FAO GLOBAL INFORMATION AND EARLY WARNING SYSTEM ON FOOD AND AGRICULTURE
|
|
Sri Lanka, especially in the dry-zone areas, has experienced a prolonged drought stemming from reduced rainfall levels since the beginning of the 2003/04 Maha season from September 2003. Following a request of the Government of Sri Lanka, a FAO/WFP Crop and Food Supply Assessment Mission (CFSAM) visited the country from 7 to 24 March 2004 to assess the 2003/04 Maha harvest and to forecast 2004 Yala production in order to estimate cereal import requirements for 2004/05 marketing year including anticipated food aid needs.
The findings of the CFSAM mission in March revealed that failure of the rainfall, characterized as low and erratic during Maha 2003/04 season resulted in a reduction of paddy production, when compared with the previous year. Of the districts affected, Kurunegala, Anuradhapura, and Puttalam are the worst hit districts for Maha crops. Further, it was revealed that reduced availability of water in the major irrigation schemes in Kurumegala, Puttalam and Anuradhapura and in other districts might cause a significant reduction in the Yala crop of 2004.
Since March, the beginning of the Yala season (April to September 2004), drought conditions have worsened. 2004 Yala crops were reportedly affected seriously by the prolonged drought. Recently, GIEWS staff and a FAO National consultant (Dr. Fernondo) visited the most affected three districts to update the
drought impact on Maha and Yala production and discussed the food security situation with local WFP staff in the field. The purpose of this report is to provide the updated information regarding the drought situation and its impact on Yala crop production, especially in three most affected districts; update country’s 2003/04 Maha paddy production, total 2004 paddy production, and balance sheet for rice and wheat supply and demand situation for 2004/05; and review the food security situation.
The Mission interviewed the government officials in the districts and Agrarian Service Centres, and the farmers in the fields to gather first hand information. The Mission visited the WFP Food-for-Work projects, the rehabilitated small tanks. The Mission also collected information from central government officials in Colombo on rainfall, water availability, and crop production on the national level.
Sri Lanka is categorized as three agro-ecological zones- the wet zone, the intermediate zone and the dry zone. Sixty-four per cent (64 percent) of the island falls under the dry zone, which receives less than 1,800 mm of rainfall per year during both the south-western (smaller Yala season) and the north-eastern (Maha season) monsoon periods. With fewer irrigation schemes, rain-dependent agriculture in dry zones obliges vulnerable people to suffer from the vagaries of weather. During the 2003/04, the impact of drought on crop production in dry zone was more severe than in wet and intermediate zones. Among the three districts visited, all agrarian service centres in Anuradhapura are in the dry zone. Some agrarian service centres in Kurunegala and Puttalam are categorized as dry zone, but the others are in intermediate zone.
Rainfall during the 2003/04 Maha season was low and erratic compared with that of the normal season. Rainfall levels well below the 50-year averages were recorded for each month from September 2003 to February 2004 for the North-western and Central Provinces, as reported by CFSAM in March.
Since the beginning of the Yala season (from April to September 2004), precipitation has continued to be lower than normal and drought conditions have become worse. As shown in Figures below, the observed cumulative rainfall by the end of August registered 1012 millimetres (mm) in Anuradhapura district, 912 mm in Kurunegala District, and Puttalam District. They are 48 percent, 42 percent, and 38 percent, respectively, below last year’s level.
As a result of the reduced rainfall, water level and storage in major tanks were extremely low in three districts as reported in Table 1. Some tanks were seriously depleted after the year-long prolonged drought. As of 16 September, the average effective storage was only 5.6 percent in Aunradhapura, 14 percent in Kurunegala, and 10.4 percent in Puttalam.
