Previous Page Table of Contents Next Page


3.6 Institutional consumers

Most institutional consumers (IC) surveyed were restaurants, popular restaurants, and canteens, of which the restaurants and popular restaurants are the majority (Table 30). The popular restaurants mostly serve normal daily meals. The canteens are somewhat similar in terms of operation but targeted to specific groups of customers from offices or institutions. The restaurants target higher levels of consumption where people occasionally come for a party or evening out.

TABLE 30
Type of business by region

Types of Business

Region

Total

Northern

Central

Southern

Restaurant

Count

21

25

21

67

%

52.5

83.3

45.7

57.8

Canteen

Count

6

3

4

13

%

15.0%

10.0

8.7

11.2

Popular restaurant

Count

13

2

21

36

%

32.5

6.7

45.7

31.0

Total

Count

40

30

46

116

%

100.0

100.0

100.0

100.0

Similar to the other market operators, institutional consumers can be run at family household or enterprise level. According to the survey, institutional consumers at household level are the majority, accounting for 64 percent, the rest were operating at either enterprise or joint-capital group level (Table 31).

TABLE 31
Type of business patterns of institutional consumers by region

Organizational patterns

Region

Total

Northern

Central

Southern

Household

Count

27

17

32

76

%

67.5

56.7

66.7

64.4

Private enterprise

Count

1

7

8

16

%

2.5

23.3

16.7

13.6

Joined capital group

Count

-

2

4

6

%

-

6.7

8.3

5.1

State-owned enterprises

Count

7

2

3

12

%

17.5

6.7

6.3

10.2

Equitized enterprise

Count

4

1

-

5

%

10.0

3.3

-

4.2

Others

Count

1

1

1

3

%

2.5

3.3

2.1

2.5

Total

Count

40

30

48

118

%

100.0

100.0

100.0

100.0

Patterns of institutional consumption

Various kinds of meat are consumed in eating institutions, including fishery products, pork, chicken, beef and duck. The survey shows that fishery products are dominant among the meats consumed. In nearly half (46 percent) of the cases, fishery products accounted for more than 50 percent of the total meat consumed. The situation was slightly different among regions of the country where the north tended to consume less fish than the other regions (Table 32).

TABLE 32
Proportions of fish among total meat consumption of institutional consumers by region

Proportions of fish (%)

Region

Total

Northern

Central

Southern

<25

Count

10

1

1

12

%

25.0

3.6

2.1

10.3

25-50

Count

20

9

22

51

%

50.0

32.1

45.8

44.0

50-75

Count

5

7

20

32

%

12.5

25.0

41.7

27.6

>75

Count

5

11

5

21

%

12.5

39.3

10.4

18.1

Total

Count

40

28

48

116

%

100.0

100.0

100.0

100.0

Various kinds of fisheries products are consumed in institutions, among which fish sauce is a product that cannot be ignored by any eating-place. On average 39 litres of fish sauce are consumed per month per institution in addition to various kinds of marine and freshwater products.

Among the 120 institutions surveyed, shrimp, crab, squid, snakehead, shellfish, common carp, major carp, tilapia, scad and grouper are the ten major species purchased (Table 33). However, when ranked by value of the total purchase by species, there was a slight change in the list of the ten major species that were most consumed financially. Species of mackerel, lobster, and snapper entered the list instead of two freshwater species namely common carp, major carps, and scad the marine species. Among the species consumed, purchased shrimp, crab, and lobster were the most valuable ones. Shrimp consumption accounted for only 17 percent of the total quantity consumed by institutions but accounts for 35 percent of value. Other examples are 11 percent by quality and 16 percent by value for crab and 1 percent and 4 percent by value for lobster.

TABLE 33
Quantity (tonnes) of fish products consumed monthly by institutional consumers

Fish product

Mean

N

Std.
deviation

Sum

% of Total Sum

Dried fish

2.0

1

-

2.00

0

Dried squid

3.0

1

-

3.00

0

Shrimp

121.7

75

160.58

9131.00

17.1

Squid

83.9

58

82.36

4865.00

9.

