Revised text is underlined. New matter is in bold, only significant errors of fact are listed.
It should be noted that the Joint Meeting cannot withdraw Codex MRLs or draft MRLs; it can only recommend their withdrawal. The numerous instances of phrases such as 'the Meeting agreed to withdraw the current MRL' should therefore be interpreted as meaning 'the Meeting agreed to recommend withdrawal of the current MRL', but this change has not been included in the following list.
The corrections to the 'Residue and Analytical aspects' parts of the Report also apply to the Appraisals of the compounds in the 2002 Residue Evaluations. However in the Evaluations the lists of recommendations for MRLs and estimates of STMRs and HRs at the ends of the Appraisals and in Annex I have been corrected.
Section 4
4.3 Carbaryl
p. 42, para 1, last sentence
The radioactivity in the cellulose fraction was the largest portion in the root (0.694 mg/g 14C-carbaryl eq), and in tops accounted for 3.27 mg/g 14C-carbaryl eq.
p. 44, Water and water/sediment, para 1, last sentence
1-naphthol was the only major product. A half-life of 21 days for a 12-hour light/12-hour darkness period was calculated using the degradation rate constants under irradiated and non-irradiated conditions.
p. 44, para 3, line 3
Total radioactivity in methylene chloride extracts of the water ranged from 81.4 % at day 0 declining to 5.4% at day 14, after which it remained from 2.9 to 5.4 % up to 26 days.
p. 46, first line
...post column derivatization system and fluorescence detector.
p. 46, last para, line 4
...wet pomace, purée, paste and juice...
p. 51 Pepper
Pepper. Five trials were conducted in USA on bell peppers at the maximum GAP rate for pepper and tomato...
The Meeting agreed to recommend replacement of the current temporary CXL of 5 mg/kg for peppers with an MRL of 5 mg/kg for sweet peppers and estimated an STMR of 1.8 mg/kg and an HR of 3.8 mg/kg for carbaryl in sweet peppers.
p. 52 Garden beets, para 2
The Meeting recommends a maximum residue level of 0.1 mg/kg, an STMR of 0.025 mg/kg and an HR of 0.06 mg/kg for carbaryl in beetroot.
p. 55 Maize fodder and forage, para 2, line 5
...the median and the highest residues of carbaryl in maize forage, on a dried basis, are 20 mg/kg ([(7.7+10)/2] ÷ 0.44) and 370 mg/kg (163/0.44) respectively.
p. 57, fate of residues in processing, para 1, lines 5-7
In molasses, the residues concentrated in grapefruit and lemon (PF of 1.4 and 1.2, respectively), but not in orange (0.34 and 0.08, average 0.21). Residues were 10-30% higher in peel...and reduced in juice (average PF of 0.024 for citrus,...
p. 58, para 1, line 3
...but concentrated in wet and dry pomace (PF of 1.4 and 2.5 respectively, n=2)...
p. 58, para 7, line 2
...in fries with a PF of 0.4, and in chips and flakes with a PF of 0.03.
p. 58, last para, line 4
...they were reduced by a factor of <0.5.
p. 60, paras 1 and 2
Based on a processing factor of 0.024 for citrus juice, ... the Meeting agreed to recommend a maximum residue level of 0.5 mg/kg and an STMR-P of 0.10 mg/kg for carbaryl in citrus juice,...
Based on processing factors of 1.2 for raisins and 0.65 for grape juice, and the estimates for grapes (maximum residue level of 40 mg/kg, STMR of 4.9 mg/kg and an HR of 33 mg/kg), the Meeting recommends - an MRL of 50 mg/kg, an STMR-P of 5.9 mg/kg and an HR of 39.6 mg/kg for carbaryl in dried grapes, and an MRL of 30 mg/kg, an STMR-P - of 3.2 mg/kg and an HR of 21.45 mg/kg for carbaryl in grape juice.
p. 60, last para, line 2
...the results from two studies in meal and flour varied significantly (about 0.5 and 1.5).
p. 61, para 2
Based on processing factors of 1, 0.09 and 0.49 from wheat to bran, flour and germ and the estimations for wheat (maximum residue level of 2 mg/kg, and STMR of 0.245 mg/kg), the Meeting estimates a maximum residue level of 2 mg/kg and an STMR-P of 0.245 mg/kg for carbaryl in wheat bran, a maximum residue level of 0.2 mg/kg, and an STMR-P of 0.02 mg/kg for carbaryl in wheat flour, and a maximum residue level of 1 mg/kg and an STMR-P of 0.12 mg/kg for carbaryl in wheat germ.
p. 61, Table
Maximum farm animal dietary burden estimation
|
|
% of diet |
Residue contribution, |
|||||||||
|
Commodity |
Group |
Residues |
Basis |
% dry matter |
Residues, in dry basis, mg/kg |
Beef |
Dairy |
Poultry |
Beef |
Dairy |
Poultry |
|
Almond hulls |
AM |
50 |
MRL |
90 |
55.5 |
10 |
10 |
- |
5.6 |
5.6 |
- |
|
Sweet corn cannery waste |
|
1.48 |
STMR-P |
30 |
4.93 |
35 |
20 |
- |
1.73 |
0.99 |
- |
|
Maize forage |
AF |
400 |
MRL |
100 |
400 |
40 |
50 |
- |
160 |
200 |
- |
|
Sorghum forage |
AF |
50 |
MRL |
100 |
50 |
40 |
50 |
- |
20 |
25 |
- |
|
Maize |
GC |
0.02 |
MRL |
88 |
0.023 |
80 |
40 |
40 |
0.018 |
0.009 |
0.009 |
|
Wheat grain |
GC |
2 |
MRL |
89 |
2.24 |
50 |
40 |
80 |
1.12 |
0.90 |
1.8 |
|
TOTAL |
100 |
100 |
100 |
205.3 |
231.3 |
34.1 |
|||||
p. 62, Table
STMR farm animal dietary burden estimation
|
|
% of diet |
Residue contribution, mg/kg |
|||||||||
|
Commodity |
Group |
Residues |
Basis |
% dry matter |
Residues, in dry basis, mg/kg |
Beef |
Dairy |
Poultry |
Beef |
Dairy |
Poultry |
|
Rice hulls |
|
25.7 |
STMR-P |
90 |
28.5 |
10 |
10 |
15 |
2.85 |
2.85 |
|
|
Sweet corn cannery waste |
|
1.48 |
STPM-P |
30 |
4.93 |
35 |
20 |
- |
1.73 |
0.99 |
|
|
Rice |
GC |
8.4 |
STMR |
88 |
9.5 |
10 |
10 |
60 |
0.95 |
0.95 |
5.7 |
|
Maize |
GC |
0.02 |
STMR |
88 |
0.023 |
80 |
40 |
40 |
0.018 |
0.009 |
0.009 |
|
Wheat grain |
GC |
0.245 |
STMR |
89 |
0.275 |
50 |
40 |
80 |
0.14 |
0.11 |
|
|
TOTAL |
100 |
100 |
100 |
17.2 |
18.4 |
5.7 |
|||||
p. 63 Cattle, para 1
As the maximum dietary burden of beef and dairy cattle estimated by the Meeting were 205.3 and 231.3 mg/kg feed, respectively, the highest value (231.3 mg/kg feed) will be used....For the STMR estimation, the residue levels at 18.4 mg/kg feed (dietary burden for dairy cattle), will be derived by applying...
