Previous Page Table of Contents Next Page


8. FINDINGS AND DISCUSSION

GEAR

Two different types of gear (characteristics already described in the section on equipment and methods), were used during the trip.

Both gears were used with a single codend and both nets had horizontal openings of similar size. However, the vertical openings differed; that of Gear 1 was nearly double that of Gear 2 (4.79 m and 2.8 m respectively), and Gear 1 used a groundrope, while this was not possible with Gear 2, which had wings.

It is assumed that these differences greatly influence catchability, a factor which should be taken into account when comparing the estimates obtained with each type of gear.

Gear 1 was used throughout the survey, except in Côte d'Ivoire, where Gear 2 was used in the early stages of the trip and gave larger catches. However, the net repeatedly entangled and broke, and it was decided to switch to the other which offered better net protection thanks to the bobbins fitted to the groundrope.

COMPARATIVE TRAWLS

In an attempt to compare the yields obtained with each type of gear, parallel tows in the same geographical location and depth were carried out toward the end of the trip with an extra day at the disposal of the survey. Transect 25 was chosen for this experiment since the bottoms there presented no trawling difficulties.

Six tows were made with Gear 1 (150–155) and five with Gear 2 (151bis–155bis), care being taken to maintain the same depth and position. The data from five tows with Gear 2 are given separately. Catch comparisons (Table 6) show that (as assumed), Gear 2 was more effective than Gear 1 in all strata (a ratio of 1.34:4.33).

This would suggest that the much higher catches and yields obtained in Côte d'Ivoire (see Tables 28-30 and Annex II) were no doubt due to the use of Gear 2.

Table 6. Comparative tows. Catches obtained with the two types of gear (kg)
StratumGear 1Gear 2Coefficient
20–50 m22301.36
50–100 m60811.34
 651382.13
>100 m39817224.33
 74220422.75
TOTAL128740133.12

MESH

The mesh in the various parts of both types of gear (upper and lower panels and codend in Gear 1, and upper and lower panels, legs and codend in Gear 2) were measured several times during the trip. An ICES gauge was used and the mesh opening was always measured longitudinally.

The mean values obtained are given in Table 7 below.

Table 7. Mean mesh sizes (cm) in different parts of the gear
 Upper panelLower panelWingCodend
Gear 1126.65127.76 46.05
Gear 277.5675.17109.4744.82

Measuring the mesh

FISHING OPERATIONS

As already explained in the section on equipment and methods, the survey preparatory meeting decided to cover two more transects than originally planned, one in western Sierra Leone and the other on the Ghana shelf (27 in all, instead of 25).

A total of 168 tows were made (see Annex 1 for their location and characteristics). Maps 1, 2, 3 and 4 show where fishing operations were carried out. Arrows indicate successful hauls, the route and direction of the tows; unsuccessful hauls are shown with dots.

Table 8. Number of successful and unsuccessful (n) hauls per depth stratum in sector 1
 20–5050–100100–200200–400400–700Total%
Western443321664
Sierra Leone  5n2n2n9n36
Eastern333221368
Sierra Leone  1n3n2n6n32
Liberia589873773
4n2n2n2n4n14n27
Total12151513116669
Sector 14n2n8n7n9n30n31


Table 9. Number of successful and unsuccessful (n) hauls per depth stratum in Sector 2
 20–5050–100>100Total%
Côte d'Ivoire10962581
 1n5n6n19
Ghana91192970
5n4n3n12n30
Total1920155475
Sector 24n5n8n18n25

Tables 8 and 9 show the number of successful and unsuccessful hauls per depth stratum in each country and sector. It will be noted that the percentage of successful hauls was 31% (very high) in Sector 1 (Sierra Leone and Liberia) and only 25% in Sector2 (Côte d'Ivoire and Ghana).

BOTTOM TRAWLABILITY

Detailed data on the topography and nature of the continental shelf and slope bottoms of each of the countries surveyed have already been presented in the section dealing with the survey area.

These data are summarized in Maps 5, 6, 7 and 8, which, as mentioned in the section on cartography and topography, were based on a wide range of information obtained from various sources.

Major aspects of bottom trawlability are discussed below on a countrywise basis.

SIERRA LEONE

While there would not appear to be any problems for trawling on the Sierra Leone continental shelf (as far as its offshore edge) despite the fact that hard bottoms predominate in the west, the high number of unsuccessful hauls in the deep part of the shelf and on the slope in both east and west (36% and 32% respectively) and data provided by previous surveys (Williams, 1968) seem to indicate that trawling is impossible beyond 200 m, and in some cases 100 m depth (see Map 1).

The closeness of the isobaths in the area of transects 1 to 4 indicates a very steep slope. This situation is aggravated by very rugged bottoms in western Sierra Leone. Furthermore, drops of more than 200 fathoms (1 fath = 1.8288 m) are detectable with the echosounder, confirming the existence of deep submarine canyons and valleys, already cited by Sheridan et al. (1969) and Konate et al. (1989).

At the approach of the borders of Guinea and Liberia, the isobaths separate, the gradient of the slope becomes more gentle and trawling easier between transects 0 and 6.

Echogram: Northern Sierra Leone

LIBERIA

The presence of isolated rocks along the country's coastal strip from Cape Mesurado, the border with Côte d'Ivoire, makes trawling very difficult. As a result, it was either impossible to trawl in some transects in stratum A or hauls were null because the net became repeatedly entangled.

There were fewer problems in the more gently sloping deep zone.

Problems were mainly due to the presence of a rocky coral belt running along the shelf edge, and to strong currents which made trawling impossible in transects 14 and 15, off Point Seste and Cape Palmas. The haul made in Monrovia Bay was declared null as the net became fast in mud. (Bobbins arenot very effective on muddy bottoms because of their weight.)

The remainder of the shelf (between 50 and 700 m depth), has soft bottoms and is trawlable.

CÔTE D'IVOIRE

The Côte d'Ivoire shelf appears to be suitable for trawling (as far as its edge). The small percentage of unsuccessful hauls, 19% (Table 9), is an indication of this. It must nevertheless be noted that it was not possible to carry out all the scheduled tows in the deep stratum (below 100 m depth), as hours of searching with the echosounder failed to detect suitable, even-bottomed trawling grounds.

The only untrawlable parts of the shelf are the areas where rocky banks occur (Map 7).

GHANA

Most of the problems were encountered in Cape Saint Paul, where besides being struck by a violent storm, the gear kept sticking in mud and rocks. This implied that the strip of hard bottom off the coast of Togo must extend as far as eastern Ghana, covered by a thin layer of sediment.

Except for the net entangling on the coral reef in transect 24 and the presence of a large mud bar off Cape Three Points, the rest of the Ghanaian shelf posed no problems.

SPECIES

A total of 294 species were collected during the “Guinea 90” survey. Of these 237 were fish, 45 were crustaceans and 12 were molluscs (cephalopods). Annex II lists the species grouped into families.

Table 10 gives the number of species in each of the three groups encountered in the areas surveyed. The largest number were obtained in Liberian and Ghanaian waters, partly because the greatest number of hauls were made there.