Crab

114.0

51

162.28

5815.00

10.9

True mackerel

64.8

12

49.08

778.00

1.5

Grouper/sea bass

97.1

16

179.03

1553.00

2.9

Cat fish

53.0

5

9.74

265.00

0.5

Tuna

114.3

7

97.27

800.00

1.5

Common carp

159.1

14

232.13

2228.00

4.2

Tilapia

242.5

8

219.45

1940.00

3.6

Snakehead

112.8

55

146.14

6203.00

11.6

Gouramy

212.5

10

207.76

2125.00

4.0

Scad

90.8

18

120.07

1636.00

3.1

Jobfish

50.0

1

-

50.00

0.1

Pomfret

90.0

1

-

90.00

0.2

Marine fish

131.7

6

135.41

790.00

1.5

Fish (general)

156.4

27

183.82

4222.00

7.9

FW fish

106.4

7

98.77

745.00

1.4

Snapper

86.

13

108.55

1121.00

2.1

Major carp

61.5

31

39.02

1908.00

3.6

FW shrimp

15.3

8

14.73

122.00

0.2

Leather jacket

115.0

2

120.21

230.00

.4

Clam/snail

66.5

38

89.88

2527.00

4.7

‘keo’ fish

100.0

1

.

100.00

0.2

Sheat fish

135.8

6

132.83

815.00

1.5

Goby

60.0

3

36.06

180.00

0.3

Other mackerel

89.4

8

63.3830

715.00

1.3

Anabas

65.0

7

44.0643

455.00

0.9

Eel

63.3

12

51.8009

760.00

1.4

Other species and products

53.6

13

46.1240

697.00

1.3

Lobster

67.9

7

103.7568

475.00

0.9

Total

102.2

522

135.3981

53346.00

100.0

Purchasing behaviour of institutional consumers

Institutions purchase fish products on a daily basis either at their home-gate or in the market. According to the survey, 45 percent of the institutions had home delivery service for fish products, mostly from wholesalers or retailers. The average monthly purchase of fish products was VND 22.68 million; the figure for restaurants was VND 34.16 million, which was 4 to 5 times higher than that of the canteen and popular restaurant (Table 34).

TABLE 34
Monthly expenses (VND millions) on fishery products by institutional consumers1

Fish product

Mean Monthly expenses (VND millions)

N

Std. deviation

Sum

% of Total Sum

Dried fish

120

1

-

120

0

Dried squid

450.4

1

-

450

0

Shrimp

11511.1

75

17407.52

863330

34

Squid

3144.4

58

3057.72

182377

7.3

Crab

7727.5

50

14448.62

386377

15

True mackerel

8700.0

12

15855.66

104400

4.2

Grouper/sea bass

8343.7

16

17847.82

133500

5.4

Catfish

645.0

5

68.74

3225

0.1

Tuna

1540.0

7

1162.24

10780

0.4

Common carp

3385.2

14

5135.34

47394

1.9

Tilapia

6630.6

8

7834.10

53045

2.1

Snakehead

2871.6

55

4291.82

157940

6.4

Gouramy

5102.0

10

4177.68

51020

2.1

Scad

902.7

18

1064.90

16248

0.7

Pomfret

2880.0

1

-

2880

0.1

Marine fish

2613.3

6

2430.20

15680

0.6

Fish (general)

3889.4

27

4620.74

105015

4.2

FW fish

1881.9

7

2561.38

13173

0.5

Snapper

4364.8

13

5888.65

56742

2.3

Major carp

662.4

31

461.39

20536

0.8

FW shrimp

527.6

8

704.82

4221

0.2

Leather jacket

4525.0

2

4914.39

9050

0.4

Clam/snail

1525.1

38

2300.04

57952

2.3

‘keo’ fish

3500.0

1

.

3500

0.1

Sheat fish

2101.7

6

2191.00

12610

0.5

Goby

1916.7

3

1421.56

5750

0.2

Other mackerel

870.0

8

508.22

6960

0.3

Anabas

2017.9

7

2295.59

14125

0.6

Eel

2601.3

12

2150.06

31215

1.3

Other species and products

1256.3

12

902.02

15075

0.6

Lobster

14035.7

7

21859.30

98250

4.0

Total

4784.1

519

10236.42

2482940

100.0

1 Large organizations and catering users of fish.

The preferences for fish products differ. Various factors affecting the purchasing decision of consumer institutions were identified in the survey. Product price was the major factor for 67 percent of institutions; freshness and quality of the product were also important factors as reported by 44 percent and 42 percent of the institutions, respectively (Table 35). Moreover, 33 percent of the institutions reported that the size of the product had affected their purchase because the size should fit a single meal of a family. Almost all institutions (93 percent) were satisfied with the fish products purchased (Table 36).