p. 63, Table
|
Dose (ppm) |
Carbaryl concentration (mg/kg) |
||||||||
|
Milk |
Liver |
Kidney |
Muscle |
Fat |
|||||
|
(mean) |
Highest |
Mean |
Highest |
Mean |
Highest |
Mean |
Highest |
Mean |
|
|
MRL |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(231.3) |
(0.034) |
(0.835) |
|
(1.62) |
|
(<0.035) |
|
(0.081) |
|
|
[114/ |
[0.02/ |
[0.66/ |
|
[0.85/ |
|
[<0.02/ |
|
[0.04/ |
|
|
STMR |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(18.4) |
(0.003) |
|
(0.079) |
|
(0.111) |
|
(<0.003) |
|
(0.003) |
|
[114] |
[0.02] |
|
[0.49] |
|
[0.69] |
|
[<0.02] |
|
[0.02] |
[Recommendations based on the original figures and already published have not been corrected]
p. 64, Poultry, line 1
For poultry, the maximum and the STMR estimated dietary burden were 34.1 and 5.7 mg/kg feed, respectively.
4. 5 Carbofuran
p. 68, para 3
The Meeting estimated a maximum residue level of 0.3 mg/kg, an STMR of 0.10 mg/kg and an HR of 0.17 mg/kg for carbofuran in rice grain. [No recommendation was made]
p. 69,Fate of residues in processing, para 1, line 3
...Total carbofuran residues in dried grain were <0.02 (LOD), 0.17 and <0.02 mg/kg. Residues in hulled grain were (0.02), (0.02) and <0.05 mg/kg. A processing factor of about 0.25 from the second trial can be derived. No detailed information on the milling process was provided.
The calculated processing factor from rice to husked rice (0.25) was applied to the estimates for rice (maximum residue level of 0.3 mg/kg, an STMR of 0.10 mg/kg and an HR of 0.17 mg/kg). The Meeting recommends a maximum residue level of 0.1 m/kg, an STMR-P of 0.025 mg/kg and an HR-P of 0.042 mg/kg for carbofuran in rice, husked.
4.8 Deltamethrin
p. 90, para 2, line 3
...The Meeting estimated a maximum residue level, an STMR value and an HR value for deltamethrin in hazelnuts and walnuts of 0.02*, 0.02 and 0.02 mg/kg, respectively.
4.9 Diflubenzuron
p. 113, para 8
The Meeting estimated a maximum residue level of 5 mg/kg (fresh weight) and an STMR of 1.65 mg/kg in fresh grass.
p. 119, para 2, last sentence
The Meeting estimated STMRs for milks of 0.02 mg/kg, and for meat (fat) and edible offal of 0.1 mg/kg.
para 3, last sentence
The Meeting estimated STMRs for poultry meat (fat) and eggs of 0.05 mg/kg.
4.10 Esfenvalerate
p. 132, 1st Table
|
Choose diets, % |
Residue contribution, mg/kg |
||||||||||
|
Commodity |
group |
residue |
basis |
% dry matter |
residue, on dry wt |
Beef cattle |
Dairy cattle |
Poultry |
Beef cattle |
Dairy cattle |
Poultry |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Maximum dietary burden |
0.61 |
1.42 |
0.045 |
||
p. 132, 2nd Table and text below
| |
Choose diets, % |
Residue contribution, mg/kg |
|||||||||
|
Commodity |
group |
residue |
basis |
% dry matter |
residue, on dry wt mg/kg |
Beef cattle |
Dairy cattle |
Poultry |
Beef cattle |
Dairy cattle |
Poultry |
|
Cotton seed |
SO |
0.01 |
STMR |
88 |
0.011 |
25 |
|
|
0.003 |
|
|
The esfenvalerate dietary burdens...are: beef cattle 0.61 and 0.14 mg/kg, dairy cattle 1.4 and 0.32 mg/kg and poultry 0.045 and 0.009 mg/kg.
4.13 Flutolanil
p. 146, Table
| |
Choose diets, % |
Residue contribution, mg/kg |
|||||||||
|
Commodity |
group |
residue |
basis |
% dry matter |
residue, on dry wt |
Beef cattle |
Dairy cattle |
Poultry |
Beef cattle |
Dairy cattle |
Poultry |
|
Brown rice |
CM |
2 |
MRL |
88 |
2.3 |
40 |
40 |
60 |
0.91 |
0.91 |
1.36 |
p. 147, Table
| |
Choose diets, % |
Residue contribution, mg/kg |
|||||||||
|
Commodity |
group |
residue |
basis |
% dry matter |
residue, on dry wt |
Beef cattle |
Dairy cattle |
Poultry |
Beef cattle |
Dairy cattle |
Poultry |
|
Brown rice |
CM |
0.39 |
STMR |
88 |
0.44 |
40 |
40 |
60 |
0.18 |
0.18 |
0.27 |
4.15 Imidacloprid
p. 150, Metabolic products
|
Code |
Chemical name |
Short name |
|
M04 |
1-(6-chloro-3-pyridylmethyl)-5-hydroxy-N-nitroimidazolidin-2-ylideneamine |
|
|
|
glucuronide |
5-hydroxy glucuronide |
|
M05 |
1-(6-chloro-3-pyridylmethyl)-4-hydroxy-N-nitroimidazolidin-2-ylideneamine |
|
|
|
glucuronide |
4-hydroxy glucuronide |
p. 174, penultimate para, Citrus fruits, line 3
...Based on the STMR value of 0.26 mg/kg for unprocessed whole citrus fruits, the STMR-Ps were 0.16 mg/kg for marmalade and 0.07 mg/kg for citrus juice. A maximum residue level of 10 mg/kg and an STMR of 1.94 mg/kg is estimated for citrus dried pulp.
