Tech vs. Touch: Is innovation killing participation in African evaluation?

The African Evaluation Association's (AfrEA) upcoming conference sparks a crucial debate: is the rise of technology in evaluation practice the "last nail in the coffin" for participatory approaches? In Africa, where evaluation has often been criticized for being Eurocentric, fostering participation has been a key focus. Can tech and participation co-exist, or are we on the verge of losing the human touch?

The power of participation

Traditionally, African evaluation has emphasized including stakeholders – from community members to policymakers – in the process. This "culturally responsive evaluation" ensures local voices are heard and evaluations reflect the context they operate within. Participatory methods like focus groups and storytelling allow for rich, nuanced data collection that might be missed by purely quantitative approaches.

The rise of the machines

Technology offers undeniable advantages. Mobile surveys can reach wider populations in remote areas. Big data analysis can uncover hidden patterns in vast datasets. Online platforms facilitate real-time feedback and collaboration. These tools can streamline processes, improve efficiency, and potentially even democratize access to evaluation for under-resourced communities.

Finding the right balance

The key isn't to choose tech over participation, but to find a way to integrate them. Here are some ways to achieve that:

• Tech-enabled participation: Use mobile apps to gather data through surveys or photovoice projects.
• Data democratization: Develop online platforms where communities can access and analyze evaluation results.
• Tech as a tool: Integrate technology into existing participatory methods, like using online forums for group discussions.

A future for both?

Technology shouldn't replace participation; it should enhance it. By using tech thoughtfully, we can expand the reach and impact of participatory evaluation. This requires:

• Building Capacity: Equipping evaluators and communities with the skills to use technology effectively.
• Prioritizing Equity: Ensuring everyone has access to the technology needed to participate.
• Maintaining the Human Touch: Never forgetting the importance of in-person interaction and qualitative data collection.

The AfrEA conference is a timely opportunity to explore these issues. By fostering dialogue and collaboration, we can ensure that technological innovation strengthens, rather than undermines, participatory evaluation practices in Africa.

What are your thoughts? Can tech and participation work together?