Data from many supervised trials on peaches, broccoli, head cabbages, cauliflowers, melons, egg plants and tomatoes were submitted or resubmitted to the Meeting, but some reports lacked important information so the Meeting did not evaluate trials which lacked data on analytical recoveries or those with abnormally high residues in control samples and for which no representative chromatograms were supplied. In such cases, it was not clear whether the control samples were contaminated or the analysis was at fault. The trials which were considered to be unsuitable for evaluation are shaded in the Tables.
Residues in crops
Peaches. Ten supervised trials were carried out in Italy and Spain. The summarized data are shown in Table 3.
Table 3. Residues of methamidophos in peaches. All SL formulations.
Country Year |
Application |
PHI, days |
Residues |
Reference |
||
No. |
kg ai/ha |
kg ai/hl |
||||
Italy 1994
|
2
|
0.68
|
0.057
|
01 |
0.19 |
36
|
0 |
1.1 |
|||||
7 |
0.41 |
|||||
14 |
0.26 |
|||||
21 |
0.16 |
|||||
28 |
0.11 |
|||||
Italy 1994
|
2
|
0.68
|
0.057
|
01 |
0.13 |
37
|
0 |
0.67 |
|||||
21 |
0.12 |
|||||
28 |
0.06 |
|||||
Italy 1994
|
2
|
0.6
|
0.05
|
01 |
0.12 |
34
|
0 |
0.39 |
|||||
21 |
0.09 |
|||||
28 |
0.04 |
|||||
Italy 1994
|
2
|
0.6
|
0.05
|
01 |
0.41 |
31
|
0 |
0.95 |
|||||
7 |
0.55 |
|||||
14 |
0.28 |
|||||
21 |
0.27 |
|||||
28 |
0.13 |
|||||
Spain 1994
|
2
|
0.6
|
0.048
|
01 |
0.26 |
33
|
0 |
1.3 |
|||||
6 |
0.59 |
|||||
14 |
0.27 |
|||||
21 |
0.09 |
|||||
28 |
0.09 |
|||||
Spain 1994
|
2
|
1
|
0.054
|
01 |
0.6 |
35
|
0 |
1 |
|||||
21 |
0.27 |
|||||
28 |
0.15 |
|||||
Spain 1995
|
1 |
0.72 |
0.048 |
28 |
<0.01 |
1
|
35 |
<0.01 |
|||||
1 |
1.1 |
0.072 |
28 |
0.11 |
||
35 |
0.07 |
|||||
Spain 1995
|
1 |
0.86 |
0.048 |
28 |
0.12 |
1
|
35 |
0.24 |
|||||
1 |
1.3 |
0.072 |
28 |
0.4 |
||
35 |
0.76 |
1 Sampling just before last application
Broccoli. Eighteen supervised trials were carried out in Brazil, Canada, Mexico and the USA. The results are shown in Table 4.
Table 4. Residues of methamidophos in broccoli.
Country Year |
Application |
PHI, days |
Residues1 |
Reference |
|||
Form. |
No. |
kg ai/ha |
kg ai/hl |
||||
Brazil 1987
|
SL
|
5
|
0.6
|
0.06
|
0 |
1.6 |
272
|
14 |
<0.01 |
||||||
21 |
<0.01 |
||||||
28 |
<0.01 |
||||||
5 |
1.2 |
0.12 |
21 |
0.01 |
|||
Brazil 1995 |
SL |
3 |
0.6 |
0.06 |
21 |
0.2 |
76 |
3 |
1.2 |
0.12 |
21 |
0.6 |
|||
Canada 1995 |
EC |
3 |
1.08 |
|
14 |
0.01, 0.01 |
793 |
Canada 1972
|
EC
|
8
|
1.12
|
0.12
|
0 |
13.05 |
24
|
3 |
5.87 |
||||||
7 |
1.88 |
||||||
14 |
0.13 |
||||||
Canada 1972
|
EC
|
8
|
1.12
|
0.14
|
0 |
0.95 |
34
|
3 |
0.94 |
||||||
7 |
0.99 |
||||||
14 |
0.41 |
||||||
Mexico 1995 |
EC |
2 |
0.9 |
0.3 |
21 |
<0.01, 0.08 |
464 |