pp. 176 and 177, Tables
Estimated maximum dietary burden of farm animals
|
Commodity |
Codex Commodity Group |
Residue |
Basis |
% Dry matter |
Residue dry wt |
Choose diets, % |
Residue contribution |
||||
|
Beef cattle |
Dairy cattle |
Poultry |
Beef cattle |
Dairy cattle |
Poultry |
||||||
|
Citrus pulp, dried |
AB |
1.94 |
STMR P |
91 |
2.13 |
20 |
20 |
|
0.427 |
0.427 |
|
|
Wheat milled by-products |
CF |
0.175 |
STMR-P |
88 |
0.199 |
35 |
10 |
50 |
0.07 |
0.0199 |
0.0995 |
|
TOTAL |
100 |
100 |
100 |
2.75 |
3.95 |
0.128 |
|||||
Estimated STMR dietary burden of farm animals
|
Commodity |
Codex Commodity Group |
Residue |
Basis |
% Dry matter |
Residue dry wt |
Choose diets, % |
Residue contribution |
||||
|
Beef cattle |
Dairy cattle |
Poultry |
Beef cattle |
Dairy cattle |
Poultry |
||||||
|
Citrus pulp, dried |
AB |
1.94 |
STMR-P |
91 |
2.13 |
20 |
20 |
|
0.427 |
0.427 |
|
|
TOTAL |
100 |
100 |
100 |
0.937 |
0.819 |
0.128 |
|||||
p. 178, para 1
The dietary burdens of imidacloprid for estimating MRLs, STMR and HR values for animal commodities ....are: 2.75 and 0.94 mg/kg for beef cattle, 3.95 and 0.82 mg/kg for dairy cattle and 0.13 mg/kg each for poultry.
p. 179, paras 2-7
As the maximum dietary burdens of beef and dairy cattle (2.75 and 3.95 ppm) were lower than the lowest feeding level of 5 ppm, the highest residues in tissues and milk were therefore calculated by applying the transfer factors to the maximum dietary burdens (transfer factor · dietary burden in mg/kg feed).
As the maximum dietary burden of dairy cows exceeds that for beef cattle, the former (3.95 mg/kg) was used to estimate the maximum residue level in muscle, liver and kidney.
As the STMR dietary burdens of beef and dairy cattle (0.94 and 0.82 ppm) were lower than the lowest feeding level of 5 ppm, the resulting STMRs in tissues and milk were calculated by applying the transfer factors to the STMR dietary burdens.
|
Dietary burden (ppm) |
Imidacloprid total residue, mg/kg |
||||||||
|
Milk |
Muscle |
Liver |
Kidney |
Fat |
|||||
|
mean |
highest |
mean |
highest |
mean |
highest |
mean |
highest |
mean |
|
|
MRL dairy/beef cattle |
(0.01) |
(0.008) |
|
(0.04) |
|
(0.024) |
|
(0.005) |
|
|
STMR beef cattle |
|
|
(0.002) |
|
(0.009) |
|
(0.0056) |
|
(0.001) |
|
STMR dairy cattle |
(0.0024) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The maximum concentrations of residues expected in tissues are 0.008 mg/kg in muscle, 0.04 mg/kg in liver, 0.024 mg/kg in kidney, 0.005 mg/kg in fat and 0.01 mg/kg in milk. The mean extrapolated concentrations are 0.002 mg/kg in muscle, 0.009 mg/kg in liver, 0.0056 mg/kg in kidney, 0.001 mg/kg in fat and 0.0024 mg/kg in milk.
The Meeting estimated maximum residue levels of 0.02* mg/kg for meat (mammalian) and milks. For edible offal (mammalian), the estimated maximum residue level is 0.05 mg/kg. The Meeting recommended that the HR values should be 0.008 mg/kg in meat (mammalian), 0.04 mg/kg in edible offal (mammalian) and 0.005 mg/kg in fat (mammalian). The estimated STMR values are 0.002 mg/kg for meat (mammalian), 0.009 mg/kg for edible offal (mammalian), 0 for fat (mammalian) and 0.0024 mg/kg for milks.
Note. The changes to the STMR and HR values have no effect on the estimates of long- or short-term dietary intake.
4.22 Piperonyl butoxide
p. 224, para 7,line 3
...The median (29.5 mg/kg) and the maximum (153 mg/kg) values were corrected for the moisture content of pea hay (12%, FAO Manual, p. 125), and became 33.5 and 174 mg/kg, respectively, on a dried basis. The Meeting estimated a maximum residue level of 200 mg/kg and an STMR of 33.5 mg/kg for piperonyl butoxide in bean hay and pea hay or fodder.
p. 225, para 3
The Meeting estimated a maximum residue level of 0.2 mg/kg, and an STMR value of 0.05 mg/kg for piperonyl butoxide in pulses after post-harvest use.
p. 226, para 2
As insufficient data from trials performed according to GAP were submitted, the Meeting agreed not to recommend a maximum residue level for piperonyl butoxide in cacao beans after post-harvest treatment.
p. 230, para 3, line 6
...a maximum residue level of 30 mg/kg and an STMR-P value of 10.8 mg/kg for wheat - wholemeal.
para 4, line 4
...The concentrations of residues in germ decreased, and that in oil increased, with average processing factors of < 0.3 and < 2.7, respectively (n = 6).