Table 10. Number of species caught in each area
SpeciesFishCrustaceansMolluscsTotal
Western Sierra Leone1201610146
Estern Sierra Leone1142010144
Liberia1513311195
Côte d'Ivoire1352011166
Ghana153229184
Total2374512294

FISH

A total of 237 fish species, belonging to 108 different families, were caught. Of these, 29 (belonging to 12 families) were Chondricthyes, and the remainder, i. e., 208 species (belonging to 96 families) were Teleostei.

The greatest diversity by family was shown by the Sparidae and Scorpenidae, each represented by nine species, the Carangidae, Macrouridae and Serranidae, with eight each and the Sciaenidae and Soleidae, with seven each.

Of the Chondricthyes, the Squalidae family, with five species, provided the widest diversity.

CRUSTACEANS

Fortyfive crustacean species, belonging to 19 different families, were caught during the survey. The widest specific diversity was encountered within the Pandalidae and Penaeidae families (with nine and seven species respectively).

Eastern Sierra Leone was the geographical area where diversity was widest.

MOLLUSCS

Only cephalopods were taken into account in this phylum. A number of gasteropods (especially Opisthobranchia and Lamellibranchia) were caught, even though the gear was not really suitable for catching this type of benthic fauna. Specimens of all the species were nevertheless kept.

Twelve species of cephalopods, belonging to five families, were caught. The greatest diversity was shown by the Sepiidae family (five species altogether, four of the genus Sepia).

Eastern Sierra Leone again gave the largest number of species by country.

OTHER INVERTEBRATES

Due to the short deadline for the publication of this report, it was not possible to process fully all the data collected during the trip. Data on the benthic fauna by-catch will undoubtedly provide valuable direct information on the ecosystem in general, as well as indirect information on the type of substrate with which demersal communities are associated. Similar studies have already been carried out by other authors (Rijavec, 1980) and are useful for defining some of the Gulf of Guinea benthic communities.

The echinoderms (mainly holothuroids and echinoids) are generally one of the most abundant groups on soft bottoms, while calcareous Gorgoniacea and Bryozoa, associated with the lutjanid community, are found on rocky bottoms. The sciaenid community appeared in many hauls to be associated with very characteristic bottoms formed by red coralline algae.

Other groups worth mentioning are Porifera, alcyonoids, pennatulids and nudibranchs.

CATCHES AND YIELDS

This section reviews the catches and yields obtained in the different depth strata (defined in the section on equipment and methods) in each sector, with special attention being paid to species of commercial interest.

Tables 11–31 and Figures 10–30 give the percentage incidence in the catch of the most abundant communities and species by depth stratum and country.

Annex III gives the per stratum and total yield data per species for each sector, expressed in grammes per 30-min tow.

WESTERN SIERRA LEONE

Catches

The total catch was 1 091 kg (5.2% of the total for the trip), with the 20– 50 m and 100–120 m depth ranges accounting for the highest percentages (Tables 11–15; Figs. 10–14).

Sparids gave the highest percentage down to a depth of 200 m, with the first three strata providing between 52% and 65% of the total. D. congoensis was the most abundant sparid between 100 and 200 m depth (38.7%), but Epinephelus, representing 15.9% and 12.0% of the catch in stratum A and B respectively (between 20 and 100 m depth) is also worth noting.

The lutjanid community accounted for 23.6% of the catch in stratum A, with Lutjanus dominating (14.5%).

The continental slope community represented more than half the catch beyond 200 m, but was rarely encountered in the deep strata. As seen in Tables 14 and 15, the highest percentages by species corresponded to H. bella in the 200–400 m depth range, and Macrouridae, between 400 and 700 m depth. Chondricthyes also represented a high proportion of the catch in both strata.

Because of their commercial importance, mention must also be made of the cephalopods, which represented 15.5% of the catch in the 50–100 m depth range (S. officinalis amounting to 8.9%).

Yields

Highest global yields in this area correspond to L. dentatus, E. aeneus and E. alexandrinus and P. bellottii. However, none of these species yielded more than 7 kg/30-min tow. The highest yields per stratum were as follows: in the 100–200 m depth range, D. congoensis and D. angolensis gave 60 and 23.5 kg/30-min tow respectively, while in the shallower stratum, L. dentatus and E. alexandrinus gave 11.8 and 10.3 kg/30-min tow respectively.

WESTERN SIERRA LEONE

20–50 m

Fig. 10.

Fig. 10. Western Sierra Leone, 20–50 m: Percentage catch distribution

Fig. 11 and 12.

Fig. 11 and 12. Western Sierra Leone, 50–100 m and 100–200 m: Percentage catch distribution

Fig. 13 and 14.

Figs. 13 and 14. Western Sierra Leone, 200–400 m and 400–700m: Percentage catch distribution

Table 11. Western Sierra Leone, 20–50 m: Percentage catch distribution
Acanthurus monroviae7.6
Lutjanus14.5
Others1.5
LUTJANID community23.6
Brachydeuterus auritus2.2
SCIAENID community2.2
Epinephelus15.9
Lagocephalus laevigatus1.5
Pagellus bellottii9.4
Pagrus caeruloestictus1.6
Pseudupeneus prayensis5.1
Serranus accraensis13.4
Syacium micrurum1.7
Triglidae1.7
Others1.8
SPARID community52.3
Trachurus trecae3.8
Other pelagics0.7
PELAGICS4.5
Raja miraletus1.7
CHONDRICTHYES1.7
CEPHALOPODS9.1
OTHER SPECIES6.6
CATCH PER STRATUM (kg)278


Table 12. Western Sierra Leone, 50–100 m: Percentage catch distribution
Branchiostegus semifasciatus1.2
Citharus linguatula1.5
Dentex angolensis15.1
Epinephelus12.0
Pagellus bellottii1.5
Pseudupeneus prayensis2.6
Saurida brasilensis9.7
Serranus accraensis2.3
Tetraodontidae2.0
Triglidae9.5
Uranoscopus4.0
Other species2.6
SPARID community64.0
Raja miraletus9.3
Squatina oculata2.9
Other species3.9
CHONDRICTHYES16.1
Octopus vulgaris2.8
Sepia bertheloti3.2
Sepia officinalis8.9
Other species0.6
CEPHALOPODS15.5
OTHER SPECIES4.4
CATCH PER STRATUM (kg)278


Table 13. Western Sierra Leone, 100–200 m: Percentage catch distribution
Ariomma bondi3.4
Dentex angolensis15.1
Dentex congoensis38.7
Spicara alta6.1
Other species1.8
SPARID Community65.1
Antigonia capros10.5
DEEP SHELF Community10.5
Mustelus mustelus1.8
Raja barnardi2.3
Raja miraletus9.1
CHONDRICTHYES13.3
Anthias anthias1.6
Aulopus cadenati2.5
Scorpenidae5.3
Other species1.7
CATCH PER STRATUM (kg)450


