Chapter 3
1. Physiographic zones
2. Annual runoff in major
river systems
3. Bio-climatic and physiographic zones
4. Profile of the
physiographic zones
5. Area in different physiographic zones and development regions, 1986
Chapter 4
6. Land use (LRMP) 1986
7. Land use by agro-climatic
zone, 1986
8. Land use by development regions, 1986
9. Forest and shrub
area by development regions
10. Forest and shrub area by development
regions
11. Forest cover under different forest inventories
12. Change in
forest and shrub cover between 1978-1994
13. Change woody vegetation cover
between 1978-1994
14. Change in growing stock between 1960 and 1994
15.
Change in stems per hectare
16. Soil erosion rates for specific sites
17.
Tree plantation on different types of land
18. Plant diversity
19. Endemic
plants in the protected areas
20. Number of threatened species
21. Forest
and shrub cover in protected areas
22. Physiographical linkages or protected
areas
23. Representation of ecosystems in protected areas
24. Faunal diversity
Chapter 5
25. Settlements and population by ecological zone,
1991
26. Population projection
27. Area and population of development
regions in 1981 and 1991
28. Person per hectare of farm land
29. Livestock
population
30. Percentage distribution of livestock
31. Literacy rates
over time
32. Annual growth rates of GDP during different five year
plans
33. Urban consumer price index
34. Percentage contribution to gross
domestic product
35. Long-tern projection of economic growth rates
36.
Share in gross domestic product during VIII FYP
37. Forestry share in GDP at
constant prices (1984)
38. Development expenditure during VIII FYP (at 1991
prices)
39. Foreign grants and loans to forestry sector
Chapter 6
40. Household fuelwood requirement
41. Per-capita
consumption of fuelwood in different regions
42. Population projection for
fuelwood requirement
43. Projected fuelwood supply
44. Potential of
Indigenous Energy Resources
45. Indigenous grass species found in different
agro-eco zones
46. Endangered forage species of Nepal
47. Fodder
requirements
48. Projected fodder production
49. Change in forest based
industries
50. Performance of forest based manufacturing units for
1996
51. Annual variation in production in selected forest industries
52.
Timber requirements
53. Annual per-capita timber requirement
54. Projected timber production
Chapter 7
55. Annual revenue from forests
56. Change in
quantity and revenue
57. Areas of deficit
58. Forests handed over to
communities (1997)
59. Forest user groups, 1998
60. Condition of community
forest, 1997
61. Leasehold hill forest
Physiographic Zone |
Elevation |
Terai |
Less than 500 m |
Siwaliks |
500 to 1 000 m |
Midhills |
1 000 to 3 000 m |
High Mountains |
3 000 to 5 000 m |
High Himalaya |
Above 5 000 m |
(Source: LRMP 1986)
Table 2. Annual runoff in major river systems
River System |
Catchment Area* (km2) |
Mean Annual Runoff** (billion m3) |
Mahakali (Pancheswor)*** |
12 100 |
4 |
Karnali (Chisapani) |
42 890 |
42 |
Babai (Bargadha) |
3 000 |
2 |
West Rapti (Jalkundi) |
3 380 |
3 |
Narayani (Narayanghat) |
31 100 |
39 |
Bagmati (Pandhera Dovan) |
2 700 |
4 |
Kamala (Timnai, Chisapani) |
1 450 |
1 |
Sapta Koshi (Chatra-Kothu) |
54 100 |
22 |
Kankai (Mainachuli) |
1 148 |
2 |
Other Southern Rivers |
42 603 |
50 |
Total |
194 471 |
170 |
Notes:
* Up to gauging sites of the basins within Nepal only.
** The Values are for the annual run-off from the Nepal Territory only.
*** Names given an ( ) indicate the place of the terminal gauging station.
(Source: Assessment of water Resources of Nepal & its Economic value: Kiran Shankar Yogacharya, 1996)
Table 3. Bio-climatic and physio-graphic zones
Vegetation (Bio-climatic) Zone |
Altitude in m |
Physiographic Zone |
Tropical Lower |
Below 500 m |
Terai |
Upper |
500 to 1 000 m |
Siwalik |
Sub-tropical Lower |
1 000 to 1 500 m |
Middle Hills |
Upper |
1 500 to 2 000 m | |
Temperate Lower |
2 000 to 2 500 m | |
Upper |
2 500 to 3 000 m | |
Sub-Alpine Lower |
3 000 to 3 500 m |
High Mountain |
Upper |
3 500 to 4 000 m | |
Alpine Lower |
4 000 to 4 500 m | |
Upper |
4 500 to 5 000 m | |
Nival |
Above 5 000 m |
High Himalayas |
Table 4. Profile of the physiographic zones
MAIN ITEMS |
TERAI |
SIWALIKS |
MIDDLE MOUNTAIN |
HIGH MOUNTAIN |
HIGH HIMAL |
Geology |
Quaternary alluvium. |
Tertiary sandstone, siltstone, shale and conglomerates |
Phyllite, quartzite limestone & islands of granites |
Gneiss, quartzite & mica shists |
Gneiss, schist, limestone and Tethys sediments |
Elevation |
60-330 m. Subtropical |
200-1 500 m. |
800-2 400 m. Relief 1 500 m with isolated peaks to 2 700 m |
2 200-4 000 m. High relief 3 000 m from valley floor to ridges Warm to cool temperate |
4 000 m+ |
Climate |
Subhumid in FW+MWDR; humid in W+C and EDR |
Subtropical (but warm temperate in higher hill spurs) |
Warm temperate (but subtropical in lower river valleys and cool temperate on high ridges |
