Previous Page Table of Contents Next Page


7. OTHER COMPLEMENTARY WATER POLLUTION CONTROL MECHANISMS


Waste discharge prohibitions, waste discharge permit requirements, and wastewater discharge requirements built in water utilization permits can be complementary to, or complemented by, other water pollution control mechanisms. The following such complementary mechanisms can be the subject of subsidiary legislation:

7.1 Water Quality Management Planning

Subsidiary legislation provides procedural requirements for the implementation of water quality management planning mechanisms provided for by principal legislation. Requirements in the example below are aimed at providing opportunities for public review and comment on plans being formed, and public information of plans which have been made.

IRELAND - Local Government (Water Pollution) Regulations, 1978

39. In this Part:

"plan" means a water quality management plan under section 15.

40. (1) Where a local authority proposes to make, revise or replace a plan it shall publish notice of such intention in at least one newspaper circulating in its functional area.

(2) A notice under sub-article (1) shall indicate:

(a) the waters to which the plan relates,

(b) that a copy of the plan may be inspected at a stated place and at stated times during a stated period of not less than three months (and the copy shall be kept available for inspection accordingly),

(c) that any person may make written representations relating to the plan to the local authority within the period stated under paragraph (b), and

(d) in the case of a plan to be made, revised or replaced jointly by two or more local authorities, that the plan is to be so made, revised or replaced and the local authorities concerned.

41. (1) Where a local authority makes, revises or replaces a plan, it shall publish notice to this effect in at least one newspaper circulating in its functional area.

(2) A notice under sub-article (1) shall state that a copy of the plan is available for inspection at a stated place and at stated times.

(3) Where the plan has been made, revised or replaced jointly by two or more local authorities the notice under sub-article (1) shall indicate that the plan has been so made, revised or replaced and shall specify those local authorities.

42. Where application is made to a local authority for a copy of a plan or part thereof, the local authority shall issue a copy to the applicant on payment by him to the local authority of a sum which shall not exceed the reasonable cost of making the copy.

7.2 Inventory of Pollution

Inventories of the nature and extent of pollution, and of its causes can be viewed as a pre-requisite to a pollution control programme, and as the first step in water quality management planning. The example below clarifies the scope of the inventories and who can initiate an inventory. In addition, it conveys to the responsible government officials the powers which are needed for the necessary field investigations, most notably, the power to enter private property and take samples and inspect records. In this connection, it further clarifies the extent of the government's liability for damage resulting from the exercise of the said powers.

NEW ZEALAND - Waters Pollution Regulations, 1963

3. (1) The Council may from time to time carry out investigations for the purpose of ascertaining:

(a) The extent of the pollution of waters in any locality;

(b) The cause of any such pollution;

(c) The number of outfalls from which pollutants are discharged into the waters;

(d) The persons or authorities by which any such outfalls are controlled;

(e) The type and amount of pollutants being discharged from each such outfall;

(f) The uses for the time being made or likely in the future to be made of the waters;

(g) The extent to which any pollution found to exist should, in the circumstances, be controlled or mitigated;

(h) Any other information necessary for the purposes of these regulations.

(2) Any such investigation may be carried out at the request of any person or authority having an interest in the mitigation of pollution of the waters affected or the Council may decide to carry out an investigation on its own motion.

(3) Investigations shall be carried out in such order of priority as the Council thinks fit.

4. (1) For the purpose of carrying out any investigation under these regulations the Council, or any person authorised specially or generally in that behalf in writing by the Council, may make surveys, investigations, tests, and measurements in respect of waters pollution, and for that purpose may:

(a) Enter and re-enter from time to time upon any land to which the authority relates with such assistants, gear, appliances, and equipment as may be necessary;

(b) Require any person to furnish such information and returns in respect of the pollution of waters as may be considered necessary;

(c) Take samples of waters;

(d) Generally do all things necessary in respect of any such survey, investigation, test, or measurement.

(2) Where practicable, reasonable notice of the intention to enter upon any land owned by another person shall be given to the owner and occupier thereof.

(3) Every person who is authorised in writing as aforesaid shall produce his authority when so required by the owner or occupier of any land on which he intends to enter or has entered.