Table 14. Western Sierra Leone, 200–400 m: Percentage catch distribution
Peristedion cataprhactum2.5
Zenopsis conchifer1.4
DEEP SHELF Community3.9
Chorophthalmus10.2
Hypoclydonia bella30.6
Macrouridae3.1
Trigla lyra2.5
Other species5.6
SLOPE Community52.0
Mustelus mustelus27.4
Raja barnardi1.8
CHONDRICTHYES29.2
Illex coindetii4.4
Sepia elegans3.0
Todaropsis eblanae1.6
CEPHALOPODS8.9
CRUSTACEANS2.1
OTHER SPECIES3.9
CATCH PER STRATUM (kg)66


Table 15. Western Sierra Leone, 400–700 m: Percentage catch distribution
Ectreposebastes imus4.1
Laemonema3.1
Lamprogrammus exutus6.2
Lophiidae13.6
Macrouridae20.7
Merluccius polli5.4
Other species11.2
SLOPE Community64.3
Centrophorus granulosus14.7
Raja straeleni5.8
Other species4.3
CHONDRICTHYES24.8
Paromola cuvieri2.7
Other species2.7
CRUSTACEANS5.4
OTHER SPECIES5.5
CATCH PER STRATUM (kg)19

EASTERN SIERRA LEONE

Catches

The total catch in this area was 773 kg. The largest catches were obtained in the 50–100 m depth interval (Tables 16–20; Figs. 15–19). As in the western part of the country, sparids dominated the catches down to a depth of 200 m, whilst sciaenids were dominant (40.9%) in shallower waters.

Lutjanids accounted for only 3.3% in the shallower depths, where the crustaceans with two species of interest to fisheries, P. atlantica and P. notialis, represented 7.6%.

Below 200 m, species belonging to the slope community and the shark family dominated, with catches of C. granulosus being particularly abundant.

Yields

The best global yields (14.4 kg/30-min tow) were given by D. angolensis, with strata B and C (50–200 m) providing the highest, 41.2 and 28 kg/per 30-min tow, respectively. D. congoensis and E. aeneus gave good yields in strata C and B (18.7 and 18.0 kg/30-min tow, respectively).

C. granulosus and L. carolae were the only two non-commercial species to give particularly good yields.

EASTERN SIERRA LEONE

20–50 m

Fig. 15

Fig. 15. Eastern Sierra Leone, 20–50 m: Percentage catch distribution

Figs. 16 and 17.

Figs. 16 and 17. Eastern Sierra Leone, 50–100 and 100–200 m: Percentage catch distribution

Figs. 18 and 19.

Figs. 18 and 19. Eastern Sierra Leone, 200–400 and 400–700 m: Percentage catch distribution

Table 16. Eastern Sierra Leone, 20–50 m: Percentage catch distribution
LUTJANID Community3.3
Brachydeuterus auritus34.4
Pseudotolithus typus4.8
Others1.7
SCIAENID Community40.9
Lagocephalus laevigatus5.6
Saurida brasilensis15.4
Syacium micrurum3.0
Others4.8
SPARID Community28.8
CEPHALOPODS5.0
Parapenaeopsis atlantica2.5
Penaeus notialis2.5
Others2.6
CRUSTACEANS7.6
OTHER SPECIES14.5
CATCH PER STRATUM (kg)64


Table 17. Eastern Sierra Leone, 50–100 m: Percentage catch distribution
Citharus linguatula3.8
Dentex angolensis35.0
Dentex congoensis2.9
Epinephelus aeneus15.2
Saurida brasilensis5.8
Serranus accraensis2.8
Triglidae9.7
Uranoscopus albesca2.4
Others1.9
SPARID Community79.6
Raja miraletus8.9
CHONDRICTHYES8.9
Octopus vulgaris2.1
Sepia bertheloti4.9
CEPHALOPODS6.9
OTHER SPECIES4.6
CATCH PER STRATUM (kg)325


Table 18. Eastern Sierra Leone, 100–200 m: Percentage catch distribution
Brotula barbata1.5
Dentex angolensis33.0
Dentex congoensis21.9
Epinephelus guaza2.0
Others2.8
SPARID Community60.1
Hypoclydonia bella6.9
Others3.2
SLOPE Community9.9
Mustelus mustelus12.2
Raja miraletus4.7
Squatina oculata9.8
CHONDRICTHYES26.3
CEPHALOPODS1.6
OTHER SPECIES2.1
CATCH PER STRATUM (kg)232


Table 19. Eastern Sierra Leone, 200–400 m: Percentage catch distribution
Brotula barbata3.8
Others2.3
SPARID Community6.1
Chlorophthalmus1.8
Gephyroberyx darwini3.7
Hypoclydonia bella6.0
Lophiidae4.4
Macrouridae8.2
Merluccius polli4.2
Scorpaenidae7.0
Others4.1
SLOPE Community39.3
Centrophorus granulosus15.6
Mustelus mustelus9.5
Oxynotus centrina5.3
Squatina oculata8.2
Others3.5
CHONDRICTHYES42.1
CEPHALOPODS4.8
CRUSTACEANS5.3
OTHER SPECIES2.3
CATCH PER STRATUM (kg)70


Table 20. Eastern Sierra Leone, 400–700 m: Percentage catch distribution
Chaunax pictus2.9
Laemonema laureysi3.8
Lamprogrammus exutus2.6
Lophiidae21.2
Macrouridae8.8
Merluccius polli1.9
Others3.6
SLOPE Community44.8
Centrophorus granulosus41.8
Oxynotus centrina1.3
Others2.6
CHONDRICTHYES45.8
Todaropsis eblanae5.2
CEPHALOPODS5.2
Pontophilus sp.1.4
Paromola cuvieri1.5
CRUSTACEANS2.9
OTHER SPECIES1.4
CATCH PER STRATUM (kg)82

LIBERIA

Catches

Catches in Liberian waters totalled 3 875 kg, the catch rate being highest in the 50–100 m depth stratum (Tables 21–25; Figs. 20–24). Sparids dominated between 20 and 400 m, accounting for 39–48% of the total catch in each of the strata concerned. The dominant species at 100–200 m depth was D. angolensis, with 26.6% while the most abundant catches in the first depth stratum corresponded to non-commercial species, S. brasiliensis (13.9%) and S. accraensis (11.7%). Sparids were also abundant between 200 and 400 m depth, where A. bondi accounted for 40.7%.

Also worth mentioning in the 50–100 m depth stratum are the catches of “groupers”, Epinephelus, species of considerable commercial value to artisanal fisheries in the region (8.2%).

In shallow waters, sciaenids made up for 20.7% of the catch, the dominant species being B. auritus (13.1%).

Between 100 and 200 m depth, 29.1% of the catch comprised species belonging to the deep shelf community, mainly A. capros, but also small quantities of P. cataphractum.

Beyond 200 m, the slope community was the best represented, with H. bella and the shark C. granulosus (16.8%) dominating at 400–700 m, where catches were nevertheless very small.

The dominant cephalopods were S. bertheloti in shallow waters and Illex condeiti and T. eblenae in deep tows.

