Descriptive Data
Municipality |
Total |
Urban |
% |
Indig. |
Rural |
School |
Total # |
Total # |
Students/ |
PAO |
Institution |
NBI |
Urban |
Rural |
Pucarani |
32237 |
0 |
0.0% |
0 |
48 |
317 |
6970 |
383 |
18.2 |
1 |
FNDR |
0.964 |
0 |
0.964 |
Viacha |
54761 |
19036 |
34.8% |
0 |
300 |
787 |
18860 |
1153 |
16.4 |
1 |
FNDR |
0.852 |
0.598 |
0.974 |
Desaguadero |
4337 |
0 |
0.0% |
0 |
32 |
51 |
1123 |
78 |
14.4 |
1 |
SNPP |
0.927 |
0 |
0.927 |
Charagua |
18769 |
2486 |
13.2% |
51 |
37 |
141 |
4316 |
246 |
17.5 |
1 |
SNPP |
0.873 |
0.453 |
0.926 |
Porongo |
8272 |
0 |
0.0% |
0 |
29 |
89 |
2209 |
101 |
21.9 |
0 |
|
0.928 |
0 |
0.928 |
Sucre |
153153 |
131769 |
86.0% |
1 |
103 |
1462 |
47211 |
3099 |
15.2 |
1 |
FNDR |
0.467 |
0.388 |
0.971 |
Atocha |
12216 |
5275 |
43.2% |
0 |
0 |
135 |
3552 |
191 |
18.6 |
1 |
FNDR |
0.555 |
0.499 |
0.605 |
Baures |
5133 |
0 |
0.0% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Guayaramerín |
32273 |
27706 |
85.8% |
0 |
23 |
|
|
|
|
1 |
FNDR |
0.659 |
0.627 |
0.978 |
Sipe Sipe |
19132 |
2033 |
10.6% |
0 |
7 |
125 |
3685 |
231 |
16.0 |
0 |
|
0.815 |
0.659 |
0.834 |
source: UDAPSO data base
Municipality |
Region |
Size |
Urban/ |
City |
NGO |
NBI |
Primary |
Indigenous |
Pucarani |
A |
M |
R |
0 |
Yes |
+ |
Aymara |
No |
Viacha |
A |
L |
U |
1 |
Yes (Rural) |
- |
Aymara |
No |
Desaguadero |
A |
S |
R |
0 |
No |
+ |
Aymara |
No |
Charagua |
E |
M |
R |
0 |
Yes |
= |
Guarani |
Yes |
Porongo |
E |
S |
R |
1 |
Yes |
+ |
Spanish/Quechua |
No |
Sucre |
V |
L |
U |
1 |
Yes |
- |
Spanish/Quechua |
Yes |
Atocha |
A |
S |
R |
0 |
No |
- |
Spanish/Quechua |
No |
Baures |
E |
S |
R |
0 |
No |
|
Spanish |
Yes |
Guayaramerín |
E |
M |
U |
1 |
? |
- |
? |
? |
Sipe Sipe |
V |
M |
R |
0 |
? |
- |
? |
? |
NB:
A - Altiplano
V- Valleys/Foothills
E- East/Lowlands
Average Municipal Population in Bolivia is 20,646
NBI: Above or below Bolivian average (=0.8857)
Municipal Administration and the Local Economy
Municipality |
Local Economic Base |
Municipal Employees |
||||||||
1st |
2nd |
3rd |
4th |
1997 |
1993 |
% Increase |
per 1000 pop |
Top Salary |
Qualif. Reqs. |
|
Pucarani |
Agriculture |
Cattle |
Fishing |
|
16 |
3 |
433.3% |
0.50 |
1000 |
No |
Viacha |
Industry |
Agriculture |
Cattle |
Artesanery |
150 |
70 |
114.3% |
2.74 |
1560 |
Yes (?) |
Desaguadero |
Commerce |
Transport |
Agriculture |
Fishing |
23 |
14 |
64.3% |
5.30 |
700 |
No |
Charagua |
Agriculture |
Cattle |
Education |
Commerce |
9 |
4 |
125.0% |
0.48 |
1700 |
Yes (?) |
Porongo |
Agriculture |
Cattle |
|
|
10 |
1 |
900.0% |
1.21 |
1300 |
Yes (?) |
Sucre |
Services |
Industry |
Commerce |
Agriculture |
361 |
520 |
-30.6% |
2.36 |
4891 |
No |
Atocha |
Mining |
Commerce |
Agriculture |
Cattle |
9 |
5 |
80.0% |
0.74 |
800 |
No |
Baures |
Agriculture |
Cattle |
Hunting |
|
7 |
4 |
75.0% |
1.36 |
1500 |
No |
Municipality |
Local Tax Revenues |
Municipal Budget |
Increase | Operating/ Total |
Local Tax/ Total Budget |
Investment % Seat Gov |
Population % Seat Gov |
% Excess Investment |
||
Current |
Potential |
1996/7 |
1993% |
|||||||
Pucarani |
1000 |
|
2827931 |
800 |
353391% |
15% |
0% |
20% |
3% |
545% |
Viacha |
1500000 |
|
13000000 |
600000 |
2067% |
? |
12% |
? |
35% |
|
Desaguadero |
500000 |
|
1192000 |
500000 |
138% |
16% |
42% |
70% |
35% |
101% |
Charagua |
49000 |
350000 |
2993714 |
45000 |
6553% |
4% |
2% |
38% |
41% |
-9% |
Porongo |
316865 |
|
1635643 |
66000 |
2378% |
15% |
19% |
14% |
14% |
0% |
Sucre |
40458326 |
|
76274915 |
48892500 |
56% |
23% |
53% |
86% |
86% |
0% |
Atocha |
140000 |
|
2411496 |
50000 |
4723% |
9% |
6% |
? |
20% |
|
Baures |
112558 |
225000 |
1082489 |
(created 1996) |
N/A |
3% |
10% |
? |
43% |
|
NB: "Cattle" includes Llamas and Alpacas on the Altiplano.
Municipal Employees % Increase compared to 1993-4.
Top Salary: Salary of highest administrative official below Mayor.
Local Revenues: Estimated for Viacha.Municipal Budget: Excluding one-off transfers from external sources (e.g. central government). Data for 1993 are estimates for Desaguadero, Charagua, Sucre and Atocha. % Budget: Municipal operating costs as percent of total municipal budget (overhead + investment).
% Seat Gov: Share of total municipal investment going to the main town or community in the municipal area. This is in addition to municipal operating costs, almost all of which are spent in the main town.