TABLE 35
Criteria used by institutional consumers to select fish products

Criteria

Restaurant

Canteen

Popular restaurant

Total

Count

%

Count

%

Count

%

Count

%

Size of products

23

34.3

2

15.4

14

37.8

39

33.3

Demanded species

40

59.7

10

76.9

22

59.5

72

61.5

Price

41

61.2

8

61.5

29

78.4

78

66.7

Aware of its source

6

9

0

0

1

2.7

7

6.0

Known products

6

9

2

15.4

13

35.1

21

17.9

High quality

30

44.8

9

69.2

10

27

49

41.9

Freshwater products

0

0

1

7.7

0

0

1

0.9

Marine products

2

3

0

0

0

0

2

1.7

Natural products

1

1.5

0

0

1

2.7

2

1.7

Diseases free

3

4.5

2

15.4

0

0

5

4.3

Chemical free

4

6

1

7.7

1

2.7

6

5.1

Colour of products

1

1.5

0

0

0

0

1

0.9

Freshness

35

52.2

3

23.1

14

37.8

52

44.4

Others

1

1.5

0

0

0

0

1

0.9

Total

67

57.3

13

11.1

37

31.6

117

100

TABLE 36
Satisfaction with fishery products by types of institutional consumers

Degree of satisfaction

Type of institutional consumers

Total

Restaurant

Canteen

Popular restaurant

Always

Count

38

6

13

57

%

56.7

46.2

35.1

48.7

Most of the time

Count

27

5

20

52

%

40.3

38.5

54.1

44.4

Sometimes

Count

2

1

4

7

%

3.0

7.7

10.8

6.0

Seldom

Count

-

1

-

1

%

-

7.7

-

0.9

Total

Count

67

13

37

117

%

100.0

100.0

100.0

100.0

Customers and services offered

Government employees, workers and ordinary people were the main groups of customers of institutions, especially the popular restaurants. Business people, tourists and foreigners were also important groups of customers for restaurants (Table 37).

TABLE 37
Major groups of customers to institutional consumers

Groups of customers

Restaurants

Canteen

Popular restaurant

Total

Count

%

Count

%

Count

%

Count

%

Workers

21

32.3

3

23.1

27

73.0

51

44.3

Government employees

47

72.3

9

69.2

23

62.2

79

68.7

Pupils, students

7

10.8

6

46.2

22

59.5

35

30.4

Army, police persons

2

3.1

3

23.1

0

0

5

4.3

Ordinary people

36

55.4

1

7.7

25

67.6

62

53.9

Business people

25

38.5

1

7.7

1

2.7

27

23.5

Domestic tourists

26

40

0

0

1

2.7

27

23.5

Foreign visitors

18

27.7

0

0

0

0

18

15.7

Others

2

3.1

1

7.7

4

10.8

7

6.1

Total

65

56.5

13

11.3

37

32.2

115

100

Typically, customers prefer fresh, high quality and cheap fishery products (Table 38). In addition, food safety issue were raised by 26 percent of the customers. It was reported by 23 percent of customers that they preferred ready-made food and 22 percent said that they paid much attention in choosing marine products.