Warm to cool temperate |
Alpine to Arctic (snow 6-12 months) |
Moisture Regime |
Subhumid in FW+MWDR; humid in W+C and EDR |
Subhumid in most of the area; humid in N-aspect of W+C+EDR and Dun valleys |
Subhumid; humid above 2000 m N-aspects and 1000 m S-aspects |
Subhumid N-aspects; humid throughout the region below 3 600 m |
|
Rainfall intensity |
High |
High |
Medium |
Low |
Low |
Vegetation |
Sal + mixed hardwoods |
Sal + mixed hardwoods + pine forest |
Pine forest + mixed hardwood and oak forest |
Fir, pine, birch and rhododendron |
Open meadows + tundra vegetation |
Soils |
Ustochrepts, Haplustolls, Haplaquepts, Haplustalfs, Ustifluvents & Ustorthents |
Ustochrepts, Haplustolls, Rhodustalfs, Ustothents, Dystrochrepts, Haplaquepts & Ustifluvents. |
Ustochrepts, Haplustalfs, Rhodustalfs, Haplumbrepts, Ustorthents & Ustifluvents |
Eutrochrepts, Dystrochrepts, Haplumbrepts, Cryumbrepts, Cryorthents & Ustorthents |
Cryumbrepts, Cryorthents & Rock |
Crops |
Rice, maize, wheat, mustard, sugarcane, jute, tobacco, cotton, tea |
Rice, maize, wheat, millet, radish, potato, ginger, tea. |
Rice, maize, wheat, millet, barley, pulse, sugarcane, radish, potato, ginger, cardamom. |
Oat, barley, wheat, potato, buckwheat, yams, amaranthus, medicinal herbs |
Grazing (June-Sept.) |
Horticulture |
Mango, litchi, pineapple, jackfruit, imli, palm |
Mango, papaya, banana, moringa. |
Mango, papaya, banana, orange, lime, lemon, peach, plum, aegal, pomegranate |
Chestnut, walnut, apple, peach, plum, apricot |
|
People |
Tharus, Brahmins, Chhetris, Mohammedan |
Tharus (Dun valley) presently all hill tribes immigrated from Middle Mountain |
Gurungs, Magars, Tamangs, Newars, Brahmins, Chhetris, Damais, Sarkis, Sunars, Kumals, Rais, Limbus |
Khas chhetris, Tibetean related groups-Thakalis, Bhotias, Sherpas, Tamangs, Ghales |
Temporary herders & Sherpas (in East Nepal) |
Industry |
Matches, jute, cigarette & sugar factories, saw mills, rice & flour mills, soaps, consignments, food processing, furniture, industrial estates. |
Saw mills, rice, flour & oil mills, industrial estates, cotton factory; cement factory and wildlife camps. |
Rice, flour & oil mills, cement factory, industrial estates, cottage industry-handicrafts, curios, hosiery, plastics, hotels & lodges. |
Cottage industry- carpets, blankets, hard woven cloths, trekking & expeditions. |
Mountaineering expeditions & trekking. |
(Source: CES, 1998)
Table 5. Area in different physiographic zones and development regions, 1986 (Areas in 1 000 ha)
Physiographic Region |
Development Regions |
Total Area |
Percent | ||||
Eastern |
Central |
Western |
Mid- Western |
Far- Western | |||
High Mountains |
470.6 |
224.3 |
883.1 |
1502.5 |
269 |
3349.5 |
22.7 |
High Hills |
531.1 |
366.9 |
489.8 |
1147.5 |
424 |
2959.3 |
20.1 |
Mid Hills |
980.8 |
931.2 |
1011.7 |
803.3 |
716.4 |
4443.4 |
30.1 |
Siwalik |
251.2 |
629.7 |
237.2 |
570.2 |
197.5 |
1885.8 |
12.8 |
Terai |
620.6 |
582.0 |
313.8 |
256.7 |
337.4 |
2110.5 |
14.3 |
Nepal |
2 854.3 |
2 734.1 |
2 935.6 |
4 280.2 |
1 944.3 |
1 4748.5 |
100 |
(Source: CES, 1998)
Table 6. Land use (LRMP), 1986
Type |
Land (000 ha) |
Percentage |
Agriculture |
||
Cultivated |
2 968 |
20.12 |
Uncultivated |
998 |
6.77 |
Subtotal |
3 966 |
26.89 |
Forest |
0.00 | |
Forest Land |
5 617 |
38.08 |
Shrubs |
690 |
4.68 |
Subtotal |
6 307 |
42.76 |
Pastures |
1 747 |
11.84 |
Others |
2 729 |
18.50 |
Snow-capped Area |
506 |
3.43 |
Rocky/Surface |
1 869 |
12.67 |
Stone/Sand |
322 |
2.18 |
Steep Terrain |
6 |
0.04 |
Barren Land |
3 |
0.02 |
Lake/Pond |
12 |
0.08 |
Urban Areas |
11 |
0.07 |
Total |
14 749 |
100 |
(Source, CES, 1998)
Table 7. Land use by agro-climatic zone, 1986
Land Use |
Agro-climatic Zone (Area in 1 000 ha) | ||||||
High Mount. |
High Hill |
Mid Hill |
Siwalik |
Terai |
Total |
Percent | |
Agriculture Area |
7.8 |
244.4 |
1 224.6 |
268.0 |
1 307.9 |
3 052.7 |
20.7 |
Percent |
0.3 |
8 |
40 |
8.7 |
43 |
||
Forest&Afforestation Area |
154.5 |
1639.0 |
1806.4 |
1438.4 |
474.4 |
5 512.7 |
37.4 |
Percent |
3 |
30 |
33 |
26 |
8 |
||
Pasture / Meadow Area |
884.8 |
508.0 |
279.6 |
16.3 |
58.0 |
1 746.7 |
11.8 |
Percent |
51 |
29 |
16 |
1 |
3 |
||
Shrub & Degraded Area |
66.7 |
175.7 |
406.6 |
30.8 |
29.2 |
709.0 |
4.8 |
Percent |
9 |
25 |
58 |
4 |
4 |
||
Non-agricultural use Area |
1.9 |
147.7 |
666.7 |
57.5 |
124.3 |
998.1 |
6.8 |
Percent |
0.2 |
14.8 |
66.8 |
5.8 |
12.4 |
||
Other uses Area |
2 233.8 |
244.5 |
59.5 |
74.8 |
116.7 |
2 729.3 |
18.5 |
Percent |
82 |
9 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
||
All Total Area |
3 349.5 |
2 959.3 |
4 443.4 |
1 885.8 |
2 110.5 |
14 748.5 |
|
Percent |
23 |
20 |
30 |
13 |
14 |
100 |
(Source, CES, 1998)
Table 8. Land use by Development regions, 1986
Land Use |
Development Regions (Area in 1 000 ha) |
Total |
Percent | ||||
Eastern |
Central |
Western |
Mid-West |
Far-west | |||
Agriculture Area |
