Previous Page Table of Contents Next Page


The consistency analysis model

-   Overview

The consistency analysis model calculates, by country, demand for roundwood (“derived removals”), on the basis of the scenarios for consumption, trade and production of forest products presented in the earlier chapters of ETTS V, using input/output conversion factors available to FAO/ECE. Flows of waste paper and of residues, as well as use of wood for energy are calculated explicitly. This derived demand for roundwood is compared to national forecasts of roundwood supply. In the few cases where the gap between the two in the initial run was unacceptably large, adjustments were made in consultation with national correspondents, so that in the base scenarios, the “gap” between derived and forecast removals is quite small.

The only difference in assumptions between the two base scenarios (BASE LOW and BASE HIGH) is that referring to the speed of growth of the overall economy, as set out in chapter 3.

Although the model is expressed in purely physical terms, it has a foundation of economic theory. All the separate parts of the base scenario assume constant real prices for roundwood and for all forest products.

-   Main characteristics

The consistency analysis model is a detailed material balance model, with data by country for four periods: base year around 1990, 2000, 2010 and 2020. All data are in material terms (m3 or tons), but there is a common price assumption for those parts of the base scenario obtained by econometric methods, that prices remain constant. The model is not self regulating, as it identifies and quantifies inconsistencies, but does not resolve them. In order to achieve consistency, it is necessary to reexamine the scenarios, in the light of the inconsistencies, and make any necessary adjustments. It is thus an iterative process and well suited to discussion of scenarios, as it is fairly transparent and requires expert judgement. It is also comprehensive (from the forest to consumption and recovery of forest products) and rigorous, forcing users to take all aspects into account, and not be content with the outlook for only one or a few parameters.

-   Input data

The following are the data provided to the model from other parts of the study:

-   Calculation of derived removals

“Derived removals” are generated from the input data as follows:

1 Conversion Factors (Raw Material/Product) for Forest Products, 1987, United Nations, New York, 1991 (ECE/TIM/55).

2 For instance, if 1.6 m3 of logs are required to produce 1 m3 of sawnwood, then 0.6 m3 of residues are “available” for each cubic metre of sawnwood produced: there is, at this stage, no consideration of economic or technical constraints, which are implicitly considered when “availability” of residues is used as a basis for calculating “supply”.

-   Calibration

“Derived removals” were also calculated for the base year and compared to the recorded removals for that period. The main causes for the difference between the derived removals and the recorded data are:

The difference between derived and recorded removals measured for the base year has been used to adjust the projections to prevent any break in comparability over time.

-   Adjustment

After an initial run of the base scenarios, each country's data was examined to ensure that the difference between derived and forecast removals was not unreasonably large and that the scenarios passed the general test of “reasonableness”. In the relatively few cases where this “gap” was unacceptably large, the scenarios were adjusted by the secretariat in consultation with the national correspondent. Although any part of the scenario can be adjusted, it was preferred not to change those scenarios which are based on the most detailed and explicit reasoning. For this reason, the secretariat was extremely reluctant to change either the econometric projections or the national removals forecasts. The adjustments were as follows:

It should be noted that for the study itself, the figures given in the earlier chapters are the adjusted data, rather than the original forecast or projections (which are shown in the relevant Working Paper), as it was not acceptable to have different figures for the same parameter in different chapters of the same study.

-   Presentation of results

The aggregated results of each scenario are shown on a single sheet per country, at a product group level (although the calculations were done at the level of individual products). This sheet shows consumption, production, net trade, waste paper and residues recovered (used), the derived removals, the forecast removals and the difference between them, as well as a number of ratios (self sufficiency and increment/removals), which serve both as an illustration of trends and a check. This sheet provides a simple yet complete overview of the scenario. They are also aggregated by country group and at the European level.

3 For a discussion of the factors which influence these conversion factors, see ECE/TIM/55.


Previous Page Top of Page Next Page