District/Reservoir | Gross Extent | Gross Capacity | Effective Storage | |
Acres | Acft | Acft | Percent | |
Anuradapura District | 63 433 | 419 890 | 22 647 | 5.6 |
Basawakkulama | 1 788 | 1 900 | 205 | 10.8 |
Huruluwewa | 10 000 | 55 000 | 6 500 | 12.3 |
Mahakandarawa | 6 000 | 36 250 | -3 300 | -10.2 |
Mahawilachchiya | 2 700 | 32 500 | 2 375 | 7.5 |
Nachchaduwa | 6 275 | 45 140 | 7 890 | 17.5 |
Nuwara Wewa | 2 400 | 36 000 | 2 620 | 7.5 |
Padaviya | 13 800 | 85 000 | 1 480 | 1.8 |
Rajangana | 17 500 | 81 600 | 2 515 | 3.3 |
Tissa Wewa | 970 | 3 500 | 1 070 | 33.0 |
Wahalkada | 2 000 | 43 000 | 1 292 | 3.2 |
Kurunegala District | 24 703 | 78 963 | 10 231 | 14.1 |
Ambakolawewa | 840 | 6 700 | 365 | 5.7 |
Attaragallawa | 1 036 | 3 668 | -240 | -7.6 |
Batalagoda | 6 030 | 4 840 | 531 | 11.3 |
Hakwatuna | 5 060 | 19 727 | 3 858 | 23.1 |
Kimbulwana | 1 664 | 6 900 | 414 | 6.4 |
Magalla | 6 000 | 7 440 | 1 515 | 20.6 |
Palukadawala | 2 023 | 7 688 | 1 318 | 17.2 |
Usgala Siyabalan | 2 050 | 22 000 | 2 470 | 12.1 |
Puttalam District | 7 319 | 73 835 | 7 198 | 10.4 |
Inginimitiya | 5 226 | 58 835 | 4 946 | 9.1 |
Tabbowa | 2 093 | 15 000 | 2 252 | 15.2 |
As major tanks in Kurunegala, Anuradhapura, and Puttalam were seriously depleted, many farmers suffered two successive crop failures. Large areas of paddy land were unplanted due to insufficient water supply in the irrigation tanks.
In Anuradhapura, with the whole district belonging to dry zone, the 2004 Yala crop was the worst-hit by drought at the district level. The area achieved for Yala paddy is estimated at 3 460 hectares, a decrease of 84 percent from the previous year. The Yala paddy production is estimated at some 10 760 tonnes, about 84 percent below that of the previous year. The brunt of the decline in productivity was borne by farmers using major and minor irrigation tanks for Yala crop production.
Compared with that of Anuradhapura, overall Yala crop situations at the district level in Kurunegala and Puttalam were slightly better. The total 2004 Yala areas are estimated at 18 590 hectares in the former and 6 010 hectares in the latter, 65 percent and 44 percent, respectively, reduction from the previous year; while the total 2004 Yala paddy production are estimated at 57 520 tonnes in the former district and 15 180 tonnes in the latter, 66 percent and 46 percent, respectively, reduced from the previous year.
However, the impact of drought on ASCs located in dry zone in these two districts is not different from that in Anuradhapura. 2004 Yala production area in ASCs located in Dry Zone are reported in Tables 2 and 3. More than 90 percent production located in the centres of dry zone of Kurunegala was lost based on the average of all 12 centres. Of them, five ASCs lost all Yala paddy production. In Puttalam district, all Yala production in all 10 agrarian service centres was also totally lost.
Similar to paddy, the areas for other crops in these centres were reduced considerably and resulted in almost no production in some areas.
Agrarian Service Centre in Dry Zone | 2003 Yala | 2004 Yala | Percent of 2004 over 2003 |
Maho | 699 | 0 | 0.0 |
Nagollagama | 1 497 | 0 | 0.0 |
Galgamuwa | 2 063 | 85 | 4.1 |
Ehetuwewa | 1 545 | 0 | 0.0 |
Mahananneriya | 573 | 40 | 7.0 |
Nikawertiya | 2 253 | 1 173 | 52.1 |
Divullegoda | 625 | 4 | 0.6 |
Ratnayakepura | 1 393 | 161 | 11.6 |
Kotawehera | 663 | 56 | 8.5 |
Mahagiriulla | 847 | 102 | 12.1 |
Tambutta | 4 452 | 0 | 0.0 |
Ambanpola | 1 415 | 0 | 0.0 |
Total | 18 024 | 1 621 | 9.0 |
Agrarian Service Centre in Dry Zone | 2004 Target | 2004 Achieved | Percent of Achieved over Target |
Serukele | 485 | 0 | 0 |
Mahakumbu | 815 | 0 | 0 |
Anamaduwa | 800 | 0 | 0 |
Inginimitiya | 1 630 | 0 | 0 |
Nawagaththegama | 425 | 0 | 0 |
Ih/Puliyankuama | 718 | 0 | 0 |
Puth/Thabbowa | 1 223 | 0 | 0 |
Wanathawillu | 250 | 0 | 0 |
Puttalama | 456 | 0 | 0 |
Madurankuliye | 282 | 0 | 0 |
Total | 7 084 | 0 | 0 |
The Yala crop normally comprises 35 percent of the volume of the total paddy crop in Sri Lanka and the mean annual production for 1998–2003 was some 1.12 million tonnes. This crop is usually produced using irrigation water from major and minor tanks usually.
