Previous Page Table of Contents


APPENDIX 1
Personnel Employed on the AGRITEX Fisheries Unit

PostExperience, etc.No. Employed
Brief Technical AdviserExtensive international1
F.A.O. ExpertOverseas experience1
SupervisorExtensive rational1
Specialist OfficersTrained to degree standard3
Fishery Extension OfficersBased at Fisheries Unit3
Fishery Extension OfficersBased in three provinces3
SecretaryClerical skills and typing1
Office orderlyMiscellaneous unskilled duties1
Driver 1
 TOTAL15

APPENDIX 2
Main Goals of the Fisheries Unit

AGRITEX/FAO/UNDP PROJECT ZIM/88/021 “SUPPORT FOR RURAL AQUACULTURE EXTENSION”

APPENDIX 3
People and groups consulted

AGRITEX 
“Seminar group on GIS”- Mr. B. de Gong Mr. G. Jiprie, Mr. A. Lilime, Mr. B. Hobbs
Mr. A. Andreasson- Programme Manager - ALCOM
Mr. Ataman- GIS Consultant - FAO, Rome
Mr. J. Barrett- Attached to Tsetse Control Branch - University of Zimbabwe
Mr. S. Chimbuya- Senior Ecologist, Dept. of National Parks and Wild life
Mr. Cuta- “Dom Database” specialist - MEWRD
Dept. of Natural Resources- Mr. Myofre, Mr. R. Mukwanda, Mr. G. Kurane.
Dept. of Surveyor-General- Mr. F. Chunga, Mr. A Fussell, Mr. K. Philip, Mr. S. Banda, Mr. R. Movina, Mr. B. Mdambakuwa.
Early Warning 
Unit-AGRITEX- Dr. Mathema. Dr. Benadi
Fisheries Unit - AGRITEX- Mr. Iambava, Mr. W. Bind, Mr. E Shonhuiva, Mr. Chimowa
Mr. Goodwin- Secretary, National LIS/GIS Coordinating Committee,
c/o University of Zimbabwe
Mr. Gowera- GIS Specialist, System Ltd.
Mrs. P. Haggerty- Nutritionist, FAO, Rome
Dr. B. Hight- Senior Aquaculturist - ALCOM
Mr. J. Holland- “Dom Database” conversion - MEWRD
Mr. T. Jayne- Dept. of Agricultural Economics - Univ. of Zimbabwe
Mr. Kahwa- Bhaiman - National Steering Committee on Food and Nutrition - AGRITEX
Dr. H. Kaufmann- Programme Manager, NRSF - Geological Survey
Mr. P. Loth- Remote Sensing Specialist - Dept. of Meteorological Service
Mrs. Malaba- Social and Economics Section - C.S.O.
Mr. C. Masterton- Dept. of Land Survey, Univ. of Zimbabwe
Mr. Muyaka- Agricultural Section C.S.O.
Mr. C. Nugent- Chief Technical Adviser - Fisheries Unit - AGRITEX
Dr. V. Odenyo- Chief Technical Adviser - Dept. of Meteorological Service
Mr. A. Pilime- Land Use Planning - AGRITEX
Mrs. Tagwerti- Chief Nutritionist - Min. of Health
Mrs. V. Ushenwokunze 
- Obatolou- Dept. of Veterinary Science, Univ. of Zimbabwe
Mr. U. Wijkström- Aquacultural Economist - FAO, Rome

APPENDIX 4
Main Reports Studied and Bibliography

Burrough, P.A. (1986) “Principles of Geographical Information Systems for Land Resources Assessment” Blarendon Press, Oxford, England

FAO (1989) “Support for Rural Aquaculture” Project Document for project ZIM/88/021, ACC/UNDP, FAO Rome

FAO (1991) “Programme of Technical assistance to the Dept. of Agriculture, Technical and Extension Services (AGRITEX)” Project Document for project ZIM/91/005, ACC/UNDP, FAO, Rome

Haggerty, P.A. (1990) “Potential for Using the Geographical Information System to Integrate Food and Nutrition Data with Fishery Resource Data: Assessment Studies in Zambia and Zimbabwe” Report of a consultancy for project GCP/INT/467/NOR, FAO, Rome

