Previous Page Table of Contents Next Page


CHAPTER II
Preparatory studies

1. REVIEW OF EXISTING INFORMATION

The country data, available in the form of statistical tables or maps, are the main source of information for the assessment. Therefore, a review of the current state of the forest inventories in every country is presented a proper understanding and evaluation of the Project methodology and results.

Table 1
State of forest inventory in non-tropical developing countries at end 1990
Region Number of countries with forest resources data at national level
Number of countries under assessmentNo assessmentOne area assessmentMore than one area assessmentForest plantations assessmentVolume and biomass assessment
before 19811981–1990
Africa 83 050 81
Asia1711024175
South America 30 120 30
Total2841194286

Source: FORIS database of the Project

The findings of the Project on the current state of the country forest inventories can be summarized as follows.

2. REVIEW OF APPROACHES TO ASSESSMENT

Two main techniques of global assessments have been tried so far both based on the available data: (i) a questionnaire approach and (ii) a centralized approach. The questionnaire approach was started in 1948 and abandoned in 1968 because of many non- or incorrect responses. The centralized approach was started by FAO/UNEP Tropical Forest Resources Assessment Project (1980) and also used by the present project. It consists in collecting the existing country data from a wide variety of sources at FAO HQ, bringing them to a common conceptual and mensurational standard and finally adjusting results to the common reference.

The centralized methodology used for the assessment of the non-tropical developing countries is similar to the one used for the tropical with the following characteristics:

  1. use of a database management system for easy storage, retrieval, analysis and updating of country information;

  2. use of a modeling technique (syn. adjustment function) to update country information to common reference year(s) i.e. 1980 and 1990;

  3. use of auxiliary variables such as ecofloristic zones; population density and population growth in the adjustment function, for which data are readily available and which are among the important driving forces behind deforestation;

  4. reduction in size of the assessment unit from national to sub-national level which is ecologically and demographically more homogeneous;

The most important difference between the tropical and non-tropical developing world is the absence of a statistical sampling approach using multi-date high resolution satellite data. This could not be applied in the non-tropical assessment due to budgetary limitations.


Previous Page Top of Page Next Page