Table 6
FOREST GENETIC RESOURCES PRIORITIES (BY REGION, SPECIES AND OPERATION)
Operation | Importance rating | Operational priority rating | Remarks | ||||||||||
Exploration | Evaluation | Conservation | Utilisation | ||||||||||
Species | Wood Production | Other Purposes | Botanical | Genecological | Collection for Testing | Testing (Provenance Trials) | In Situ | Collection for Conservation | Storage as Seed etc. | Ex Situ in Artificial Stands | Use of Bulk Supplies | Individual Selection and Breeding | |
9. Australia (contd.) | |||||||||||||
E. gillii | 2 | 3 | 3 | 2 | shelter in arid zones | ||||||||
E. glaucescens | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | ornamental in cool temperate areas | |||||||
E. globulus | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | |||||||
E. gomphocephala | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 1 | |||||||
E. gongylocarpa | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | shelter in v. arid zones | ||||||||
E. grandis | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | selection and breeding in Australia/Africa & South America | ||||||
E. gunnii | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 1 | Ornamental in cool temperate areas | ||||||
E. houseana | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||
E. intertexta | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 3 | ||||||||
E. kingsmillii | 3 | 3 | 3 | ||||||||||
E. kondininensis | 1 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 2 | salt tolerant species | |||||
E. laevopinea | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | oil production | |||||||
Eucalyptus largiflorens (bicolor) | 2 | 3 | 3 | 3 | tolerates sites with high pH | ||||||||
E. leptophleba | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | |||||||||
E. leucoxylon | 1 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 2 | ornamental in cool temperate areas | |||||||
E. longifolia | 2 | 3 | 3 | 3 | |||||||||
E. loxophleba | 2 | 3 | 2 | 2 | Shelter in arid zones | ||||||||
E. macarthuri | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | oil production in high altitude tropics | ||||||||
E. maculata | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | ||||||||
E. maidenii | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||||||
E. melanoxylon | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | shelter in arid zones | ||||||||
E. microcorys | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 2 | ||||||||
E. microtheca | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | |||||||
E. miniata | 2 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 2 | ornamental in tropical areas | |||||||
E. moluccana | 2 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 3 | ||||||||
E. muellerana | 1 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | |||||||
E. nesophila | 2 | 2 | 2 | 3 | |||||||||
E. niphophila | 3 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | ornamental in cool temperate areas | |||||
E. mitens | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | ||||||||
E. occidentalis | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | shelter in arid zones, salt tolerant | ||||||
Eucalyptus ochrophloia | 2 | 3 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||
E. Oleosa | 3 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 3 | shelter in arid zones | ||||||
E. oleosa var. glauca | 3 | 2 | shelter in arid zones | ||||||||||
E. oleosa var. longicornis | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | tree form E. oleosa | |||||||
E. oreades | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | potential pulp species | ||||||||
E. paniculata | 1 | 3 | 3 | 2 | |||||||||
E. papuana | 2 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 2 | ||||||||
E. parvifolia | 2 | 2 | 2 | cold resistant, hybrids with E. viminalis | |||||||||
E. pauciflora | 3 | 2 | 3 | 3 | ornamental and protection in cool temperate areas | ||||||||
E. pilularis | 1 | 3 | 1 | 2 | |||||||||
E. polycarpa | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 3 | ||||||||
E. populnea | 2 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 3 | ||||||||
E. propinqua | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||||||||
E. pruinosa | 3 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 2 | ornamental and protection in arid zones | |||||||
E. pseudoglobulus | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | ||||||||
E. punctata | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | |||||||
