APPENDIX 1
Mission Itinerary
11.10.94 - Rome / Port of Spain
13.10.94 - Port of Spain / Bonaire
17.10.94 - Bonaire / Aruba
23.10.94 - Aruba / Rome
Persons met
Port of Spain
L.B. Hayles | - FAO Representative |
B. Chakalall | - Regional Fisheries Officer, FAO/RLAC Regional Office |
M. Alleyne | - Programme assistant |
J.V. Eyndhoven | - UNDP Resident Coordinator |
Bonaire
E. Berben | - Head of Agriculture Dept. in Bonaire and Fundashon Marcultura Secretary |
R. Hensen | - Fundashon Marcultura Aquaculture Station Managing Director |
C. Winkel | - Head of Agriculture Dept. in Curaçao |
Aruba
S. Vrolijk | - Director of Agriculture, Husbandry and Fisheries Dept. (DAHF) |
T. Barnes | - Vice Director of DAHF |
B. Boekhoudt | - DAHF Officer in Charge for Fisheries |
H.van Trickt | - Dir. Dept. of Economic Affairs, Commerce and Industry (DEACI) |
F.F.A bath | - Acting Director of Govt. Land Administration Dept. |
D.Wever | - Engineer at the Dept. of Public Work |
J.C. van Berkel | - Project Engineer ESSO |
J.M. van der Valk | - PROPESCA (Venezuela) |
APPENDIX 2
Relevant documents consulted
- Aviat D., 1993 - Marketing report. FAO, ARU/090/002 field document.
- Central Bank van Aruba, 1991. - Aruba: basic facts, economic indicators, international economic relations and its quest for new investments.
- DEACI, 1994. - Guide to industrial development in Aruba. Publ. by the Dept. of Economic Affairs, Commerce and Industry. Ministry of Economic Affairs and Tourism of Aruba.
- Directie Openbare Werken, 1989. Ruimteluk Ordenings Plan Kustgebied Aruba (Planning of the Coastal Zone Development in Aruba). Ministry of Public Work and Public Health.
Espeut P., Y. Harache, G. Lemarie and J.M. Ricard. Report to the Government of Jamaica on an evaluation of the possibilities for marine cage fish-culture and other alternative technologies. FAO TCP/JAM/2251, Field Document No 1
- FAO, 1992. Caribbean Aquaculture Development (CARAD) Project Proposal. FAO, GCP/RLA/102/ITA.
- FAO 1993a. Round table on technical cooperation in artisanal fisheries and aquaculture development in the Caribbean. Chaguaramas, Trinidad and Tobago, 15–18 Novenber 1993. FAO Fisheries Report No 555, Rome, FAO, 98 pags.
- FAO 1993b. Species cultured in insular Caribbean Countries, Belize, French Guiana, Guyana and Suriname. Caribbean Technical Co-operation Network in Artisanal Fisheries and Aquaculture. FAO, RLAC/93/28-PES-24, 29 pags.
- Hensen R.R. and M.F.J. Grashof, 1991. Fundashon Marcultura. Published in: World Aquaculture 22 (1). Special issue: Aquaculture in the Caribbean.
- Lovatelli A. and L. Loria, 1993. Status report on Caribbean aquaculture. FAO, GCP/RLA/102/ITA field document No6.
- PROPESCA, 1994. Shrimp Hatchery Project. Documentation submitted by C.A. PROPESCA Company to the Government of ARUBA.
- Sanders M.J., 1994 - ARU/090/002 terminal report; project findings and recommendations. FAO, ARU/090/002 field document.
- Sanhueza Ward R.E., 1993 - Project Masterfisherman final report. FAO, ARU/090/002 field document.
- Spotts D. 1993 - A review of the biological feasibility for aquaculture at the Marcultura Fundashon, Sorobon, Bonaire, Netherlands Antilles. Miami Aquaculture Inc., Florida, U.S.A, technical report to Fundashon Marcultura.
- UNDP, 1992. - ARU/90/002 Project Document. UNDP-FAO
- Velarde Silva E.J., 1993. No title. Consultant technical report to Fundashon Marcultura.