859.2 |
818 |
608.5 |
464.8 |
302.2 |
3 052.7 |
20.7 |
Percent |
28 |
27 |
20 |
15 |
10 |
||
Forest & Afforestation Area |
923.7 |
1 059.6 |
898.8 |
1 639.6 |
990.9 |
5 512.6 |
37.4 |
Percent |
17 |
19 |
16 |
60 |
18 |
||
Pasture / Meadow Area |
174.4 |
139.6 |
438.3 |
782.8 |
211.6 |
1 746.7 |
11.8 |
Percent |
10 |
8 |
25 |
45 |
12 |
||
Shrub & Degraded Area |
198.2 |
240 |
142.8 |
75.9 |
52.1 |
709.0 |
4.8 |
Percent |
28 |
34 |
20 |
11 |
7 |
||
Non-agricultural use Area |
238.6 |
238.6 |
228.7 |
178.7 |
113 |
997.6 |
6.8 |
Percent |
24 |
24 |
23 |
18 |
11 |
||
Other uses Area |
460.2 |
238.3 |
618.5 |
1 138.4 |
274.5 |
2 729.9 |
18.5 |
Percent |
4 |
3 |
2 |
9 |
82 |
||
All Land Uses Total Area |
2 854.3 |
2 734.1 |
2 935.6 |
4 280.2 |
1 944.3 |
14 748.5 |
|
Percent |
19 |
19 |
20 |
29 |
13 |
100 |
(Source: CES, 1998)
Table 9. Forest and shrub area by Development Region
Development Region |
Total Land Area (1 000 ha) |
Forest Area (1 000 ha) |
Forest to total land (Percent) |
Shrub Area (1 000 ha) |
Shrub to total land (Percent) |
Forest and Shrub Area (1 000 ha) |
Forest and Shrub to total land (Percent) |
Far Western |
1 953.9 |
687.4 |
35.2 |
2 63.9 |
13.5 |
951.3 |
48.7 |
Mid Western |
4 237.8 |
1 192.4 |
28.2 |
4 42.0 |
10.4 |
1 634.4 |
38.6 |
Western |
2 939.8 |
734.3 |
25.0 |
2 56.9 |
8.7 |
991.2 |
33.7 |
Central |
2 741.0 |
918.6 |
33.5 |
2 33.8 |
8.5 |
1 152.4 |
42.0 |
Eastern |
2 845.6 |
736.1 |
25.9 |
3 62.6 |
12.7 |
1 098.7 |
38.6 |
Total |
14 718.1 |
4 268.8 |
29 |
15 59.2 |
10.6 |
5 828 |
39.6 |
(Source: NFI, 1999)
Table 10. Forest and shrub area by Development regions
Development Region |
Total Land Area (1 000 ha) |
Total Forest Area (1 000 ha) |
Reachable Forest Area (1 000 ha) |
Non-Reachable Forest Area (1 000 ha) |
Reachable Forest | ||
Percent of Total Forest Area |
Mean Volume m3 per hectare |
Total Volume (O.B.) million m3 | |||||
Far Western |
1 953.9 |
687.4 |
358.8 |
328.6 |
52.2 |
200 |
71.9 |
Mid Western |
4 237.8 |
1192.4 |
454.4 |
738.0 |
38.1 |
157 |
71.2 |
Western |
2 939.8 |
734.3 |
262.1 |
472.2 |
35.7 |
167 |
43.8 |
Central |
2 741.0 |
918.6 |
527.7 |
390.9 |
57.4 |
170 |
89.8 |
Eastern |
2 845.6 |
736.1 |
576.3 |
159.8 |
78.3 |
192 |
110.8 |
Total |
14 718.1 |
4268.8 |
2179.3 |
2089.5 |
51.5 |
178 |
387.5 |
(Source: NFI, 1999)
Table 11. Forest cover under different forest inventories
LRMP |
NRSC |
Master Plan |
NFI | |
1978-79 |
1984 |
1985-86 |
1994* | |
Forest |
38% |
35.9% |
37.4% |
29.0% |
Shrub |
4.7% |
Partly Included in forest |
4.8% |
10.6% |
Total |
42.7% |
42.2% |
39.6% |
(*The NFI was implemented between 1989 and 1996 but it uses 1994 as the base year (FSCN, 1999)
(Source: NFI, 1999
Table 12. Change in forest and shrub cover between 1978 and 1994
Development Region |
LRMP 1978 (1 000 ha) |
NFI 1994* (1 000 ha) |
Percentage Change | |||
Forest |
Shrub |
Forest |
Shrub |
Forest |
Shrub | |
Far Western |
989.5 |
60.4 |
687.4 |
263.9 |
-30.5 |
336.9 |
Mid Western |
1 649.7 |
77.3 |
1 192.4 |
442.0 |
-27.7 |
471.8 |
Western |
924.0 |
137.3 |
734.3 |
256.9 |
-20.5 |
87.1 |
Central |
1 104.9 |
222.8 |
918.6 |
233.8 |
-16.9 |
4.9 |
Eastern |
948.7 |
192.1 |
736.1 |
362.6 |
-22.4 |
88.8 |
Total |
5 616.8 |
689.9 |
4 268.8 |
1 559.2 |
-24.0 |
126.0 |
(*The NFI was implemented between 1989 and 1996 but it uses 1994 as the base year)
(Source: NFI, 1999)
Table 13. Change in woody vegetation cover between 1978-1994
Development Region |
LRMP 1978 (1 000 ha) |
NFI 1994* (1 000 ha) |
Total change (percent) |
Far Western |
1 049.9 |
951.3 |
-9.4 |
Mid Western |
1 727.0 |
1 634.4 |
-5.4 |
Western |
1 061.3 |
991.2 |
-6.6 |
Central |
1 327.7 |
1 152.4 |
-13.2 |
Eastern |
1 140.8 |
1 098.7 |
-3.7 |
Total |
6 306.7 |
5 828.0 |
-7.6 |
(*The NFI was implemented between 1989 and 1996 but it uses 1994 as the base year
(Source: NFI, 1999)
Table 14. Change in growing stock between 1960 and 1994
Development Region |
Mean Volume (Top dbh >10cm) m3/ha. | ||
1960 |
NFI |
Change (%) | |
Far Western |
94 |
150 |
59.6 |
Mid Western |
88 |
113 |
28.4 |
Western |
71 |
117 |
64.8 |
Central |
77 |
122 |
58.4 |
Eastern |
96 |
147 |
53.1 |
Nepal |
85 |
131 |
54.1 |
(Source: NFI, 1999)
Table 15. Change in stems per hectare
Diameter class |
1960 |
NFI 1994* |
Change (%) |
10-20 cm |
165 |
432 |
160 |
20-50 cm |
82 |
133 |
62 |
Over 50 cm |
11 |
21 |
91 |
258 |
586 |
127 |
(Source: NFI, 1999)
(*The NFI was implemented between 1989 and 1996 but it uses 1994 as the base year)
Table 16. Soil erosion rates for specific sites
Location |
Land Use |
Erosion Rate (Tonnes/km2/yr) |
A. Siwalik Range | ||
1. Eastern Nepal, south aspect sand stone foot hills |
1. Different land use ranging from forest to grazing |
780 to 3,680 |
2. Far-west Nepal, south aspect sand stone foot hills of Surkhet |
1. Degraded forest 2. Degraded forest, gullied land 3. Severely degraded heavily grazed forest, gullied land |
2 000 4 000 20,000 |