p. 231, Tables
Estimate of maximum dietary burden of farm animals
|
Commodity |
Group |
Residues |
Basis |
Dry matter |
Residues, dry weight |
% of diet |
Residue contribution |
||||
|
Beef cattle |
Dairy cows |
Poultry |
Beef cattle |
Dairy cows |
Poultry |
||||||
|
Citrus, dried pulp |
AB |
5.7 |
STMR-P |
91 |
6.3 |
20 |
10 |
- |
1.3 |
0.6 |
- |
|
Potato peel, wet |
AB |
0.15 |
STMR-P |
20 |
0.75 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
Sorghum |
GC |
30 |
MRL |
86 |
34.9 |
5 |
|
20 |
1.7 |
|
7.0 |
|
Wheat |
GC |
30 |
MRL |
89 |
33.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rice |
GC |
30 |
MRL |
88 |
34.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maize |
GC |
30 |
MRL |
88 |
34.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
100 |
100 |
100 |
147.9 |
236.6 |
78.9 |
|||||
Estimated STMR value for dietary burden of farm animals
|
Commodity |
Group |
Residues |
Basis |
Dry matter |
Residues, dry weight |
% of diet |
Residue contribution |
||||
|
Beef cattle |
Dairy cows |
Poultry |
Beef cattle |
Dairy cows |
Poultry |
||||||
|
Citrus, dried pulp |
AB |
5.7 |
STMR-P |
91 |
6.3 |
20 |
10 |
- |
1.3 |
0.6 |
- |
|
Potato peel, wet |
AB |
0.15 |
STMR-P |
20 |
0.75 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
Sorghum |
GC |
11 |
STMR |
86 |
12.8 |
5 |
|
20 |
0.6 |
|
2.5 |
|
Wheat |
GC |
11 |
STMR |
89 |
12.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wheat bran |
GC |
29.7 |
STMR |
89 |
33.4 |
50 |
40 |
80 |
16.7 |
13.4 |
26.7 |
|
Rice |
GC |
11 |
STMR |
88 |
12.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maize |
GC |
11 |
STMR |
88 |
12.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
100 |
100 |
100 |
45.6 |
68 |
29.3 |
|||||
p. 232 Residues in animal products
Cattle, para 1
The maximum calculated dietary burden of piperonyl butoxide for cattle was 147.9 mg/kg feed for beef cattle and 236.6 mg/kg for dairy cows.... The mean intake calculated for dairy cattle (67 mg/kg feed) was higher than that for beef cattle (45.6 mg/kg) and was used to estimate the STMR value for milk and cattle tissues.
p. 233
Poultry
The calculated maximum and mean intakes of piperonyl butoxide for poultry, 78.9 and 29.3 mg/kg feed respectively, were used in the estimations for tissues and egg. For the estimation of the maximum residue level in tissues, the values at the calculated dietary burden (78.9 mg/kg feed) were estimated by interpolation from the highest residue values at 61.2 and 199 ppm in feed. For the STMR estimation, the values at the 29.3 mg/kg feed dietary burden were estimated by interpolation of the mean residue data at 20.4 and 61.2 ppm....
p. 234, Table
Residues in poultry products from poultry treated orally
|
Dose (ppm) |
Piperonyl butoxide (mg/kg) |
|||||||
|
Interpolated/ |
Eggs |
Liver |
Muscle |
Fat |
||||
|
Actual |
Highest |
Mean |
Highest |
Mean |
Highest |
Mean |
Highest |
Mean |
|
MRL |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
78.9/ |
0.549/ |
|
<0.063/ |
|
0.218/ |
|
3.15/ |
|
|
61.2 |
0.35 |
|
< 0.05 |
|
0.12 |
|
1.7 |
|
|
199 |
1.9 |
|
0.15 |
|
0.88 |
|
13 |
|
|
STMR |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29.3/ |
|
0.063/ |
|
<0.01/ |
|
<0.058/ |
|
0.52/ |
|
20.4 |
|
0.03 |
|
- |
|
< 0.05 |
|
0.30 |
|
61.2 |
|
0.18 |
|
< 0.05 |
|
0.09 |
|
1.3 |
4.23 Phosmet
p. 238, para 2
The phosmet processing factors for oranges to juice and dried pulp were both <0.05. This factor applied to the STMR (0.64 mg/kg) for citrus whole fruit provided the STMR-P for orange juice - (0.03 mg/kg).
4.24 Propargite
p. 245, 1st line
....Ten trials support this GAP: 0.39, 0.59, 0.63, 0.65, 0.74, 0.81, 0.97, 1.1, 1.2, 3.0 mg/kg.
Peach, para 2
The Meeting agreed that the residue data for peach, nectarine, and plum were from the same population and could be combined. The GAPs are similar, 1.5 - 3.2 kg ai/ha, PHI 14 or 21 days. The 25 values in ranked order are: 0.39, 0.57, 0.59, 0.63, 0.65, 0.73, 0.74, 0.80, 0.81, 0.82, 0.86, 0.87, 0.89, 0.94, 0.97, 0.99, 1.0, 1.1, 1.2 (3), 1.3, 1.4, 1.9, 3.0 mg/kg. The Meeting estimated a maximum residue level of 4 mg/kg for stone fruit (excluding cherry)....The Meeting estimated an STMR of 0.89 mg/kg for stone fruit (excluding cherry) with stone.
252, penultimate para, line 4
...These replace the previous recommendations for maximum residue levels of 0.1 F and 0.1 (fat). The Meeting also estimated a maximum residue level for offal of mammals at 0.1 (*) mg/kg.
p. 253, main para, line 6
...The Meeting estimated maximum residue levels for poultry meat (0.1 mg/kg * (fat)) and eggs (0.1 mg/kg *) to replace 0.1 mg.kg (fat) and 0.1 mg/kg, and estimated a maximum residue level of 0.1 mg/kg * for poultry offal.
4.25 Tolylfluanid
p. 267, para 1
These two sets of results seem to belong to similar populations. The combined concentrations from 25 trials in ranked order were: 0.03(2), 0.05, 0.08, 0.12, 0.14, 0.20, 0.23, 0.32, 0.35, 0.41, 0.43, 0.47, 0.55, 0.73, 0.75, 0.77(2), 0.90, 1.1, 1.4, 1.7, 1.9, 2.6 and 2.65 mg/kg for tolylfluanid;...