Appendix 3*
Appendix 5 /1
Appendix 5 /2
MONITORING WELL NUMBER PP-1
Job Lago Oil & Transport Co., Ltd. Location NE End of Pitch Piles
Date December 9, 1985 Logged By M. Howar
Drilling Company Dual Tube Drilling Driller Dirk/Edwin Rig AP-1000
Hole Size 6" × 3" CSR Casing Details 2" Sch. 40 PVC
Casing +2.00–2.50 BLS .020 slot 2" PVC Sch. 40 Screen 2.50–12.25'
G. L. Elev. M. P. TOC Klev. M. P.
LEGEND: | |||||
Topsoil | ![]() | Sand | ![]() | ||
Clay | ![]() | Caliche | ![]() | Mative Fill | ![]() |
Limestone | ![]() | Cement Grout | ![]() | Casing | ![]() |
Granite | ![]() | Gravel Pack | ![]() | Screen | ![]() |
Casing | Log | Description | Remarks |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | Pitch-brown stained coraline sand Coraline sand, tan broken shell fragments and bryazoa chunk Coraline sand, tan with broken shell fragments and bryozoa chunks |
Appendix 5 /3
MONITORING WELL NUMBER PP-2
Job Lago Oil & Transport Co., Ltd. Location
Date December 9, 1985 Logged By M. Howar
Drilling Company Dual Tube Drilling Driller Dirk/Edwin Rig AP-1000
Hole Size 6" × 3" CSR Casing Details 2" Sch. 40 PVC Pipe
+2.00 – 6.10' BLS 2" .020 slot 2" PVC Screen 6.10–15.15' BLS
G. L. Elev. M. P. TOC Klev. M. P.
LEGEND: | |||||
Topsoil | ![]() | Sand | ![]() | ||
Clay | ![]() | Caliche | ![]() | Mative Fill | ![]() |
Limestone | ![]() | Cement Grout | ![]() | Casing | ![]() |
Granite | ![]() | Gravel Pack | ![]() | Screen | ![]() |
Casing | Log | Description | Remarks |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | Black hard pitch Sand, fine, gray, silty Sand, coraline, tan, fractured shells & fragments broken bryozoa Coraline sand, very fine silty with broken shell fragments and bryozoa |
Appendix 5 /4
MONITORING WELL NUMBER PP-3
Job Lago Oil & Transport Co., Ltd. Location Lago Pitch Piles
Date December 10, 1985 Logged By M. Howar
Drilling Company Dual Tube Drilling Driller Dirk/Edwin Rig AP-1000
Hole Size 6" × 3" CSR Casing Details 2" Sch. 40 PVC
+2.00–15.00 BLS
G. L. Elev. M. P. Klev. M. P.
LEGEND: | |||||
Topsoil | ![]() | Sand | ![]() | ||
Clay | ![]() | Caliche | ![]() | Mative Fill | ![]() |
Limestone | ![]() | Cement Grout | ![]() | Casing | ![]() |
Granite | ![]() | Gravel Pack | ![]() | Screen | ![]() |
Casing | Log | Description | Remarks |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | Black hard pitch Brownish gray, fine silty coraline sand Coraline sand-broken shell fragments, tan, some small coral (bryozoa) chunks Coraline sand and broken shell fragments, tan |
Appendix 5 /5
MONITORING WELL NUMBER PP-4
Job Lago Oil & Transport Co., Ltd. Location Lago Pitch Piles
Date December 10, 1985 Logged By M. Howar
Drilling Company Dual Tube Drilling Driller Dirk/Edwin Rig AP-1000
Hole Size 6" × 3" CSR Casing Details 2" Sch. 40 PVC
+0.9–15.0 BLS
G. L. Elev. M. P. Klev. M. P.
LEGEND: | |||||
Topsoil | ![]() | Sand | ![]() | ||
Clay | ![]() | Caliche | ![]() | Native Fill | ![]() |
Limestone | ![]() | Cement Grout | ![]() | Casing | ![]() |
Granite | ![]() | Gravel Pack | ![]() | Screen | ![]() |
Casing | Log | Description | Remarks |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | Black soft pitch Coraline sand, tan shell fragments & silt, soft |