B. Mahabharat Lekh | ||
Central Nepal, very steep slopes on metamorphic and sedimentary Rocks |
1. Degraded forest and Agricultural. Fields 2. Gullied land |
3,150 to 14,000 6,300 to 42,000 |
C. Middle Mountain | ||
1. Northern foot hills of Kathmandu Valley |
1. Degraded forest scrub land 2. Over grazed scrub land 3. Severely gullied land |
2,00 to 4,500 4,300 12 ,500 to 57,000 |
2. South of Kathmandu Valley |
75 percent dense forest |
800 |
3. Phewatal Watershed |
1. Protected pasture 2. Overgrazed grass land 3. Overgrazed grass land 4. Gullied overgrazed grass land |
920 34,700 2,200 2,900 |
(Source: Water and Energy Commission Secretariat (WECS), 1987, Erosion and Sedimentation in Nepal Himalayas)
Table 17. Tree plantations on different types of land
Type of land |
Area of Plantations (hectares) | ||||
1992 |
1993 |
1994 |
1995 |
1996 | |
Public (Government) |
2 667 |
3 056 |
N.A | ||
Community Forest |
3 732 |
4 420 |
3 044.6 |
2 913.5 |
1 313.4 |
Private Forest |
6 810 |
3 559 |
6 656 |
8 800.2 |
N.A |
Leasehold Forest |
298.4 |
436 |
899 |
N.A |
(Source: CES, 1998 )
Group |
Families |
Nepal |
World Species |
Nepal’s share (%) | |
Genera |
Species | ||||
Algae |
50 |
150 |
687 |
>40 000 |
1.72 |
Fungi |
80 |
542 |
1 670 |
>70 000 |
2.38 |
Lichen |
30 |
79 |
465 |
>17 000 |
2.77 |
Bryophytes |
78 |
180 |
853 |
>14 000 |
6.09 |
Pteridophytes |
31 |
103 |
383 |
>12 000 |
3.19 |
Flowering plants (Angiosperm + gymnospers) |
213 |
1 475 |
5 175 |
250 000 |
2.07 |
(Source: CES, 1998)
Table 19. Endemic plants in the Protected Areas
Protected Areas |
No. of endemic plant species recorded |
National Parks |
|
Khaptad |
4 |
Langtang |
15 |
Makalu Barun (including conservation area) |
7 |
Royal Bardiya |
0 |
Royal Chitwan |
0 |
Rara |
16 |
Sagarmatha |
11 |
Shey Phoksundo |
30 |
Wildlife Reserves |
|
Koshi Tappu |
1 |
Parsa |
0 |
Royal Suklaphanta |
0 |
Shivapuri |
16 |
Hunting Reserve Dhorpatan |
36 |
Conservation Areas Annapurna |
55 |
TOTAL |
191 |
(Source CES, 1998)
Table 20. Number of threatened species
Animal Groups |
World |
Nepal |
Mammals |
741 |
28 |
Birds |
970 |
22 |
Reptiles |
316 |
9 |
Amphibians |
169 |
|
Fishes |
979 |
|
Invertebrates |
2 754 |
2 |
Total |
5 929 |
61 |
(Source: CES, 1998)
Table 21. Forest and shrub cover in Protected Areas
Protected Area |
Development Region |
Physiographic Zone |
Total Area (1 000 ha) |
Forest & Shrub Cover | |
(1 000 ha) |
% | ||||
Sagarmatha National Park |
Eastern |
High Himalaya |
115 |
2 |
1.7 |
Langtang National Park |
Central |
High Himalaya & High Mountain |
171 |
69 |
40.4 |
Royal Chitwan National Park |
Central |
Terai |
93 |
80 |
86.0 |
Shey-Phoksundo National Park |
Mid Western |
High Himalaya |
356 |
NA |
- |
Rara National Park |
Mid Western |
High Mountain |
11 |
NA |
- |
Royal Bardia National Park |
Mid Western |
Terai & Siwalik |
97 |
NA |
- |
Khaptad National Park |
Far Western |
High Mountain |
23 |
NA |
- |
Makalu-Barun National Park & Conservation Area |
Eastern |
High Himalaya & High Mountain |
233 |
86 |
36.9 |
Kanchenjungha Conservation Area |
Eastern |
High Mountain |
165 |
49 |
29.7 |
Annapurna Conservation Area |
Western |
High and Middle Mountain |
763 |
153 |
20.1 |
Manaslu Conservation Area |
166 |
NA |
|||
Koshi Tappu Wildlife Reserve |
Eastern |
Terai |
17 |
10 |
58.8 |
Shivapuri Wildlife Reserve |
Central |
Middle Mountain |
14 |
10 |
71.4 |
Parsa Wildlife Reserve |
Central |
Terai & Siwalik |
50 |
49 |
98.4 |
Shuklaphanta Wildlife Reserve |
Far Western |
Terai |
31 |
NA |
- |
Dhorpatan Hunting Reserve |
Western & Mid Western |
High Mountain |
132 |
16 |
12.1 |
TOTAL |
2,437 |
(Source: SGFFU, 1998, CBBC, 1998, CES, 1998 and SYBN, 1999)
Table 22. Physiographical linkages of protected areas
Physiographic Zone |
Protected Area |
Terai |
Royal Chitwan NP, Royal Bardia NP, Koshi Tappu WR, Prasa WR, Suklaphanta WR |
Siwaliks |
Royal Chitwan NP, Royal Bardia NP, Parsa WR |
Mid Hills |
Shivapuri WR, Khaptad NP, Makalu Barun CA, Annapurna CA |
High Mountains |
Makalu Barun NP and CA, Sagarmatha NP, Langtang NP, Dhorpatan HR, Rara NP, Khaptad NP, Shey Phokshundo NP, Annapurna CA |
Makalu Barun NP and CA, Sagarmatha NP, Langtang NP, Annapurna CA |
(Source: Maskey 1997)
Physiographic Zone |
Number of Ecosystems in Protected Areas | |
Total |
Represented | |
Terai |
10 |
10 |
Siwaliks |
13 |
5 |
Midhills |
52 |
33 |
Highlands |
38 |
30 |
Others |
5 |
2 |
Total |
118 |
80 |
(Source: T. Maskey)
Table 24. Faunal diversity
Fauna | |
Group |
No. of species |
Mammals |
181 |
844 | |
Reptiles |
100 |
Amphibians |
43 |
Fish |
185 |
Butterflies |
635 |
Spiders |
144 |
Total |
2132 |
(Source: BPP 1996)
Table 25. Settlements and population by ecological zone, 1991
Ecological Zone |
No. of VDCs1 |
Settlements2 |
Population |
Mountain |
544 |
6,000 |
1,443,130 |
Hill |
2,073 |
29,137 |
8,419,889 |
Terai |
1,431 |
14,915 |
8,628,078 |
Nepal |
4,048 |
50,052 |
18,491,097 |
Note:
1. Number of Village Development Committee includes municipality.
2. Excluding Okhaldhunga and Darchula districts.
(Source: NPC (1992/93). Settlement Service Inventory)
Table 26. Population and projected population
Year |
1991 |
1996 |
2001 |
2006 |
2011 |
2016 |
Population (millions) |
18.49 |
20.83 |
23.45 |
26.28 |
29.23 |
32.20 |
(Source: SYBN, 1999)
Table 27. Area and population of Development Regions in 1981 and 1991
Development Region |
Area 1 000 ha |
Total Population |
Population Density | |||
1981 |
1991 |
1981 |
1991 |
% Change | ||
Central |
2 741.0 |
4 909 357 |
6 183 955 |
1.79 |
2.26 |
25.96 |
Eastern |
2 845.6 |
3 708 923 |
4 446 749 |
1.30 |
1.56 |
19.89 |
Western |
2 939.8 |
3 128 859 |
3 770 678 |
1.06 |
1.28 |
20.51 |
Far West |
1 953.9 |
1 320 089 |
1 679 301 |
0.68 |
0.86 |
27.21 |
Mid West |
4 237.8 |
1 955 611 |
2 410 414 |
0.46 |
0.57 |
23.26 |
Nepal |
14 718.1 |
15 022 839 |
18 491 097 |
1.02 |
1.26 |
23.09 |
(Source , SYBN, 1999)
Table 28. Persons per hectare of farm land
Year |
Mountain |
Hill |
Terai |
Mountain & Hill |
Total |
Persons per hectare | |||||
1971 |
9.3 |
6.5 |
3.1 |
6.8 |
4.7 |
1981 |
10.6 |
7.6 |
4.7 |
8 |
6.1 |
1991 |
8.9 |
9.6 |
6.6 |
9.5 |
7.9 |
Source: CBS 1993
Table 29. Livestock population (in 1,000)
Livestock |
1981 |
1991 |
1993 |
1994 |
1995 |
1996 |
1997 |
Cattle |
6 501.6 |
7 359.3 |
7 128.3 |
7 127.7 |
7 008.4 |
7 024.8 |
7 048.3 |
Buffalo |
2 379.7 |
3 116.3 |
3 142.5 |
3 116.2 |
3 302.2 |
3 362.4 |
3 388.7 |
Sheep |
677.1 |
602.8 |
851.3 |
870.4 |
859.0 |
869.6 |
869.1 |
Goats |
3 643.7 |
5 515.5 |
5 529.6 |
5 597.9 |
5 783.1 |
5 922.0 |
6 080.1 |
Pigs |
433.6 |
495.8 |
608.5 |
625.6 |
670.3 |
723.6 |
758.6 |
Total |
19 738.6 |
23 323.7 |
19 253.2 |
19 331.8 |
19 618.0 |
19 898.4 |
20 141.8 |
(Source: SYB, 1999)
Table 30. Percentage distribution of livestock
Type of Livestock |
Total 1997 million |
Physiographic Zone |
Development Region | ||||||
Mountain |
Hills |
Tarai |
Eastern |
Central |
Western |
Mid-west |
Far-west | ||
Percentage distribution |
Percentage distribution | ||||||||
Cattle |
7.025 |
11.7 |
48.9 |
39.4 |
24.0 |
22.7 |
19.9 |
20.0 |
13.4 |
Goats |
5.922 |
14.0 |
57.3 |
28.7 |
25.1 |
30.3 |
19.1 |
17.7 |
7.8 |
Buffalo |
3.362 |
9.1 |
57.1 |
33.8 |
20.7 |
24.4 |
28.2 |
14.5 |
12.2 |
Sheep |
0.870 |
40.0 |
44.9 |
15.1 |
13.3 |
11.8 |
18.6 |
46.3 |
10.0 |
Pigs |
0.724 |
12.4 |
57.1 |
30.5 |
46.8 |
13.2 |
15.8 |
18.0 |
6.2 |
(Source: CBS, 1997)
Table 31. Literacy rates over time
Year |
Percent Literacy |
1952 |
5.3 |
1961 |
8.9 |
1971 |
13.9 |
1981 |
23.3 |
1991 |
39.6 |
(Source CSE, 1998)
Table 32. Annual growth rates of GDP during different Five Year Plans
Period |
Overall GDP |
Agriculture |
Non-Agriculture |
1965/66 – 69/70 Third Plan |
2.6 |
2.8 |
2.2 |
1970/71 – 74/75 Fourth Plan |
1.8 |
1.6 |
2.3 |
1975/76 – 79/80 Fifth Plan |
2.3 |
-1 |
8.8 |
1980/81 – 84/85 Sixth Plan |
4.9 |
5.1 |
4.7 |
1985/86 – 89/90 Seventh Plan |
4.8 |
4.1 |
5.3 |
1992/93 – 96/97 Eighth Plan |
4.6 |
2.8 |
6 |
(Notes: * 1990/91 and 1991/92 were the years without periodic plan and their growth rate are not
included in the above averages)
Table 33. Urban Consumer Price Index (1988 = 100)
Urban Consumer Price Index | ||||||||||
Year |
1988 |
1989 |
1990 |
1991 |
1992 |
1993 |
1994 |
1995 |
1996 |
1997 |
Index |
100 |
111.5 |
122.5 |
148.2 |
161.4 |
175.9 |
189.3 |
204.7 |
220.6 |
229.4 |
(Source: SYBN, 1999)
Table 34. Percentage contribution to Gross Domestic Product
Sector |
Last year of | ||||
VIII FYP |
IX FYP |
X FYP |
XI FYP |
XII FYP | |
Agriculture Sector |
41.02 |
38 |
34 |
30 |
25 |
Non-agriculture Sector |
58.98 |
62 |
66 |
70 |
75 |
(Source: Ninth Plan, 1998)
Table 35. Long-term projection of economic growth rates
Total and Sectoral GDP |
Ninth FYP |
Tenth FYP |
Eleventh FYP |
Twelfth FYP |
TOTAL GDP (at factor cost) |
6 |
7 |
7.5 |
8.3 |
Agriculture Sector GDP |
4 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
Non- Agriculture Sector GDP |
7.3 |
8.2 |
8.8 |
9.7 |
(Source: Ninth Plan, 1998)
Table 36. Share in Gross Domestic Product during VIII Five Year Plan
Sector |
VIII FYP | |
First year (1991) |
Last year (1996) | |
Agriculture, Irrigation & Forestry Sector |
44.89 % |
41.02 % |
Non-agriculture Sector |
55.11 % |
58.98 % |
(Source: Ninth Plan, 1998)
Table 37. Forestry share of GDP at constant prices (1984) in million Rs.