The 2004 Yala paddy areas, yield, and production for whole country were estimated based on the information collected from the Government of Sri Lanka in Colombo. The estimated results with the comparison to the 2003 crop and the average of the previous five years are reported in Table 4. The total area harvested for Yala paddy is estimated at 236 320 tonnes, 32.8 percent below last year and 26.9 percent below the average of the last 5 years. The total Yala paddy production is estimated at 798 990 tonnes, 32.1 percent lower than the previous year and 28.4 percent below the average of five years, reflecting the lower area harvested and low yield achieved. The estimated area and production are 12 percent and 9 percent below the CFSAM forecast in March reflecting the fact that the drought situation during 2004 Yala season was much worse than expected.
District | Area Harvested | Yield | Production | ||||||
2004 (‘000 ha) |
2004 (percent change from 2003) |
2004 (percent change from average) |
2004 (tonnes/ ha) |
2004 (percent change from 2003) |
2004 (percent change from average) |
2004 (‘000 tonnes) |
2004 (percent change from 2003) |
2004 (percent change from average) |
|
Colombo | 0.8 | -50.5 | -54.8 | 1.97 | -1.5 | -9.1 | 1.6 | -51.1 | -58.7 |
Gampaha | 1.1 | -75.2 | -57.7 | 2.10 | 0.3 | -11.8 | 2.3 | -75.1 | -62.4 |
Kalutara | 9.9 | -8.6 | -19.6 | 2.19 | -0.3 | -7.3 | 21.5 | -8.6 | -25.6 |
Galle | 6.1 | -42.3 | -43.0 | 2.02 | -1.1 | -1.7 | 12.3 | -42.8 | -44.0 |
Matara | 14.0 | 4.6 | -3.5 | 2.44 | 9.8 | -6.4 | 34.2 | 14.8 | -10.4 |
Ratnapura | 10.5 | -0.6 | -8.0 | 2.41 | 9.8 | -4.8 | 25.2 | 9.1 | -12.5 |
Kegalle | 6.5 | -17.4 | -6.8 | 2.90 | 1.4 | 1.7 | 18.8 | -16.1 | -5.8 |
Kurunegala | 18.6 | -65.4 | -51.7 | 3.09 | -2.4 | -3.2 | 57.5 | -66.2 | -53.5 |
Puttalam | 6.0 | -44.1 | -24.1 | 2.63 | -4.1 | -10.0 | 15.8 | -46.4 | -30.8 |
Kandy | 8.9 | -8.4 | -9.1 | 2.69 | 1.5 | -3.5 | 23.8 | -7.9 | -12.4 |
Matale | 3.4 | -48.0 | -46.2 | 3.25 | -1.4 | -0.8 | 10.9 | -48.8 | -46.6 |
Nuwara Eliya | 1.6 | -11.6 | -25.4 | 1.89 | 0.1 | -3.0 | 2.9 | -11.5 | -27.7 |
Badulla | 9.8 | -10.8 | -3.4 | 3.07 | -13.5 | -15.0 | 30.2 | -22.9 | -18.1 |
Monaragala | 5.3 | -15.6 | 9.9 | 2.53 | -27.7 | -32.0 | 13.3 | -39.1 | -24.6 |
Jaffna | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.00 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