Annex 1
|
Pesticide |
ADI, |
CCN |
Commodity |
Recommended MRL, |
STMR or STMR-P, |
HR or HR-P, |
|
|
New |
Previous |
||||||
|
Carbaryl** (008) |
|
|
Citrus fruit, edible portion |
|
|
0.487 |
1.16 |
| |
|
JF 0001 |
Citrus fruit juice |
0.5 |
|
0.10 |
|
| |
|
MF 0100 |
Mammamalian fats (except milk fats) |
|
|
0.003 |
0.062 |
| |
|
JF 0269 |
Grape juice |
30 |
|
3.2 |
21.45 |
|
[Delete row] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
ML 0106 |
Milks |
0.05 |
0.1 (*) T |
0.003 |
|
| |
|
AO5 1900 |
Nuts (whole in shell) |
W |
10 T |
|
|
| |
|
VO 0445 |
Peppers, Sweet |
5 |
5 T |
|
|
| |
|
FS 0012 |
Stone fruits, except Cherries1 |
10 |
|
2.05 |
7.8 |
| |
|
VR 508 |
Sweet potato |
0.02 (*) |
|
0.02 |
0.02 |
| |
|
CM 0654 |
Wheat bran, unprocessed |
2 |
20 |
0.245 |
|
|
Carbofuran (096) |
0-0.002 |
VO 0447 |
Sweet corn (corn-on-the-cob) |
0.1 |
W |
0.04 |
0.08 |
|
Deltamethrin**(135) |
0-0.01 |
MM 0095 |
Meat (from mammals other than marine mammals) |
0.5 (fat) |
0.5 (fat) |
0.155 |
0.186 |
| |
|
FT 0305 |
Olives |
1 |
0.1 |
0.21 |
0.31 |
| |
|
PM 0110 |
Poultry meat |
0.1 (fat) |
0.01 (*) |
0.038 |
0.09 |
| |
|
Residue (For compliance with MRLs and estimations of dietary intake): sum of deltamethrin,. a-R-deltamethrin ([1R-[1a(R*),3a]]- a-cyano-3-phenoxybenzyl 3-(2,2-dibromovinyl)-2,2-dimethylcyclopropanecarboxylate) and trans-deltamethrin ([1R-[1a(S*),3b]- a-cyano-3-phenoxybenzyl 3-(2,2-dibromovinyl)-2,2-dimethylcyclopropanecarboxylate) The residue is fat-soluble 1 The information provided to the JMPR precludes an estimate that the dietary intake would be below the acute reference dose. Acute RfD: 0.05 mg/kg bw |
|||||
|
Diflubenzuron** (130) |
0-0.02 |
JF 0226 |
Apple juice |
- |
- |
0.072 |
|
| |
|
AS 0649 |
Rice straw and fodder, dry |
0.7 |
|
0.02 |
|
|
Esfenvalerate* (204) |
0-0.02 |
|
|
|
Fenvalerate (CXL) |
|
|
| |
|
GC 0654 |
Wheat |
0.05 |
|
0.01 |
0.03 |
| |
|
AS 0654 |
Wheat straw and fodder, dry |
2 |
2 |
0.47 |
|
|
Imidacloprid (206) |
0-0.06 |
JF 0001 |
Citrus juice |
|
|
0.07 |
|
| |
|
AB 0001 |
Citrus pulp, dry |
10 |
|
1.94 |
|
| |
|
|
Citrus marmalade (orange) |
|
|
0.16 |
|
| |
|
MO 0105 |
Edible offal (Mammalian) |
0.05 |
|
0.009 |
0.036 |
| |
|
MM 0095 |
Meat (from mammals other than marine mammals) |
0.02* |
|
0.002 (muscle) |
(muscle) |
| |
|
ML0106 |
Milks |
0.02* |
|
0.0024 |
|
| |
|
VO 0051 |
Peppersa [Delete superscript] |
1 |
|
0.15 |
0.48 |
| |
|
a Expressed on dry weight basis Residue (For compliance with MRLs and for estimation of dietary intake): Sum of imidacloprid and its transformation products containing the 6-chloropyridinyl moiety, expressed as imidacloprid. Acute RfD: 0.4 mg/kg bw |
|||||
|
Oxamyl** (126) |
0-0.009 |
ML 0106 |
Milks |
0.02 (*) |
|
0 |
0 |
| |
|
AL 0697 |
Peanut fodder |
0.2 (dry wt) |
2 |
0.041 (dry wt) |
|
| |
|
OC 0697 |
Peanut oil, crude |
|
|
0.0034 |
|
| |
|
OR 0697 |
Peanut oil, refined |
|
|
0.0034 |
|
|
Phosmet (103) |
0-0.01 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
FP 0009 |
Pome fruits1 |
|
|
3.3 |
7.3 |
|
Piperonyl butoxide (062) |
0-0.2 |
MM 0812 |
Cattle meat |
5a (fat) |
|
2.6 (fat)a,b |
|
| |
|
MM 0095 |
Meat (from mammals others than marine mammals), except cattle |
2 (fat) |
|
0.14 |
|
| |
|
PM 0110 |
Poultry meat |
7 (fat)a |
|
2.0 (fat)a,b |
|
| |
|
GC 0654 |
Wheat |
W d |
10 Po |
11 |
|
| |
|
Residue (For compliance with MRLs and for estimation of dietary intake) for plant and animal commodities: piperonyl butoxide The residue is fat soluble a The MRL accommodates external animal treatment b Not STMR value but median residue concentrations in animals in a treated group c The MRL for cattle kidney (MO 1280) is higher than for other species of kidneys because of direct treatment of cattle. The Codex commodity MO 0098 includes cattle in its standard wording, but cattle kidney has to be excluded in this case because of the higher cattle kidney MRL d Now included in Cereal grains Acute RfD: Unnecessary |
|||||
|
Propargite** (113) |
0-0.01 |
AM 0660 |
Almond hulls |
50 |
- |
15 |
|
| |
|
SO 0691 |
Cottonseed |
0.1 |
0.1* |
0.02 |
|
| |
|
GC 0645 |
Maize |
0.1 |
0.1* |
0.05 |
|
| |
|
MO0105 |
Edible offal (Mammalian) |
0.1 * |
- |
0.004 |
|
| |
|
|
Wine |
0.2 |
- |
0.01 |
|
|
Tolylfluanid** (162) |
0-0.08 |
|
Grape wine |
|
|
0.75 |
|
FAO TECHNICAL PAPERS
FAO PLANT PRODUCTION AND PROTECTION PAPERS
|
1 |
Horticulture: a select bibliography, 1976 (E) |
|
2 |
Cotton specialists and research institutions in selected countries, 1976 (E) |
|
3 |
Food legumes: distribution, adaptability and biology of yield, 1977 (E F S) |
|
4 |
Soybean production in the tropics, 1977 (C E F S) |
|
4 Rev.1 |
Soybean production in the tropics (first revision), 1982 (E) |
|
5 |
Les systèmes pastoraux sahéliens, 1977 (F) |
|
6 |