Appendix 5 /6
MONITORING WELL NUMBER PP-5
Job Lago Oil & Transport Co., Ltd. Location NE End of Pitch Piles
Date December 10, 1985 Logged By M. Howar
Drilling Company Dual Tube Drilling Driller Dirk/Edwin Rig AP-1000
Hole Size 6" × 3" CSR Casing Details 2" Sch. 40 PVC
+2.00–16.1 BLS
G. L. Elev. M. P. Klev. M. P.
LEGEND: | |||||
Topsoil | ![]() | Sand | ![]() | ||
Clay | ![]() | Caliche | ![]() | Native Fill | ![]() |
Limestone | ![]() | Cement Grout | ![]() | Casing | ![]() |
Granite | ![]() | Gravel Pack | ![]() | Screen | ![]() |
Casing | Log | Description | Remarks |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | Coraline sand, tan, silty, soft, broken coral and shell fragments Coraline sand, tan silty, soft, broken coral & shell fragments |
Appendix 6 /1
Clear Seawater & Tilapia production
Growout Stages, Weights and Periods | |||
Growout Production Stage | Fish Weight (g) | Culture Period (days) | |
Initial | Final | ||
1 | 1.0 | 20.0 | 40.0 |
2 | 20.0 | 100.0 | 40.0 |
3 | 100.0 | 400.0 | 80.0 |
4 | 400.0 | 600.0 | 60.0 |
Unit Production Module | |
Fish Population | 10000.0 |
Target weight (g) | 600.0 |
Total time (days) | 220.0 |
Production (mt/year) | 10.0 |
Cond.Fact. (100 g/cm3) | 2.3 |
BDI (kg/m3/cm) | 3.2 |
Equiv. to 0.5 lbs/ft3/in |
Growout Production Stage | Maximum Fish Size | Biomass Density (BD) | Approx. Pond Vol. and Flowrates per Unit Prod. | ||||||
Maximum BD @ BDI (kg/m3) | Culture System | System Factor for BDI | Reqd. Pond Vol. (m3) | Pond Water Exch. Rate (exch/day) | Reqd. Water Flowrate | ||||
Fish Wt. (g) | Fish Ln. (cm) @ CF | (m3/day) | (gal/min) | ||||||
1 | 20.0 | 9.5 | 30.1 | Clear | 1.0 | 6.7 | 12.0 | 79.8 | 14.6 |
2 | 100.0 | 16.3 | 51.4 | Clear | 1.0 | 19.5 | 12.0 | 233.4 | 42.8 |
3 | 400.0 | 25.9 | 81.6 | Clear | 1.0 | 49.0 | 12.0 | 588.1 | 107.9 |
4 | 600.0 | 29.7 | 93.4 | Clear | 1.0 | 64.2 | 12.0 | 770.7 | 141.4 |
139.3 | 16721 | 306.8 | |||||||
Total | Total | Total |
Growout Production Stage | Feed Conversion (Feed/Fish) | Total Feed Consumption (kg) | ||
Culture System | Base FCR Level | System Factor for FCR | ||
1 | Clear | 2.0 | 1.0 | 380.0 |
2 | Clear | 1.5 | 1.0 | 1200.0 |
3 | Clear | 1.7 | 1.0 | 5100.0 |
4 | Clear | 1.8 | 1.0 | 3600.0 |
10280.0 | ||||
Total |
Number Production Modules | Total Fish Production (mt/year) | Total Feed Consumption (mt/year) | Total Pond Volume (m3) | Total Pond Area (ha) @ 1m depth | Total Water Flowrate (m3/day) | Reqd. Water Pump Power for 25 C S W @ 7.0 m head | Number Windmills @10 kW/mill | |
(kW) | (HP) | |||||||
1.0 | 10.0 | 17.1 | 139.3 | 0.01 | 1672.1 | 1.4 | 1.0 | 0.1 |
5.0 | 49.8 | 85.3 | 696.7 | 0.07 | 8360.4 | 6.8 | 9.1 | 0.7 |
10.0 | 99.5 | 170.6 | 1393.4 | 0.14 | 16720.7 | 13.6 | 18.2 | 1.4 |
20.0 | 199.1 | 341.1 | 2786.8 | 0.28 | 33441.4 | 27.2 | 36.5 | 2.7 |
50.0 | 497.7 | 852.8 | 6967.0 | 0.70 | 83603.5 | 68.0 | 91.2 | 6.8 |
100.0 | 995.5 | 1705.5 | 13933.9 | 1.39 | 167207.1 | 136.0 | 182.3 | 13.6 |
Note 1: ft3/s - 450 gpm = 2450 m3/day
Note 2: given variables are within double lines, calculated variables are within single lines
Note 3: Clear = without phytoplankton, green = with phytoplankton
Appendix 6 /2
Green Seawater Tilapia Production
Growout Stages, Weights and Periods | |||
Growout Production Stage | Fish Weight (g) | Culture Period (days) | |
Initial | Final | ||
1 | 1.0 | 20.0 | 40.0 |
2 | 20.0 | 100.0 | 40.0 |
3 | 100.0 | 400.0 | 80.0 |
4 | 400.0 | 600.0 | 60.0 |