Among the crustaceans, P. validus accounted for 2.3% of the catch in stratum A, while N. africanus represented 5.9% in the deeper stratum.

Yields

The highest yields for the entire area were: E. encrasicholus (29.3kg/30-min tow), D. angolensis (11.7 kg/30-min tow) and E. aeneus (6 kg/30-min tow). Of the non-commercial species, S. brasiliensis gave an overall yield of 6 kg/ 30-min tow.

The anchovy, E. encrasicholus, gave a substantial yield in stratum B (45.8% of the catch) in the vicinity of Cape Three Points, which coincides with the western front of the Ivorio-Ghanaian upwelling zone.

The highest yields per stratum of demersal species were: D. angolensis in strata C and B, and B. auritus and E. aeneus in strata A and B respectively. The highest yields among the non-commercial species were: A. bondi (60 kg/ 30-min tow) and H. bella at 200–400 m, A. capros at 100–200 m and S. brasiliensis and S. accraensis at 20–50 m.

Crustacean yields were very low; only two species, P. validus in the first stratum and P. cuvieri in the fourth yielded more than 2kg/30-min tow.

The only cephalopod to yield more than 2 kg/30-min tow was S. bertheloti.

Fig. 20.

Fig. 20. Liberia, 20–50 m: Percentage catch distribution

Figs. 21 and 22.

Figs. 21 and 22. Liberia, 50–100 and 100–200 m: Percentage catch distribution

Figs. 23 and 24.

Figs. 23 and 24. Liberia, 200–400 and 400–700 m: Percentage catch distribution

Table 21. Liberia, 20–50 m: Percentage catch distribution
Brachydeuterus auritus13.1
Ilisha africana2.6
Galeoides decadactylus0.8
Pseudotolithus1.0
Pteroscion peli2.2
Selene dorsalis1.0
SCIAENID Community20.7
Chylomipterus antennatus0.8
Citharus linguatula0.7
Dactylopterus volitans1.2
Dentex angolensis1.0
Neanthias accraensis11.7
Pseudupeneus prayensis2.6
Saurida brasilensis13.9
Sphyraena piscatorum1.2
Triglidae4.7
Others0.9
SPARID Community38.7
Cynoglossus canariensis4.2
Sardinella maderensis6.2
Mustelus mustelus5.1
Raja miraletus9.4
CHONDRICTHYES14.5
Sepia bertheloti2.7
Sepia officinalis0.7
CEPHALOPODS3.4
Parapeneopsis atlantica0.5
Portunus validus2.3
CRUSTACEANS2.8
OTHER SPECIES9.5
CATCH PER STRATUM (kg)492


Table 22. Liberia, 50–100 m: Percentage catch distribution
Citharus linguatula1.7
Dentex angolensis11.6
Dentex congoensis2.0
Epinephelus8.2
Pagellus bellottii2.5
Pentheroscion mbizi1.0
Pseudupeneus prayensis1.0
Saurida brasilensis2.6
Triglidae5.4
Uranoscopus1.0
Others4.1
SPARID Community41.1
Raja miraletus2.3
Squatina1.9
CHONDRICTHYES4.2
Sepia bertheloti2.4
CEPHALOPODS2.7
Engraulis encrasicholus45.8
Sardinella2.0
PELAGICS47.8
OTHER SPECIES4.2
CATCH PER STRATUM (kg)1300


Table 23. Liberia, 100–200 m: Percentage catch distribution
Brotula barbata2.0
Dentex angolensis26.6
Dentex congoensis6.5
Epinephelus1.0
Liosaccus cutaneus2.0
Spicara alta1.3
Triglidae2.7
Uranoscopus1.0
Others2.1
SPARID Community45.2
Antigonia capros26.9
Peristedion cataphractum2.2
DEEP SHELF Community29.1
Scorpenidae1.5
Others1.4
SLOPE Community2.9
Mustelus mustelus5.4
Raja miraletus3.2
Squalus blanvillei1.3
Squatina6.0
CHONDRICTHYES15.9
CEPHALOPODS1.1
OTHER SPECIES5.8
CATCH PER STRATUM (kg)777


Table 24. Liberia, 200–400 m: Percentage catch distribution
Arioma bondi40.7
Dentex angolensis5.2
Others1.9
SPARID Community47.8
Antigonia capros5.5
Peristedion cataphractum1.1
Others1.5
SLOPE Community8.1
Hypoclidonia bella12.1
Macrouridae3.2
Scorpenidae1.6
Others1.4
SLOPE Community25.0
Mustelus mustelus4.6
Raja barnardi1.0
Squalus blanvillei1.0
Squatina5.4
CHONDRICTHYES12.8
Todaropsis eblenae1.0
CEPHALOPODS1.3
CRUSTACEANS1.3
OTHER SPECIES3.7
CATCH PER STRATUM (kg)1181


Table 25. Liberia, 400–700 m: Percentage catch distribution
Chaunax pictus2.7
Cubiceps12.2
Halosaurus oweni1.1
Laemonema2.9
Lamprogramun6.9
Lophiidae7.5
Macrouridae6.0
SLOPE Community43.4
Deania calcea4.2
Rays1.8
Centrophorus granulosus16.8
Squalus blanvillei1.1
CHONDRICTHYES23.9
Illex condeiti3.2
Todaropsis eblenae2.4
CEPHALOPODS5.6
Nematocarcinus africanus5.9
Paromola cuvieri2.3
Pontophilus1.1
CRUSTACEANS9.3
OTHER SPECIES17.8
CATCH PER STRATUM (kg)125

CÔTE D'IVOIRE

Catches

Tables 26–28 and figures 25–27 give the percentage catch distribution of the various communities in the three depth ranges surveyed.

The total catch amounted to 11 248 kg, 43% of which was taken in the 20–50 m depth range. It is noted that S. alta with 2 350 kg (taken in haul 128), alone accounts for half the total catch in the deep stratum (> 100 m).

The sparid community makes up a large proportion of the catch, especially in the 50–100 m depth range (82.5%), but also in the 20–50 m stratum (41.7%). P. bellottii (18.4%) and D. angolensis (15.6%) dominated in Stratum A and B respectively. The dominant species in the by-catch were D. volitans and P. arenatus in Stratum A and Triglidae, A. bondi and P. arenatus in Stratum B. As anticipated, the sciaenid community is well represented in the 20–50 m depth interval, where it accounts for 35% of the catch, with the small Pomadasyidae, Brachydeuterus auritus (15.6%) dominating. This community, however, accounted for only 5.1% of the catch in Stratum B and was not represented in deep waters.

The Chondricthyes were represented in the same proportions in all three strata. The largest catches corresponded to Mustelus mustelus and Raja miraletus in shallower waters, and C. granulosus in deeper waters.

The “sole” (Cynoglossus canariensis) accounted for 5.7% of the total catch in stratum A, where it was caught in all tows.

The slope community, especially H. bella and the two Chlorophthalmus species, dominated in deep waters.