Year |
Forestry |
Agriculture & Other sub sectors |
Total |
1992 |
2,609 |
25,287 |
27, 896 |
1993 |
2,738 |
27, 279 |
30, 017 |
1994 |
2,842 |
27, 075 |
29, 917 |
1995 |
2,550 |
28, 689 |
31, 239 |
1996 |
2,465 |
30, 067 |
32, 532 |
1997 |
2,456 |
30, 411 |
32, 867 |
1998 |
2, 209 |
31, 437 |
33, 646 |
(Source: CBS, 1999)
Table 38. Development expenditure during the VIII Five Year Plan (at 1991 prices)
Annual Development Expenditure (Rs. In Million) | ||||||||
Sectors |
1991 |
1992 |
1993 |
1994 |
1995 |
1996 |
Total |
Percentage |
1 276.0 |
1 908.8 |
1 939.5 |
2 067.2 |
1 611.1 |
1 465.5 |
8 992.2 |
10.33 | |
Irrigation |
2 212.2 |
1 853.8 |
2 725.2 |
1 997.8 |
2 107.9 |
1 811.2 |
10 496.0 |
12.05 |
Hydrology |
16.1 |
17.7 |
15.9 |
15.9 |
-- |
27.2 |
76.7 |
0.09 |
Forestry |
8 84.3 |
853.5 |
814.9 |
319.9 |
265.1 |
264.1 |
2 517.5 |
2.89 |
Land Reform |
1 18.9 |
105.0 |
163.7 |
156.7 |
193.8 |
211.3 |
830.6 |
0.95 |
Sub Total (Agriculture, Irrigation, & Forestry) |
4 507.5 |
4 738.8 |
5 659.2 |
4 557.5 |
4 177.9 |
3 779.3 |
22 913.0 |
26.31 |
Others Sectors |
12 005.3 |
13 101.3 |
12 206.1 |
10 946.0 |
13 918.7 |
13 995.6 |
64 167.5 |
73.69 |
Total |
16 512.8 |
17 840.1 |
17 865.3 |
15 503.5 |
18 096.6 |
17 774.9 |
87 080.3 |
100 |
(Source: Ninth Plan, 1998)
Table 39. Foreign aid disbursement in forest resources of Nepal, 1975-1995
Year |
Grant |
Loan |
Total |
in million | |||
1975 |
9.4 |
0.3 |
9.7 |
1976 |
4.5 |
5.5 |
10 |
1977 |
3.4 |
21.2 |
24.6 |
1978 |
5.1 |
4.3 |
9.4 |
1979 |
25.8 |
5.6 |
31.4 |
1980 |
21.4 |
10.4 |
31.8 |
1981 |
18.2 |
52.4 |
70.6 |
1982 |
44 |
49.1 |
93.1 |
1983 |
54 |
46.5 |
100.5 |
1984 |
73 |
62.8 |
135.8 |
1985 |
42.4 |
51.4 |
93.8 |
1986 |
75.5 |
91.6 |
167.1 |
1987 |
65.6 |
130.9 |
206.5 |
1988 |
57.4 |
87.7 |
145.1 |
1989 |
55 |
125.6 |
180.6 |
1990 |
57.8 |
150 |
207.8 |
1991 |
93 |
296.7 |
389.7 |
1992 |
93.5 |
77.7 |
171.2 |
1993 |
197.4 |
1132.4 |
1329.8 |
1994 |
130.5 |
50.4 |
180.9 |
1995 |
32.6 |
48.2 |
80.8 |
Table 40. Household fuelwood requirement (kg/capita)
Zone |
Source |
Development Region |
Nepal | |||
Far West/ Mid West |
Western |
Central |
Eastern | |||
Mountain |
Forests |
455 |
379 |
290 |
323 |
378 |
Private trees |
93 |
364 |
194 |
506 |
262 | |
Total |
548 |
743 |
484 |
829 |
640 | |
Terai |
Forests |
445 |
434 |
384 |
348 |
388 |
Private trees |
34 |
48 |
90 |
135 |
91 | |
Total |
479 |
482 |
474 |
483 |
479 | |
Total |
Forest |
900 |
813 |
674 |
671 |
766 |
Private trees |
127 |
412 |
284 |
641 |
353 | |
Total |
1 027 |
1 225 |
958 |
1 312 |
1 119 |
Source: MPFS, Vol: Forest Development Plan for the supply of main forest products, 1988
Table 41. Per-capita consumption of fuelwood in different regions
Development Region |
Forest Fuelwood |
Own Tree Fuelwood |
Agriculture Residue |
Total |
kilograms | ||||
Eastern |
323 |
506 |
46 |
875 |
Central |
290 |
194 |
105 |
589 |
Western |
379 |
364 |
66 |
809 |
Mid West |
455 |
93 |
33 |
581 |
Far West |
455 |
93 |
33 |
581 |
Nepal |
378 |
262 |
68 |
708 |
Note: Agriculture residue has been converted to fuelwood equivalence in MPFS based
on 1 kg Agricultue = 0.706 fuelwood
Source: MPFS, 1988, Volume: Forest development plan for the Supply of main forest products
Table 42. Population projection for fuelwood requirement
Development Region |
1985-86 |
1990-90 |
1995-96 |
2000-01 |
2005-06 |
2010-11 |
Far West |
1 456 |
1 607 |
1 750 |
1 880 |
1 990 |
2 074 |
Mid West |
2 171 |
2 422 |
2 670 |
2 909 |
3 129 |
3 322 |
Western |
3 502 |
3 940 |
4 374 |
4 797 |
5 188 |
5 533 |
Central |
5 503 |
6 179 |
6 826 |
7 419 |
7 922 |
8 310 |
Eastern |
4 277 |
4 960 |
5 665 |
6 381 |
7 073 |
7 712 |
Nepal |
16 909 |
19 108 |
21 285 |
23 386 |
25 302 |
26 951 |
Source: MPFS, 1988, Vol: Forest development plan for the supply of main forest products
Table 43. Projected fuelwood supply (1 000 tonnes)
Source |
1985-86 |
2000-01 |
2010-11 |
Managed Natural Forests |
39 |
1 112 |
3 055 |
Shrub/degraded Forests |
253 |
351 |
402 |
Plantations |
0 |
1 419 |
2 657 |
Unmanaged forests |
4 018 |
2 648 |
1 230 |
Private Tree Farms |
2 961 |
3 694 |
4 868 |
Total |
7 271 |
9 224 |
12 212 |
Source: MPFS, Vol: Forest Development Plan for the supply of main forest products, 1988
Table 44. Indigenous energy resources