(4) Every person having any estate or interest in land injuriously affected and every person suffering any damage whatever from the exercise of any power under this regulation shall be entitled to full compensation from the Council. Any such compensation may be claimed and may be determined in the manner provided by the Public Works Act 1928.

7.3 Standards of Water Quality ("Ambient" Water Quality Standards)

Ambient water quality standards or objectives are generally fixed in relation to different categories of water. In the examples below, subsidiary legislation provides the procedure and criteria for the classification of waters (I), and for the establishment of water quality standards (II).

I - UNITED KINGDOM - The Surface Waters (River Ecosystem) (Classification) Regulations, 1994

2. Classification of waters

(1) A system employing the classifications RE1, RE2, RE3, RE4 and RE5 is prescribed as a system of classification applying to inland freshwaters which are relevant rivers or watercourses.

(2) The criteria for each of the classifications RE1 to RE5 are that the following requirements are satisfied by a series of samples of water taken and analysed in accordance with regulation 3, that is to say -

(a) the 10 percentile of the saturation of dissolved oxygen shall not be less than the value specified in respect of that classification in column (2);

(b) the 90 percentile of the biochemical oxygen demand shall not exceed the value specified in respect of that classification in column (3);

(c) the 90 percentile of the concentration of total ammonia shall not exceed the value specified in respect of that classification in column (4);

(d) the 95 percentile of the concentration of un-ionised ammonia shall not exceed the value, if any, specified in respect of that classification in column (5);

(e) the 5 percentile of the pH value shall not be less than the lower value, if any, specified in respect of that classification in column (6), and the 95 percentile of the pH value shall not exceed the higher value, if any, so specified;

(f) the 95 percentile of the concentration of dissolved copper shall not exceed the value, if any, which is specified in respect of that classification in column (8) by reference to the hardness of the water as described in column (7); and

(g) the 95 percentile of the concentration of total zinc shall not exceed the value, if any, which is specified in respect of that classification in column (9) by reference to the hardness of the water as described in column (7).

3. Sampling, analysis and compliance

The following matters, that is to say --

(a) the frequency, location and methods of sampling;

(b) the samples to be used, or to be disregarded, for the purpose of assessing whether any requirement specified in regulation 2(2) is satisfied;

(c) the requirements for analysis of samples; and

(d) the methods of determining percentile values,

shall be determined by the National Rivers Authority in accordance with the procedures, and by reference to the principles, set out in the document dated 30th March 1994 and entitled "Water Quality Objectives: Procedures used by the National Rivers Authority for the purpose of the Surface Waters (River Ecosystem) (Classification) Regulations 1994".

Schedule - River ecosystem classifications (Omitted) ...

Explanatory Note (This note is not part of the Regulations)

These Regulations prescribe a system of classifying the general quality of inland freshwaters which are relevant rivers or watercourses (as defined in section 104 of the Water Resources Act 1991 ("the Act")). The system, which consists of five classes ranging in order of decreasing quality from RE1 to RE5, will be used for establishing quality objectives under section 83 of the Act. ...

II - UNITED STATES OF AMERICA - Code of Federal Regulations - Title 40, Protection of Environment

PART 131 - Water Quality Standards

Subpart A - General Provisions

§131.1 Scope.

This part describes the requirements and procedures for developing, reviewing, revising, and approving water quality standards by the States as authorized by section 303(c) of the Clean Water Act. ...

§131.2 Purpose.

A water quality standard defines the water quality goals of a water body, or portion thereof, by designating the use or uses to be made of the water and by setting criteria necessary to protect the uses. States adopt water quality standards to protect public health or welfare, enhance the quality of water and serve the purposes of the Clean Water Act (the Act). "Serve the purposes of the Act" (as defined in sections 101(a)(2) and 303(c) of the Act) means that water quality standards should, wherever attainable, provide water quality for the protection and propagation of fish, shellfish and wildlife and for recreation in and on the water and take into consideration their use and value of public water supplies, propagation of fish, shellfish, and wildlife, recreation in and on the water, and agricultural, industrial, and other purposes including navigation.

Such standards serve the dual purposes of establishing the water quality goals for a specific water body and serve as the regulatory basis for the establishment of water-quality-based treatment controls and strategies beyond the technology-based levels of treatment required by sections 301(b) and 306 of the Act.

§131.6 Minimum requirements for water quality standards submission.