As regards crustaceans and cephalopods, the former, occuring only beyond 100 m depth, accounted for only 1% of the catch, while the latter represented 6.6% of the catch in Stratum A, with the two cuttlefish species, S. officinalis and S. bertheloti dominating. In stratum B the largest catches corresponded to the octopus, Octopus vulgaris.

Yields

The highest yields overall corresponded to S. alta, with 80 kg/30-min tow. The commercial species providing the best yields were P. bellottii and D. angolensis, with 49.5 and 46.1 kg/30-min tow, respectively, followed by B. auritus, with 30.1 kg/30-min tow.

P. bellottii yielded 86 and 48 kg/30-min tow in stratum A and B, respectively. The highest yields of D. angolensis were obtained in stratum B (80 kg/30-min tow).

Another valuable commercial species, E. aeneus, yielded 12.2 kg/30-min tow for the country as a whole, with the best results (22.1 kg/30-min tow) being obtained in the 50–100 m depth range, which coincides with the bathymetric distribution range quoted for this species.

The only cephalopod worth mentioning is S. officinalis, for which a yield of 18.8 kg/30-min tow was obtained in shallow waters.

A. bondi, P. arenatus, Lepidotrigla carolae and Raja miraletus were among the species yielding more than 10 kg/30-min. tow in this sector.

This was the only area where Geryon maritae was caught in significant quantities (1.1 kg/30-min tow in the deep stratum), and this may be due to the different gear used in this sector. This yield is nevertheless rather low compared with results obtained in other areas where the species is fished commercially (between 10 and 30 kg/30-min tow).

Fig. 25.

Fig. 25. Côte d'Ivoire, 20–50 m: Percentage catch distribution

Figs. 26 and 27.

Figs. 26 and 27. Côte d'Ivoire, 50–100 and >100 m: Percentage catch distribution

Table 26. Côte d'Ivoire, 20–50 m: Percentage catch distribution
Brachydeuterus auritus15.6
Chloroscombrus chrysurus1.1
Eucinostomus melanopterus5.8
Galeoides decadactylus6.6
Pseudotolithus3.8
Selene dorsalis2.0
SCIAENID Community34.9
Dactylopterus volitans5.9
Dentex angolensis3.5
Pagellus bellottii18.4
Priacanthus arenatus5.0
Pseudupeneus prayensis2.8
Sphyraena piscatorum1.5
Umbrina canariensis1.1
Syacium micrurum1.4
Others2.2
SPARID Community41.8
Cynoglossus canariensis3.6
Mustelus mustelus2.7
Raja miraletus3.1
CHONDRICTHYES5.8
Sepia bertheloti2.5
Sepia officinalis2.9
Others1.2
CEPHALOPODS6.6
OTHER SPECIES7.3
CATCH PER STRATUM (kg)4809


Table 27. Côte d'Ivoire, 50–100 m: Percentage catch distribution
Brachydeuterus auritus4.3
Others0.8
SCIAENID Community5.1
Arioma bondi6.2
Brotula barbata1.7
Citharus linguatula3.2
Dentex angolensis23.4
Dentex canariensis1.2
Dentex congoensis5.1
Epinephelus aeneus2.8
Laegocephalus laevigatus1.9
Pagellus bellottii16.2
Pentheroscion mbizi2.1
Priacanthus arenatus5.5
Pseudupeneus prayensis1.5
Triglidae8.1
Umbrina canariensis1.3
Uranoscopus1.0
Others1.2
SPARID Community82.4
Mustelus mustelus1.1
Raja miraletus3.1
Squatina1.0
Others0.7
CHONDRICTHYES5.9
Octopus vulgaris1.3
Sepia1.5
Others1.3
CEPHALOPODS4.1
OTHER SPECIES2.5
CATCH PER STRATUM (kg)3316


Table 28. Cote d'Ivoire, >100 m: Percentage catch distribution
Spicara alta77.8
Others1.3
SPARID Community79.1
Chlorophthalmus1.4
Hypoclidonia bella4.6
Ijimania lopei1.4
Macrouridae1.1
Others1.6
SLOPE Community10.1
Centrophorus granulosus4.1
Mustelus mustelus1.0
CHONDRICTHYES5.6
CEPHALOPODS1.3
  
  
OTHER SPECIES3.9
  
CATCH PER STRATUM (kg)3123

GHANA

Catches

The total catch in Ghanaian waters amounted to 3 098 kg, the most abundant hauls being obtained below 100 m depth (Tables 29–31; Figs. 28–30).

Sparids were almost half the catch in the 20–50 m depth range. The catches of P. caeruloestictus (14.6%), a species of importance to fisheries, and D. volitans, a non-commercial species, are worth mentioning. The largest catches in stratum B (50–100 m) were P. bellottii (10.7%) and Triglidae (12.4 %). The dominant individual species in the deep stratum was H. bella, which accounted for 28.1% of the catch.

Most noteworthy in Ghana were the catches of S. officinalis, a very valuable commercial species, which accounted for 20.6% of the catch in the 50–100 m depth range.

Yields

The highest yields recorded for the country corresponded to S. officinalis, (13.9 kg/30-min tow overall mean and 19.5 kg/30-min tow in the 50–100 m depth range).

The only commercial fishes worth mentioning are the sparids, P. caeruloestictus (7 kg/30-min tow) and P. bellottii (5.6 kg/30-min tow). The sparids were also the commercial species offering the highest yields by stratum, even though these were by far exceeded by non-commercial species such as H. bella and S. oculata.

Table 29. Ghana, 20–50 m: Percentage catch distribution
Acanthostracion2.3
Acanthurus monroviae2.2
Balistes punctatus4.9
Lethrinus atlanticus3.6
Lutjanus fulgens1.7
Monacanthidae1.5
Others0.8
LUTJANID Community16.9
Brachydeuterus auritus2.4
Pomadassidae1.0
Others1.0
SCIAENID Community4.4
Dactylopterus volitans14.8
Dentex canariensis3.4
Epinephelus aeneus1.4
Pagellus bellottii2.3
Pagrus caeruloestictus14.6
Priacanthus arenatus1.7
Pseudupeneus prayensis3.6
Syacium micrurum1.5
Umbrina2.2
Others1.9
SPARID Community47.4
Cynoglossus canariensis1.1
Dasyatidae2.5
Raja miraletus3.2
Rhinobatos4.3
Zanobatus schoenlenii1.5
Others1.1
CHONDRICTHYES12.5
Sepia officinalis12.7
CEPHALOPODS13.5
OTHER SPECIES4.1
CATCH PER STRATUM (kg)745


Table 30. Ghana, 50–100 m: Percentage catch distribution
Alutherus punctatus1.0
Others1.5
LUTJANID Community2.5
Dactylopterus volitans9.6
Dentex angolensis4.0
Dentex canariensis5.8
Dentex congoensis1.5
Epinephelus aeneus5.8
Pagellus bellottii10.7
Pagrus coeruloectistus3.6
Priacanthus arenatus1.0
Pseudupeneus prayensis2.9
Tetraodontidae2.1
Triglidae12.4
Others3.0
SPARID Community62.7
Zeus faber1.5
Mustelus mustelus1.1
Raja miraletus7.1
CHONDRICTHYES8.9
Sepia bertheloti1.7
Sepia officinalis20.6
CEPHALOPODS22.5
OTHER SPECIES1.9
CATCH PER STRATUM (kg)1046