Unit Production Module | |
Fish Population | 10000.0 |
Target weight (g) | 600.0 |
Total time (days) | 220.0 |
Production (mt/year) | 10.0 |
Cond.Fact.(100 g/cm3) | 2.3 |
BDI (kg/m3/cm) | 3.2 |
Equiv. to 0.5 lbs/ft3/in |
Growout Production Stage | Maximum Fish Size | Biomass Density (BD) | Approx Pond Vol. and Flowrates per Unit Prod. | ||||||
Maximum BD @ BDI (kg/m3) | Culture System | System Factor for BDI | Reqd. Pond Vol.(m3) | Pond Water Exch. Rate (exch/day) | Reqd. Water Flowrate | ||||
Fish Wt. (g) | Fish Ln. (cm) @ CF | (m3/day) | (gal/min) | ||||||
1 | 20.0 | 9.5 | 30.1 | Green | 0.1 | 66.5 | 0.5 | 33.3 | 6.1 |
2 | 100.0 | 16.3 | 51.4 | Green | 0.1 | 194.5 | 0.5 | 97.3 | 17.8 |
3 | 400.0 | 25.9 | 81.6 | Green | 0.1 | 490.1 | 0.5 | 245.1 | 45.0 |
4 | 600.0 | 29.7 | 93.4 | Green | 0.1 | 642.2 | 0.5 | 321.1 | 58.9 |
1393.4 | 696.7 | 127.8 | |||||||
Total | Total | Total |
Growout Production Stage | Feed Conversion (Feed/Fish) | Total Feed Consumption (kg) | ||
Culture System | Base FCR Level | System Factor for FCR | ||
1 | Green | 2.0 | 0.8 | 304.0 |
2 | Green | 1.5 | 0.8 | 960.0 |
3 | Green | 1.7 | 0.8 | 4080.0 |
4 | Green | 1.8 | 0.8 | 2880.0 |
8224.0 | ||||
Total |
Number Production Modules | Total Fish Production (mt/year) | Total Feed Consumption (mt/year) | Total Pond Volume(m3) | Total Pond Area (ha) @ 1m depth | Total Water Flowrate (m3/day) | Reqd. Water Pump Power for 25CSW @ 7.0 m head | Number Windmills @10 kW/mill | |
(kW) | (HP) | |||||||
1.0 | 10.0 | 13.6 | 1393.4 | 0.14 | 696.7 | 0.6 | 0.8 | 0.1 |
5.0 | 49.8 | 68.2 | 6967.0 | 0.70 | 3483.5 | 2.8 | 2.8 | 0.3 |
10.0 | 99.5 | 136.4 | 13933.9 | 1.39 | 6967.0 | 5.7 | 7.6 | 0.6 |
20.0 | 199.1 | 272.9 | 27867.8 | 2.79 | 13933.9 | 11.3 | 15.2 | 1.1 |
50.0 | 497.7 | 682.2 | 69669.6 | 6.97 | 34834.8 | 28.3 | 38.0 | 2.8 |
100.0 | 995.5 | 1364.4 | 139339.2 | 13.93 | 69669.6 | 56.6 | 76.0 | 5.7 |
Note 1: 1.0 ft 3/s - 450 gpm = 2450 m3/day
Note 2: given variables are within double lines, calculated variables are within single lines
Note 3: Clear = without phytoplankton, green = with phytoplankton
Appendix 7
APPENDIX 8
RED TILAPIA PILOT PROJECT
1. JUSTIFICATION
Red Tilapia appears to be the most appropriate species with which to begin aquaculture production in Aruba, because of its adaptability to the rearing conditions suitable for the island:
Nevertheless, the shortage of experienced staff and the doubts raised about the acceptability of this product on the local market, one of the main objectives for aquaculture development in Aruba, question the investment necessary to build up a red Tilapia farm on the island.
The above comments give rise to the proposal of a one-year pilot project, which, through the partial and fixed-term use of the aquaculture facilities existing in Bonaire will allow:
The realization of the pilot project will, furthermore, bring benefits to:
2. PROJECT OBJECTIVES
2.1 Long-term development objective
The long-term objective is the development of aquaculture in Aruba, which, through the local production of commodities, will reduce the island's imports of fish products.
2.2 Medium-term objective
The medium-term objective is the acquisition of the necessary experience to show aquaculture feasibility in Aruba, through the creation of a red Tilapia pilot farm on the island (governmental or private), as well as through the local availability of skilled personnel to advise future investors.