Killinochchi | 3.3 | 3.4 | -17.1 | 2.97 | 0.4 | 12.7 | 9.7 | 3.4 | -4.3 |
Vavuniya | 0.1 | -86.3 | -87.6 | 3.38 | -2.9 | 6.3 | 0.4 | -86.5 | -86.6 |
Mullativu | 2.6 | 48.8 | 37.1 | 3.65 | 2.5 | 28.0 | 9.3 | 51.7 | 76.2 |
Mannar | 0.2 | -60.7 | -74.6 | 2.22 | -13.7 | -13.5 | 0.4 | -66.1 | -78.2 |
Anuradhapura | 3.5 | -84.0 | -80.7 | 3.11 | -0.6 | -7.7 | 10.8 | -84.1 | -82.1 |
Polonnaruwa | 36.6 | -21.5 | -20.9 | 3.88 | -2.1 | -4.0 | 141.8 | -23.1 | -24.2 |
Trincomalee | 7.1 | -44.6 | -41.2 | 5.24 | 35.3 | 39.5 | 37.3 | -25.0 | -17.9 |
Batticoloa | 15.6 | -17.2 | -0.5 | 2.96 | 0.9 | -0.7 | 46.1 | -16.5 | -1.2 |
Ampara | 41.7 | -19.6 | -20.8 | 4.19 | -2.3 | -4.2 | 174.4 | -21.5 | -24.1 |
Hambantota | 12.3 | -33.5 | -22.7 | 3.83 | 16.7 | 6.5 | 47.0 | -22.5 | -16.1 |
Udawalawe | 8.2 | -3.5 | -1.5 | 4.80 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 39.3 | -3.1 | -1.6 |
Mahawelih | 3.1 | -62.5 | -59.2 | 3.93 | -0.2 | 0.6 | 12.2 | -62.6 | -59.2 |
Sri Lanka | 236.3 | -32.8 | -26.9 | 3.38 | 1.1 | -2 | 799.0 | -32.1 | -28.4 |
The Government of Sri Lanka (DCS) has officially made an official estimate of the 2003/04 Maha season paddy production. The revised 2003/04 Maha paddy production for Sri Lanka at the district level with comparison to last year’s level and the average of the previous 5 years is presented in Table 5. The revised 2003/04 Maha production is at 1 669.7 thousand tonnes which is about 2 percent higher than the March estimate, mainly due to the higher yield achieved than the earlier estimate. The revised 2003/04 Maha paddy production is 12 percent and 5.2 percent below those in the previous year and the average of the previous 5 years.
Table 6 provides the revised overall total paddy production in 2004 (the sum of the 2003/04 Maha and the 2004 Yala seasons), which is estimated at 2.47 million tonnes, 41 000 tonnes or 1.7 percent below that estimated in March. Based on this revised data, total paddy production in 2004 is about 20 percent below last year and about 14 percent below the average of the previous five years.
District | Area Harvested | Yield | Production | ||||||
2003/04 (‘000 ha) |
2003/04 (percent change from 2002/03) |
2003/04 (percent change from average) |
2003/04 (tonnes/ ha) |
2003/04 (percent change from 2002/03) |
2003/04 (percent change from average) |
2003/04 (‘000 tonnes) |
2003/04 (percent change from 2002/03) |
2003/04 (percent change from average) |