Tabel 31. Ghana, >100 m: Percentage catch distribution
Dentex angolensis1.7
Dentex congoensis3.5
Dentex gibbosus4.2
Spicara alta1.9
Triglidae1.7
Umbrina canariensis2.6
Others1.9
SPARID Community17.5
  
  
Zenopsis conchifer2.9
  
DEEP SHELF Community3.4
  
Chlorophthalmus6.2
Gephyroberyx3.6
Hypoclidonia bella28.1
Macrouridae1.2
Trigla lyra1.0
Others2.0
SLOPE Community41.9
  
  
  
Sphoeroides cutaneus3.0
  
  
Centrophorus granulosus1.0
Mustelus mustelus6.2
Rajidae1.3
Squatina18.5
Torpedo nobiliana3.0
Others1.2
  
CHONDRICTHYES31.2
CEPHALOPODS1.3
  
  
OTHER SPECIES1.7
  
  
CATCH PER STRATUM (kg)2117

GHANA
20–50 m

Fig. 28.

Fig. 28. Ghana. 20–50 m: Percentage catch distribution

Figs. 29 and 30.

Figs. 29 and 30. Ghana, 50–100 and >100 m: Percentage catch distribution

TOTALS

Catches

Tables 32 and 33 summarize the overall catches obtained in the different strata in each country. The total catch for the trip was 20 891 kg.

More than half of that total was fished in Côte d'Ivoire; Sierra Leone's share amounted to 8.9%, while Liberia and Ghana provided almost identical shares, 18.5% and 18.7%, respectively.

As already noted, a more efficient type of gear was used in Côte d'Ivoire (pp 43–44). In order to compare the Côte d'Ivoire results with those of the other areas, each country's catch should be divided by 3.12, a mean coefficient derived from the basis of the catches obtained with each type of gear (Table 6). This would give 3 605 kg for Côte d'Ivoire as a whole, very close to the figure obtained in Ghana, which is also situated in the most productive central upwelling area of the Gulf of Guinea.

Mean catches by stratum and area (Tables 34 and 35; Figs. 31 and 32) are much higher in sector 2 (Côte d'Ivoire-Ghana). After applying the coefficient 3.12, Côte d'Ivoire's mean catch would be 144.2 kg, slightly higher than, but of the same order as Ghana's. The mean for sector 2 would therefore be 139.4 kg, much higher than that obtained for sector 1 (87.0 kg).

Sierra Leone would appear to be the least productive area, with mean catches differing little between east and west (59.5 and 68.2 kg, respectively). Furthermore, the mean catch figure obtained for Liberia, 104.7 kg (much higher than Sierra Leone's) would not appear to confirm the earlier assumption that Liberian waters were unproductive.

The 50–100 m depth stratum in the Sierra Leone-Liberia sector was the most productive, with a mean of 126.9 kg per haul, while the deep stratum (400–700 m) gave only 20.5 kg per tow. The most productive depth range in the Côte d'Ivoire-Ghana sector was that below 100 m.

Table 32. Total catches (kg) per depth stratum in Sector 1
Depth (m)20–5050–100100–200200–400400–700Total
Western Sierra Leone27827845066191091
Eastern Sierra Leone643252327082773
Liberia492130077711811253875
TOTAL SECTOR 18341903145913172265739


Table 33. Total catches (kg) per depth stratum in Sector 2
Depth (m)20–5050–100>100Total
Côte d'Ivoire48093316312311248
Ghana741104621173904
TOTAL SECTOR 255504362524015152


Table 34. Mean catches (kg) per depth stratum in Sector 1
Depth (m)20–5050–100100–200200–400400–700Total
Western Sierra Leone59.569.5150.022.09.568.2
Eastern Sierra Leone21.3108.377.335.041.059.5
Liberia98.4162.586.3147.617.9104.7
TOTAL SECTOR 169.5126.997.3101.320.587.0


Table 35. Mean catches (kg) per depth stratum in Sector 2
Depth (m)20–5050–100>100Total
Côte d'Ivoire480.9368.4520.5449.9
Ghana82.395.1235.2134.6
TOTAL SECTOR 2292.1218.1349.3280.6

Fig. 31

Fig. 31. Mean catches per depth stratum (kg/No tows) in Sector 1

Fig. 32

Fig. 32. Mean catches per depth stratum (kg/No tows) in Sector 2

Yields

The highest overall yields were obtained in Côte d'Ivoire. As already stated, the higher yields of many of the species were due to the more efficient gear used. Among the higher yielding species were P. bellottii (49.5 kg/30-min tow) and D. angolensis (46.1 kg/30-min tow), followed by B. auritus (30.1 kg/ 30-min tow) and S. officinalis (18.8 kg/30-min tow).

Total yields were not as high in the other areas. The exceptional yield of the pelagic species, E. encrasicholus in Liberia (29.3 kg/30-min tow) was a mere coincidence.

The highest-yielding of all the species (commercial and non-commercial) was S. alta (80 kg/30-min tow), which also gave the highest per stratum yield (all species included) in Côte d'Ivoire's deep stratum (406 kg/30-min tow).

Of the commercial species, the sparids gave good yields on the whole, although these varied from species to species depending on geographical area. The highest were attributable to P. bellottii and D. angolensis (86.0 kg/30-min tow in the 20–50 m depth range and 80.0 kg/30-min tow in the 50–100 m depth range respectively) in Côte d'Ivoire, and D. congoensis (60.0 kg/30-min in the 100–200 m depth range) in Western Sierra Leone.

The yield of B. auritus of the sciaenid community in stratum A in Côte d'Ivoire (77.8 kg/30-min tow) is also worth noting.

Among the high yielding, but currently unmarketed species which could be useful resources are S. alta (mentioned above), H. bella and A. bondi. The latter, already noted for its abundance in the deep shelf, yielded 60 kg/30-min tow in the 200–400 m depth stratum in Liberian waters.

S. officinalis would appear to be exploitable in Côte d'Ivoire and Ghana where it yielded 18.8 and 13.9 kg/30-min tow, respectively.



Various moments of the seientistis'working day.

  1. Sampling sparids

  2. Inspecting the catch

  3. Determining the species




  1. What a catch!

  2. Sorting lutijanids

  3. Commenting

  4. Photographic equipment

SIZE DISTRIBUTIONS

Size sampling was done for almost all the target species. The most intensively sampled were the sparids, a total of six species of this community being studied for this report. The length measurement used was fork length (expressed as total length in the graphs).

Total length to the nearest centimetre below was used for the other fish species, but only the findings for the Pomadasyidae, B. auritus, are given here. Most of the unprocessed data concerned the associated fauna (B. barbata, A. bondi, Z. conchifer, etc.). These data will be presented to the Working Group on Demersals in the Western Gulf of Guinea.

Mantle length was used for Sepiidae and the length of the cephalothorax for crustaceans.