Resources |
||
in Natural Units |
in Energy Units (Gigajoules) | |
1 Firewood (Sustainable Yield – 1994/95) |
5.4 x 106 tonnes |
90.45 (106 GJ) |
2 Agricultural Residues (For fuel only – 1994/95) |
12.1 x 106 tonnes |
152.00 (106 GJ) |
3 Animal Dung (For fuel only – 1994/95 on dry basis) |
4.9 x 106 tonnes |
53.36 (106 GJ) |
4 Fossil Fuels |
(Unknown) |
|
5. Hydropower Technically feasible potential (45610 MW = 985.2 x 106 GJ) |
985.20 (106 GJ) | |
6 Alternative Sources a. Direct Solar Insolation b. Micro-Hydro c. Wind d. Geothermal |
26.6 x 106 MW (Unknown) (Unknown) (Unknown) |
|
Total |
1281.01 (106 GJ) |
(Source: WECS, 1996, Energy Synopsis Report – 1994/95 and WECS, 1992, Energy Synopsis Report - 1990/91)
Table 45. Grass species in different agro-ecological zones
Agro-ecological Zone |
Number of principal species |
Sub-tropical and warm temperate zone (400 to 1 200 m) |
56 |
Warm temperate – temperate transition zone (1 200 to 1 800 m) |
86 |
Temperate zone (1 800 to 2 500 m) |
91 |
(Source: CES, 1998)
Table 46. Endangered forage species of Nepal
Region |
Species |
Semi-Arid Region |
Medicago falcata Pennisetum flaccidum |
High Altitude: Eastern Region |
Elymus nutaus Trifolium spp. |
Mid-Hills: Communal Grazing land |
Desmodium spp. Medicago spp. Melilotus spp. |
(Source: CES, 1998)
Table 47. Fodder requirements
Development Region |
1985-86 |
1990-91 |
1995-96 |
2000-01 |
2005-06 |
2010-11 |
1,000 tonnes TDN | ||||||
Far West |
700 |
765 |
843 |
937 |
1 049 |
1 183 |
Mid West |
1 103 |
1 192 |
1 305 |
1 443 |
1 610 |
1 811 |
Western |
1 458 |
1 461 |
1 472 |
1 494 |
1 524 |
1 564 |
Central |
1 537 |
1 695 |
1 874 |
2 077 |
2 307 |
2 569 |
Eastern |
1 288 |
1 274 |
1 273 |
1 286 |
1 317 |
1 366 |
Total |
6 086 |
6 387 |
6 767 |
7 237 |
7 807 |
8 493 |
(Source: MPFS, Vol: Forest Development Plan for the supply of main forest products, 1988)
Table 48. Projected fodder production
Source |
1985-86 |
2000-01 |
2010-11 |
1 000 tonnes | |||
Common Lands |
2,766 |
2,937 |
3,053 |
Non-Cultivated Inclusions. |
889 |
1,065 |
1,325 |
Cultivated Lands |
2,928 |
3,439 |
3,897 |
Total |
6,583 |
7,441 |
8,275 |
(Source: MPFS, Volume: Forest Development Plan for the supply of main forest product, 1988)
Table 49. Change in forest based industries (in number)
Forest based Industry |
Number of Forest based Industries | |||
Group |
Industry |
1976 |
1987 |
1998 |
Wood based |
Sawmills |
102 |
252 |
376 |
Seasoning |
3 |
6 |
4 | |
Preservative |
3 |
3 |
5 | |
Plywood |
3 |
2 |
4 | |
Veneer |
8 |
46 | ||
Particle/block board |
2 | |||
Parquet |
4 |
1 |
3 | |
Furniture (large) |
3 |
12 |
12 | |
Matches (wooden) |
10 |
9 |
10 | |
Pencil |
3 |
1 |
1 | |
Non-timber forest products |
Katha |
7 |
6 |
6 |
Rosin and turpentine |
3 |
3 |
5 | |
Sal oil |
4 |
4 | ||
TOTAL |
141 |
307 |
478 |
(Source: SGFFU, 1998)
Table 50. Performance of forest based manufacturing units for 1996
Forest-based Industries |
Units |
Persons |
Input |
Output |
Ratio |
Value Added |
No. |
No. |
Rs. 1 000 |
Rs.1 000 |
Output/Input |
Rs1 000 | |
Sawmilling and planing |
137 |
2 140 |
390 590 |
613 470 |
1.57 |
222 880 |
Veneer sheets, plywood |
30 |
1 039 |
63 803 |
115 167 |
1.81 |
51 364 |
Builders, carpentry and joinery |
13 |
158 |
19 816 |
29 742 |
1.50 |
9 926 |
Other products of wood |
18 |
394 |
25 094 |
50 102 |
2.00 |
25 008 |
Pulp, paper and paperboard |
60 |
2 209 |
420 680 |
649 652 |
1.54 |
228 972 |
Corrugated paper and board |
26 |
699 |
158 191 |
244 465 |
1.55 |
86 274 |
Other paper items |
32 |
638 |
101 119 |
155 623 |
1.54 |
54 504 |
Total |
316 |
7 277 |
1 179 293 |
1 858 221 |
1.66 |
678 928 |
(Source SYBN, 1999)
Table 51. Annual variation in production in selected industries
Industry |
Production of Plywood and Matches | ||||||||||
Unit |
1988 |
1989 |
1990 |
1991 |
1992 |
1993 |
1994 |
1995 |
1996 |
1997 | |
Plywood |
Thousand Sq. Ft. |
1,315 |
0 |
268 |
645 |
411 |
570 |
450 |
383 |
476 |
70 |
Matches |
Thousand Gross |
1, 272 |
1,223 |
1,091 |
942 |
1,071 |
1,113 |
1,176 |
1,316 |
1,246 |
1,095 |
(Source: SYBN, 1999)
Table 52. Timber requirements (1 000 m3)
Development Region |
1985-86 |
2000-01 |
2010-11 |
m3 | |||
Far West |
97 |
202 |
250 |
Mid West |
145 |
312 |
401 |
Western |
235 |
514 |
668 |
Central |