The following elements must be included in each State's water quality standards submitted to EPA for review:

(a) Use designations consistent with the provisions of sections 101(a)(2) and 303(c)(2) of the Act.

(b) Methods used and analyses conducted to support water quality standards revisions.

(c) Water quality criteria sufficient to protect the designated uses.

(d) An antidegradation policy consistent with §131.12.

(e) Certification by the State Attorney General or other appropriate legal authority within the State that the water quality standards were duly adopted pursuant to State law.

(f) General information which will aid the Agency in determining the adequacy of the scientific basis of the standards which do not include the uses specified in section 101(a)(2) of the Act as well as information on general policies applicable to State standards which may affect their application and implementation.

Subpart B - Establishment of Water Quality Standards

§131.10 Designation of uses.

(a) Each State must specify appropriate water uses to be achieved and protected. The classification of the waters of the State must take into consideration the use and value of water for public water supplies, protection and propagation of fish, shellfish and wildlife, recreation in and on the water, agricultural, industrial, and other purposes including navigation. In no case shall a State adopt waste transport or waste assimilation as a designated use for any waters of the United States.

(b) In designating uses of a water body and the appropriate criteria for those uses, the State shall take into consideration the water quality standards of downstream waters and shall ensure that its water quality standards provide for the attainment and maintenance of the water quality standards of downstream waters.

(c) States may adopt sub-categories of a use and set the appropriate criteria to reflect varying needs of such sub-categories of uses, for instance, to differentiate between cold water and warm water fisheries.

(d) At a minimum, uses are deemed attainable if they can be achieved by the imposition of effluent limits required under sections 301(b) and 306 of the Act and cost-effective and reasonable best management practices for nonpoint source control.

(e) Prior to adding or removing any use, or establishing sub-categories of a use, the State shall provide notice and an opportunity for a public hearing under §131.20(b) of this regulation.

(f) States may adopt seasonal uses as an alternative to reclassifying a water body or segment thereof to uses requiring less stringent water quality criteria. If seasonal uses are adopted, water quality criteria should be adjusted to reflect the seasonal uses, however, such criteria shall not preclude the attainment and maintenance of a more protective use in another season.

(g) States may remove a designated use which is not an existing use, as defined in §131.3, or establish sub-categories of a use if the State can demonstrate that attaining the designated use is not feasible because:

(1) Naturally occurring pollutant concentrations prevent the attainment of the use; or

(2) Natural, ephemeral, intermittent or low flow conditions or water levels prevent the attainment of the use, unless these conditions may be compensated for by the discharge of sufficient volume of effluent discharges without violating State water conservation requirements to enable uses to be met; or

(3) Human caused conditions or sources of pollution prevent the attainment of the use and cannot be remedied or would cause more environmental damage to correct than to leave in place; or

(4) Dams, diversions or other types of hydrologic modifications preclude the attainment of the use, and it is not feasible to restore the water body to its original condition or to operate such modification in a way that would result in the attainment of the use; or

(5) Physical conditions related to the natural features of the water body, such as the lack of a proper substrate, cover, flow, depth, pools, riffles, and the like, unrelated to water quality, preclude attainment of aquatic life protection uses; or

(6) Controls more stringent than those required by sections 301(b) and 306 of the Act would result in substantial and widespread economic and social impact.

(h) States may not remove designated uses if:

(1) They are existing uses, as defined in §131.3, unless a use requiring more stringent criteria is added; or

(2) Such uses will be attained by implementing effluent limits required under sections 301(b) and 306 of the Act and by implementing cost-effective and reasonable best management practices for nonpoint source control.

(i) Where existing water quality standards specify designated uses less than those which are presently being attained, the State shall revise its standards to reflect the uses actually being attained.

(j) A State must conduct a use attainability analysis as described in §131.3(g) whenever:

(1) The State designates or has designated uses that do not include the uses specified in section 101(a)(2) of the Act, or

(2) The State wishes to remove a designated use that is specified in section 101(a)(2) of the Act or to adopt subcategories of uses specified in section 101(a)(2) of the Act which require less stringent criteria.

(k) A State is not required to conduct a use attainability analysis under this regulation whenever designating uses which include those specified in section 101(a)(2) of the Act.

§131.11 Criteria.