2.3. Immediate objectives
The immediate objectives, to be achieved through the realization of the proposed pilot project, are:
2.3.1. - to train DAHF personnel on red Tilapia broodstock management, reproduction, sex selection and fattening techniques,
2.3.2. - to gain the necessary experience to design, build up and manage an aquaculture pilot farm. In addition to analyze the most convenient financial model for effective rearing in Aruban environmental conditions, and
2.3.3. - to realize the first local analysis of red Tilapia (fresh and transformed) market acceptability
3. PROJECT ACTIVITIES
3.1. Activities to be implemented for the achievement of immediate objective 2.3.1.:
3.2. Activities to be implemented for the achievement of immediate objective 2.3.2.:
one-month study tour to the Caribbean Marine Research Center of Florida, to be carried out by the selected DAHF staff member, during the last month of the pilot project, in order to visit local productive facilities, learn about marketing strategies and finalize the design of Aruban pilot farm as well as the analysis of the most convenient financial model. for effecting rearing
3.3. Activities to be implemented for the achievement of immediate objective 2.3.3.:
4. PROJECT BUDGET*
4.1 | Personnel | (US $) | ||
Expert on Tilapia rearing | 4 m/m | 10.000/m | 40.000 | |
DAHF professional | 12 m/m (including DSA in Bonaire) | 30.000 | ||
Worker (recruited in Bonaire) | 12 m/m | 800/m | 9.600 | |
Sub-total personnel | 79.600 |
4.2. Travel and lodging
Expert on Tilapia rearing | 3 flights U.S.A./Bonaire/U.S.A. | 3.000 |
Lodging in Bonaire (2000 US $/month) | 8.000 | |
DAHF professional | 2 flights Aruba/Bonaire/Aruba | 300 |
study tour to U.S.A (Florida). - travel | 1.500 | |
- lodging | 3.000 | |
Sub-total travel and lodging | 15.800 |
4.3. Inputs
Fingerlings: (in raceways, 100m3 total volume) | |||
30 kg/m3 final harvest | 8.500 fing, at 0.30 US $ unit | (2.550 US $) | |
40 kg/m3 final harvest | 11.500 fing. | (3.450 US $) | |
50 kg/m3 final harvest | 14.000 fing. | (4.200 US $) | |
in a 3000 m2 pond | 30.000 fing. | (9.000 US $) | 19.200 |
Feed (2:1 average conversion rate) | 50 000 Kg at 0.7 US $/kg | 35.000 | |
Energy | 10.000 | ||
Maintenance** | 5.000 | ||
Unforeseen (approx. 5%) | 3.500 | ||
Marketable Tilapia (2000 kg, fresh and transformed)*** | 6.000 | ||
Sub-total inputs | 78.700 | ||
GRAND TOTAL | 174.100 |
4.4. Revenues
Raceways: | 12.000 kg | |
Pond: | 12.000 kg | |
TOTAL | 24.000 sold at 3 US $/kg (5.25 AFI/kg) | -72000 |
PROJECT COST BALANCE | 102.100 |
* the project will be financed by the Aruban Government which, at the same time, could look for private investors interested in funding the project (or part of it) and having their own personnel trained in redTilapia rearing.
** refers to maintenance cost of the facilities and equipment necessary for the pilot project implementation, since the general maintenance cost of the station is already jointly supported by the governments of the three island.
*** activity 3.3. will be carried out by DAHF or the DAHF professional involved in the project and therefore no extra-salary costs are budgeted for this activity. Only the cost of Tilapia to be importated is included in the budget.
5 INSTITUTIONAL ORGANIZATION
The Aruban DAHF will be responsible for project organization, co-ordination and monitoring. The selected DAHF candidate will be responsible for project activity execution in Bonaire; he will prepare four-monthly progress reports to be submitted to DAHF Director. The candidate will also prepare a final report which will include the draft project of an Aruban aquaculture pilot farm, including financial analysis evaluation.
The Aruban DAHF will contact the corresponding authorities in Curaçao and Bonaire to evaluate their interest in participating in the project (one candidate from each island). In the case of a positive answer, the project costs will be shared by the Governments of the three islands. A joint working group, composed of representatives from the three Governments' Agriculture Departments will be nominated for coordination and monitoring activity.
The Aruban DAHF (or the joint working group) will contact the FAO Regional Office in Port of Spain, Trinidad, for assistance in establishing contact with the Caribbean Marine Research Center of Florida. Furthermore, FAO will help to diffuse the pilot project technical information and to create the base for further co-operation between the Netherlands Antilles and the Caribbean Region's countries, with the objective of strengthening their common development of new aquaculture models (e.g. marine net cages aquaculture)
Fig 1. Project activities planning