0098-C1

Challenging the National Logging Ban in China: An Experience of Community-Based Natural Forest Management in Sichuan Province

Weijie Deng[1]


Abstract

China’s National Logging Ban was issued in 1998 because of the degraded and deteriorated forests that had resulted from unsuitable and unsustainable management strategies and methodologies. However, many more conflicts between government and local communities have emerged under the conventional approaches. Currently, the local communities in China still have their own approaches to forest management using indigenous technology knowledge (ITK). This implies that local communities could manage the local forests using local/customary rules and ITK for sustainable development and conservation of natural forests.

A participatory action research was conducted in Daocai village, Mao County, Sichuan province, China in 2001. The main purpose of the study was to facilitate community-based natural forest management and learn some things in the process. Daocai village is a typical mountain village in western Sichuan - economically poor but rich in natural resources, especially the natural forest. The study in Daocai village has shown that the community has a very high interest in forest management and is capable of managing the forest under the certain conditions, such as improved village rules, active participation of the community, appropriate local capacity and organization, transparency and communication among key stakeholders in the process, and consensus and agreement on a new strategy and plan. The experience in Daocai village has also proved that forming a new special local organization is not the only option for community-based forest management. The village committee, as the governmental organization at the grass roots level in China, could play the key role in community-based forest management. A positive attitude of the committee and especially the village director to community-based natural forest management and his or their good reputation in the community are preconditions for success. Where this is the case, community-based natural forest management should be another option for better management of natural forests instead of just the National Logging Ban.


1. Participatory Action Research on Community-based Forest Management

In 2001, a participatory action research (PAR) on community-based natural forest management was initiated in Daocai village, Mao County, Sichuan Province. The goal of the study is focus on the innovation of policies on natural forest management at County or regional level in China, and the objectives of the study includes:

So the final objective of study is ‘learning from the community and adapting the participatory approaches in the process by facilitating community-based natural forest management ’.

2. Basic Information about Mao County and Daocai Village

Mao County is located in Northwest Sichuan province, the transition region between West Sichuan Plain and Qing-Tibet Plateau with the area of 4064.35 square kilometers, and the forestland occupied the 67.26% of total area, and about 54% of forestland is distributing in high and steep mountains and hills while 20% are distributing in the drought valley areas. Daocai village is located in the upstream of Mingjiang River, the one of main distributaries of Yangtze River as the key area of natural forest with 600 persons of population. Mao County is one of three counties of Qiang Minority in China.

3. Forests Management in Daocai Village

There are as more as 130 ha of forests distributing in two hamlets of Daocai village and 60 ha of that is natural forests. Those natural forests have being managed well by local people compared with other communities in the region without any budgetary support from government. Normally, the villagers in Daocai could benefit from the natural forest by collecting fuel wood, timbers, pine mushroom as well as waters. All the benefits from the natural forests have promoted the interest of villagers on the natural forests management.

Daocai village has long history on forest management even if before the liberation (1949), all the forest guard were nominate themselves or by others but confirmed finally by village committee through the village committee meetings, and all the management costs was shared by local people since 1983. Daocai village also has their own village rules on forest management. For example, one might be fined with 50-100 RMB if he/she fell a young tree or seedling.

The main factors promoting villagers in Daocai village to manage the natural forests are the environmental factor and economic factor. As mentioned before that Daocai village is know well in the region, because most of the people in the region including local governmental staff think that Daocai is quite beautiful with the existing natural forest as well as the collection of pine mushroom in the forest. The villagers in Daocai community believe that the conservation of natural forests will beautify the environment in Daocai and benefit them economically.

4. Facilitating the Community-Based Natural Forest Management

The villagers in Daocai have realized some constraints on natural forests management. The hiring of PRA tools in the process of participatory action research (PAR) have provided us with the following key information on natural forests management in Daocai village:

For more benefit economically and environmentally from those natural forests, in Daocai, the following suggestions are recommended by villagers during the study process:

Finally, the suggestions on better management of natural forests in Daocai village were finalized as:

For those purpose, the new village rules were developed by researcher, local governmental staff and local villagers, and submitted as the draft for the further discussion in the community meeting. All the idea on the natural forests management, which generated by villagers in Daocai have been shared with other key stakeholders including the government of Township and Forestry Bureau of Mao County as well as Baodinggou Natural Reserve Administration. in March 2001, a community meeting was organized in Daocai village, the main objectives of this is to explore and confirm the village rules on natural forests management, the management of forest guards and the regulations for the forest management group in Daocai village. When the rules have been ensured compliance with local community members, all the community members (householders) signed up in the written paper of rules. One more objectives of the is to elect local forest guards as well as the FMG members in Daocai for implementing new rules and new management mechanism of community-based natural forest management.