|
Colombo | 4.4 | -0.4 | -1.8 | 3.03 | 8.7 | 4.5 | 13.4 | 8.2 | 2.6 |
Gampaha | 9.5 | -4.7 | -3.3 | 2.76 | -0.5 | -0.5 | 26.3 | -5.1 | -3.7 |
Kalutara | 13.4 | -0.1 | -9.2 | 2.24 | -2.2 | -14.7 | 30.0 | -2.3 | -22.8 |
Galle | 13.3 | -14.3 | -17.5 | 2.65 | -1.7 | 5.2 | 35.3 | -15.7 | -13.1 |
Matara | 13.8 | -1.4 | -14.1 | 3.00 | 7.9 | 7.5 | 41.4 | 6.3 | -7.5 |
Ratnapura | 12.6 | -0.6 | -12.0 | 2.55 | -2.8 | -7.1 | 32.2 | -3.3 | -18.2 |
Kegalle | 7.0 | -19.4 | -21.3 | 3.03 | -5.7 | -12.7 | 21.1 | -24.0 | -31.1 |
Kurunegala | 20.8 | -67.7 | -65.1 | 3.61 | 2.3 | 3.4 | 75.0 | -67.0 | -63.9 |
Puttalam | 7.2 | -52.6 | -28.3 | 3.13 | 18.3 | 10.3 | 22.5 | -44.0 | -19.8 |
Kandy | 12.7 | -8.7 | -16.5 | 2.87 | 1.8 | 1.3 | 36.4 | -7.1 | -15.4 |
Matale | 13.7 | -11.9 | -0.8 | 3.71 | -0.9 | 1.7 | 50.9 | -12.8 | 1.0 |
Nuwara Eliya | 5.1 | -9.3 | -17.2 | 1.87 | 10.5 | 0.4 | 9.5 | 0.2 | -16.9 |
Badulla | 21.0 | -1.1 | -0.3 | 3.68 | 14.6 | 7.2 | 77.2 | 13.3 | 6.8 |
Monaragala | 14.6 | 0.2 | 13.6 | 3.98 | 5.9 | 5.6 | 58.4 | 6.1 | 20.3 |
Jaffna | 7.1 | 10.1 | 17.8 | 1.79 | -42.2 | -30.3 | 12.7 | -36.3 | -18.5 |
Killinochchi | 16.6 | 85.5 | 118.8 | 3.02 | 3.7 | 37.7 | 50.0 | 92.4 | 213.6 |
Vavuniya | 8.0 | 2.3 | 25.9 | 3.49 | 1.1 | 7.8 | 27.9 | 3.4 | 35.3 |
Mullativu | 6.9 | -28.6 | 18.0 | 3.75 | 33.9 | 49.1 | 25.8 | -4.4 | 74.0 |
Mannar | 6.0 | -27.2 | 2.6 | 3.92 | -4.3 | 23.0 | 23.7 | -30.3 | 24.6 |
Anuradhapura | 28.0 | -55.4 | -45.7 | 3.64 | 4.2 | 3.5 | 101.8 | -53.5 | -43.7 |
Polonnaruwa | 51.3 | 2.8 | 5.1 | 4.44 | 12.4 | 10.0 | 227.7 | 15.6 | 15.5 |
Trincomalee | 24.4 | -2.7 | 8.8 | 3.70 | 14.5 | 14.4 | 90.3 | 11.5 | 24.3 |
Batticoloa | 45.5 | 2.6 | 20.6 | 2.48 | 9.0 | -0.7 | 113.0 | 11.8 | 20.4 |
Ampara | 56.0 | -1.3 | 1.0 | 4.45 | 10.2 | 11.3 | 249.0 | 8.7 | 12.3 |
Hambantota | 16.6 | 2.4 | -4.7 | 4.04 | 1.1 | 2.6 | 67.3 | 3.5 | -1.1 |
Udawalawe | 8.5 | -4.9 | 14.1 | 4.94 | -2.2 | 0.9 | 41.8 | -7.1 | 13.5 |
Mahawelih | 24.9 | -1.9 | 1.3 | 4.39 | -4.1 | -3.5 | 109.1 | -5.9 | -2.3 |
Sri Lanka | 468.8 | -16.2 | -9.6 | 3.56 | 5.1 | 4.8 | 1 669.7 | -12.0 | -5.2 |
District | Area Harvested | Yield | Production | ||||||
2003/04 (‘000 ha) |
2003/04 (change from 2002/03) |
2003/04 ( change from average) |
2003/04 (tonnes/ ha) |
2003/04 (change from 2002/03) |
2003/04 (change from average) |
2003/04 (‘000 tonnes) |
2003/04 (change from 2002/03) |
2003/04 (change from average) |
