

The aim of protection is the concentrated expression of management objectives. It expresses the picture and structure of an ecosystem in gradual time steps. It can range in marginal limits of the protection of the spontaneous uncontrolled ecosystem development (protection of processes) with the total elimination of the production role of forests up to, e.g. the mosaic protection of a plant species where economic activities do not have to be virtually reduced in the majority of a region. In general, it is possible to say that as much specially protected regions as many differentiated objectives of protection can exist.

2. Optimization principles of management strategies

The condition of forests is generally the result of cultural, economic and political development. A basic requirement for permanent benefits is a necessity to preserve production potential and permanent existence of forests. In forests on areas with a special statute of protection the use of the system of sustainable management only is not sufficient. The function of these areas is actually to preserve natural values or to improve present condition of their anthropogenicly affected environment by means of differentiated close-to-nature care or close-to-nature management of forest ecosystems. It is the case of using spontaneous processes with the goal-directed reduction of additional energy inputs into biological processes. In contrast to sustainable forest management, close-to-nature ways of care put considerable emphasis on autochthonous stands, i.e. not only on species but also on ecotype structure as well as on the natural and spatial structure in fulfilling the whole spectrum of non-wood-producing functions.

It is evident that in the choice of management strategies schematic procedures cannot be used and, on the contrary, the basic feature is variability and plasticity. Economic principles are reduced. From the aspect of principles mentioned above it is possible to use theoretical and practical criteria to check the fulfilment of protection objectives.

2.1 Theoretical criteria

From theoretical criteria, the most important are as follows:

2.2 Practical criteria

Practical criteria are as follows:

In the context of ecological principles and criteria mentioned above, it is necessary to mention the problem of applying the wood-producing function of forests.

The fulfilment of the production function of forests can be understood as the removal of wood mass (logging) from the forest environment usually for the purpose of their commercial use. The activity can be implemented in all stages of the forest development. Positive economic effect are usually supposed. Intensity of using the production function can range in extreme positions from an individual selection with the minimum volume of harvested timber per ha up to the use of clear felling. As a quite extreme position is to keep the forest to its natural development without any intervention. Then, however, we cannot speak about the use of the wood-producing function.

In forests with the special statute of protection, in affecting the forest and forest environment, thus also in fulfilling the wood-producing function of forests, it is necessary to favour objectives of ensuring and stabilization of the ecological function of forest ecosystems in agreement with differentiated objectives of protection and management of their use. In fulfilling the objectives, the use of the wood-producing function is often understood as an antagonistic negative factor.

This attitude is not, however, correct because it is necessary to admit that special management in particularly protected regions has to take into account also silvicultural and regeneration measures (to ensure protection objectives) where the production function is used. It is evident that the use of the production function of forests in regions with the special statute of protection brings risks to achieve the protection objectives. The risk has to be evaluated and according to possibilities also quantified. Primarily, it is, however, necessary to determine variants of technologies which can be used in the implementation of management principles according to determined protection objectives.

3. Technological aspects of management strategies

Similarly as in the selection of management strategy (silvicultural practices) differentiated approach is necessary, it is not possible to propose the only universal model solution in the choice of technologies and, therefore, we have to develop a separate technological typification which must correspond to the following requirements:

It is necessary to state that the use of any technological variant brings always a certain damage to the natural environment and thus it brings risks for the fulfilment of protection objectives.

4. Risks for the implementation of a management strategy

A risk for the practical realization of a management strategy from the viewpoint of achieving the protection objective can be dealt with in the following steps:

4.1 Risk degree (SR) - basic value 1 - 100

Potential limitation for achieving (or maintaining) the protection objective and its extent

0

none

risk factor has no effects on the protection objective

1

1

small

in fulfilling the effect of a risk factor the objective of protection is not endangered and its attainment is not worsened

10

2

medium

in fulfilling the effect of a risk factor the objective of protection is not endangered, however, its attainment is worsened

20

3

large

in fulfilling the effect of a risk factor the objective of protection is endangered, its achievement is difficult but realistic

50

4

very large

in fulfilling the effect of a risk factor the objective of protection is endangered, its attainment is often unrealistic

80

5

extreme

the fulfilment of risk factor effects cannot be prevented, attainment of protection objectives is unrealistic

100

A conception is also introduced of the global risk of irreversible changes of the destruction of a forest ecosystem

4.2 Fulfilling the risk (NR) - weight 1 - 10

1

minimal, zero

weight

1

2

realistic, unpredictable

weight

3

3

realistic, significant

weight

7

4

sure

weight

10

4.3 Effects of fulfilling the risk (UNR) - weight 1 - 10 time aspects of the effect of fulfilling the risk from the viewpoint of maintaining (renewing) the protection objective

1

short-term

weight

1

2

temporary

weight

5

3

permanent

weight

10

4.4 Quantification of risks (KN)

Quantification of a particular risk

KNi = (SR. NR. UNR) + KNR,

KNR - coefficient of an unpredictable risk - (0 - 100)

Quantification of the total risk (KCR) of a technology:

a - coefficient of the potential infringement of an optimum logging and hauling technology (1-10)
b - coefficient of the protection regime degree in relation to zones of protection grading (1-4)
c - coefficient of the degree of naturalness of forest stands (2-10)

4.5 The use of technologies from the viewpoint of fulfilling the protection objective

5. Criteria of fulfilling the protection objective in using special management based on the forest growth and development simulation

A basic moment is to assess those management strategies only (or their variants and alternatives) which are classified as acceptable in evaluating risks of implementation. Thus, we fulfilled a condition that the strategy could be used in a territory with a special statute of protection. Moreover, we proceed from a condition that intentions of protection objectives will be fulfilled. To corroborate factors mentioned above it is suitable to use control mechanisms the basic element of which is mathematical modelling, e.g. on the basis of visual representation of the growth and development simulation of selected model areas (in larger areas if the area cannot be analysed as a whole). Thanks to the simulation it is possible to expect that from the actual condition of a forest (under the given context of natural conditions) on the basis of given and specified management strategy it will determine and provide visual representation of the forest condition for determined time steps with the quantification of particularly following attributes:

As a comparative standard serves an analysis of the same structure for the variant of spontaneous development (often used for the protection objective - forest ecosystem development free of any silvicultural measures and protection of natural developmental processes). At present, the technology is elaborated within the preparation of a Central European, locally calibrated growth simulator.

6. Economic aspects of management strategies

A strategy accepted on the basis of given criteria does not mean, however, its practical feasibility. If we leave out the question of technological equipment the economic sphere is fundamental. Introduction of special management strategies in the given area (which will be at least doubled with respect to our integration into European structures) which is in interest of a state and not of the property owner who is logically limited, is a costly business and financial flows depend on actual social and economic conditions. The conditions are generally valid. Based on these aspects it is necessary to carry out stratification of the area with a special statute of protection. Here, a basic criterion is uniqueness of the region and processes particularly from supra-regional aspects. The stratification serves at the beginning of studying the suggested scheme, for the question to determine the protection objectives enlarged by social obligation with reflection in legislation.

7. Conclusion

The problem of variants and alternatives of management strategies in the Czech Republic is traditionally studied in a long-term context springing from the Central European forestry school. Elaboration of strategies for areas with a special statute of protection in the context of increased interest and problems of the environment are intensively dealt with and worked out in many regions.


[1] Mendel University of Agriculture and Forestry, Faculty of Forestry and Wood Technology, Zemedelská 3, 61300 Brno, Czech Republic. Email: [email protected]