12. SOILS AND FRESHWATER FISH CULTURE

12.0 What have you learned?

In the previous chapters of this manual you have been told:

  • How soils develop with time;
  • What the main soil characteristics are;
  • How to evaluate these soil characteristics so that you can use this information to your advantage.

On the basis of this new knowledge, you should be better able to:

  • Select a suitable site for either small reservoirs or freshwater fish-ponds;
  • Manage your ponds.

Site selection and pond management will be discussed in detail in later volumes of Simple methods for aquaculture, but certain aspects will be briefly discussed here so that you will have an idea of how the results of your soil survey may apply directly to these two subject areas.

12.1 Soil suitability for the building of earthen ponds

If you plan to build earthen fish-ponds, soil quality will be important, both for the selection of the best materials for making the pond dikes and for designing the fish-farm. The inlet canals and the pond bottoms will have to be sufficiently impermeable to minimize water losses by seepage. For good fish production, the fertility of your pond water should be maintained to prevent the loss of nutrients through high permeability of the pond bottom.

Note:the coefficient of permeability of soils to be used for pond bottoms should preferably be smaller than

K = 5 x 10-6 m/s.

When a site is unsuitable for earthen ponds

A site may be considered unsuitable for earthen ponds if it contains:

  • Rock outcroppings or big surface stones;
  • Gravel beds or rocky soils;
  • Sandstone soils;
  • Organic soils such as peat soils which should be avoided if possible because of their fast permeability and their unsuitability as dike construction material. When ponds are built in such soils, special construction techniques will have to be used.

When a site is suitable for earthen ponds

A site may be considered suitable for earthen ponds if the soil will ensure:

  • Good water retention such as clay or sandy clay soils;
  • Good pond fertility such as clay loam or silty clay loams.

To be suitable, the texture of the soil should be fine grained with the silt and clay particles representing more than 50 percent of the total dry weight. The best soils for fish culture are the sandy clay, silty clay loam or clay loam soils which belong to the USC-CL group.

 

 

Good pond fertility
GR000204.JPG (6825 byte)

12.2 Soil suitability for building embankments

A soil survey will help you to decide upon the suitability of a particular site. If you are planning to have a small reservoir to meet your water requirements, you will need to select a site for building the dam. Among the main factors to consider is soil quality, not only as construction material for building the earthen dam itself but to avoid accidents later. For example, if the dam is not well anchored to a deep impermeable soil layer, water may percolate along this layer making it slippery enough for the dam to slide away.

 


GR000205.JPG (4075 byte)

GR000206.JPG (4634 byte)

Dam or pond dikes

The suitability of a soil as material for building a dam or pond dikes decreases as the percentage of the clay particles decreases. This can be seen from Table 25 where soils with different textures are compared for permeability, compressibility and compaction characteristics.

The characteristics of different soil materials for compacted embankments are summarized, for guidance only and according to USC soil groups, in Table 26. The best compaction characteristics are achieved with soils having a liquid limit equal to 35 percent and a plasticity index equal to 16 percent. The moisture content of the soil should also be as close as possible to the optimum value (see Section 10.2).

Dikes without a clay core

For the construction of dikes without a clay core, look for the following soil material properties:

  • Particles with a diameter smaller than 0.1 mm, 20 to 70 percent;
  • Particles with a diameter smaller than 0.05 mm, 10 to 40 percent;
  • Plasticity index, 8 to 20 percent;
  • Coefficient of permeability from 1 x 10-4 to 5 x 10-6 m/s.

Dikes with a clay core

For the construction of dikes with a clay core, you must use a good impermeable material for the clay core with the following plasticity characteristics:

  • Liquid limit greater than 60 percent;
  • Plastic limit greater than 20 percent;
  • Plasticity index greater than 30 percent.

Note:the relative position of the particle-size frequency curve of your sample may also assist you in judging soil suitability, as discussed later in Section 12.4.

TABLE 25
The relative suitability as dike material of various types of soil
Texture
Permeability
Suitable as dike material
Clay
Impermeable
Medium
Fair to good
Excellent
Sandy clay
Impermeable
Low
Good
Good
Loam
Semi-impermeable to impermeable
High
Fair to very poor
Fair
Sandy loam
Semi-impermeable to impermeable
Medium to high
Good to very poor
Poor
Sand
Permeable
Negligible
Good
Poor
Peat
Very poor