|
Colombo | 5.2 | -14.0 | -17.0 | 2.87 | 11.3 | 6.6 | 15.0 | -4.2 | -11.5 |
Gampaha | 10.6 | -26.2 | -14.6 | 2.69 | 4.9 | 0.3 | 28.6 | -22.6 | -14.4 |
Kalutara | 23.2 | -3.9 | -13.9 | 2.22 | -1.2 | -11.7 | 51.5 | -5.1 | -24.0 |
Galle | 19.5 | -25.6 | -27.7 | 2.45 | 1.0 | 5.1 | 47.6 | -24.9 | -24.0 |
Matara | 27.8 | 1.5 | -9.0 | 2.72 | 8.3 | 0.2 | 75.6 | 10.0 | -8.9 |
Ratnapura | 23.1 | -0.6 | -10.2 | 2.49 | 2.4 | -6.2 | 57.4 | 1.8 | -15.8 |
Kegalle | 13.4 | -18.5 | -14.9 | 2.97 | -2.4 | -7.2 | 39.8 | -20.5 | -21.1 |
Kurunegala | 39.4 | -66.7 | -59.9 | 3.37 | 0.0 | -0.2 | 132.5 | -66.7 | -60.0 |
Puttalam | 13.2 | -49.1 | -26.5 | 2.90 | 8.0 | 2.3 | 38.3 | -45.0 | -24.8 |
Kandy | 21.6 | -8.6 | -13.6 | 2.80 | 1.3 | -0.7 | 60.2 | -7.4 | -14.2 |
Matale | 17.0 | -22.5 | -14.9 | 3.62 | 0.2 | 2.6 | 61.7 | -22.4 | -12.7 |
Nuwara Eliya | 6.6 | -9.9 | -19.2 | 1.88 | 7.8 | -0.6 | 12.4 | -2.8 | -19.7 |
Badulla | 30.8 | -4.4 | -1.3 | 3.48 | 4.7 | -0.2 | 107.4 | 0.1 | -1.6 |
Monaragala | 19.9 | -4.5 | 12.6 | 3.60 | -2.4 | -3.8 | 71.7 | -6.7 | 8.3 |
Jaffna | 7.1 | 10.1 | 17.8 | 1.79 | -42.2 | -30.8 | 12.7 | -36.3 | -18.5 |
Killinochchi | 19.9 | 64.0 | 72.2 | 3.01 | 2.9 | 32.7 | 59.8 | 68.7 | 128.6 |
Vavuniya | 8.1 | -5.7 | 12.4 | 3.49 | 1.2 | 7.9 | 28.3 | -4.6 | 21.3 |
Mullativu | 9.4 | -16.9 | 22.6 | 3.72 | 27.6 | 42.4 | 35.1 | 6.0 | 74.5 |
Mannar | 6.3 | -29.1 | -6.5 | 3.86 | -3.6 | 22.7 | 24.1 | -31.7 | 14.8 |
Anuradhapura | 31.5 | -62.8 | -54.7 | 3.58 | 5.4 | 3.2 | 112.5 | -60.8 | -53.3 |
Polonnaruwa | 87.9 | -8.9 | -7.6 | 4.21 | 6.4 | 4.1 | 369.5 | -3.1 | -3.8 |
Trincomalee | 31.5 | -16.9 | -8.7 | 4.05 | 17.4 | 18.4 | 127.6 | -2.4 | 8.1 |
Batticoloa | 61.1 | -3.3 | 14.4 | 2.61 | 5.3 | -1.0 | 159.1 | 1.8 | 13.2 |
Ampara | 97.6 | -10.0 | -9.6 | 4.34 | 4.3 | 3.7 | 423.4 | -6.1 | -6.2 |
Hambantota | 28.9 | -16.7 | -13.3 | 3.95 | 9.3 | 6.2 | 114.3 | -9.0 | -7.9 |
Udawalawe | 16.6 | -4.2 | 5.9 | 4.87 | -1.0 | -0.2 | 81.1 | -5.2 | 5.6 |
Mahawelih | 28.0 | -16.8 | -13.1 | 4.34 | -1.9 | -1.4 | 121.3 | -18.4 | -14.3 |
Sri Lanka | 705.1 | -22.6 | -16.4 | 3.50 | 3.8 | 2.7 | 2 468.7 | -19.7 | -14.2 |
Following the failure of Maha and Yala harvests in 2004, there was a large perceived shortage in rice supply in major markets in Sri Lanka. The retail price of rice has increased to about 45 to 50 Rps per kg in September 2004, compared to about 25 Rps in September a year ago.
