Previous PageTable Of ContentsNext Page

Problems faced by investors

Forest tree planting on private land has faced a number of problems. The most important constraints appear to be lack of knowledge on tree planting, difficulty in selecting appropriate species, uncertain market prices, lack of land and difficulty in obtaining quality seedlings (Table 16).


Table 16.  Obstacles and problems faced in forest tree planting

Obstacle/problem

Companies

(n =  6)

Individual planters

(n = 21)

Total

(n = 27)

Lack of knowledge on tree planting

4

4

8

Difficulty in selecting appropriate species

4

2

6

Uncertain market price

4

1

5

Lack of land

3

1

4

Difficulty in obtaining quality seedlings

3

1

4

Lack of market

1

2

3

Labour shortage

3

0

3

Note: Some respondents provided multiple answers.

Future intentions

The future of private sector plantations in Peninsular Malaysia appears to look bleak. The future plans of most respondents do not include forest tree planting (Table 17). Only one company plans to extend its holdings. It has planted 20 ha of mixed tree species as buffer zones around its oil palm and rubber plantations. It plans to plant tembusu in 2002/03, balau in 2003/04 and binuang in 2004/05. The rest of the respondents apparently are in a wait-and-see mode. The general view is that if the trees grow well and the timber can be sold profitably, then most respondents would consider planting forest trees in new areas.

Table 17. Future plans to plant forest trees

 

Companies

(n = 6 )

Individual planters

(n = 21)

Total

(n = 27)

 

No.

%

No.

%

No.

%

With future plans

1

17

0

0

1

4

Without future plans

5

83

21

100

26

96

Total

6

100

21

100

27

100

Plantation characteristics

Species choice

For the last 10 years, the two most popular tree species have been teak and sentang. The choice was very much influenced by the promotion of these two species by government agencies and the private sector. Monocropping and mixed cropping are equally important. Of the 27 respondents, 22 percent planted teak only, 22 percent sentang only and 4 percent Maesopsis eminii only. The remaining 52 percent had plantations composed of at least two species (Table 18).

Table 18. Type of forest tree species planted

Type of tree

Companies

(n = 6)

Individual planters

(n = 21)

Total

(n = 27)

No.

%

No.

%

No.

%

Teak only

1

17

5

24

6

22

Senta ng only

1

17

5

24

6

22

Maesopsis eminii only

1

17

0

0

1

4

Teak and oil palm

1

17

2

10

3

11

Sentang and rubber

1

17

6

29

7

26

Teak and banana

0

0

1

24

1

4

Teak and tongkat ali

0

0

2

10

2

7

Mixed forest species

1

17

0

0

1

4

Total

6

100

21

100

27

100

Other than expected high economic returns, there are three main reasons for choosing a specific type of forest tree species for planting. Of the six companies, three felt that the selected species were suitable for the land type. Among the 21 individual planters, seven said that RISDA advised them to plant the species. For the individual planters, other reasons given included advice from friends, relatives and agents who sold seedlings, and investment for children.

Area planted

In 2002, the total area planted with forest trees by the 27 respondents was 495 ha comprising 448.6 ha (91 percent) by companies and 46.7 ha (9 percent) by individuals (Table 19). An obvious characteristic of tree planting is the pattern of mono- and mixed cultivation among the respondents. Of the total 448.6 ha managed by the six companies, 27 percent is monocropped. Individual planters on the other hand do not appear to have a preference for either monocropping or mixed cropping (Table 19). Teak accounts for 346.4 ha (70 percent), Maesopsis eminii for 96 ha (19 percent), sentang 44.9 ha (9 percent) and other mixed forest species 8 ha (2 percent). The individual planters also intercropped teak with banana and tongkat ali, which is not practised by the companies.

Table 19. Area of forest trees planted (ha)

Type of tree

Companies

(n = 6)

Individual planters(n = 21)

Total

(n = 27)

 

No.

%

No.

%

No.

%

Teak only

8.0

2

18.8

40

26.8

5

Sentang only

20.0

4

4.6

10

24.6

5

Maesopsis eminii only

96.0

21

0

0

96.0

20

Teak and oil palm

300.0

67

8.6

18

308.6

62

Sentang and rubber

16.6

4

3.7

8

20.3

4

Teak and banana

0

0

7.0

15

7.0

1

Teak and tongkat ali

0

0

4.0

9

4.0

1

Mixed forestry species

8

2

0

0

8.0

2

Total

448.6

100

46.7

100

495.3

100



Planting year and spacing

All the respondents planted trees between 1990 and 2000 (Table 20). While one-quarter of the individual planters planted trees between 1993 and 1995, companies only did so in the beginning of 1996. There were two phases of planting, namely the 1993/95 period involving only the individual planters, and the 1996/2000 period involving both individual planters and companies. No one planted in 2001.

Table 20. Planting year of forest trees (ha)

Year

Companies

(n =6)

Individual planters

(n = 21)

Total

(n = 27)

 

No.

%

No.

%

No.