369 |
795 |
1 002 |
Eastern |
287 |
684 |
930 |
Total |
1 133 |
2 507 |
3 251 |
(Source: MPFS, Vol: Forest Development Plan for the supply of main forest products, 1988)
Table 53. Annual per-capita timber requirement
Type of Requirement |
1986 |
1991 |
1996 |
2001 |
2006 |
2011 |
m3 | ||||||
Housing |
0.040 |
0.046 |
0.053 |
0.060 |
0.060 |
0.060 |
Implements etc. |
0.013 |
0.016 |
0.020 |
0.023 |
0.027 |
0.030 |
Public infrastructure, etc. |
0.014 |
0.017 |
0.021 |
0.024 |
0.027 |
0.030 |
Total (m3/capita/year) |
0.067 |
0.079 |
0.094 |
0.107 |
0.114 |
0.120 |
(Source: MPFS, Vol: Forest Development Plan for the supply of main forest products, 1988)
Table 54. Timber production
Source |
1985-86 |
2000-01 |
2010-11 |
1 000 m3 | |||
Natural Forests |
524 |
504 |
589 |
Plantations |
0 |
247 |
589 |
Tree Farms |
360 |
605 |
1 034 |
Total |
884 |
1 356 |
2 212 |
(Source: MPFS, Vol: Forest Development Plan for the supply of main forest product, 1988)
Table 55. Annual revenue from forest
Year |
Timber |
Hunting Fees |
Herbs |
Sabai Grass |
Misc. |
Total |
1 000 Nepal Rs. | ||||||
1980 |
39 332 |
11 |
738 |
402 |
20 370 |
60 853 |
1983 |
51 283 |
33 |
1 498 |
669 |
2 842 |
56 325 |
1988 |
52 451 |
23 |
4 229 |
290 |
8 119 |
65 112 |
1993 |
233 300 |
15 812 |
2 470 |
251 582 | ||
1996 |
268 176 |
25 699 |
1791 |
23 951 |
319 617 |
(Source: CES, 1998 )
Table 56. Change in quantity and revenue
Year |
Quantity Sold |
Revenue (million Rs) | |||
Logs (Hcft) |
Sawn Timber (Hcft) |
Poles (Hcft) |
Fuelwood (Stacks) | ||
1994 |
1.141 |
17.632 |
71.632 |
6.562 |
311.461 |
1995 |
1.916 |
45.009 |
93.212 |
10.194 |
335.365 |
1996 |
1.755 |
113.493 |
81.627 |
7.725 |
361.787 |
(Source: SGFFU, 1998)
Table 57. Areas of forest product deficit
Forest Product |
Physiographic zone facing deficit |
Fuelwood |
All of the Terai Zone, Mid Western and Eastern part of Siwaliks Zone and Western and Eastern part of Middle Mountains Zone |
Timber |
All of Terai, Siwalik, and Middle Mountain Zones and Western part of High Himalaya Zone |
Fodder |
Central, Mid Western and Far Western part of Terai Zone; Central and Mid-Western part of Siwalik Zone; and Central, Western, Mid-Western and Far-Western part of Middle Mountain Zone. |
Table 58. Forests handed over to communities (1997)
Forest Type |
Area, ha |
Share, % |
Shorea robusta |
117 347 |
29.5 |
Subtropical deciduous |
56 268 |
14.2 |
Pinus roxburghii |
57 898 |
14.6 |
Schima castanopsis |
52 212 |
13.1 |
Alnus nepalensis |
11 651 |
2.9 |
Oak-rhododendron |
19 127 |
4.8 |
Upper slope conifers |
29 029 |
7.3 |
Upper slope mixed hardwood |
20 718 |
5.2 |
Not specified |
33 402 |
8.4 |
Total |
397 652 |
100 |
( Source: CES, 1998).
Table 59. Forest user groups, 1998
Development Region |
No. of Groups |
No. of Households |
Area handed over (ha) |
% Area given |
Area (ha) per Group |
Area per household |
% User groups | |
Eastern |
1 541 |
175 273 |
152 048 |
30.3 |
98.7 |
0.9 |
21.9 | |
Central |
1 512 |
183 320 |
109 628 |
21.9 |
72.5 |
0.6 |
21.5 | |
Western |
2 134 |
235 130 |
93 937 |
18.7 |
44.0 |
0.4 |
30.3 | |
Mid Western |
992 |
113 030 |
89 783 |
17.9 |
90.5 |
0.8 |
14.1 | |
Far Western |
862 |
80 020 |
56 216 |
11.2 |
65.2 |
0.7 |
12.2 | |
Total |
7 041 |
786 773 |
501 612 |
100.0 |
71.2 |
0.6 |
100 |
(Source: CES, 1998)
Table 60. Condition of community forest, 1997
Description |
Status |
Percentage |
Very Good |
11 | |
Reasonable dense forest with regeneration |
Good |
48 |
Some patches, moderate regeneration |
Degraded |
17 |
Thin patches of forest with little or no regeneration |
Very Degraded |
2 |
Not specified |
Not Specified |
22 |
(Source: CES, 1998)
Table 61. Leasehold Hill forest
Area of Leasehold Hill Forest (ha) | ||||
1993/1994 |
1994/1995 |
1995/1996 |
1996/1997 | |
District |
||||
Jhapa |
15.3 |
|||
Sindhuli |
2.2 |
104.5 | ||
Dolakha |
20.7 |
87.9 |
||
Ramechhap |
87.7 |
136.4 |
245 |
126.1 |
Sindhupalchok |
15.6 |
85.7 |
92.4 |
64.8 |
Kavrepalchok |
111.4 |
112.8 |
147.6 |
100.5 |
Makwanpur |
16 |
116.7 |
154 |
173.1 |
Dhading |
58.2 |
244.3 | ||
Bara |
0.9 |
|||
Tanahu |
89.2 | |||
Chitwan |
28 |
86.9 | ||
Organization |
||||
Nepal Glading(Lele) |
3.2 |
|||
Khimti Hydro Project |
35 |
|||
Bhaktapur |
37 | |||
Kapilbastu |
110 |
(Source: CES, 1998)