A revised cereal supply/demand balance sheet for the country for 2004/05 is presented in Table 7. In preparing the balance sheet, the following assumptions were made:
a midyear population of 19.22 million in 2004, obtained by applying an annual growth rate of 0.8235 percent to the previous year;
a consumption requirement of 151.46 kg/caput of cereals (rice 98 kg/caput, wheat 50 kg/caput), the same level as in the previous year;
a seed requirement of 103 kg/ha for paddy;
post-harvest losses of 6 percent for rice;
a milling rate of 66 percent from paddy to rice;
opening stocks of 155 000 tones of rice and 300 000 tonnes of wheat;
closing stocks of 150 000 tones of rice and 300 000 tonnes of wheat.
Item | Rice | Wheat |
Domestic availability | 1 784 | 300 |
Opening stocks | 155 | 300 |
Production | 1 629 | 0 |
Maha season | 1 102 | 0 |
Yala season | 527 | 0 |
Total utilization | 2 223 | 1 281 |
Food use | 1 884 | 961 |
Feed use | 0 | 0 |
Seed use | 90 | 0 |
Losses | 99 | 20 |
Exports | 0 | 0 |
Closing stocks | 150 | 300 |
Import requirement (including food aid) | 439 | 981 |
The total cereal (rice and wheat) import requirement is revised up from last estimated 1.39 million tonnes to 1.42 million tonnes, reflecting the lower total paddy production.
The continuation of drought for two consecutive seasons has caused severe socio-economic problems due to food insecurity, reduced job opportunities and lack of availability of drinking water. The affected families are generally subsistence farmers. The Ministry of Women’s Empowerment & Social Welfare (MWESW) has estimated that at present nearly 1.5 million people have been affected by the ongoing drought.
With slowed down economic activities, limited off-farm employment opportunities, and with virtually no farm work at hand for a long time, farmers’ incomes have been significantly affected. Lower incomes have affected the purchasing power of the people. The rising prices of essential commodities have further aggravated food insecurity. Many farmers, especially in the most drought-affected areas, totally lack capital to purchase inputs such as seeds, implements, fertilizers etc to start their cultivation in the coming Maha season.
Since the March Mission, some donors have provided funds for WFP and FAO projects to provide relief to the 14 000 most severely affected families in eight Divisional Secretariat Divisions in the Puttalam, Kurunegala and Anuradhapura Districts. WFP under their food-for-work (FFW) programme, has commenced work on restoring the small scale irrigation infrastructure in the selected beneficiary areas. Considerable efforts are being made by World Food Programme to implement improvement projects such as de-silting, bund management, canal clearance and other rehabilitation work under FFW programmes. The Mission has been very impressed with some of these projects, especially after visiting two rehabilitated dams in Puttalam. The FAO project is starting to provide seeds and fertilizer to the neediest 13 640 families.
This report has been prepared by Cheng Fang, under the responsibility of the FAO Secretariat with information from official and other sources. Since conditions may change rapidly, please contact Mr. Henri Josserand, Chief, GIEWS, FAO, Fax: 0039-06-5705-4495, | |
Please note that this Special Report is also available on the Internet as part of the FAO World Wide Web (www.fao.org) at the following URL address: http://www.fao.org/giews/ The Special Alerts/Reports can also be received automatically by E-mail as soon as they are published, by subscribing to the GIEWS/Alerts report ListServ. To do so, please send an E-mail to the FAO-Mail-Server at the following address: [email protected], leaving the subject blank, with the following message: subscribe GIEWSAlertsWorld-L To be deleted from the list, send the message: unsubscribe GIEWSAlertsWorld-L Please note that it now possible to subscribe to regional lists to only receive Special Reports/Alerts by region: Africa, Asia, Europe or Latin America (GIEWSAlertsAfrica-L, GIEWSAlertsAsia-L, GIEWSAlertsEurope-L and GIEWSAlertsLA-L). These lists can be subscribed to in the same way as the worldwide list. |