Previous Page Table of Contents Next Page


ANNEX 4. GUIDELINES FOR RESOURCE PERSON FOR CASE STUDY PREPARATION


Each case study will be prepared in close collaboration with the leaders of agricultural research institutions, departments, agencies and other institutions involved in agricultural research as part of the National Agricultural Research System, under the overall supervision of the FAO Research and Technology Development Service (SDRR), the Special Programme for African Agricultural Research (SPAAR) and the Team Leader. The Government authorities, the FAO Representative and donors (bilateral and multilateral) active in agricultural research will be intimately informed of and involved in the exercise. Specifically the resource person will include the topics listed below:

1. Background

1.1 Natural resources and environment (soil, climate and rainfall)

1.2 Economic indicators (total and rural population; total GDP and agricultural GDP)

1.3 Government policy and priority for agricultural development

1.4 Donors' contributions to agriculture sector development

2. Agricultural research, institutions and system

2.1 Evolution of the agricultural research system

2.2 Organization, structure and management

2.3 Agricultural research network: number of centres, stations, distribution by agro-ecological zones, etc.

2.4 Research personnel: number of professional staff, educational level (PhD, MSc, BSc. or equivalent) distribution between nationals and expatriates by age and seniority, number of support staff, etc.

2.5 Research budgets:

2.6 Infrastructure and facilities: appropriateness and state of maintenance

2.7 Linkages within and outside the system: institutions of higher education, extension and development agencies, regional and international research institutions, donors, etc.

3. Analysis of foreign assistance to agricultural research: donors' policies and strategies for assistance to agricultural research in the following areas:

3.1 Programme/project formulation and priority setting mechanism; decision-making process; governance; target beneficiary; resource-poor farmers, commercial farmers, environmental considerations, etc.

3.2 Timeframe of the assistance: short- (two to four years), medium- (five to ten years) or long-term (10 years or more) commitment

3.3 Implementation modalities/mechanisms:

i) donor-managed programmes and projects with expatriate expert input: number, age, professional qualifications and seniority relative to nationals; evolution during programme or project life. This category could include CGIAR/NARS executed research projects;

ii) donor/recipient country jointly managed programme or project, with limited expatriate expert input: number, age professional qualifications and seniority relative to nationals; evolution during programme or project life;

iii) national executed programme or project: modalities of monitoring and evaluation mechanisms; procedures of programme or project reporting.

3.4 Priority areas for agricultural research assistance:

i) institutional building type: multidisciplinary or multi-sectoral research programmes or projects;

ii) commodity-oriented research programmes or projects;

iii) research-extension development programmes or projects;

iv) research-education-training programmes or projects;

v) adaptive, on-farm research component of agricultural or rural development programmes or projects

3.5 Human resources development: policy and practice

i) training of professionals and support staff:

ii) salaries, incentives and social welfare for national staff;

iii) social and recreational facilities for research centres and stations

3.6 Infrastructure development and equipment: policy and practice:

i) building of new infrastructure:

ii) refurbishment of, upgrading or expansion of existing infrastructure (same as above)

3.7 Recurrent and operational costs: policy and practice:

i) operational and maintenance costs of the above-mentioned infrastructure and equipment;

ii) research activities cost per se

iii) as percentage of overall programme or project cost and institution budgets

iv) breakdown of cost elements by sources (government as counterpart contribution, donors, self-financing, etc.) and relative percentage

4. Assessment of the role and contribution of foreign assistance to the development of three institutional national agricultural research capacity. Based on the information and data collected above, the resource person will assess the impact of foreign assistance, using the following indicators:

4.1 Quality of research management: in terms of policy formulation, planning, priority setting, organization, etc.

4.2 Improvement of institutional stability: how much reorganization and restructuring has the institution gone through during donor involvement?

4.3 Personnel stability: ratio of turnover of staff; did it improve or worsen; conditions of service, job satisfaction, work environment, etc.

4.4 Level of budget and stability funding:

4.5 Research programme: stability and relevance:

4.6 Linkages with the World Knowledge System:

4.7 Size of the research institution/system:

4.8 Monitoring and evaluation:

5. Conclusions and recommendations for efficient and effective use of foreign assistance:


Previous Page Top of Page Next Page