Previous PagesNext Page

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Introduction

This report assesses the socio-economic roles and economic values associated with Egypt’s mangroves. Due to the nature of the study, it has only been possible to undertake a “rapid appraisal” of the socio-economic roles and economic value of Egypt’s mangroves. As such, the socio-economic assessment is only a partial appraisal of key aspects. Furthermore, the economic values determined are not highly accurate; rather they provide an indication of the relative order of possible value (see Annex II).

Further studies will be required to validate and enhance the accuracy, robustness and completeness of the socio-economic issues and economic values. Despite this, the study provides a valuable first step in the continuous process of fully understanding and evaluating the importance of Egypt’s mangroves.

Socio-economic and economic values

Table 1 highlights the main socio-economic roles that mangroves play to different stakeholder groups in Egypt. Through a variety of direct, indirect and non-use values, the mangroves help to support the lives and welfare of many people in Egypt, including Bedouin, by contributing to income generation, job security, provision of food and general quality of life. Indeed, the Bedouin and local communities benefit the most with respect to incomes and employment from mangroves, although stakeholders extend to the international community as well.

Table 1 Socio-economic roles of Egypt’s mangroves

Notes: I = income, E = employment, B = benefit, on a scale of 0 (not important) to 3 (very important). * current status for all is 0, the values in the table relate to potential values.

Direct use value is based on the direct use of a resource (e.g. recreation). Indirect use value is the benefit derived from functional services that the environment provides (e.g. the fact that mangroves harbour juvenile fish that support commercial offshore fisheries), and non-use value accrues to someone without actually making any current use of a resource. Non-use values have motives relating to: the option of using a resource in the future (option value); one’s own self-satisfaction (existence value); and future generations (bequest value). Non-use values also capture some of the biodiversity, social, heritage and cultural values associated with natural resources.

There are also many economic welfare values associated with Egypt’s mangroves. Again, these have been divided into direct, indirect and non-use values. The main current and potential economic welfare benefits are summarised below in Table 2. The highest values relate to recreation, followed by landscape value, non-use value, fisheries, shoreline protection and sediment regulation. However, with the exception of fisheries and perhaps non-use values, the values are highly site specific. Care must also be taken to avoid double counting (for example, one cannot necessarily add together landscape and recreation values at any one site). Compared to other mangroves, the recreation value per hectare for mangroves at Ras Mohammed could certainly be amongst the highest in the World, due to the high visitor numbers and small area of mangroves.

Table 2 Summary of current and potential values of Egypt’s mangroves

Use category

Type of value

*Approximate current range of values
US$/ha/yr

Potential to increase values at some sites

Direct use – extractive/

partially extractive

Fuel

0 - Low

Low

Browsing

0 - Medium

Low

Medicines and tannins etc

0

Low

Pharmaceutical & genetic

0

High

Apiculture

0

Low

Wildlife resources

**Medium

Low

Fish/shellfish

0 - Medium

Medium

Direct use –

non-extractive

Recreation and tourism

0 – 180,000

High

Landscape value

***0 – 100,000

Medium

Education and research

0 - High

Medium

Indirect uses - functions

Support to fisheries

0 - 13,000

Medium

Support to habitats and species

**High

Medium

Shoreline protection

0 – 1,000

Medium

Sediment regulation & accretion

0 – 1,000

Medium

Other functions (e.g. carbon storage)

Low – Medium

Low

Non-use value

Non-use values

****350 – 100,000

High

Notes: * For the current value estimate column, where no monetary values are estimated, “low” may be in the order of US$10s/ha/yr, medium may be US$ 100s/ha/yr and high may be US$ 1,000s/ha/yr.
** Much of these values are included in recreation/tourism and non-use value estimates.
*** Only appropriate for small areas of mangroves in highly developed locations.
**** Non-use value may vary from site to site, but due the high uncertainty of this value, the overall value could range anywhere between US$ 350 and US$ 100,000/ha/yr, with a best estimate of US$ 13,000/ha/yr.

Based on the limited available information, the Total Economic Value (TEV) of the mangroves at Ras Mohammed could be as high as US$ 182,000/year (US$ 91,000/ha/yr), and for Nabq Protected Area the figure could be as high as US$ 1,290,000/year (US$ 24,000/ha/yr). (However, see the comments from FAO in Annex II concerning the uncertainty associated with these estimates). Most other mangroves are likely to have a value in the order of US$ 13,000/ha/yr for fisheries and perhaps in the order of US$ 13,000/ha/yr for non-use values.

Impacts on mangroves

The extent of mangroves in Egypt has decreased significantly over the past few hundred years. This is particularly related to land clearance for coastal development and cutting of mangroves for a variety of purposes. Destruction of mangroves has been curtailed by law, but they still suffer from a range of impacts. In particular, excessive browsing and interference with hydrodynamics affects the health of the mangroves. Solid waste is the most common problem, but is more of an aesthetic issue. The potential threat of oil spills and damage from tourism are also cause for concern, however, they can be controlled and mitigated against to some degree. The key impacts are summarised below in Table 3.

Table 3 Impacts to Egypt’s mangroves and key values affected

Category of Impact

Impact

Key values affected

Direct

Clearance (e.g. for roads, houses, hotels and other infrastructure)

All

Cutting (e.g. for wood and charcoal)

Tourism, landscape, wildlife, productivity related values and non-use

Browsing

Tourism, landscape, wildlife, productivity related values and non-use

Human trampling, disturbance & souvenir collection

Tourism, landscape, wildlife, productivity related values and non-use

Over fishing (e.g. on adjacent reef flats)

Fisheries

Indirect

Hydrological changes (e.g. coastal roads and jetties)

All

Nearby development

Wildlife related

Solid waste (e.g. litter from land and sea)

Tourism, landscape, wildlife, productivity related values and non-use

Pollution (e.g. oil spills, tar balls phosphates)

Tourism, landscape, wildlife, productivity related values and non-use

Through appropriate management and restoration, Egypt’s mangroves can continue to provide many economic and socio-economic benefits. In particular, benefits that could be enhanced in the future include tourism and both pharmaceutical and genetic uses.

Recommendations

High priority recommendations include:

Medium priority recommendations include:

Lower priority recommendations include:

sNext Page