Pest resistance to pesticides and crop loss assessment - Vol. 1, 1977 (E F S) |
|
6/2 |
Pest resistance to pesticides and crop loss assessment - Vol. 2, 1979 (E F S) |
|
6/3 |
Pest resistance to pesticides and crop loss assessment - Vol. 3, 1981 (E F S) |
|
7 |
Rodent pest biology and control - Bibliography 1970-74, 1977 (E) |
|
8 |
Tropical pasture seed production, 1979 (E F** S**) |
|
9 |
Food legume crops: improvement and production, 1977 (E) |
|
10 |
Pesticide residues in food, 1977 - Report, 1978 (E F S) |
|
10 Rev. |
Pesticide residues in food 1977 - Report, 1978 (E) |
|
10 Sup. |
Pesticide residues in food 1977 - Evaluations, 1978 (E) |
|
11 |
Pesticide residues in food 1965-78 - Index and summary, 1978 (E F S) |
|
12 |
Crop calendars, 1978 (E/F/S) |
|
13 |
The use of FAO specifications for plant protection products, 1979 (E F S) |
|
14 |
Guidelines for integrated control of rice insect pests, 1979 (Ar C E F S) |
|
15 |
Pesticide residues in food 1978 - Report, 1979 (E F S) |
|
15 Sup. |
Pesticide residues in food 1978 - Evaluations, 1979 (E) |
|
16 |
Rodenticides: analyses, specifications, formulations, 1979 (E F S) |
|
17 |
Agrometeorological crop monitoring and forecasting, 1979 (C E F S) |
|
18 |
Guidelines for integrated control of maize pests, 1979(C E) |
|
19 |
Elements of integrated control of sorghum pests, 1979(E F S) |
|
20 |
Pesticide residues in food 1979 - Report, 1980 (E F S) |
|
20 Sup. |
Pesticide residues in food 1979 - Evaluations, 1980 (E) |
|
21 |
Recommended methods for measurement of pest resistance to pesticides, 1980 (E F) |
|
22 |
China: multiple cropping and related crop production technology, 1980 (E) |
|
23 |
China: development of olive production, 1980 (E) |
|
24/1 |
Improvement and production of maize, sorghum and millet - Vol. 1. General principles, 1980 (E F) |
|
24/2 |
Improvement and production of maize, sorghum and millet - Vol. 2. Breeding, agronomy and seed production, 1980 (E F) |
|
25 |
Prosopis tamarugo: fodder tree for arid zones, 1981 (E F S) |
|
26 |
Pesticide residues in food 1980 - Report, 1981 (E F S) |
|
26 Sup. |
Pesticide residues in food 1980 - Evaluations, 1981 (E) |
|
27 |
Small-scale cash crop farming in South Asia, 1981 (E) |
|
28 |
Second expert consultation on environmental criteria for registration of pesticides, 1981 (E F S) |
|
29 |
Sesame: status and improvement, 1981 (E) |
|
30 |
Palm tissue culture, 1981 (C E) |
|
31 |
An eco-climatic classification of intertropical Africa, 1981 (E) |
|
32 |
Weeds in tropical crops: selected abstracts, 1981 (E) |
|
32 Sup.1 |
Weeds in tropical crops: review of abstracts, 1982 (E) |
|
33 |
Plant collecting and herbarium development, 1981 (E) |
|
34 |
Improvement of nutritional quality of food crops, 1981(C E) |
|
35 |
Date production and protection, 1982 (Ar E) |
|
36 |
El cultivo y la utilización del tarwi - Lupinus mutabilis Sweet, 1982 (S) |
|
37 |
Pesticide residues in food 1981 - Report, 1982 (E F S) |
|
38 |
Winged bean production in the tropics, 1982 (E) |
|
39 |
Seeds, 1982 (E/F/S) |
|
40 |
Rodent control in agriculture, 1982 (Ar C E F S) |
|
41 |
Rice development and rainfed rice production, 1982 (E) |
|
42 |
Pesticide residues in food 1981 - Evaluations, 1982 (E) |
|
43 |
Manual on mushroom cultivation, 1983 (E F) |
|
44 |
Improving weed management, 1984 (E F S) |
|
45 |
Pocket computers in agrometeorology, 1983 (E) |
|
46 |
Pesticide residues in food 1982 - Report, 1983 (E F S) |
|
47 |
The sago palm, 1983 (E F) |
|
48 |
Guidelines for integrated control of cotton pests, 1983(Ar E F S) |
|
49 |
Pesticide residues in food 1982 - Evaluations, 1983 (E) |
|
50 |
International plant quarantine treatment manual, 1983(C E) |
|
51 |
Handbook on jute, 1983 (E) |
|
52 |
The palmyrah palm: potential and perspectives, 1983(E) |
|
53/1 |
Selected medicinal plants, 1983 (E) |
|
54 |
Manual of fumigation for insect control, 1984 (C E F S) |
|
55 |
Breeding for durable disease and pest resistance, 1984 (C E) |
|
56 |
Pesticide residues in food 1983 - Report, 1984 (E F S) |
|
57 |
Coconut, tree of life, 1984 (E S) |
|
58 |
Economic guidelines for crop pest control, 1984 (E F S) |
|
59 |
Micropropagation of selected rootcrops, palms, citrus and ornamental species, 1984 (E) |
|
60 |
Minimum requirements for receiving and maintaining tissue culture propagating material, 1985 (E F S) |
|
61 |
Pesticide residues in food 1983 - Evaluations, 1985 (E) |
|
62 |
Pesticide residues in food 1984 - Report, 1985 (E F S) |
|
63 |
Manual of pest control for food security reserve grain stocks, 1985 (C E) |
|
64 |
Contribution à l'écologie des aphides africains, 1985 (F) |
|
65 |
Amélioration de la culture irriguée du riz des petits fermiers, 1985 (F) |
|
66 |
Sesame and safflower: status and potentials, 1985 (E) |
|
67 |
Pesticide residues in food 1984 - Evaluations, 1985 (E) |