The most villagers do agree with the new attempt because they think that the natural forest is the collective property so that all the community members should benefit from it by new attempt. The existing way on the collection of pine mushroom just benefit few of households, and Daocai village is also facing the problem on the short of fuel wood and the water supply. Most of young men and some of old men thinks that all the implementation and enforcement of new rules on natural forests management must be conducted by villagers themselves as soon as possible.

Since some of other villager thinks that the professional forest guards from government could protect the natural forests without compensation from Daocai village, the local forest guards should have focused on the management of pine mushroom so that the election of local forest guards could be delayed until the start of collection of pine mushroom. It was promised that whole villagers will follow the new rules on the natural forests management which approved by themselves. As the facilitating process, we respected to the decision made by the local community and cancelled the election of local forest guards, but we were recommended to monitor the process of community-based natural forests management in Daocai village and evaluate in some time.

5. Participatory Project Monitoring

In the beginning of May 2001, a special evaluation for the implementation of community-based natural forest management in Daocai village was conducted, and it was noted that

In September 2001, one more evaluation has been done in Daocai village by researcher and local governmental staff, and local villagers informed me that at least 60,000RMB(8,000USD) has been generated by collecting pine mushroom in August, and all community members in Daocai suggested to continue the community-based natural forests management furtherly. It implies that the effort on community-based forest management is effective obviously.

6. The Community-based Natural Forest Management and the National Logging Ban

It is challenge to National Logging Ban on exploring solution for income generation of communities in the forest areas in China, and the collection of NTFPs might be the opportunity for sustainable conservation and development in the community by improving the management of forests, especially the natural forests, and the community-based natural forests management could the one of option in this process. In case of this, it is suggested strongly

The problems illustrated above on the natural forest conservation and Nation Logging Ban is quite similar with the one we identified in Daocai village, and the attempt of community-based natural forests management in Daocai might provide National Logging Ban with the experience on ideas and strategies as well as the process The National Logging Ban also provides us an opportunity to learn how to involve or how to promote local community participate the natural forests management for the sustainable conservation and development. To achieve the objectives, the role and function of local community in the process of natural forests management should be identified, recognized, and promoted by institutionalizing and capacity building at local community level at least.

REFERENCES

Berkes, F. and M.Taghi Farvar. 1988. "Introduction and Overview" in F.Berekss (ed). Common Property Resources. London, Belhaven Press.

Case, D.D. 1990. The Community’s Toolbox: The Idea, Methods and Tools for Participatory Assessment, Monitoring and Evaluation in Natural forestsry. FAO/RWEDP, Rome.

Fisher, R J. 1991. Studying Indigenous Forest Management System in Nepal: Toward A More Systematic Approach. Environment &Policy Institute, East-West Center, Honolulu, USA, 1991.

Fisher, R.J. 2000. "Decentralization and Devolution in Forest Management: A Conceptual Overview" in Thomas Enters, Patrick B. Durst and Michael Victor (ed). Decentralization and Devolution of Forest Management in Asia and the Pacific. Bangkok: RECOFTC. RECOFTC 18 (3).

Holdgate, Martin. 1995. From Care to Action: Making a Sustainable World. London: Earthscan Publications Ltd.

Ingles, Andrew. W; Musch. Ame and Helle. Qwist-Hoffmann. 1999. The Participatory Process for Supporting Collaborative Management of Natural Resources: An Overview. FAO, Rome.

Munasingbe, Mohan. 1994. "The Economist's Approach to Sustainable Development" in Ismail Serageldin (ed). Making Development Sustainable: From Concepts to Action. Washington, D.C. The World Bank: Environmentally Sustainable Development Occasional Paper Series No.2.

The Forestry Bureau of Mao County. 1988. The Investigation Report on Forests in Mao County (in Chinese). Mao County, Sichuan Province, China.


[1] Associate Professor, Institute for Community & Conservation, Jianshe Road No. 241, Dujiangyan, Sichuan Province, P.I. China 611830. Email: [email protected]