Previous Page Table of Contents Next Page


Chapter 2

Agricultural production


Levels of technology

In the study “El Perfil Tecnológico de la Producción Agropecuaria Argentina” (INTA, 2002), the crops were grouped as follows:

Then the crops were grouped according to the level of technology used (Table 1).

In the case of grains, high and medium technology producers account for 82 percent of the area and 86 percent of the production, while in the case of fruit crops the 8 percent of producers with a high level of technology produced 42 percent of the production. In the case of industrial crops 14 percent of producers with a high level of technology produced 50 percent of the output.

TABLE 1
Areas, number of producers and production according to the technical level

Crop group

Technical
level

Area
('000 ha)

Producers
('000)

Production
('000 tonnes)

Main crops

Cereals and oil crops

Low

3 187

38

7 015

Soybean


Medium

8 413

75

24 564

Wheat


High

5 103

28

19 545

Maize


Total

16 703

141

51 124

Sunflower

Fruit crops

Low

64

14

532

Citrus


Medium

80

8

1 864

Grapes


High

75

2

1 751

Apples


Total

219

24

4 147

Pears

Industrial crops

Low

361

31

3 733

Cotton


Medium

543

22

8 761

Sugar cane


High

370

9

12 318

Tobacco


Total

1 274

62

24 812

Yerba mate

Horticultural crops

Low

27

4

516

Potato


Medium

23

3

533

Garlic


High

48

1

2 036

Onion


Total

98

8

3 085

Tomato

Note: These are not national totals. They concern producers for which information on levels of were available.

TABLE 2
Differences in yield at different technical levels

Crop group

Low-medium

Medium-high

Low-high

Grains

27%

24%

44%

Fruit crops

55%

38%

70%

Horticultural crops

18%

15%

44%

Industrial crops

37%

28%

55%

Three levels of technology adoption were defined, according to the type of technology used by a given sector. The variables included yields, areas of production, number of producers[1], economic indicators, the size of farms and constraints to the adoption of technology. The latter were evaluated according to a range from no constraints (0) to serious constraints (3). Table 2 summarizes difference of yield between levels, expressed as a proportion of the yield of the higher level.

The gap between the low level and the medium level in general is higher than that between the medium level and the high level, with some exceptions within each group. The difference between the extremes is about 50 percent for each group of crops.

Changes in the profile of producers

During the past decade there have been profound changes in the profiles of the agricultural producers, especially those of the Pampa (White, 2000).

Level of education

One in four producers has completed tertiary or university education. However, 43 percent of producers in the humid Pampa have not completed secondary education. There are considerable variations between regions.

Place of residence

Approximately 28 percent of the producers in the humid Pampa live on the farm. However, in certain other regions only 10 percent live on the farm. Only 15 percent of the producers live in cities with more than 50 000 inhabitants, apart from the region of the southeast area of Buenos Aires, where the figure is 38 percent.

Out of a total national population in 2001 of 37.5 million people, only 4.4 million were classed as rural, and 3.7 million, or 10 percent of the total, agricultural (FAO).

Access to technical assistance

Many institutions are involved in the provision of technical assistance to agriculture. They include state, national and provincial programmes, private non-profit institutions, profit making institutions, consultancy organizations, independent technicians, distributors of agrochemicals, seed and other inputs etc. The level of assistance has improved significantly during the past decade. In 1992, 44 percent of the producers did not receive advice whereas today this is the case with only one in four. Eighty four percent of the producers receive advice on accounting and taxation.

Land ownership

About 50 percent of the producers today cultivate rented land (Table 3). The real estate market in land is very active. The growing trend towards the purchase of land for renting reflects the attraction of investment in land due to lower debts in agriculture, the absence of alternative investment opportunities and the low cost of capital. A land-owning farmer may expand the area of his farm with rented land.

TABLE 3
Pampa: Farmer-owned and rented land


Owned

Rented

Year

2000/01

2001/02

2000/01

2001/02

'000 ha

273

175

313

136

Percent

47

56

53

44

Source: Fertilizar. Unpublished data.

Production by region

Pampa

This region produces the main grain crops (wheat, maize, soybean and sunflower). Approximately 15 percent of farms in the humid Pampa are mixed, 28 percent exclusively arable and 17 percent exclusively livestock. There has been an increase in the purely arable farms at the expense of purely livestock farms. In 1992 arable farms represented about a third, increasing to 44 percent in 1999 (White, 2000). The cattle population fell during the same period from 32 to 27 million head.

In terms of the areas cultivated, the main crops are soybean, wheat, maize and sunflower in that order. Secondary crops are sorghum, barley, groundnuts and flax.

Following the abolition of the export levy in 1991, grain production became much more attractive. An average production of cereals and soybeans of 29 million tonnes between 1989 and 1991 rose to over 50 million tonnes by the end of the decade.

There has been a substantial concentration of land, reduction in the number of producers and increase in the average farm size in the Pampa region (Table 4).

The most important technical changes in the 1990s were the increase in the use of fertilizers and direct seeding (Figure 3). Today approximately one in three ha sown in the humid Pampa is direct seeded. This development is explained by the increase in the cost of fuel, the availability of cheap and efficient herbicides and the yield potential of herbicide resistant soybean varieties. With the improvement in fertilizer technology, direct seeding is increasingly used also for cereals crops.

TABLE 4
Number and average area of farms in the Pampa region

Pampa region

Number of farms
('000)

Average size
(ha)

1988

2002

1988

2002

Buenos Aires

196

136

391

531

NEA

85

68

222

284

NOA

65

56

261

238

Irrigated valleys

69

52

363

498

Source: Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Censos (INDEC), 2003.

FIGURE 3
Development of direct seeding for the principal crops

Source: Asociacion Argentina de Productores de Siembra Directa (AAPRESID), 2003. (The percentages indicate the proportion of the national total).

The economic regions

There are two main agricultural systems in the regions, a subsistence system, which is not considered in this study, and a commercial system characterized by intensification, capital investment and use of inputs.

There have been many changes also in the agriculture of the regional economies. In the north there has been a significant increase in the sown areas, thus expanding the agricultural frontier. In a decade, the sown area in the four provinces of Tucumán, Santiago del Estero, Salta and Chaco has increased from one to more than three million ha, with an annual rate of increase of 6 percent. Until 1997 rice and cotton destined for the Brazilian market were important but with the progressive devaluation of the Brazilian Real they became less profitable and much of their area has been replaced with soybean.

Industrial crops such as sugar cane, tobacco and cotton are grown mostly in the north west and yerba mate and tea in the north east. Subtropical crops have a good potential in the region and there are substantial areas of early vegetable crops.

In the region of the irrigated valleys the main crops are vines, nuts, olives and horticultural crops. In Comahue the main fruit crops are apples and pears.

The irrigation of fruit and horticultural crops with pressure systems (sprays, drip and similar) has increased at an exponential rate (Figure 4).

FIGURE 4
Development of pressure irrigation

Source: Morabíto et al. (1997).


[1] In this publication, a “producer” is defined as the first to market the agricultural product. The “producer” is not necessarily the farmer who cultivated the land.

Previous Page Top of Page Next Page