Kent, G. and Josupeit, H. (1989) “The Contribution of Fisheries to Alleviating Malnutrition in Southern Africa” FAO Fisheries Circular No. 818. FAO, Rome

Kidd, D.W., R.H. Maxwell and P.H. Sloane (1991) “Mission Report for the Republic of Zimbabwe on Programme of Technical Assistance to AGRITEX (Project ZIM/90/003)” FAO, Rome

Meaden, G.J. and J.M. Kapetsky (1991) “Geographical Information Systems and Remote Sensing in Inland Fisheries and Aquaculture” FAO Fisheries Technical Paper No. 318, FAO, Rome

Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources (1991) “Project Management Plans - Research and Technical Branch Project” Toronto, Ontario, Canada, 1991

Pooley, M.R. (1991) “GIS and Remote Sensing Feasibility Study in the Western Region of Zimbabwe” Report Submitted to the Natural Resources Institute - Gan. 1991

Tyrie, G.R. (1991) “Position Paper for Project ZIM/86/018: Strengthening Land Use Planning in the Zambezi Valley” Paper presented at a Provincial Forum - 29–30 April 1991 in Morondeva, Zimbabwe

Wood-Sichra, U. (1991) “Strengthening Land Use Planning - Zimbabwe: Computerized Land Use Planning - Requirements and Preparations” Consultants draft report for project ZIM/86/018 - Harare, Zimbabwe - May 1991

APPENDIX 5
Main Relevant Maps Which are Readily Available

MAP “LAYER” AND SOURCECOMMENTS
1.Administrative Boundaries
a)1:1,000,000 DSG Administrative areas (1982)Shows main divisions down rural boundaries and municipalities but NOT wards. AGRITEX holds alter maps showing ward boundaries by province. Some changes have taken place since 1982. Some data is gathered to ward level but census data is gathered by enumeration district.
2.Agro-ecological zones or Farming types 
a)1:1,000,000 DSG natural regions and farming areas (1984)Very generalised. Shows types of farming area based on rainfall (mainly)
- by 6 major categories. Older versions of this map appear to be more detailed.
b)FAO-1:5,000,000 World D/B IIShown by enumeration areas in 9 classes. Urban area densities not shown and data related to 1982. There is also a population distribution map - one dot per 500 in rural areas plus proportional circles for urban areas. Will be updated after 1992 census.
3.Dam site location 
a)1:250,000 DSG topographicThe 1:250,000 sheet shows dams down to approximately 5 hecares in size and gives good coverage. The 1:50,000 sheet plots dams down to about ½ hectare. This is a very good source of data - extremely accurate.
b)1:50,000 DSG topographic
4.Pattern of land holdings 
a)1:1,000,000 DSG land classification (1979)Shows main subdivisions of land, e.g. large commercial farms, small commercial farms, resettlement land, communal land, state land, parks, other. Dated but otherwise could be used with care.
5.Population density or distribution 
a)1:1,000,000 DSG density of rural areas (1982)Shown by enumeration areas in 9 classes. Urban area densities not shown and data related to 1982. There is also a population distributio map - one dot per 500 in rural areas plus proportional circles for urban areas. Will be updated after 1992 census.
6.Relief and Slopes 
a)1:1,000,000 DSG relief (1984)Counter interval on 1:1,000,000=300 metres
Counter interval on 1:250,000=100 metres
Counter interval on 1:50,000=20 metres
Very accurate and comprehensive. I have also seen a slope map at 1:1,000,000 - source unknown (see NRSF)
b)1:250,000 DSG topographic
c)1;50,000 DSG topographic
7.River location 
a)1:1,000,000 DSG physical or hydrological (1984)Well documented for all country down to 1:50,000, but no indication of perennial nature of flow. Dpt. of Water Resources has data on flow from several hundred gauging stations.
b)1:250,000 DSG topographic
c)1:50,000 DSG topographic
d)1:5,000,000 FAO - from W D/B II
8.Soils 
a)1:1,000,000 DSG provisional soil mapRecently out of print but copies held by AGRITEX. Very generalised in that soil maps are inefficient on helping to determine optimum pond location at a macro-soil. More detailed information from Dept. of Research and Specialist Services - Mr. Knynda (Pedology)
b)1:5,000,000 - FAO Rome W D/B II
9.Transport 
a)1:1,000,000 DSG (several maps show roads and railways)Main roads and all rail links shown on 1:1,000,000 sheet. Minor roads additionally shwown on larger scale maps. Accurately plotted - reliable data.
b)1:250,000 DSG topographic
c)1:50,000 DSG topographic
d)1:5,000,000 FAO, Rome W D/B II

