Previous Page Table of Contents Next Page


4. CAPTURE FISHERIES: STATUS AND DEVELOPMENT

4.1 Status of the capture fisheries in Kenya

4.1.1 Public sector of the capture fisheries. The Kenya Department of Fisheries (DOF, Ministry of Wildlife and Tourism) has primary responsibility for fisheries management and development (Fig. 12). Other Ministries, including the Ministries of Cooperative Development, of Works and of Power and Communications, are also responsible for activities related to fishing operations. These include fishermens' cooperatives, roads and landing facilities.

The Department of Fisheries has an antenna in Kisumu (DOF/Western) responsible for fishery development in western Kenya, particularly the Lake Victoria fishery. Total staff numbers 487 among which 122 full-time fish scouts and 47 fishery assistants are directly involved in the field, most of them in the lake fishery (Table 19).

The Kenya Fishing Industries Ltd. (KFI) established in 1970 is a transhipment cold storage facility in Mombasa which operates a number of trawling vessels. The company is Government owned, but has been financed by foreign investors. There are plans to acquire more vessels, establish a fish cannery and a fish meal processing plant.

The Kenya Fishnet Company Ltd. (KFC) was built in 1971 in Kisumu. It is jointly owned by the Kenyan Government (43%), the Hirata Spinning Co. Ltd. from Japan (45%), and fishermens cooperatives (12%). The plant capacity is adequate to supply all domestic net requirements.

Fishery research. Since the collapse of the East African Community in 1977, responsibility for all research has become national. Fishery Department stations have undertaken local research, but this has been minimal as the greatest portion of the available manpower did not have the adequate technical background and were fully occupied with the collection of statistical data and the enforcement of fishery regulations. A separate autonomous body, Kenya Marine and Fisheries Research Institute (KMFRI) have now become responsible for scientific research, from two main centres in Mombasa and Kisumu. In July 1981, a symposium was organized in Mombasa to identify future priorities in research (Sec. 3.2.2 and 3.3.2).

Fisheries training. The Zoology Department of the University of Nairobi offers an aquatic ecology degree, which dwells on subjects related to fishery management and hydro-biology. About 5 M.Sc. and 20 B.Sc. students graduate every year. Technical training of middle and lower cadres of staff will be provided from 1983 at the Wildlife and Fisheries Training Institute in Naivasha.

4.1.2 Private sector of the capture fisheries. It has been estimated that fishing provides the main source of income to about 31 000 fishermen and a large number of fish traders (Anon. 1980). Both marine and inland fishing methods are generally traditional and labour intensive with operations limited to shallow waters. Most of the catch comes from about 7 000 small craft landing between 20 – 50 kg/day.

Fishermen generally receive 20 – 30% of the retail value of the fish cropped. Annual earnings vary from Ksh.4 000 – 5 000, less various expenses such as boat repairs, net repairs and licences. As a result fishing is considered as a low status occupation. This has led to the situation where rich fishermen prefer to employ a labour force to operate their gear or many fishermen are employed by or operate nets on behalf of an external benefactor (Kongere, 1979). Up to 40 – 50% of the canoes may therefore not be owner operated. Fishermens cooperatives operate in most areas, but they tend to be inefficient and of little benefit to the fishermen.

Several private companies are engaged in wholesale and retail fish marketing, cold storage and transport. The larger companies include Samaki Industries (Kenya) Ltd., Kenya Cold Stores, Wanainchi Marine Products and Ocean Products. These are primarily fish traders, but some of them operate their own fishing vessels.

There are few experienced builders of modern mechanised offshore vessels. They manufacture mainly sport fishing and leisure crafts as, for example, Specialised Moulding Ltd.

Sport fishing, though not of high commercial value from the fish sales aspect, represents a substantial generator of foreign revenues as it caters for the tourist industry. Mombasa, Malindi, Shimoni, and to a lesser extent Kisumu, are the main centres.

4.2 Status of the marine capture fishery

4.2.1 General. Most of Kenya's coastline (640 km) is fringed by coral reefs. The 100 fathom (183 m) isobath runs close to the shore, except north of Malindi. Here it is found more than 30 km offshore and it is in this region that trawlers operate. Current production is poor and recent surveys indicate that the potential for increase is low.

The bulk of the catch is harvested inside the reef by 11 000 artisanal fishermen using handlines, drifting gillnets, trolling lines, traps or seines. They also dive for lobsters and molluscs.

In 1980, marine landings amounted to 5 336 t approximately subdivided into 50% demersal fish, 15% pelagic fish and 7.5% crustacea.

4.2.2 Research. Research currently underway on marine resources includes work on pelagic fish (Nzioka, 1981), on demersal fish (De Souza, 1981), on sardines (Wakwabi, 1981), on crustacea (Muthiga, 1981; Mutagyera, 1981; Kazungu, 1981) and on algae/seaweeds (Ruwa, 1981). Other research includes oceanographic studies (Mutua, 1981), pollution (Munga, 1981; Onyari, 1981) and fish quality control (Hussein, 1981).