(a) Inclusion of pollutants: (1) States must adopt those water quality criteria that protect the designated use. Such criteria must be based on sound scientific rationale and must contain sufficient parameters or constituents to protect the designated use. For waters with multiple use designations, the criteria shall support the most sensitive use.

(2) Toxic pollutants. States must review water quality data and information on discharges to identify specific water bodies where toxic pollutants may be adversely affecting water quality or the attainment of the designated water use or where the levels of toxic pollutants are at a level to warrant concern and must adopt criteria for such toxic pollutants applicable to the water body sufficient to protect the designated use. Where a State adopts narrative criteria for toxic pollutants to protect designated uses, the State must provide information identifying the method by which the State intends to regulate point source discharges of toxic pollutants on water quality limited segments based on such narrative criteria. Such information may be included as part of the standards or may be included in documents generated by the State in response to the Water Quality Planning and Management Regulations (40 CFR part 35).

(b) Form of criteria: In establishing criteria, States should:

(1) Establish numerical values based on:

(i) 304(a) Guidance; or
(ii) 304(a) Guidance modified to reflect site-specific conditions; or
(iii) Other scientifically defensible methods;

(2) Establish narrative criteria or criteria based upon biomonitoring methods where numerical criteria cannot be established or to supplement numerical criteria.

§131.12 Antidegradation policy.

(a) The State shall develop and adopt a statewide antidegradation policy and identify the methods for implementing such policy pursuant to this subpart. The antidegradation policy and implementation methods shall, at a minimum, be consistent with the following:

(1) Existing instream water uses and the level of water quality necessary to protect the existing uses shall be maintained and protected.

(2) Where the quality of the waters exceed levels necessary to support propagation of fish, shellfish, and wildlife and recreation in and on the water, that quality shall be maintained and protected unless the State finds, after full satisfaction of the intergovernmental coordination and public participation provisions of the State's continuing planning process, that allowing lower water quality is necessary to accommodate important economic or social development in the area in which the waters are located. In allowing such degradation or lower water quality, the State shall assure water quality adequate to protect existing uses fully. Further, the State shall assure that there shall be achieved the highest statutory and regulatory requirements for all new and existing point sources and all cost-effective and reasonable best management practices for nonpoint source control.

(3) Where high quality waters constitute an outstanding National resource, such as waters of National and State parks and wildlife refuges and waters of exceptional recreational or ecological significance, that water quality shall be maintained and protected.

(4) In those cases where potential water quality impairment associated with a thermal discharge is involved, the antidegradation policy and implementing method shall be consistent with section 316 of the Act.

§131.13 General policies.

States may, at their discretion, include in their State standards, policies generally affecting their application and implementation, such as mixing zones, low flows and variances. Such policies are subject to EPA review and approval.

Subpart C - Procedures for Review and Revision of Water Quality Standards

§131.20 State review and revision of water quality standards.

(a) State review. The State shall from time to time, but at least once every three years, hold public hearings for the purpose of reviewing applicable water quality standards and, as appropriate, modifying and adopting standards. Any water body segment with water quality standards that do not include the uses specified in section 101(a)(2) of the Act shall be re-examined every three years to determine if any new information has become available. If such new information indicates that the uses specified in section 101(a)(2) of the Act are attainable, the State shall revise its standards accordingly. Procedures States establish for identifying and reviewing water bodies for review should be incorporated into their Continuing Planning Process.

(b) Public participation. The State shall hold a public hearing for the purpose of reviewing water quality standards, in accordance with provisions of State law, EPA's water quality management regulation (40 CFR 130.3(b)(6)) and public participation regulation (40 CFR part 25). The proposed water quality standards revision and supporting analyses shall be made available to the public prior to the hearing.

(c) Submittal to EPA. The State shall submit the results of the review, any supporting analysis for the use attainability analysis, the methodologies used for site-specific criteria development, any general policies applicable to water quality standards and any revisions of the standards to the Regional Administrator for review and approval, within 30 days of the final State action to adopt and certify the revised standard, or if no revisions are made as a result of the review, within 30 days of the completion of the review.

§131.21 EPA review and approval of water quality standards.