TABLE 38
Criteria used by different customers to select fish products

Selection criteria

Workers

Government employees

Pupils, students

Army, police persons

Ordinary people

Business people

Domestic tourists

Foreign visitors

Others

Total

Ready made

21

12

12

2

15

3

4

3

1

73

%

40.4

15.4

34.3

40.0

23.4

10.7

15.4

16.7

14.3

23.3

Fresh

30

55

12

3

38

18

16

11

3

186

%

57.7

70.5

34.3

60

59.4

64.3

61.5

61.1

42.9

59.4

Dried

1

1

0

0

3

1

1

0

0

7

%

1.9

1.3

0

0

4.7

3.6

3.8

0

0

2.2

Frozen

0

2

0

0

0

0

1

0

0

3

%

0

2.6

0

0

0

0

3.8

0

0

1.0

Canned

2

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

2

%

3.8

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0.6

High quality

2

15

0

0

4

19

11

5

1

57

%

3.8

19.2

0

0

6.3

67.9

42.3

27.8

14.3

18.2

Cheap

27

16

26

1

32

1

1

0

2

106

%

51.9

20.5

74.3

20.0

50.0

3.6

3.8

0

28.6

33.9

Freshwater

2

8

2

0

5

0

1

3

1

22

%

3.8

10.3

5.7

0

7.8

0

3.8

16.7

14.3

7.0

Marine

7

18

1

1

11

12

8

7

3

68

%

13.5

23.1

2.9

20.0

17.2

42.9

30.8

38.9

42.9

21.7

Aquaculture

2

8

0

0

6

1

1

4

3

25

%

3.8

10.3

0

0

9.4

3.6

3.8

22.2

42.9

8.0

Natural

2

3

0

0

5

3

2

3

0

18

%

3.8

3.8

0

0

7.8

10.7

7.7

16.7

0

5.8

Safety

18

26

3

0

17

7

5

5

1

82

%

34.6

33.3

8.6

0

26.6

25.0

19.2

27.8

14.3

26.2

Diversified

8

11

4

0

12

7

7

0

1

50

%

15.4

14.1

11.4

0

18.8

25.0

26.9

0

14.3

16.0

Brand named

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

2

0

2

%

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

11.1

0

0.6

Total

52

78

35

5

64

28

26

18

7

313

%

16.6

24.9

11.2

1.6

20.4

8.9

8.3

5.8

2.2

100

Table 39 shows that almost all of the institutions served lunch and dinner for customers, only a few cases offered breakfast. On average, the number of daily customers ranged from 100 to 200 people. Canteens had the highest number of daily customers (median of 200 persons); restaurants and popular restaurants served fewer customers per day (means of 155 and 133 persons, respectively). It was also reported that the number of customers going to canteens was rather stable over time compared with other restaurants (Table 40).

TABLE 39
Types of meals offered by institutional consumers

Types of meals

Type of business

Total

Restaurant

Canteen

Popular restaurant

Lunch

Count

3

2

4

9

%

4.5

15.4

10.8

7.7

Dinner

Count

8

-

1

9

%

11.9

-

2.7

7.7

Breakfast and lunch

Count

-

-

1

1

%

-

-

2.7

0.9

Breakfast and dinner

Count

2

-

-

2

%

3.0

-

-

1.7

Lunch and dinner

Count

28

5

28

61

%

41.8

38.5

75.7

52.1

All three meals

Count

26

6

3

35

%

38.8

46.2

8.1

29.9

Total

Count

67

13

37

117

%

100.0

100.0

100.0

100.0

TABLE 40
Percentage of customers eating fish by types of institutional consumers

Range (%)

Types of institutional consumers

Total

Restaurant

Canteen

Popular restaurant

<25

Count

3

1

2

6

%

4.5

8.3

5.4

5.2

25-50

Count

16

5

19

40

%

23.9

41.7

51.4

34.5

50-75

Count

21

4

8

33

%

31.3

33.3

21.6

28.4

>75

Count

27

2

8

37

%

40.3

16.7

21.6

31.9

Total

Count

67

12

37

116

%

100.0

100.0

100.0

100.0

The average price paid by a customer for a fishmeal was VND 32 000. There was a great difference in price for a fish meal paid by customers in different types of institutions. The average price for a fish meal in canteens and popular restaurants was VND 5 000, which was quite affordable by various ordinary customers. In contrast, the average cost of a fish meal at restaurant was much higher at VND 48 000, which was much higher than that at the other types of eating places (Table 41). It was perceived by 82 percent of customers at restaurants that fish meal are more expensive than non-fish meals. While the majority of customers at canteens and popular restaurant saw the fish meals were either cheaper than or as cheap as non-fish meals (Table 42).

TABLE 41
Price (VND x 1 000) of a fish meal charged by types of institutional consumers

Types of institutional consumers

Mean

N

Std. deviation

Restaurant

48

67

64.3

Canteen (median)

5

13

40.2

Popular restaurant (median)

5

37

11.1

Total

-

117

-

TABLE 42
Customer perception of the prices of a fish meal to a nonfish meal

Customer perception

Types of institutional consumers

Total

Restaurant

Canteen

Popular restaurant

More expensive

Count

50

3

4

57

%

82.0

33.3

13.8

57.6

Cheaper

Count

5

5

7

17

%

8.2

55.6

24.1

17.2

No difference

Count

6

1

18

25

%

9.8

11.1

62.1

25.3

Total

Count

61

9

29

99

%

100.0

100.0

100.0

100.0

The difference in customer’s expense on fish consumption was explained by the difference in major groups of customers at each type of business and the fish species ordered. In restaurants, most of the customers had higher purchasing power, while ordinary people or workers could afford only cheaper fish products. There was a higher demand for high quality fish products in restaurants, while in canteens and popular restaurants cheaper fish products are the most preferred products by customers; hence price and quality differ in importance according to the group of customers.


Previous Page Top of Page Next Page