E. pyrocarpa | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | formerly E. pilularis var. pyriformis | ||||||||
Eucalyptus quadrangulata | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||||||||
E. radiata var. australiana | 1 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 1 | oil production (cineole) | |||||||
E. raveretiana | 2 | 2 | 2 | ||||||||||
E. regnans | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | selection and breeding in Australia | ||||||
E. resinifera | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | ||||||||
E. robusta | 1 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | |||||||
E. rudis | 1 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 2 | ||||||||
E. saligna | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||||
E. salmonophloia | 1 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | |||||||
E. sargentii | 1 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | very salt tolerant | ||||
E. seeana | 2 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | ||||||||
E. siderophloia | 2 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 3 | ||||||||
E. sideroxylon | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | tolerates high pH in semi arid areas | ||||||
E. sieberi | 1 | 1 | 1 | potential pulp species, temperate areas | |||||||||
E. spathulata | 2 | 2 | 2 | very salt tolerant | |||||||||
E. sphaerocarpa | 2 | 2 | 2 | new species, subtropical | |||||||||
E. staigerana | 2 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 2 | oil production in tropical areas | |||||||
E. striaticalyx | 3 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 2 | shelter in arid zones | ||||||
Eucalyptus tectifica | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | ||||||||
E. tereticornis | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||||||
E. terminalis | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 3 | shelter in arid zones | ||||||
E. tessellaris | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | ||||||||
E. tetrodonta | 2 | 3 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||
E. thozetiana | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||
E. torelliana | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | ||||||||
E. torquata | 3 | 2 | 3 | 3 | ornamental in warm temperate areas | ||||||||
E. umbrawarrensis | 3 | 3 | 3 | tropical dry country species | |||||||||
E. viminalis | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||||
E. zygophylla | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 |
Species | Organizations responsible 2) | COLLECTION | DISTRIBUTION 1) | |||
Year | Number of | Number of | ||||
Countries | Provenances | Countries | Sites | |||
Abies lasiocarpa | IUFRO, Iceland, Denmark | 1971–73 | 2 | 25 | ||
Araucaria angustifolia | IBDF, UNDP, FAO | 1973 | 2 | 18 | 8 | |
Eucalyptus alba | CTFT France | 1972–73 | 3 | 20 | 7 | |
E. “brassiana” | CTFT France | 1972–73 | 1 | 5 | 7 | |
E. camaldulensis | FRI Canberra, CCMFR | 1965 | 2 | 34 | 18 | 30 |
E. camaldulensis | FRI Canberra | 1970–73 | 1 | 46 | ||
E. camaldulensis | CTFT France | 1972–73 | 1 | 54 | 7 | |
E. microtheca | FRI Canberra | 1972 | 1 | 7 | ||
E. nesophila | CTFT France | 1972–73 | 1 | 8 | 5 | |
E. tereticornis/E. “brassiana” | FRI Canberra | 1970–73 | 1 | 15 | ||
E. tereticornis | CTFT France | 1970–73 | 1 | 10 | 7 | |
E. urophylla | CTFT France | 1972–73 | 2 | 70 | 4 | |
Melaleuca leucadendron | CTFT France | 1972–73 | 1 | 5 | 3 | |
M. viridiflora | CTFT France | 1972–73 | 1 | 5 | 3 | |
Picea engelmannii | IUFRO, Iceland, Denmark | 1971–73 | 2 | 29 | ||
P. mariana | Canada | 1971 | 2 | 53 | ||
P. sitchensis | IUFRO | 1970–72 | 2 | 67 | 16 | |
Pinus caribaea var.hondurensis | CFI Oxford | 1970–71 | 4 | 51 | 39 | 162 |
P. oocarpa | CFI Oxford | 1970–71 | 4 | |||
P. contorta | IUFRO | 1967–72 | 2 | 169 | 22 | |
P. kesiya | FRI Canberra | 1969 | 2 | 21 | 29 | |
P. merkusiana/P. merkusii | CFI Oxford | 1967 | 5 | 9 | 19 | |
P. merkusiana | Thailand, Denmark | 1971–72 | 1 | 18 | ||
P. oocarpa | INIF Mexico | 1972–73 | 1 | 11 | ||
P. patula | INIF Mexico | 1972–73 | 1 | 3 | 18 | 67 |
P. pseudostrobus/P. tenuifolia | CFI Oxford | 1970–74 | 3 | 8 | ||
P. pseudostrobus/P. tenuifolia | INIF Mexico | 1972–73 | 1 | 5 | ||
Populus deltoides | Poplar Council of America | 1967 | 1 | 192 3) | 16 | |
P. trichocarpa | IUFRO | 1972–73 | 2 | 75 | ||
Pseudotsuga mensiesii | IUFRO | 1966–72 | 3 | 187 | 30 | |
Tectona grandis | CTFT France | 1968–69 | ? | 16 | 4 | |