%

1993

0

0

1

4

1

4

1994

0

0

2

10

2

7

1995

0

0

2

10

2

7

1996

3

50

2

10

5

19

1997

0

0

3

14

3

11

1998

2

33

2

10

4

15

1999

1

17

8

38

9

33

2000

0

0

1

4

1

4

Total

6

100

21

100

27

100


The spacing selected was not uniform (Table 21). The respondents made their own decisions with regard to the planting distance. A good example is the individual planters who inter-cropped sentang and rubber in Malacca, encouraged by RISDA. Even though they attended the same briefing on forest tree planting, only two of them followed the same planting distance of 4 x 6.4 m.

Table 21.  Planting distance practised

Planting distance (m) by respondent

Type of tree

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

Teak only

1.5 x 1.5

2.4 x 2.4

2.4 x 3

2.5 x 3.8

3 x 3

3 x 3.7

-

Sentang only

1.5 x 2.4

2 x 2

2 x 3.6

2.5 x 3

3 x 3

3 x 3

-

Maesopsis eminii only

4 x 4

-

-

-

-

-

-

Teak and oil palm

3 x 15

4.6 x 4.6

4.7 x 6.4

-

-

-

-

Sentang and rubber

2.4 x 2.4

2.5 x 3.2

2.7 x 3

3 x 5.5

3 x 6

4 x 6.4

4 x 6.4

Teak and banana

2.5 x 4

-

-

-

-

-

-

Teak and tongkat ali

3 x 3

4 x 4

-

-

-

-

-

Mixed forest species

2.5 x 5

-

-

-

-

-

-



Tree densities

Tree densities varied considerably. For single species plantations, the density was 1 696 trees/ha for teak, 1 337 trees/ha for sentang and 625 trees/ha for Maesopsis eminii. In mixed plantations, the planting density of teak was between 800 and 1 000 trees mixed with banana, oil palm or tongkat ali. When mixed with rubber, the average planting density for sentang was 145 trees/ha (Table 22). Frequently, strict planting densities were not followed. The actual planting density was also influenced by landscape features. In low-lying areas, fewer trees were planted to avoid flooding.

Table 22. Planting density (trees/ha)

Species

Planting density of forest trees

Teak only

1 696

Sentang only

1 337

Maesopsis eminii only

625

Teak with oil palm

889

Sentang with rubber

145

Teak with banana

1 000

Teak with tongkat ali

825

Mixed forest species*

650

*Planted on buffer zones of oil palm and rubber plantations. These include light hardwood and medium hardwood (kembang semangkok, meranti sarang punai, meranti tembaga, meranti melantai, meranti rambai daun, meranti kepong, merawan siput jantan and kempas) and heavy hardwood and medium hardwood (penaga, perah, kelat and kapur).

Previous crops

Of the 27 planters, 67 percent had planted rubber before converting the current area to forest trees (Table 23). The land of the remaining planters had been planted with oil palm (seven percent), fruit trees (11 percent) and other crops (15 percent). The conversion of rubber to forest trees was most obvious among the individual planters; this can be explained by labour shortages. Forest plantations are less labour intensive than rubber.


Table 23. Previous land use

Previous crop

Companies

(n= 6)

Individual planters

(n = 21)

Total

(n =27)

 

No.

%

No.

%

No.

%

Oil palm

0

0

2

10

2

7

Rubber

3

50

15

70

18

67

Fruit orchard

1

17

1

5

2

7

Coconut

1

17

2

10

3

11

Stateland forest

1

17

0

0

1

4

Residential land

0

0

1

0

1

4

Total

6

100

21

100

27

100



Terrain
slope, altitude and soil type

Most plantations were established on flat or gently sloping land (Table 24). In particular, individual planters preferred land with a gradient of 15 percent or less because most of them owned fairly flat land.

Table 24. Terrain slope

Land condition

Companies

(n = 6)

Individual planters

(n = 21)

Total

(n = 27)

 

No.

%

No.

%

No.

%

Flat (5% or less)

1

17

13

62

14

52

Less flat (6–15%)

2

33

6

28

8

30

Less steep (16–30%)

2

33

2

10

4

15

Steep (> 30%)

1

17

0

0

1

3

Total

6

100

21

100

27

100



Most trees were planted at low elevations (Table 25). Seventy percent of the respondents planted on land below 100 m asl; another 22 percent planted on land between 100 and 300 m asl. Most individual planters own
ed land in the lowlands. This again is related to the location of smallholdings in lowland areas. Companies on the other hand, also planted trees above 500 m asl. This indicates that companies with widespread agricultural areas have allocated land at high altitudes to forest tree planting.

Table 25. Altitude of plantations

Altitude

(m asl )

Companies

(n= 6)

Individual planters

(n =21)

Total

(n = 27)

 

No.

%

No.

%

No.

%

Less than 100 m

4

66

15

71

19

70

100–300 m

0

0

6

29

6

22

301–500 m

0

0

0

0

0

0

501–750 m

1

17

0

0

1

4

More than 750 m

1

17

0

0

1

4

Total

6

100

21

100

27

100



In general, forest trees are planted on three types of soil, namely sandy loam (18 percent), laterite (41 percent) and clay (41 percent) as indicated in Table 26.


Table 26. Soil types of forest tree land

Soil type

Companies

(n = 6)

Individual planters

(n =21)

Total

(n = 27)

 

No.

%

No.

%

No.

%

Sandy loam

1

17

4

19

5

18

Clay

2

33

9

43

11

41

Laterite

3

50

8

38

11

41

Total

6

100

21

100

27

100



Previous PageTop Of PageNext Page