(a) After the State submits its officially adopted revisions, the Regional Administrator shall either:

(1) Notify the State within 60 days that the revisions are approved, or

(2) Notify the State within 90 days that the revisions are disapproved. Such notification of disapproval shall specify the changes needed to assure compliance with the requirements of the Act and this regulation, and shall explain why the State standard is not in compliance with such requirements. Any new or revised State standard must be accompanied by some type of supporting analysis.

(b) The Regional Administrator's approval or disapproval of a State water quality standard shall be based on the requirements of the Act as described in §§131.5 and 131.6, and, with respect to Great Lakes States or Tribes (as defined in 40 CFR 132.2), 40 CFR part 132. ...

§131.22 EPA promulgation of water quality standards.

(a) If the State does not adopt the changes specified by the Regional Administrator within 90 days after notification of the Regional Administrator's disapproval, the Administrator shall promptly propose and promulgate such standard.

(b) The Administrator may also propose and promulgate a regulation, applicable to one or more States, setting forth a new or revised standard upon determining such a standard is necessary to meet the requirements of the Act.

(c) In promulgating water quality standards, the Administrator is subject to the same policies, procedures, analyses, and public participation requirements established for States in these regulations.

7.4 Standards of Effluent Quality ("Effluent" Quality Standards)

Standards of effluent quality may be found in subsidiary legislation. In view of their highly technical nature, they have not been reproduced here. As the example below illustrates, effluent quality standards may be complemented by a grant of authority to responsible government officials to tailor to the circumstances particular to each case more or less stringent standards than those laid down in the legislation.

AUSTRALIA - QUEENSLAND - Clean Waters Regulations, 1973

26. (a) In any case where the Council considers that the observance of the general standard set out in Regulation 25(a) will not ensure that the receiving waters will be fit for some other water use, the Council shall determine such other standards for the waste discharge which, in its opinion, will ensure that such receiving waters will be fit for such water use.

(b) In any case where the Council considers that the observance of a less stringent standard than the general standard set out in Regulation 25(a) will ensure that the receiving waters will be fit for all other water uses, the Council may determine other standards for the waste discharge which, in its opinion, will ensure that such receiving waters will be fit for such water uses and may determine the periods during which such less stringent standards shall apply.

(c) In any case where the Council considers such action to be necessary or desirable, it may determine specific limits for the concentrations of any of the matters or organisms referred to in Regulation 25(b) and for any of the properties referred to in Regulation 25 (c).

(d) In any case where Regulation 25 (a) does not apply, the Council shall determine specific standards for the waste discharge....

7.5 Sampling and Testing of Waters and Effluents

Sampling and testing of the waters where wastes are discharged are an essential complement to all the water pollution control mechanisms thus far reviewed insofar as sampling and testing are instrumental in (a) ascertaining the extent of pollution and (b) monitoring progress in general in the fight against pollution, and, more specifically, compliance with legal requirements. In the examples below, subsidiary legislation prescribes various matters related to sampling and testing - notably, procedures, standard methodologies and techniques, the circumstances which qualify a grant of authority to government officials to carry out sampling and testing, record-keeping, sampling methods and the effects which follow from the results of a test.

I - MALAYSIA - Environmental Quality (Sewage and Industrial Effluents) Regulations, 1979

7. For the purpose of these Regulations, the effluent discharged into any inland waters shall be analyzed in accordance with the latest edition of the methods specified in the Second Schedule[24], as amended from time to time, or in accordance with such other methods of analysis as the Director-General thinks fit.

II - MALAWI - Water Resources (Water Pollution Control) Regulations, 1978

12.... (2) Any person authorized by the Board may, at any time and without prior notice to any person, enter upon any land for the purpose of testing, or taking samples of, the waste or effluent capable of being discharged by means of the works erected pursuant to paragraph (b) of sub-regulation (1), but no compensation shall be payable by such authorized person or the Board to any person in respect of any damage done to such land by reason of such entry.

III - CAYMAN ISLANDS - Water Authority Regulations, 1985

21. (1) The Authority may from time to time, in pursuance of sub-paragraph (c) of sub-section (2) of section 44 of the Law, test the quality of an effluent being discharged under a permit.

(2) If, as a result of a test made in pursuance of the last preceding sub-section, the effluent discharged fails to meet the minimum quality standard laid down in regulation 19 or 20 or these regulations, as the case may be, the provisions of sub-section (1) of section 21 of the Law shall apply, and the Authority will charge for the test made the fee prescribed in Schedule 2[25] to these regulations.