TABLE 26
Characteristics of various soil materials for the construction of dikes and dams1
Suitability for dikes/dams
Compaction characteristics and recommended equipment2
Compressi- bility when saturated when saturated
Workability as a construction material
Shear strength when compacted/ saturated
GW
Very stable permeable shells of dikes/dams
K > 10-4
Good crawler tractor, pneumatic or steel roller
Low
Excellent
High
High
Low
About nil
GP
Reasonably stable permeable shells of dikes/dams
K > 10-4
Good crawler tractor, pneumatic or steel roller
Low
Good
High
High
Low
Very low
GM
Reasonably stable not particularly suited to shells, but may be used for impermeable cores or blankets
K = 10-5
to 10-8
Fair to good with very close control of moisture, pneumatic or sheeps'-foot roller.
Low
Good
High to medium
Medium to low
Medium to low
Very low
GC
Fairly stable may be used for impermeable cores
K = 10-2
to 10-5
Good to fair, pneumatic or sheeps-foot roller
Low to medium
Good
Medium
Low
Medium to low
Low
SW
Very stable permeable sections slope protection required
K > 10-5
Good, crawler tractor or pneumatic roller
Low
Excellent
High
High
Medium
About nil
SP
Reasonably stable may be used
K > 10-5
Good, crawler tractor
Low
Fair
Medium
High
Medium to low
About nil
SM
Fairly stable not particularly suited to shells, but may be used for impermeable cores or dikes
K = 10-5
to 10-8
Fair to good with very close control of moisture, pneumatic or sheeps'-foot roller.
Low to medium
Fair
Medium
Medium to low
Medium to high
Very low
SC
Fairly stable; used for impermeable core for flood control structures
K = 10-8
to 10-10
Good to fair; pneumatic or sheeps'-foot roller.
Low to medium
Good
Medium to low
Low
Medium to low
Low to medium
ML
Poor stability; may be used for embankments with proper control
K = 10-5
to 10-8
Fair to poor with very close control of moisture, pneumatic or sheeps'-foot roller
Medium
Fair
Medium to low
Medium to low
High
Low to medium
MH
Poor stability; core of hydraulic fill dams not desirable in rolled fill construction
K = 10-6
to 10-8
Poor to very poor; pneumatic or sheeps'-foot roller
High
Poor
Low
Low to medium
Medium to low
High
CL
Stable; impermeable cores and blankets
K = 10-8 to 10-10
Fair to good; pneumatic or sheeps'-foot roller
Medium
Good to fair
Medium to low
Low
Low to medium
Medium to high
CH
Fair stability with flat slopes; thin cores, blankets and dike sections
K = 10-8
to 10-10
Fair to poor; pneumatic or sheeps'-foot roller
High
Poor
Medium to low
Low
Low
High
OL
Suitable for low embankments with very low hazard only
K = 10-6
to 10-8
Fair to poor; sheeps'-foot roller
High
Fair
Low
Low to medium
Medium to high
High
OH
Suitable for low embankments with very low hazard only
K = 10-8
to 10-10
Poor to very poor; sheeps'-foot roller
High
Poor
Low
Low
Medium to low
High to very high

1 This information given for guidance only.
2 This equipment will usually produce good compaction with a reasonable number of passes if moisture conditions and thickness of layers are properly controlled.


A simple test for soils to be used in building embankments

It is very important to know the ability of a soil to resist water saturation* when you are selecting soil material for embankment construction. Here is a very simple test that you can perform to determine this soil quality:

  • Take a sample of the soil and wet it well;
 
GR000207.JPG (4380 byte)
     
  • Knead it with your hands until it becomes a stiff plastic mass;
 
GR000208.JPG (4430 byte)
     
  • Make several balls, each about 10 cm in diameter;
 
GR000209.JPG (4192 byte)
     
  • Put the balls in still water about 45 to 60 cm deep. You can use a hole dug in the ground and lined with a plastic sheet or a large container such as a 200 l metal drum;
 
GR000210.JPG (15642 byte)

  • Look at the balls of soil every few hours at first, and later several times a day
   
     
  • If the balls fall apart within a few hours (E), the soil is not good for embankment construction;
 
GR000211.JPG (7298 byte)
     
  • If the balls do not fall apart but remain intact for at least 24 hours (F), the soil is good for embankment construction.
 
GR000212.JPG (7463 byte)

12.3 Soil suitability for water canals

The relative stability of various USC soil groups for water canals, such as inlet and outlet canals for fish-farms, varies, as shown in Table 27, which gives estimates of resistance to water erosion and of suitability as compacted earth lining. When digging water canals, you should also consider the permeability characteristics of the soil, giving preference to those with a coefficient of permeability smaller or equal to 10-5 m/s.