|
68 |
Pesticide residus in food 1985 - Report, 1986 (E F S) |
|
69 |
Breeding for horizontal resistance to wheat diseases, 1986 (E) |
|
70 |
Breeding for durable resistance in perennial crops, 1986 (E) |
|
71 |
Technical guideline on seed potato micropropagation and multiplication, 1986 (E) |
|
72/1 |
Pesticide residues in food 1985 - Evaluations - Part I: Residues, 1986 (E) |
|
72/2 |
Pesticide residues in food 1985 - Evaluations - Part II: Toxicology, 1986 (E) |
|
73 |
Early agrometeorological crop yield assessment, 1986 (E F S) |
|
74 |
Ecology and control of perennial weeds in Latin America, 1986 (E S) |
|
75 |
Technical guidelines for field variety trials, 1993 (E F S) |
|
76 |
Guidelines for seed exchange and plant introduction in tropical crops, 1986 (E) |
|
77 |
Pesticide residues in food 1986 - Report, 1986 (E F S) |
|
78 |
Pesticide residues in food 1986 - Evaluations - Part I: Residues, 1986 (E) |
|
78/2 |
Pesticide residues in food 1986 - Evaluations - Part II: Toxicology, 1987 (E) |
|
79 |
Tissue culture of selected tropical fruit plants, 1987 (E) |
|
80 |
Improved weed management in the Near East, 1987 (E) |
|
81 |
Weed science and weed control in Southeast Asia, 1987 (E) |
|
82 |
Hybrid seed production of selected cereal, oil and vegetable crops, 1987 (E) |
|
83 |
Litchi cultivation, 1989 (E S) |
|
84 |
Pesticide residues in food 1987 - Report, 1987 (E F S) |
|
85 |
Manual on the development and use of FAO specifications for plant protection products, 1987 (E** F S) |
|
86/1 |
Pesticide residues in food 1987 - Evaluations - Part I: Residues, 1988 (E) |
|
86/2 |
Pesticide residues in food 1987 - Evaluations - Part II: Toxicology, 1988 (E) |
|
87 |
Root and tuber crops, plantains and bananas in developing countries - challenges and opportunities, 1988 (E) |
|
88 |
Jessenia and Oenocarpus: neotropical oil palms worthy of domestication, 1988 (E S) |
|
89 |
Vegetable production under arid and semi-arid conditions in tropical Africa, 1988 (E F) |
|
90 |
Protected cultivation in the Mediterranean climate, 1990 (E F S) |
|
91 |
Pastures and cattle under coconuts, 1988 (E S) |
|
92 |
Pesticide residues in food 1988 - Report, 1988 (E F S) |
|
93/1 |
Pesticide residues in food 1988 - Evaluations - Part I: Residues, 1988 (E) |
|
93/2 |
Pesticide residues in food 1988 - Evaluations - Part II: Toxicology, 1989 (E) |
|
94 |
Utilization of genetic resources: suitable approaches, agronomical evaluation and use, 1989 (E) |
|
95 |
Rodent pests and their control in the Near East, 1989 (E) |
|
96 |
Striga - Improved management in Africa, 1989 (E) |
|
97/1 |
Fodders for the Near East: alfalfa, 1989 (Ar E) |
|
97/2 |
Fodders for the Near East: annual medic pastures, 1989 (Ar E F) |
|
98 |
An annotated bibliography on rodent research in Latin America 1960-1985, 1989 (E) |
|
99 |
Pesticide residues in food 1989 - Report, 1989 (E F S) |
|
100 |
Pesticide residues in food 1989 - Evaluations - Part I: Residues, 1990 (E) |
|
100/2 |
Pesticide residues in food 1989 - Evaluations - Part II: Toxicology, 1990 (E) |
|
101 |
Soilless culture for horticultural crop production, 1990 (E) |
|
102 |
Pesticide residues in food 1990 - Report, 1990 (E F S) |
|
103/1 |
Pesticide residues in food 1990 - Evaluations - Part I: Residues, 1990 (E) |
|
104 |
Major weeds of the Near East, 1991 (E) |
|
105 |
Fundamentos teórico-prácticos del cultivo de tejidos vegetales, 1990 (S) |
|
106 |
Technical guidelines for mushroom growing in the tropics, 1990 (E) |
|
107 |
Gynandropsis gynandra (L.) Briq. - a tropical leafy vegetable - its cultivation and utilization, 1991 (E) |
|
108 |
Carambola cultivation, 1993 (E S) |
|
109 |
Soil solarization, 1991 (E) |
|
110 |
Potato production and consumption in developing countries, 1991 (E) |
|
111 |
Pesticide residues in food 1991 - Report, 1991 (E) |
|
112 |
Cocoa pest and disease management in Southeast Asia and Australasia, 1992 (E) |
|
113/1 |
Pesticide residues in food 1991 - Evaluations - Part I: Residues, 1991 (E) |
|
114 |
Integrated pest management for protected vegetable cultivation in the Near East, 1992 (E) |
|
115 |
Olive pests and their control in the Near East, 1992 (E) |
|
116 |
Pesticide residues in food 1992 - Report, 1993 (E F S) |
|
117 |
Quality declared seed, 1993 (E F S) |
|
118 |
Pesticide residues in food 1992 - Evaluations - Part I: Residues, 1993 (E) |
|
119 |
Quarantine for seed, 1993 (E) |
|
120 |
Weed management for developing countries, 1993 (E S) |
|
120/1 |
Weed management for developing countries, Addedum 1, 2003 (E) |
|
121 |
Rambutan cultivation, 1993 (E) |
|
122 |
Pesticide residues in food 1993 - Report, 1993 (E F S) |
|
123 |
Rodent pest management in eastern Africa, 1994 (E) |
|
124 |
Pesticide residues in food 1993 - Evaluations - Part I: Residues, 1994 (E) |