(3) If, as a result of a test made in pursuance of sub-section (1) of this regulation, the conditions as to the quality of the effluent discharged which are contained in the relevant permit are shown to be met, no charge for the test will be made except where the test was requested by the holder of the relevant permit or by any other person, the prescribed fee being payable by one or the other, as the case may be.

IV - CANADA - SASKATCHEWAN - The Water Regulations, 2002

19. Required testing of sewage works and industrial effluent works

Every permittee shall:

(a) cause tests to be conducted and information to be collected as required in the permittee’s permit;

(b) cause operational records or logs to be maintained, including information respecting:

(i) maintenance work and any failure of treatment components;

(ii) types, dosages and total amounts of chemicals or other substances added to the sewage or industrial waste;

(iii) dates of discharge of sewage or industrial waste and the volumes of discharge;

(iv) locations from which samples for any tests are taken; and

(v) the results of any tests conducted on the samples taken pursuant to subclause (iv);

(c) promptly make available the operational records or logs mentioned in clause (b) and the results of the tests conducted and the information collected pursuant to clause (a) to the minister or to the public as required by the permit or requested by the minister; and

(d) promptly provide the minister with any additional information that the minister may reasonably request respecting the operation of the permittee’s sewage works or industrial effluent works.

38. Accredited laboratory

(1) Subject to subsections (2) and (3), on and after March 31, 2004, an accredited laboratory must perform any analysis pursuant to this Division in accordance with the parameters for which it has been accredited.

(2) For the purposes of this Division, if an accredited laboratory is not specifically accredited to perform an analysis required by this Division:

(a) the minister may approve any analytical protocols and procedures that the minister considers necessary to ensure that water is properly tested; and

(b) the accredited laboratory performing analysis pursuant to this Division shall perform the analysis in accordance with the analytical protocols and procedures authorized pursuant to clause (a).

(3) If the minister approves any analytical protocols and procedures pursuant to subsection (2), the minister shall cause those protocols and procedures to be made available to the public in any manner that the minister considers likely to bring them to the public’s attention, including causing them to be posted on the department’s Internet website.

39. Testing, test results and notice of test results

(1) Every permittee of a waterworks shall:

(a) cause water samples to be taken regularly during the operation of the waterworks to test for bacteria and chlorine, and for any other constituents that the permittee’s permit requires to be monitored, at those locations and times and at a frequency:

(i) specified in the permittee’s permit; or
(ii) as directed by an order made pursuant to the Act; and

(b) subject to subsections (2) and (3), submit the water samples taken pursuant to clause (a) for analysis to an accredited laboratory.

(2) A water sample taken for the purposes of analysis pursuant to subclause 32(1)(b)(i) may be submitted to an accredited laboratory or to any approved laboratory.

(3) A permittee may perform tests on water samples taken for the purposes of analysis for on-site total chlorine residuals, free chlorine residuals or turbidity monitoring and need not submit those water samples for testing to an accredited laboratory.

(4) If the results of any sample test taken pursuant to subsection (1) show that the level of any bacteria or any other constituent in the treated water exceeds the level or range set out in these regulations, the permittee shall:

(a) in the case a test result showing the presence of total coliforms, fecal coliforms, Escherichia coli or 200 or more organisms per 100 millilitres as an overgrowth of background bacteria, conduct any additional testing in accordance with the Bacteriological Follow-up Protocol for Waterworks Regulated by Saskatchewan Environment, EPB 205, dated November 2002 as issued by the department;

(b) in the case of any other constituent that exceeds a level set out in these regulations, conduct any additional testing at the times and frequencies and in the manner directed by the minister.

(5) For the purposes of this section, the Bacteriological Follow-up Protocol for Waterworks Regulated by Saskatchewan Environment, EPB 205, dated November 2002 as issued by the department, as amended from time to time, is adopted.

(6) If the minister considers it to be necessary, the minister may direct a permittee to conduct any further sampling and testing, in addition to that conducted pursuant to subsection (1), to monitor:

(a) the quality of the water in the waterworks; or
(b) the efficacy of the treatment process.