Denmark | 1971–72 | 10 | 68 | 13 | 44 |
Notes: 1) Includes proposed distribution in certain species
2) For abbreviations see page 2
3) Single tree collections
(US$)
A. SEED PROCUREMENT | |||||||
ALLOCATED TO | 1966/67 | 1968/69 | 1970/71 | 1972/73 | 1974/75 | ||
1. | F.R.I., Canberra (Eucalypts, Araucaria etc) | 10,000 | 13,000 | 10,000 | 10,000 | 15,000 | |
2. | C.F.I., Oxford (Central American pines) | - | - | 15,000 | 15,000 | - | |
3. | I.N.I.F., Mexico (Mexican pines) | - | - | 5,000 | 5,000 | 10,000 | |
4. | I.U.F.R.O. (N. American conifers) | - | - | 1,200 | 5,000 | 1,000 | |
5. | UNDP/FAO/Brazil (Araucaria, tropical hardwoods) | - | - | - | 8,000 | 3,000 | |
6. | F.D.F.R. Nigeria/CTFT France (tropical hardwoods) | - | - | - | 5,000 | 5,000 | |
7. | I.S.S. Florence (Mediterranean conifers, eucalypts) | - | - | 5,000 | 3,000 | 1,500 | |
8. | Seed Centre Macon, USA (cost of seed to developing countries) | - | - | - | 500 | - | |
9. | Others | - | 1,500 | - | - | 4,500 | |
Sub-total (seed procurement) | 10,000 | 14,500 | 36,200 | 51,500 | 40,000 | ||
B. INFORMATION | |||||||
1. | “Forest Genetic Resources Information” | - | - | - | 16,000 | 17,500 | |
C. OTHER | |||||||
1. | Panel Meetings | - | (10,000) | (9,000) | - | (14,000) | |
2. | H.Q. staff direct costs | ||||||
(a) | FAO Regular Programme | (5,000) | (10,000) | (12,000) | (18,500) | (18,500) | |
(b) | Finnish Government Programme | - | - | (4,000) | (16,500) | (4,000) | |
Sub-total (other) | (5,000) | (20,000) | (25,000) | (35,000) | (36,500) | ||
Total | 15,000 | 34,500 | 61,200 | 102,500 | 94,000 |
Note : Figures in parenthesis are approximate
* year 0 = start of genecological exploration. It is assumed that any preliminary planning necessary will start before year 0.
** although the taxonomic exploration has only gone on for a limited period exploration for practical purposes may have gone on since primitive man recognised useful species.
*** 2nd stage studies (more detailed examination of variation over a limited part of the range) may not always be necessary.
Burley, J., Andrew, I.A. and Templeman, H.J. 1973 INTFORPROV: Computer-based data banks for international, tropical provenance experiments. Paper for IUFRO Tropical Meeting Nairobi, Kenya October 1973.
Burley, J. and Turnbull, J.W. 1970 Proposed standard procedures for the FAO/FRI/CFI International Provenance Trial of Pinus kesiya Royle ex Gordon (syn. P. insularis Endlicher; P.khasya Royle) Mimeo.
FAO 1967 Unasylva Volume 21(3–4), FAO, Rome.
FAO 1969 Report of the first session of the FAO Panel of Experts on Forest Gene Resources, FAO, Rome.
FAO 1972 Report of the second session of the FAO Panel of Experts on Forest Gene Resources, FAO, Rome.
FAO 1973(a), (b) Forest Genetic Resources Information. Forestry Occasional Papers 1973/1 and 1973/2 FAO, Rome.
FAO 1974(a) Forest Genetic Resources Information No.3. Forestry Occasional Paper 1974/1 FAO, Rome.
FAO 1974(b) Report of the third session of the FAO Panel of Experts on Forest Gene Resources, FAO, Rome.
Fowler, D.P. and Yeatman, C.W. (Ed.) 1973 Symposium on the Conservation of Forest Gene Resources. Canadian Forestry Service, Ottawa.
Frankel, O.H. and Bennett, E. (Ed.) 1970 Genetic Resources in Plants - their exploration and conservation. IBP Handbook No.11 Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford.
IUCN 1970/71 Red Data Book Volume 5 - Angiospermae, compiled by R. Melville. IUCN, Morges, Switzerland.
Keiding, H. 1972 International Provenance Trials in Teak. Danish/FAO Forest Tree Seed Centre Circular letter No.3, Mimeo.
Kemp, R.H., Burley, J., Keiding, H. and Nikles, D.G. 1972 International Cooperation in the Exploration, Conservation and Development of Tropical and Sub-tropical Forest Gene Resources. Paper 071 for 7th World Forestry Congress.
Lacaze, J. 1970 Etude de l'adaptation écologique des eucalyptus. Compte rendu opérationnel à FAO Comité de la Recherche Forestière Méditerranéene.
Nikles, D.G. 1973 A proposed breeding plan for improvement of Caribbean pine (Pinus caribaea Morelet var. hondurensis Barr. and Golf.) based on international cooperation. In Volume 2 of “Selection and Breeding to improve some Tropical Conifers”, Oxford.
Roche, L.R. et al. 1975 The Methodology of Conservation of Forest Genetic Resources. Report on a Pilot Study. FO:MISC/75/8.
UNESCO 1973 MAB Report Series No. 12. Final Report of Expert Panel on Project 8, Conservation of natural areas and of the genetic material they contain. UNESCO, Paris.