The size distributions obtained in the random samples (excluding E. aeneus, D. canariensis, M. polli and P. longirostris, where the entire catch was sampled), were weighted on a by-stratum and total area basis and corresponding frequency histograms obtained.

Dentex angolensis

Of all the sparid species sampled, Dentex angolensis had the widest bathymetric distribution, with large-size specimens being caught below 300 m depth in Liberian and Eastern Sierra Leonean waters. It was also present in more than 50% of successful hauls in all the countries surveyed, with catches in Côte d'Ivoire being particularly large.

Tables 38–42 give the size distributions (number of specimens and percentages) by stratum in each country and for each area as a whole. Figs. 33–41 give the corresponding frequency histograms.

The population structure of this species is very similar in all the countries except Liberia, where in addition to being found in a deeper stratum, it was more apparent that mean and modal sizes increased gradually with increasing depth.

The population in the 20–50 m depth range in Liberia is composed exclusively of juveniles ranging between 4 and 10 cm in length (mean length 7.31 cm; standard deviation 1.24 cm).

Specimens caught between 50 and 100 m show a wider size range (5–24 cm) and fall mainly into two groups: one with a modal size of 10 cm and the other a modal size of 14 cm. There are two smaller groups, however, with modal sizes of 17 and 21 cm, respectively.

The first size group virtually disappears moving from stratum B to stratum C, while part of the population (with a very distinct modal size of 14 cm), maintains a wide size range of between 9 and 26 cm, even at this depth (100–200 m). Mean size between stratum B and C increases from 14.89 cm (±4.37) to 15.96 cm (± 2.98).

There is a clear shift in modal value and mean length in the 200–400 m depth range (to 26 cm and 25.33 ±1.3, respectively), indicating that individuals tend to migrate to deeper waters as they grow older. Here, as in stratum A, size range narrows, maximum lengths of 29 cm are encountered and specimens below 23 cm length disappear altogether.

The frequency distribution of this species is more normal and size range wider throughout the Liberian sector than in the other countries (Fig. 40). Mean size for all depth ranges is 14.91 cm (standard deviation 4.78 cm).

This sparid is caught in all three depth ranges under consideration in Sector 2, but only the specimens caught in the first two depth ranges in Côte d'Ivoire (20–100 m) and in the last two in Ghana (50–>100 m) were measured, as catches in the other strata were very small.

It was present between 50 and 200 m in both Western and Eastern Sierra Leone, although the catch in stratum D in the east was very small and not sampled.

It was noted that younger individuals (modal sizes in the region of 10–11 cm) cohabit with adults on the same bottoms up to 100 m depth in all the countries. Smaller sizes dominate in Western Sierra Leone, Côte d'Ivoire and Ghana, while in Eastern Sierra Leone and Liberia, the main mode between 50 and 100 m depth is slightly higher and corresponds to the larger size group (Figs. 34 and 35).

More homogenous populations appear below 100 m: the size ranges narrow slightly, the main modal values are situated around the larger sizes and individuals of less than 12 cm disappear.

This was not observed in Ghana where specimens of 9 and 10 cm in length are caught below 100 m. However, few individuals were sampled and the frequency histogram (Fig. 38) is not very representative. Ghana therefore has the lowest estimated mean length of all the countries (12.96 cm), despite the significant increase in length between stratum B and C (from 11.32 to 16.28 cm).

Mean population length increases with depth in all the countries (see Table 36). The largest sizes were encountered in Sierra Leone (16.86 cm; standard deviation 3.67 cm).

SECTOR 1
Depth (m)20–5050–100100–200200–400TOTAL
Western Sierra Leone 13.3718.55 15.33
  (4.18)(2.06) (4.35)
Eastern Sierra Leone 16.3717.77 16.86
  (3.85)(3.10) (3.67)
Liberia7.3114.8915.9625.3314.91
 (1.24)(4.37)(2.98)(1.30)(4.78)


SECTOR 2
Table 36. Mean sizes (cm) and standard deviations (in brackets) of Dentex angolensis per sector and stratum
Depth (m)20–5050–100>100TOTAL
Côte d'Ivoire13.7915.46 15.21
 (5.07)(3.91) (4.51)
Ghana 11.3216.2812.96
  (3.09)(3.81)(4.16)

Length distributions by sex

Length sampling by sex was done for all the depth strata (mentioned previously) of all the countries except Liberia and Côte d'Ivoire, where stratum A was not covered. Too few measurements were taken in Ghana to allow representative distributions per stratum to be calculated and only frequency histograms by area are presented here. The 50–100 m stratum in Sierra Leone was not considered either for the same reason.

Male and female size distributions (by stratum and for each area or country) differ considerably (Tables 43–57 and Figs. 42–58).

At all depths female mean length is clearly shorter and size ranges wider than male. Only in stratum D in Liberia was female mean length slightly higher (25.42 cm) than male (25.10), both sexes showing identical size ranges (23–29 cm) (Fig.52).

This would seem to suggest that this D. angolensis population is protogynous (i.e., the fish first maturing sexually as females and changing into males later, when they are between 16 and 22 cm).

Females are also much more abundant than males in catches in certain strata and may account for as much as eight times the weight of males. Juveniles appear in the 50–100 m depth stratum (B) in both western and eastern Sierra Leone and in stratum B and C in Liberia, with estimated mean sizes 9.14 cm (±0.99), 10 cm (±0.71) and 8.95 cm (±1.37) respectively.

Male lengths in stratum B and C are almost identical, although there is a slight shift toward larger sizes with increasing depth. Size range and modal size increases are somewhat more obvious when they occur in females.

Modal and mean lengths of both sexes increase significantly between 200 and 400 m depth and individuals below 23 cm in length disappear, signs that the population here consists of older adults that have completed their sex change and are migrating to greater depths.

Finally, female distributions appear more uniform (with a stronger bias toward longer individuals) (Fig. 53).

Table 37 gives the mean sizes and standard deviations by area for both sexes and for juveniles.

Table 37. Mean sizes (cm) and standard deviations (in brackets) by area for males, females and juveniles of D. angolensis
 MALESFEMALESJUVENILES
Western S. Leone21.04 (1.62)17.38 (2.14)9.14 (0.99)
Eastern S. Leone20.30 (1.90)16.61 (2.22)10.00 (0.71)
Liberia22.03 (2.09)16.01 (3.18)8.95 (1.37)
Côte d'Ivoire19.76 (1.51)15.97 (1.50)----
Ghana22.40(1.26)15.05(4.32)----

Species:Dentex angolensis
WESTERN SIERRA LEONE (50–200 m)

