Table 9. Type of formulated feed
used for catla culture with advantage and disadvantage and the type of
processing |
Type of feed |
|
Advantages |
Disadvantages |
Moisture |
Processing
techniques |
(%
max) |
Farm-made |
Dry� |
Use of locally available ingredients, easy to
prepare using simple household machines. As moisture contain is less, it is
more durable than moist feed. |
Poor water stability, poor digestibility, higher
FCR |
10 |
Wet dough extruded� |
|
|
|
through a meat mincer� |
|
|
|
and sun dried� |
|
|
|
|
|
Moist |
Easy processing, cheaper. |
Highly perishable |
>30 |
Wet dough |
Industrially manufactured pellet |
|
|
|
|
Sinking |
Good water stability and digestibility. Good for
bottom feeders. |
Not suitable for surface feeders like catla. |
10 |
Pelleted form |
|
|
|
|
|
Floating |
Good for surface feeders
and larval fish. |
Not useful for bottom
feeders. |
10 |
Pelleted form |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|