APPENDIX 6
Availability and Quality of Maps for Other Parameters

PARAMETERCOMMENTS
1.AgglomerationThis constitutes groupings of fish producers who may help one another. The data could eventually be inferred by plotting from the dam dom database, or a pond database, all locations where production was known to occur.
2.Availability of feedsThis is very difficult to establish since the is virtually no regular or reliable source of crop by-products. Sources of processed fish feeds are easily mapped.
3.Availability of fish seedOnly very crude indications could be mapped. Though the six main hatcheries could be plotted, most seed is probably obtained by “trading” between neighboaring fish producers. The actual distribution of producers could therefore be a good “proxy”.
4.Availability of manuresMaps showing farming type distributions could give a clue to this. AGRITEX should have more accurate data on animal distributions. The location of “feedslots” could be useful.
5.Location of fishery extension workersSome 60 of AGRITEX's extension workers have some fisheries training. It seems that their duty location could be mapped.
6.MarketsPopulation density and distributions could provide fair, but dated data. This could be used in conjunction with maps showing communal lands to show “target markets”. The limited processing plants are easily plotted. No data on purchasing power of markets.
7.Water qualityThough this is seldom a problem - though there is recent news - paper evidence of pollution - but little reliable data is available. Areas near large towns, mining areas or intensive farms could be larger.
8.Water temperaturesA “proxy” measure can be obtained from average air-temperatures, temperature ranges - and altitude can also be a good indicator.

APPENDIX 7
D A M   D A T A   S H E E T

GENERAL INFORMATIONDam Number : 115

Location Code: 1 0 3 1 02 0 99    
Province: MASHONALAND CENTRAL Administrative District: GURUVE 
Council: GURUVEDCDivision: CHIPURIROCL
Ward/Location: UNSPECIFIEDWARDLocality: SIPOLILO TTL 
Grid Reference: T S 544 582 Map Number: 1630D1 
Funding Agency:   Implementing Agency: MEWRD 
Dam Name Hydro Zone: C 
River Name: DANDE Hydro SubZone: H1 
   Site Number: 33 
Date Completed:   Water Right Number: 10665 
Natural Region: I W.D.A.C. Code  
Water Usage: [   ] Urban[   ] Agricultural  [   ] Primary  
   [   ] Industrial[   ] Institutional[   ] Other  
   [   ] Mining[   ] Government Water Supply Station  
Place Supplied    
Owner Code: MEWRD    
Maintenance Code: MEWRD    

TECHNICAL PARAMETERS 

Catchment Area:0.0km2Design Flood:0m3/5
Mean Annual Runoff:40mmCoefft of Var (MAR):120%
Dam Construction Code: UNKNOWN     
FS Capacity:340th.m3FS Surface Area:0.0ha
Live Capacity:340th.m3Height of Dam Wall:0m
10 % Yield:0th.m3FS Water Depth:0m
    Risk Factor for   
Alternative Yield:0th.m3Alternative Yield:0%
Remarks:      

DATABASE ADMINISTRATION DETAILS 

Created byLast Updated byVerified   byDate Printed
09/08/1989 JN 11/10/1989 AG25/02/1991 SYSApril 12, 1991

APPENDIX 8

DAM NAMERIVER NAMEGRID REFMAP NODATE COMPLUSAGE VIMAIGPOPLACE SUPPLOWNER CODECONSTR CODEFS CAPAFS AREAWALL HTFS DEPTH
 
    mm/yy    (th m3)(ha)(m)(m)