TABLE 27
Relative suitability of soils for water canals
Erosion resistance
Compacted earth lining
GW
1
-
GP
2
-
GM
4
4
GC
3
1
SW
6
-
SP
7, if gravelly
-
SM
8, if gravelly
5 (Erosion critical)
SC
5
2
ML
-
6 (Erosion critical)
CL
9
3
OL
-
7 (Erosion critical)
MH
-
-
CH
10
8 (Volume change critical)

NOTE: Number 1 indicates the best soil


12.4 Determination of soil suitability with the PSF-curve

If you have the particle-size frequency curve for your soil (see Section 6.7), you may compare it with the particle-size frequency curve for your soil (see Section 6.7), you may compare it with reference curves and determine the relative suitability of the soil for pond construction or for building dikes. This method, however, is normally used only for the planning and design of relatively large fish-farms by technicians specialized in civil engineering. This is an example of how it is used:

  • You have taken a disturbed soil sample from the B-horizon of one of your soil profiles to the testing laboratory. It has been analysed for a series of particle sizes and the results have been given to you, either as percentages of occurrence by weight or as a particle-size frequency curve;
  • If you have the results as percentages of occurrence, plot this information in pencil on a photocopy of the graph given in Table 28 and trace your sample PSF- curve;
  • Now compare your PSF-curve with the two reference curves on the graph ...
    • If your sample curve falls within Zone A, the soil is suitable for a pond bottom, providing that its coefficient of permeability K is less than 5 x 10-6 m/s (see Table 16);
    • If your sample curve falls within Zone B, the soil is suitable for building dikes without an impermeable clay core;
    • If your sample curve falls within Zone C, you will require further studies concerning the soil characteristics (see Sections 12.1 and 12.2). You may find that the soil may be used but only under particular conditions such as, for example, by puddling the pond bottom and using an impermeable clay core in the dikes.

Note: before making a final decision on the suitability of your soil, you should carefully check the other important soil characteristics such as soil structure and permeability. These should confirm your diagnosis (see Tables 17A and 17B).

Examples

  • Two soil horizons have been sampled in an open pit and mechanical analyses in the laboratory have provided particle-size frequencies;
  • Cumulative frequencies are calculated;
.
Particle sizes in mm
SAMPLE 1
1
0.2
0.075
0.04
0.025
0.02
0.01
0.005
0.0035
0.002
Frequency (percent)
0.3
1.7
17
13
17
9
8
3
0.5
0.5
Cumulative f�requency (percent)
0.3
2
19
32
49
58
66
69
69.5
70

 
Particle sizes in mm
SAMPLE 2
2
1
0.5
0.2
0.1
0.05
0.02
0.01
0.0075
0.045
0.002
Frequency (percent)
1
2
4
7
12
30
26
9
3
3
2
Cumulative f�requency (percent)
1
3
7
14
26
56
82
91
94
97
99
  • The PSF-curves are plotted on a photocopy of the reference graph given in Table 28, using the right vertical scale to plot the cumulative frequencies;
  • Compare the position of the sample curves with the position of the reference curves ...
  • Sample 1 is a clay loam with 28 percent sand, 42 percent silt and 30 percent clay and its PSF-curve falls within Zone A of the reference graph, which suggests that this is a suitable soil for use as a pond bottom;
  • Sample 2 is a sandy loam with 56 percent sand, 43 percent silt and 1 percent clay and its PSF-curve falls within Zone B, which suggests that this is a suitable soil for the construction of pond dikes without an impermeable clay core.
TABLE 28
Graph and reference curves for the determination of soil suitability
from the particle-size frequency curve of the soil sample

GR000215.JPG (66896 byte)

12.5 Soils and pond management

A soil survey will help you to plan and practice better pond management by reducing seepage losses and by improving pond fertility.

Reduction of water losses by seepage

   
If the pond has a sandy bottom soil, the seepage will be unusually high, 10 cm per day or more, and particularly during the first year after construction. To reduce seepage, you can block the soil pores by spreading organic matter such as compost and animal manure on the pond bottom and mixing it well with the top 10-15 cm of soil.  

If the soil of the pond bottom has a strongly developed structure and high seepage losses, 10 cm per day or more, it may also be necessary to destroy the structure either through mechanical compaction, using a crawler tractor or a sheeps-foot roller, or through puddling .





If the percentage of clay present in the pond bottom is high, more than 60 percent, when draining the pond you should not allow the pond bottom to become too dry. If this happens, deep cracks may develop and this may increase seepage losses later when you refill the pond.

 

 

Improvement of pond fertility

If the pond bottom is acid, with a low pH, you can improve pond fertility by adding lime to neutralize the acidity. This is a technique which will be discussed further in a later volume of Simple methods for aquaculture.