USA 1974
|
SC
|
5
|
1.12
|
|
0 |
2.15(H), 2.85 (L) |
124
|
7 |
0.92(H), 3.64(L) |
||||||
14 |
0.42(H), 2.24(L) |
||||||
21 |
0.14(H), 0.88(L) |
||||||
28 |
0.04(H), 0.45(L) |
||||||
USA 1974
|
SC
|
3
|
1.12
|
0.48
|
21 |
0.06(H), 0.75(L) |
114
|
28 |
0.09(H), 0.54(L) |
||||||
35 |
0.02(H), 0.24(L) |
||||||
42 |
0.03(H), 0.07(L) |
||||||
USA 1973
|
SC
|
3
|
1.12
|
0.34
|
14 |
0.03(H), 0.74(L) |
44
|
21 |
0.01(H), 0.11(L) |
||||||
28 |
<0.01(H), 0.06(L) |
||||||
35 |
<0.01(H), 0.03(L) |
||||||
42 |
<0.01(H), <0.01(L) |
||||||
USA 1973
|
SC
|
6
|
1.12
|
0.34
|
0 |
1.55(H), 7.15(L) |
34
|
7 |
1.10(H), 0.01(L) |
||||||
14 |
0.12(H), 0.22(L) |
||||||
21 |
0.02(H), 0.11(L) |
||||||
28 |
<0.01(H), 0.02(L) |
||||||
SC |
3 |
1.12 |
0.2 |
14 |
<0.01(H), 0.54(L) |
84 |
|
21 |
<0.01(H), 0.06(L) |
||||||
27 |
0.02(L) |
||||||
USA 1974
|
SC
|
3
|
1.12
|
0.27
|
14 |
2.84(H), 4.98(L) |
94
|
21 |
0.01(H), <0.01(L) |
||||||
26 |
<0.01(H), <0.01(L) |
||||||
35 |
0.02(H), 0.04(L) |
||||||
42 |
<0.01(H), 0.02(L) |
||||||
USA 1973
|
SC
|
3
|
1.12
|
0.12
|
14 |
0.28 |
144
|
21 |
0.02 |
||||||
28 |
0.03 |
||||||
35 |
0.01 |
||||||
USA 1973
|
SC |
5 |
1.12 |
0.2 |
0 |
1.32(H), 22.93(L) |
54 |
7 |
0.33(H), 2.51(L) |
||||||
13 |
0.15(H), 1.14(L) |
||||||
USA 1974
|
SC
|
5
|
1.12
|
0.12
|
0 |
1.52 |
134
|
7 |
0.21 |
||||||
14 |
0.05 |
||||||
21 |
0.01 |
||||||
USA 1974
|
SC
|
5
|
1.12
|
0.27
|
0 |
2.65(H), 7.3(L) |
104
|
7 |
2.53(H), 9.07(L) |
||||||
14 |
1.27(H), 7.62(L) |
||||||
21 |
<0.01(H), 0.08(L) |
||||||
28 |
<0.01(H), <0.01(L) |
1 (H) head (L) leaves2 The data were also submitted to the 1990 JMPR
3 The 2 results were from duplicate plots. The higher values of each pair were used to estimate both maximum residue levels and STMRs
4 No data on analytical recoveries
Head cabbages. Six supervised trials were carried out in Argentina, Brazil, Germany and Mexico. The results are shown in Table 5.
Table 5. Residues of methamidophos in head cabbages.
Country, Year |
Application |
PHI, days |
Residues1 |
Reference |
|||
Form |
No. |
kg ai/ha |
kg ai/hl |
||||
Argentina 1995 |
EC |
1 |
0.6 |
0.16 |
14 |
<0.05 |
631 |
21 |
<0.05 |
||||||
30 |
<0.05 |
||||||
Brazil 1995 |
SL |
3 |
0.6 |
0.06 |
21 |
0.08 |
77 |
3 |
1.2 |
0.12 |
21 |
0.2 |
|||
Germany 1977
|
SL
|
3
|
0.36
|
006
|
0 |
1.95 |
15
|
7 |
0.23 |
||||||
14 |
0.2 |
||||||
21 |
0.06 |
||||||
28 |
0.07 |
||||||
Germany 1977
|
SL
|
3
|
036
|
0.06
|
0 |
<0.01 |
16
|
7 |
0.16 |
||||||
14 |
0.03 |
||||||
21 |
0.02 |
||||||
28 |
0.05 |
||||||
Mexico 1995 |
EC |
2 |
0.9 |
0.3 |
35 |
<0.01, 0.02 |
651,2 |
1 No data on analytical recoveries
2 The 2 results were from duplicate plots. The higher value was used to estimate both maximum residue levels and STMRs