D A M   M A I N T E N A N C E   L I S T I N G

Report selection criteria:
Generated:April 10, 1991at 6:44 PM

MAINTENANCE AGENCY: OTHER

PROVINCE: UNSPECIFIED ADMIN DISTRICT: HYDROAUTHORITY: HYDRO DC
DIVISION: HYDRO1 CL          
LOCATION: HYDRO DSC LOCATION CODE:9.11.111.111    
   7034622032B300/00 PRIVA UNKNOW00.00
SUMMARY: HYDRO DSC 1 DAMS     Average:1234,1760.00
Maximum:00.00
SUMMARY: HYDRO CL 1 DAMS Average:1234,1760.0 
Maximum:00.0 
DIVISION: HYDRO3 CL        
LOCATION: HYDRO3 DSC LOCATION CODE: 9.11.113.111      
   6290822028D100/00APRIVA UNKNOW200.00
   7961342028D100/00APRIVA UNKNOW00.00
SUMMARY: HYDRO3 DSC 2 DAMS    Average:200.00
Maximum:200.00
SUMMARY: HYDRO3 CL 2 DAMS    Average:200.00
Maximum:200.00
DIVISION: HYDRO4 CL          
LOCATION: HYDRO4 DSC LOCATION CODE: 9.11.114.111      
 SHANGANI TRIB 5820851929C400/00APRIVA UNKNOW50.00
 NQUAESSE 4256152028A200/00APRIVA UNKNOW1320.00
   3546942028A200/00APRIVA UNKNOW890.00
SUMMARY: HYDRO4 DSC 3 DAMS    Average:750.00
Maximum:1320.00

APPENDIX 9

D A M   L O C A T I O N S

A   C A W I D S   R E P O R T

Generated April 10, 1991 at 7:21 PM

Description:

Province : UNSPECIFIED Admin District : HYDRO  
Authority : HYDRODC   
Division   : HYDRO1CLLocation : HYDRODSCCode: 9 1 1 1 11 1

Map NumberGrid ReferenceDam NumberLocalityDam NameRiver NameHydro Zone 
1731D3VR4401002560BOTHAS RUST ESTATE NYAMBUYA D IY3 
1732C2VR3985203300BUDJIGA TRIB NYAGADZI TRIB D R4 
1828C4  2951107438 MANASA  A S2 
1828C4  562687439 MATCHENASHANGANI TRIB A S2 
1828C4  4181367440 SINGWANGOMBESINGWANGOMBE A S2 
1829C3QK1961867132THE EXCHANGEEXCHANGE BLOCKGWERU A S3 
1929B2RJ637972326KWEKWE TTL MLEZU C VN3 
2032B3  7034626641    F FUZ 
Division : HYDRO3CLLocation :HYDRO3DSCCode: 9 1 1 1 13 1
2028D1  634558501    B BT4 
2028D1  629828503    B BT4 
2028D1  7961348505    B BT4 
2129B3  6894348229    B VZ1 
Division : HYDRO4CLLocation :HYDRO4DSCCode: 9 1 1 1 14 1
1929C4  582851226  SHANGANI TRIB A S6 
2028A2  4256157118  NQUAESSE A G6 
2028A2  3546947123    A G6 
       End of Report    

APPENDIX 10
Possible Fields to Enter on the “Dom Database”

A.PHYSICAL FACTORSB.OTHER GEOGRAPHICAL
1.Frequency of drying up (x grs. in 10 grs.)1.Population density (ward)
2.Dry season area2.Distance to nearest bus centre
3.Wet season area3.Distance to nearest district centre
4.River permanent or reasonal4.Distance to provincial capital
5.Water temperature - mean- range5.Associated irrigation or livestock
6.Drainage possibility6.Associated pond culture
7.Altitude7.Agro-ecological zone
8.Batchment size8.Distance from main road
10.Batchment soils  
11.Batchment geologyD.FISHERIES FACTORS
12.Run-off  
  1.Species present (A, B, C, D…)
C.LIMNOLOGICAL FACTORS2.Stocking history (species, dates, numbers)
  3.Latest annual catch
1.pH4.Mean annual catch
2.Alhalinity (summer - winter)5.Since (1st record)…
3.Conductivity6.Input of manures (qty., type)
4.Transparency7.Input of feeds (qty., types)
  8.Inorganic inputs
E.EXTENSION  
  F.BIOLOGICAL FACTORS
1.Nearest extension officer  
2.Netting group name1.Plankton volume/100 litres
3.Date of formation2.Weed infestation
4.Date of training3.Wood code (A, B, C, D…)
5.Date started activities4.% area affected
6.No. of members5.Presence of crocodiles/hippos
7.Date of latest returns6.Other predation
8.Part/full time  

APPENDIX 11

DamNyamasanga
Surface area10ha
Date of assessment3/2/91

Species distribution

Seine netting

No drag netting was done because of the nature of the shoreline which had heavy vegetative growth and infested with the oxygen weed.

