Vision

The visioning process runs through the different steps of the entire CRFS assessment and planning process. It generally starts from building a first general project vision that will grow into a more refined and consolidated -and political- vision for a sustainable and resilient CRFS that is agreed upon by all stakeholders involved as the project progresses.
At this stage- which marks the start of the further CRFS assessment and planning - building a general project vision will give direction to the implementation of the CRFS Scan and will help build consensus within the project team and multi-stakeholder Task Force regarding the overall project goal: “To build a more sustainable and resilient CRFS”.
FAO and RUAF define a sustainable and resilient CRFS as follows. Sustainable and resilient CRFS are envisioned to make affordable, nutritious, and fairly-traded foods from local and regional producers more easily available to all consumers in the city region from rich to poor, rural to urban. Access to markets and support for alternative markets (e.g. community-supported agriculture, farmers’ markets, cooperatives, local guarantee schemes, etc.) become available to smallholders and other small-scale producers from urban, peri-urban and rural areas, not just large ones. Shorter value chains, and more broadly efficient and functioning agricultural value chains that link hinterland producers to urban market systems, can contribute to sustainable diets, generate employment and stabilize livelihoods in the localized distribution, processing and manufacture of food and fibre products.
Urban and peri-urban agriculture are promoted, not only for food production, but also as strategies to enhance social inclusion, community building, city greening and adaptation to climate change. Food loss and waste is prevented, reduced and managed along food supply chains in the city region, including the recovery and redistribution of safe and nutritious food for human consumption in both urban and rural areas. Ecosystem and natural resources management is promoted, as is agro-ecological diversity, and urban ecology and ecosystems are protected. The ecological footprint of the urban food system is minimised from production to consumption, and greenhouse gas emissions in food transport, processing, packaging and waste management are reduced. Improved governance ensures transparency and participation in the food system. Private sector has a role to play in building more sustainable and resilient CRFS, but it is also understands that public goods will not be delivered by market forces alone and that greater transparency and public participation in the food system are required
Source: RUAF
Project tools
Toronto-Initial Project Vision
The vision chart is an outcome of a Toronto Task Force focus group meeting to determine possible City Region Food System activities. It was developed at the start of the CRFS project to align a common vision on ultimate CRFS outcomes and to generate a joint understanding of what type of information and data could be analyzed and what type of stakeholders could be engaged in the process. The chart was completed following the definition of a project vision (‘Healthy food for all, sourced as regionally as possible and as sustainably produced, processed, packaged, and distributed as possible’) using sustainability goals applied across the food chain. The sustainability goals were captured as: Improve health, well-being and social sustainability; Increase economic growth, jobs and agricultural viability, and; Improve stewardship of resources and land based management. The value chain categories include: Agricultural inputs and production; Storage, processing and manufacturing; Wholesale and distribution; Marketing, catering and retail; Consumption; Organic waste management; Food and farm policy; Democratic engagement, and; Education. The circles on the inside of the diagram were written on sticky notes as part of a brainstorming exercise and then aligned within the sustainability/food chain framework. It should be noted that the building of much more detailed vision at this stage of the process was possible in Toronto as the Toronto Task Force could build on earlier food systems work. In cities where such previous work and engagement does not exist, formulation of such more detailed vision and sustainability dimensions may only take place later in the process. However, a more global project vision can be established as the process begins based on the materials provided in this toolkit.