Table 13b. Some nutritional interests, deficiencies and
processing restrictions in selected raw materials. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ingredients |
% Max.{Min.} |
Main nutritional interests |
Main nutritional
deficiencies |
Processing restrictions |
|
Various
plant proteins |
|
Alternate protein source |
Low palatability,
antinutritional factors, low HUFA20, 17low lysine & methionine |
Fibre content sometimes
high |
|
Fishmeal (e.g. Menhaden) |
16{6}�40 |
Protein, HUFA |
Possibly low phenylalanine, |
Freshness important, milling difficult |
|
arginine,
histidine, and lysine4 |
|
Herring
fishmeal6 |
As above |
As above |
As above |
As above |
|
Anchovy
fishmeal6 |
As above |
As above |
As above |
As above |
|
Peruvian
fishmeal8 |
As above |
As above |
As above |
As above |
|
Squid
meal8,10 |
1�3 |
Protein, HUFA |
|
High cost |
|
Shrimp
meal8,10 |
1�10 |
Protein |
|
High cost |
|
Shrimp
head meal8,10 |
3�15 |
HUFA, chitin |
|
High fibre content |
|
Cottonseed
meal |
<914 |
|
High fibre, Lysine4 |
<1 100 ppm of free
gossypol4 |
|
Canola meal (rapeseed, Brassica napus, B. campestris)9� |
|
|
|
High fibre content |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Soybean meal8,13 |
6218,3015, 45.516 |
High lysine1 |
Low methionine1 |
High fibre content2 |
|
|
Soybean
meal |
Ditto |
Ditto |
Ditto |
Ditto |
|
Pea
meal8 |
42.3 |
|
|
|
|
Lupin
(Lupinus angustifolius)7 |
25 |
High arginine |
Low methionine |
Variable antinutritional
content between cultivars |
|
Corn
gluten meal |
1 013 |
|
Low arginine, lysine12 |
|
|
Wheat
flour8 |
35 |
Binding properties; Rich in
methionine1,19 |
Low methionine, arginine,
tyrosine, threonine19, lysine1 |
Cost |
|
Wheat
gluten |
5 |
Binder |
|
Cost |
|
Rice
bran (deoiled)8 |
|
|
|
High fibre content2 |
|
Soybean
lecithin crude (liquid)10,11 |
1�2.0 |
higher growth rate & better nutrient
digestibility3 |
|
|
|
Soybean
lecithin (deoiled powder)10,11 |
0.5�1.0 |
|
|
|
Cholestrol10 |
>0.1 |
|
|
Expensive, high melting |
|
crystalline amino acids |
No |
|
Very low rate of incorporation5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1Fox et al., 2006 (but still
low relative to fishmeal (Watanabe, 2002)). |
|
|
|
2Hertrampf, 2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
3Kumaraguru Vasagam,
Ramesh and Balasubramanian, 2006 |
|
|
|
4Lovell, 2002 |
|
|
|
|
|
5Deshimaru, 1982 |
|
|
|
|
|
6NRC and NetLibrary,
Inc., 1993 |
|
|
|
|
|
7Smith, Tabrett, and
Glencross, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
8Bautista�Teruel,
Eusebio and Welsh, 2003 |
|
|
|
|
9Su�rez et al., 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
10Hunter and
Chamberlain, 2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
11Hertrampf, 1991 |
|
|
|
|
|
12Ahamad Ali, Syama
Dayal and Ambasankar (2004) |
|
|
|
|
13FAO, 1997 |
|
|
|
|
|
14Baldwin, 1986 |
|
|
|
|
|
15Sara, Gous and
Bureau, 2009 (Fenneropenaeus indicus) |
|
|
|
16Su�rez et al., 2009 (Litopenaeus vannamei) |
|
|
|
|
17Watanabe, 2002 |
|
|
|
|
|
18Biswas et al., 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
19Slattery and Palmer,
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
20HUFA = highly
unsaturated fatty acids. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|