Gill netting

The dam was said to be very deep by the locals. This was true as evidenced by the once huge trees which were now submerged. However, the dam from the boat appeared to be a few metres deep in some places. This was because of very heavy infestation by the oxygen weed. This could limit the carrying capacity of the dam. The dam still has a big potential.

speciesnumberweight (kg)% number% weight
O. moss11040.0573.8360.34
C. gariep3826.2525.5039.55
L. cylind10.750.670.11
Total14966.38100.00100.00

CATCH PER UNIT EFFORT

Individual net length is 45 metres.

mesh (mm)numberweight (kg)no./100mwt./100m
51nil   
5124254.440.94
645140011.113.11
6410310022.226.89
76421015093.3322.56
765185011.114.11
8913340028.897.56
895235011.115.22 *
102241550053.3334.44 *
1026460013.3310.22
11413655028.8914.56
11412635026.6714.11
1277540015.5612.00
1275530011.1111.78

Nets above 89 mm mesh size should be used on this dam.

FISH FARMER/FISH POND CENSUS   
AGRITEX 1990FISH POND INFORMATION
   AP SPECIALIST 
PROVINCE  DAEO 
DISTRICT  AEO/DISTRICT SPECIALIST 
   AE SUPERVISOR 
   AE WORKER 

FARMER NUMBERPOND NO.POND AREAWATER SOURCEDATE CONSTRCOST CONSTRCONSTR QUALITYDRAINABLEDATE STOCKEDO.M.T.R.OTHER SPECIESPRODUCTION SYSTEMLAST HARVESTIRRIGATION USE
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
               

 page of 


FISH FARMER/FISH POND CENSUS   
AGRITEX 1990FISH FARMER INFORMATION
   AP SPECIALIST 
PROVINCE  DAEO 
DISTRICT  AEO/DISTRICT SPECIALIST 
   AE SUPERVISOR 
   AE WORKER 

WARDVILLAGEFARMERFARMER NUMBERSEXH/HOLD SIZEFARMING ACTIVITIESSTATUSOTHER ACTIVITIESNO OF PONDSTOTAL AREACASHSUBSASSOC. MEMBEROUTLOOK
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
               

 page of 

APPENDIX 12

Geographic Information System for ZIM/86/018

1 EQUIPMENT

EQUIPMENT Requirements for a “SMALL” GIS

Updated: June 15 1991

itemSample Brand Namesprice in US$
unittotal
HARDWARE   
80386 processorCoapuAdd 333 Tower 7,000
math co-processor   
33MHz   
8Mb RAM   
hard cache with 1 Mb RAM   
keyboard   
3.5" 1.44 Mb drive   
5.25" 1.2Mb drive   
150Mb hard disk   
1 parallel port   
3 serial ports   
VGA card and colour mon.   
1024×768 resolution   
mouse   
monitor - monochrome  150
external tape backup (250Mb)IRWIN, Mountain 1,200
digitizerSummaSketch 12×12 Pro II 500
colour plotterHP PaintJet 1,500
dot matrix printerEPSON LQ-2550 1,100
laser printerHP Laserjet IIP 1,500
scannerDFI Handy Scanner 3000 Plus 120
overhead tabletProxima Data Display Multi-Mode 2,200
modem, internal, 2400 bdHayes, Everex 250
FAI  500
UPSAmerican Power Conversion 450AT 400
surge supressorTripp-Lite ISOTEL 70
SUBTOTAL HW  16,490

Mission Report U. Wood-Sichra ZIM/86/018 - May 1991G-1

Previous Page Top of Page