|
125 |
Plant quarantine: theory and practice, 1994 (Ar) |
|
126 |
Tropical root and tuber crops - Production, perspectives and future prospects, 1994 (E) |
|
127 |
Pesticide residues in food 1994 - Report, 1994 (E) |
|
128 |
Manual on the development and use of FAO specifications for plant protection products - Fourth edition, 1995 (E F S) |
|
129 |
Mangosteen cultivation, 1995 (E) |
|
130 |
Post-harvest deterioration of cassava - A biotechnology perspective, 1995 (E) |
|
131/1 |
Pesticide residues in food 1994 - Evaluations - Part I: Residues, Volume 1, 1995 (E) |
|
131/2 |
Pesticide residues in food 1994 - Evaluations - Part I: Residues, Volume 2, 1995 (E) |
|
132 |
Agro-ecology, cultivation and uses of cactus pear, 1995 (E) |
|
133 |
Pesticide residues in food 1995 - Report, 1996 (E) |
|
134 |
(Number not assigned) |
|
135 |
Citrus pest problems and their control in the Near East, 1996 (E) |
|
136 |
El pepino dulce y su cultivo, 1996 (S) |
|
137 |
Pesticide residues in food 1995 - Evaluations - Part I: Residues, 1996 (E) |
|
138 |
Sunn pests and their control in the Near East, 1996 (E) |
|
139 |
Weed management in rice, 1996 (E) |
|
140 |
Pesticide residues in food 1996 - Report, 1997 (E) |
|
141 |
Cotton pests and their control in the Near East, 1997 (E) |
|
142 |
Pesticide residues in food 1996 - Evaluations - Part I: Residues, 1997 (E) |
|
143 |
Management of the whitefly-virus complex, 1997 (E) |
|
144 |
Plant nematode problems and their control in the Near East region, 1997 (E) |
|
145 |
Pesticide residues in food 1997 - Report, 1998 (E) |
|
146 |
Pesticide residues in food 1997 - Evaluations - Part I: Residues, 1998 (E) |
|
147 |
Soil solarization and integrated management of soilborne pests, 1998 (E) |
|
148 |
Pesticide residues in food 1998 - Report, 1999 (E) |
|
149 |
Manual on the development and use of FAO specifications for plant protection products - Fifth edition, including the new procedure, 1999 (E) |
|
150 |
Restoring farmers’ seed systems in disaster situations, 1999 (E) |
|
151 |
Seed policy and programmes for sub-Saharan Africa, 1999 (E F) |
|
152/1 |
Pesticide residues in food 1998 - Evaluations - Part I: Residues, Volume 1, 1999 (E) |
|
152/2 |
Pesticide residues in food 1998 - Evaluations - Part I: Residues, Volume 2, 1999 (E) |
|
153 |
Pesticide residues in food 1999 - Report, 1999 (E) |
|
154 |
Greenhouses and shelter structures for tropical regions, 1999 (E) |
|
155 |
Vegetable seedling production manual, 1999 (E) |
|
156 |
Date palm cultivation, 1999 (E) |
|
156 Rev.1 |
Date palm cultivation, 2002 (E) |
|
157 |
Pesticide residues in food 1999 - Evaluations - Part I: Residues, 2000 (E) |
|
158 |
Ornamental plant propagation in the tropics, 2000 (E) |
|
159 |
Seed policy and programmes in the Near East and North Africa, 2000 |
|
160 |
Seed policy and programmes for Asia and the Pacific, 2000 (E) |
|
161 |
Silage making in the tropics with particular emphasis on smallholders, 2000 (E S) |
|
162 |
Grassland resource assessment for pastoral systems, 2001, (E) |
|
163 |
Pesticide residues in food 2000 - Report, 2001 (E) |
|
164 |
Seed policy and programmes in Latin America and the Caribbean, 2001 (E S) |
|
165 |
Pesticide residues in food 2000 - Evaluations - Part I, 2001 (E) |
|
166 |
Global report on validated alternatives to the use of methyl bromide for soil fumigation, 2001 (E) |
|
167 |
Pesticide residues in food 2001 - Report, 2001 (E) |
|
168 |
Seed policy and programmes for the Central and Eastern European countries, Commonwealth of Independent States and other countries in transition, 2001 (E) |
|
169 |
Cactus (Opuntia spp.) as forage, 2001 (E) |
|
170 |
Submission and evaluation of pesticide residues data for the estimation of maximum residue levels in food and feed, 2002 (E) |
|
171 |
Pesticide residues in food 2001 - Evaluations - Part I, 2002 (E) |
|
172 |
Pesticide residues in food, 2002 - Report, 2002 (E) |
|
173 |
Manual on development and use of FAO and WHO specifications for pesticides, 2002 (E) |
|
174 |
Genotype × environment interaction - Challenges and opportunities for plant breeding and cultivar recommendations, 2002 (E) |
|
175/1 |
Pesticide residues in food 2002 - Evaluations - Part 1: Residues - Volume 1 (E) |
|
175/2 |
Pesticide residues in food 2002 - Evaluations - Part 1: Residues - Volume 2 (E) |
|
176 |
Pesticide residues in food 2003 - Report, 2004 (E) |
Availability: December 2003
|
Ar |
- |
Arabic |
|
C |
- |
Chinese |
|
E |
- |
English |
|
F |
- |
French |
|
P |
- |
Portuguese |
|
S |
- |
Spanish |
|
Multil |
- |
Multilingual |
|
* |
|
Out of print |
|
** |
|
In preparation |
The FAO Technical Papers are available through the authorized FAO Sales Agents or directly from Sales and Marketing Group, FAO, Viale delle Terme di Caracalla, 00100 Rome, Italy.
