Previous Page Table of Contents Next Page


3. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

3.1 Effect of pond management and feeding on the growth of broodfish

Table 3 presents the data on the growth of broodfish during preparation and the comparision of the weight increase of each species in traditionally managed pond and in pond treated with improved technology.

TABLE 3
GROWTH OF BROODFISH IN OFF SEASON PERIOD

SpeciesManagement methodAverage weight of broodfish (kg)Weight increaseRelative Difference
25-Oct-9027-Nov-9031-Jan-9120-Feb-9116-Mar-91
MrigalTraditional*1.41.82.12.42.579% 53%
Improved**1.42.22.32.93.1121%
RohuTraditional1.32.02.22.22.485% 18%
Improved1.62.22.52.93.2100%
Grass carpTraditional1.82.12.52.62.750% 62%
Improved2.12.63.53.73.881%
CatlaTraditional5.56.87.07.17.231% 22%
Improved5.87.17.27.98.038%

* Pond no. 2
** Pond no. 1

As it was revealed growth of fish was far better in pond managed with improved technology than in traditionally treated pond. Supposing that the gonad development is better in those fish which have better growth rate, the adventage of improved technology is clear. As the relative differences in the weight increase between the two management methods are the biggest at grass carp and mrigal (62% and 53 % respectively), we can state that the technology in use is the best for these two species. Though the other two reared species had also better growth in pond managed with improved technology, the relative differences between traditionally managed pond and the pond treated with improved technology are less, only 18 % in rohu and 22 % in catla.

3.2 Effect the improved pond management method on prodictivity of broodfish

Breeding time and production of broodfish with improved technology in pond no. 3 are shown in Table 4. The broodfish in this pond reached full maturity 2–3 weeks earlier than the first matured fish occured in traditionally managed ponds. Average fry production of broodfish originated from pond no. 3 was 50,000 feeding fry from 1 kg female. Those fully matured females wich were taken for breeding from traditionally managed broodfish ponds produced only 40,000 feeding fry per kg body weight, which is 20% less than in pond managed with improved technology.

TABLE 4
PRODUCTIVITY OF BROODFISH IN POND NO.3

SpeciesBreeding timeNo. of injected female PcAverage weight KgOvulationNo. of dry eggs MillionFertilization
%
Hatchlin
g %
No. of fry Million
Complete PcPartial PcNo Pc
Mirror carpFebruary102.57122.580951.9
March53.24-11.575901.0
MrigalMarch162.011-52.060901.1
April212.418123.575952.5
May182.216-23.680952.7
RohuApril172.413132.560901.4
May122.110-22.075951.4
Grass carpApril3.05.33--1.275950.9
May25.52--1.085980.8
Shorput iApril110.98123.560901.9
May51.04-11.575951.1
Silver CarpMarch153.015--3.685983.0
CatlaApril28.5-2-0.53050.1
May68.3--6----

It is difficult to conclude, wheather the improved feed applied, or the frequent manuring had primarily positive effect on broodfish quality. However, the fact that at the end of April, mass blooming of Cladocerans was detected in pond no. 3, which are the best source of animal protein for majority of broodfish, we suppose that the most important feature of the improved technology is the frequent small dose manuring and daily feeding of green material (duckweed), instead of feeding fish with artificial feed containing high percentage of animal protein.

3.3 Repeated breeding of broodfish

About 50 percent of earlier stripped females reached the maturity after 1 month preparation and gave sufficient quantity of good quality eggs (Table 5).

TABLE 5
PRODUCTIVITY OF BROODFISH AT REPEATED BREEDING

SpeciesRatio  (%)Egg production (% of body weight)
Mrigal3310
Rohu6615
Grass carp5013
Catla*  -  -

* Catla was not sexually riped

Results of repeated breeding of grass carps are detailed in Table 6. As data indicated only those fish produced acceptable quality eggs, which were qualified as “excellent” by visual examination at broodfish selection. Those wich were qualified as “acceptable” (i.e. belly was only slightly swollen) gave bad quality eggs. However, fish havinng similar external feature in peak season would have been able to produce good quality eggs. Contrary to grass carp, rohu and mrigal, having only “acceptable belly” gave good quality eggs. The latency time before ovulation in excellent fish is shorter than in acceptable fish.

TABLE 6
RESULTS OF REPEATED BREEDING OF GRASS CRP

Weight of female
kg
Egg production
g
Latency time
hours
Rate of fertilization
%
Broodfish quality by visual examination
2.94805.098Excellent
3.33805.098Excellent
2.84707.070Excellent
2.94107.070Excellent
4.05806.570Excellent
3.32808.530Acceptable
2.82209.030*Acceptable

* The egg were not swollen properly and all the embrios died

3.4 Failure of catla breeding

Catla broodfish reared in Natore FSMF were too young to reproduce. It is the explanation of that the females not matured during preparation for second breeding.

Catla broodfish of pond no. 3 (in Rajshahi) were not succesfully bred untill middle of May. The delay in final maturation may be due to the cummulative effect of high water hardness prevailing in this farm and the unusual hot period during spring of 1992.


Previous Page Top of Page Next Page