Table 6. Types of formulated feed
used, their advantages and disadvantages and the type of processing |
|
|
|
Type of
feed |
Advantages |
Disadvantages |
Moisture (% max) |
Processing techniques |
|
Farm-made feed |
|
|
|
Trash fish |
Low cost depending on the
location. No energy requirement. Pallatable. |
Very expensive in some
locations. Must be used immediately. High FCR. Negative environmental impact.
Risk of spreading fish diseases. Source of pollution. |
|
Chopped and minced trash fish |
Dry� |
No energy requirement (pellets can be made by
hand with a meat mincer and then sun dried); vitamins preserved. Feeds
available on site. Easy to make. Utilize local waste products. Dry feed lasts
longer than moist feeds. |
Starches not cooked and not very digestible; Low
water stability (additional binder may be required);shorter storage period;
High FCR; large surface required for drying. Moist feed can not be stored and
must to be used immediately. |
Dry pellet 10% and moist diet 30% |
Wet dough extruded through
a meat mincer and sun dried |
Wet feed
extruding line |
Moist |
Hand made dough |
Industrially manufactured pellet |
|
|
|
|
Sinking |
Good water stability. Cheaper than floating
pellets and so lower capital costs. |
Dry ingredients required; vitamins partially
lost. Generally higher FCR than floating pellet.Fish feeding can not be
observed. |
10% |
Compressed pellet |
Compressed
pellet line |
Steam
treated compressed pellet |
Steam-treated compressed
pellet line |
Floating / slow sinking |
Best water stability; best
FCR; many anti-nutritional factors removed with heat. |
Extruders more expensive
and so high production cost. Requires more skill in production. Fish feeding
can be observed. |
10% |
Extruded/Expanded pellet |
Extruded/expanded pellet
line |
Microdiets |
|
|
|
|
|
Microbound |
|
|
|
Powdered ingredients in a
water stable matrix (e.g.: agar, carrageenan, calcium alginate, casein, zein) |
|
Microencapsulated |
|
The protein membrane may be
difficult to digest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|