(7) Subject to subsection (8), any laboratory that conducts any analysis of water samples from a waterworks shall, within seven days after the date of completion of the analysis, report the results of the analysis to:

(a) the permittee of the waterworks; and
(b) the minister.

(8) If a sample submitted in accordance with subsection (1) or (6) shows the presence of total coliforms, fecal coliforms, Escherichia coli or 200 or more organisms per 100 millilitres as an overgrowth of background bacteria, the laboratory that conducted the analysis shall:

(a) notify the minister in accordance with the Bacteriological Follow-up Protocol for Waterworks Regulated by Saskatchewan Environment mentioned in subsection (5); and

(b) within 72 hours after obtaining the result, send a written copy of the result to the permittee who submitted the samples and to the minister.

(9) On being notified pursuant to subsection (8), the permittee of the waterworks shall:

(a) immediately notify the minister of the measures the permittee has taken and intends to take to remedy the situation in relation to the testing results;

(b) notify consumers served by the waterworks of the measures mentioned in clause (a) in the manner and within the time that is directed by the minister in accordance with the Bacteriological Follow-up Protocol for Waterworks Regulated by Saskatchewan Environment mentioned in subsection (5); and

(c) take any other action in relation to the results of testing and quality of water that the minister may direct to protect human health or public safety.

42. Operational records to be kept

(1) Every permittee of a waterworks shall cause operational records or logs to be maintained, including records of the following:

(a) the total water pumped into the distribution system on a daily basis or the total raw water used;

(b) the types, dosages and total amounts of chemicals applied to the water for treatment;

(c) the locations from which samples for any tests conducted by the permittee of the waterworks were taken in accordance with the permittee’s permit and the name of the person who conducted the sampling or testing and the results of those tests;

(d) any departures from normal operating procedures that may have occurred and the time and date that they occurred;

(e) any instructions that were given during operation of the waterworks to depart from normal operating practices and the name of the person who gave the instructions;

(f) any upset condition or bypass condition, the time and date of the upset condition or bypass condition and measures taken to notify others and resolve the upset condition or bypass condition;

(g) any condition of low disinfectant levels, the time, date and location of occurrence and measures taken to restore disinfectant levels to required values;

(h) the dates and results of calibrating any metering equipment and testing instruments; and

(i) the dates and types of maintenance performed on equipment and any actions taken to ensure the normal operations of the waterworks.

(2) Every permittee of a waterworks shall cause the operational records or logs mentioned in subsection (1) to be recorded and maintained in the following manner:

(a) operational records or logs must be made in chronological order, with the dates, times and testing locations clearly indicated;

(b) entries in an operational record or log must only be made by the permittee;

(c) any person making an entry in an operational record or log must do so in a manner that allows the person to be unambiguously identified as the maker of the entry;

(d) operational records or logs must be maintained for at least five years;

(e) any anomalies or instances of missing entries in an operational record or log must be accompanied by explanatory notes;

(f) operational records or logs must only contain data or information that is actually observed or produced;

(g) operational records or logs must not contain default values generated manually or by automated means;

(h) operational records or logs maintained pursuant to clause (d) must be made available promptly on request of the minister.

V - UNITED KINGDOM - Surface Waters (Dangerous Substances) (Classification) Regulations (Northern Ireland) 1998

4. Sampling and analysis

(1) The provisions of this regulation apply as respects the taking of samples of inland freshwaters, coastal waters and relevant territorial waters in relation to their classification in accordance with regulation 3.

(2) Samples shall be taken under this regulation at a frequency sufficient to show any changes in the aquatic environment, having regard in particular to natural variations in hydrological conditions.

(3) Where a discharge containing any substance listed in column (1) of any of the Schedules is made to waters mentioned in paragraph (1), samples shall be taken at a point sufficiently close to the discharge point to be representative of the quality of the aquatic environment in the area affected by the discharge,

(4) Samples taken under this regulation in relation to relevant territorial waters, coastal waters or inland freshwaters to which the classification DS1, DS2 or DS3 is for the time being applied shall be analysed using the relevant reference method of measurement respectively specified in column (3) of Schedule 1, 2 or 3 or other methods which have limits of detection, precision and accuracy at least as good.


[24] Omitted.
[25] Omitted.

Previous Page Top of Page Next Page