4.3 Status of the freshwater capture fisheries, except Lake Victoria

4.3.1 General. In 1980, 89% (42 286 t) of the total fish production from Kenyan waters originated from the freshwater capture fisheries. Among these, the Lake Victoria fishery produced 63.6% and Lake Turkana 29.2% (Table 9). The remaining fish yield came from such lakes as Baringo, Naivasha, Nakuru, Jipe, Hannington, Elementaita, Kanyaboli and Magadi and from such rivers as the Tana, Nzoia, Yala and Athi/Sabaki (Sec. 2.6.4). Generally, average fish yields range from 5 to 30 kg/ha/yr, below the African average (Lowe McConnell, 1975).

The Lake Turkana fishery has recently been developed by a NORAD aid scheme and catches have initially increased four fold. However, they now appear to be on the decline and overfishing of tilapia breeding grounds is suspected.

Table 27

Mean fish catch per canoe (CPC) and per fisherman (CPF) in Lake Victoria
(acc. Fisheries Department Statistical Records, 1971–81)

YearAnnual Catch
t
Number of CanoesC P C
t
Number of FishermenC P F
t
197114 918(4 320)a(3.453)(16 900)a(0.256)
197215 989    
197316 797    
197417 1753 4005.051  
197516 5813 4004.877  
197618 6803 9204.76518 0001.038
197719 3323 9204.932  
197823 8564 0005.964  
197930 5924 0007.648  
198026 9144 0006.72818 0001.495
198145 6675 0009.13319 5002.342
  (8 500)b(5.373)(31 000)(1.473)

a Survey by Butcher and Colaris (1975)
b Nordic Survey by Hansen (1981)

Table 28

Annual landing and proportional representation of the seven major species of fish caugh in Lake Victoria
(acc. Fisheries Department Statistical Records, 1971–81)

SpeciesTotalLates niloticusEngraulicyprisTilapiaHaplochromisClariasProtopterusBagrusOthers
Datett%t%t%t%t%t%t%t%
197114 918460.37595.13 14221.14 76231.91 86212.51 79812.11 0567.11 4789.9
197215 989380.21 2557.92 36914.84 64429.02 72517.01 91512.08563.32 18713.7
197316 7971470.91 76810.51 69010.05 57133.22 62815.62 02412.01 4458.61 5249.1
197417 1751360.83 74221.89563.36 01335.02 21112.92 17912.71 1036.48354.9
197516 581510.34 54827.46423.84 62027.92 58415.61 4698.91 3898.41 2787.7
197618 680970.55 65230.31 0075.46 36834.12 50713.49355.01 0255.51 0895.8
197719 3322031.16 70434.71 4357.45 37827.81 7559.17734.01 1415.91 94310.1
197823 8561 0664.58 71036.52 60610.96 62127.71 7297.26122.61 3965.81 1164.7
197930 5924 28414.09 32130.52 7399.06 59921.63 0299.94741.51 7695.82 3777.8
198026 9144 31016.09 44335.15 01318.63 63613.51 2234.53701.46422.42 2778.5
198145 66727 25959.79 32620.44 66810.29682.11 1262.52510.54351.01 6343.6

Table 29

L. Victoria Fishing Cooperatives: landing beaches, number of fishermen and canoes
(adapted from Hansen, 1981)

No.CooperativeNo. of BeachesMembersFishing BoatsNo.of Fishermen
TotalActiveNon-MechanizedMechanized
  1.Mbita-1 709  732---
  2.Rusinga Isd.12  300n/a70002 500  
  3.Mfangano12  149n/a2500   3 000 (?)
  4.*Gembe13  582n/a4000600
  5.Lambwep-----     800 (?)
  6.Kasingri9178  571000350
  7.Gwasi10  200n/a  9001 200   
  8.*Sori3  20n/a3000   1 000 (?)
  9.N. Kadem3  90  90  410260
10.Muhuru Bay63032853500600
11.S. Kadem2136n/a      25 +0360
12.Homa Bay10  3191501505500
13.*Ngegu3500362  8301 000  
14.Luanda Kanama-----       300 (?)
15.W. Karachuonyo13  37527840002 000  
16.*Kendu Bay5238160   128 +    1 +1 800  
17.Wagn Chieng815312026501 560  
18.Samia526515010311  400
19.*Bunyala11  8203001 490  50  4 000  
20.Yimbo11  35815086032 500  
21.E. Asembo4  44  42  380  70
22.W. Asembo3  29  20  600200
23.*Uyoma11  2002001 000  02 500  
24.*Misori51031001630300
25.Wichlum4266180  900320
26.Liunda91901702500500
27.Asat4120  751500200
28.*Kaloka3150  35  540250
29.Ogal2120n/a  440176
30.Pagap-----     150 (?)
31.Usoma3  60  46  843300
32.*Dunga1  69  41  700100
33.Miruti2  40  40  450300
34.Nduru61801802200600
35.*Nyakach72141505000350
 Total200    8 480  4 113   8 503   73  31 046    
 Mean    6.4     265.0     164.5    274.3   2.3     913.1
 2 SE x     1.32     107.1       57.5    114.9   3.2     326.1
 n =31     32    25   3131     34

a = proposed cooperative, now abandoned
p = proposed
* = indicated those beaches used by the Fishery Department to monitor statistics


Previous Page Top of Page Next Page