Table 38. Length distributions by stratum for Dentex angolensis in Western Sierra Leone
DEPTH (m)50 – 100100 – 200TOTAL
LENGTH (cm)No
specimens
%No
specimens
%No
specimens
%
100.0000.0000.00
200.0000.0000.00
300.0000.0000.00
400.0000.0000.00
500.0000.0000.00
600.0000.0000.00
781.1600.0080.70
871.0000.0070.61
9628.8000.00625.42
1027038.4400.0027023.62
1171.0000.0070.61
1200.0000.0000.00
13405.6800.00403.50
14334.53122.69453.94
15456.22245.55696.04
16588.28122.69706.12
17496.819121.0914012.25
18182.548118.57998.66
19304.208719.9211710.24
20273.746915.71968.40
21304.34153.45453.94
22111.65214.79322.80
2350.67245.55292.54
2460.8400.0060.52
2510.1700.0010.09
2600.0000.0000.00
2700.0000.0000.00
2800.0000.0000.00
2900.0000.0000.00
3000.0000.0000.00
TOTAL SPECIMENS7071004361001143100
TOTAL WEIGHT (g)4228570105112390

Species: Dentex angolensis
EASTERN SIERRA LEONE (50–200 m)

Table 39. Length distributions by stratum for Dentex angolensis in Eastern Sierra Leone
DEPTH (m)50 – 100100 – 200TOTAL
LENGTH (cm)No
specimens
%No
specimens
%No
specimens
%
100.0000.0000.00
200.0000.0000.00
300.0000.0000.00
400.0000.0000.00
500.0000.0000.00
600.0000.0000.00
700.0000.0000.00
800.0000.0000.00
9101.0800.00100.70
1012513.4400.001268.75
11353.7600.00352.45
12202.1582.00281.96
13303.23255.00553.83
14606.45418.001027.07
15606.455611.001178.16
16656.997114.001379.54
179510.226213.0015810.99
1815016.13377.0018813.09
19808.60469.001278.84
20505.38428.00936.46
21758.06286.001047.25
22555.91408.00966.65
23151.61286.00433.06
2450.5482.00130.96
2500.0010.2010.07
2600.0000.0000.00
2700.0031.0030.21
2800.0000.0000.00
2900.0000.0000.00
3000.0000.0000.00
TOTAL SPECIMENS9301004961001436100
TOTAL WEIGHT (g)12745068453197303

Species:Dentex angolensis
LIBERIA (20–400 m)

Table 40. Length distributions by stratum D. angolensis in Liberia
DEPTH (m)20–5050–100100–200200–400TOTAL
LENGTH (cm)No
specimens
%No
specimens
%No
specimens
%No
specimens
%No
specimens
%
100.0000.0000.0000.0000.00
200.0000.0000.0000.0000.00
300.0000.0000.0000.0000.00
491.8100.0000.0000.0090.21
5377.44140.8500.0000.00511.18
66813.6840.2400.0000.00721.67
715130.38171.0400.0000.001683.89
815130.38482.9300.0000.001994.60
97214.491318.0070.3400.002104.86
1091.8119311.7860.2900.002084.81
1100.00130.79120.5800.00250.58
1200.00352.14994.8000.001343.10
1300.001307.9424311.7900.003708.56
1400.0020512.5240019.4100.0060514.00
1500.001579.5834716.8400.0049811.52
1600.00985.9826512.8600.003578.26
1700.001187.201376.6500.002525.83
1800.001136.901668.0500.002786.43
1900.00623.79813.9300.001373.17
2000.00865.25854.1200.001673.86
2100.00925.62713.4400.001603.70
2200.00553.36723.4900.001242.87
2300.00513.11291.411710.19962.22
2400.00160.98211.022414.97601.39
2500.0000.00120.584527.62571.32
2600.0000.0070.344829.94561.30
2700.0000.0010.052313.89240.56
2800.0000.0000.0031.8530.07
2900.0000.0000.0021.2320.05
3000.0000.0000.0000.0000.00
TOTAL SPECIMENS497100163810020611001621004322100
TOTAL WEIGHT (g)570515178420619062460426139

Species: Dentex angolensis
CÓTE D'IVORE (20 – >100 m)

Table 41. Length distributions by stratum for D. angolensis in Côte d'Ivoire
DEPTH (m)20 – 5050 – 100TOTAL
LENGTH (cm)No
specimens
%No
specimens
%No
specimens
%
100.0000.0000.00
200.0000.0000.00
300.0000.0000.00
400.0000.0000.00
500.0000.0000.00
600.0000.0000.00
700.0000.0000.00
800.00130.14130.10
900.0050.0550.04
1048124.40103910.84153311.48
1191446.37203621.25300022.47
1200.004474.664513.38
1300.001211.262001.50
1400.002923.053972.97
1500.00115812.09158011.83
16241.227177.489286.95
17241.229139.5310227.65
1800.008498.8611408.54
19723.656797.099647.22
201206.094224.406765.06
21723.653153.294933.69
22482.441411.472161.62
23723.651811.893082.31
24964.87720.751691.27
25241.22971.011220.91
26241.22850.891351.01
2700.0000.0000.00
2800.0000.0000.00
2900.0000.0000.00
3000.0000.0000.00
TOTAL SPECIMENS1971100958210013352100
TOTAL WEIGHT (g)168923751276927897

species: Dentex angolensis
GHANA (20 – >100 m)

Table 42. Length distributions by stratum for D. angolensis in Ghana
DEPTH (m)50 – 100 100TOTAL
LENGTH (cm)No
specimens
%No
specimens
%No
specimens
%
100.0000.0000.00
200.0000.0000.00
300.0000.0000.00
400.0000.0000.00
500.0000.0000.00
600.0000.0000.00
7202.1500.00201.60
880.9400.0080.70
916918.99205.2618915.45
1033637.643810.5137430.65
1113515.1200.0013511.21
1200.0000.0000.00
1360.6700.0060.50
14485.39205.26685.36
15677.567821.0214511.06
16283.107821.021067.75
1760.67205.26261.86
1800.0000.0000.00
19283.23205.26483.76
2000.00205.26201.36
2160.673810.51443.22
22212.484010.51614.57
2300.0000.0000.00
24131.3400.00130.99
2500.0000.0000.00
2600.0000.0000.00
2700.0000.0000.00
2800.0000.0000.00
2900.0000.0000.00
3000.0000.0000.00
TOTAL SPECIMENS8911003721001263100
TOTAL WEIGHT (g)425784296685644

Fig. 33.

Fig. 33. Dentex angolensis. Length distribution in Western Sierra Leone, Stratum B and C

Fig. 34.

Fig. 34. Dentex angolensis. Length distribution in Eastern Sierra Leone, Stratum B and C

Fig. 35.

Fig. 35. Dentex angolensis. Length distribution in Liberia, Stratum A and B

Fig. 36.

Fig. 36. Dentex angolensis. Length distribution in Liberia, Stratum C and D

Fig. 37.

Fig. 37. Dentex angolensis. Length distribution in Côte d'Ivoire, Stratum A and B

Fig. 38.

Fig. 38. Dentex angolensis. Length distribution in Ghana, Stratum B and C

Fig. 39.

Fig. 39 Length distribution in Western and Eastern Sierra Leone,

Fig. 40.

Fig. 40. Dentex angolensis. Length distribution in Liberia and Côte d'Ivoire

Fig. 41.

Fig. 41. Dentex angolensis. Length distribution in Ghana


Previous Page Top of Page Next Page