Previous Page Table of Contents Next Page


SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS

The Twelfth Session of the Codex Committee on Residues of Veterinary Drugs in Foods reached the following conclusions:

MATTERS FOR CONSIDERATION BY THE 24TH COMMISSION

The Committee recommended to the Commission:

  • Draft MRLs for adoption at Step 8 for danofloxacin, gentamicin, imidocarb and sarafloxacin (Appendix II);
  • Proposed Draft MRLs for adoption at Step 5/8 for dihydrostreptomycin/streptomycin and doramectin (Appendix III); and
  • the Priority List of Veterinary Drugs for which Codex MRLs are to be elaborated (Appendix VIII).

MATTERS FOR CONSIDERATION BY THE 47TH EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE

The Committee:

  • advanced Proposed Draft MRLs for clenbuterol (in cattle milk only), phoxim, porcine somatotropin and thiamphenicol and Proposed Draft Revised/Amended MRLs for neomycin to Step 5 for adoption (Appendix V); and
  • agreed to revise the definitions of “muscle”, “milk” and “egg” contained in the Glossary of Terms and Definitions (Volume 3 of the Codex Alimentarius) and to elaborate a new definition for “fat” for the sake of harmonization, following the Accelerated Elaboration Procedure, pending approval of the Executive Committee (paras 53-58)

MATTERS OF INTEREST TO THE COMMISSION

The Committee:

  • had an exchange of opinions regarding other legitimate factors taken into account in the framework of risk analysis and concluded that the following factors had been or were taken into account in its work: Good Practices in the Use of Veterinary Drugs; Good Manufacturing Practices for veterinary drugs; technical feasibility; substantial changes in food composition and quality characteristics; the need to minimize exposure; the ALARA (As Low As Reasonably Achievable) concept; food consumption estimates; and residues from other sources than animal products (paras 7-14)
  • agreed to retain the Draft MRLs for abamectin, carazolol, chlortetracycline/oxytetracycline/tetracycline, cyfluthrin, eprinomectin and flumequine at Step 7 (Appendix IV);
  • agreed to retain the Proposed Draft MRLs for clenbuterol (in cattle and horse tissues) and deltamethrin at Step 4 (Appendix VI);
  • decided to withdraw the Draft Temporary MRLs for alpha-cypermethrin, cypermethrin and dexamethasone as recommended by JECFA which had not received data required to extend temporary MRLs or to convert them to full MRLs (paras 74-75, 79);
  • decided not to consider new MRLs proposed by the 52nd JECFA for estradiol-17beta, progesterone and testosterone as the Committee recognized that it had not requested the re-evaluation of these substances and these new proposals did not differ significantly from the current Codex MRLs (para. 84);
  • agreed that where JECFA and JMPR had recommended MRLs for the same chemical with the same residue/marker definition on the same commodity, the higher MRL should be recommended provided that intake of residues did not exceed the ADI (para. 59).
  • agreed to return the Proposed Draft Guidelines for Residues at Injection Sites to Step 3 for redrafting by Australia in the light of the comments received and the discussion at the session for circulation and consideration at the next session (paras 110-120);
  • agreed that the United States would redraft the Proposed Draft Appendix to the Guidelines for the Establishment of a Regulatory Programme for Control of Veterinary Drug Residues in Foods concerning control of veterinary drugs in milk and milk products for circulation for comments at Step 3 and consideration by the next session (paras 121-124);
  • agreed that it would consider (1) the development and application of risk analysis principles and methodologies appropriate to the specific mandate within the framework of the Action Plan, and (2) development of quality criteria for data used for risk assessment; noted, for implementation as appropriate, the other recommendations of the Codex Alimentarius Commission regarding risk analysis principles; and agreed that a drafting group would prepare a discussion paper for consideration by the Committee containing solid recommendations regarding risk analysis principles and methodologies including risk assessment policy, use of microbiological endpoints for the setting of ADIs, and data requirements and the use of extrapolation for establishing MRLs for “minor” species (paras 15-19; 65, 142);
  • received the reports of OIE and WHO on their activities in the area of antimicrobial resistance and uses of antimicrobials in animal production (paras 22-32) and agreed that a discussion paper should be prepared for consideration at the next session on all aspects on antimicrobial resistance relevant to the work of the Committee which should take into consideration activities of other international organizations and identify specific areas for further action as required including the development of a code of practice for the containment of antimicrobial resistance (paras 33-38);
  • received reports on activities of OIE including the Harmonization of Technical Requirements for Registration of Veterinary Medicinal Products; and reports on the evaluations of veterinary drugs by the 52nd and 54th JECFA (paras 39-50);
  • agreed that a paper should be prepared on the criteria for the selection of methods of analysis in the light of recent developments in method validation at the international level (paras 98-101); agreed that the task groups should proceed with the selection of appropriate methods of analysis for four drug categories (paras 102-105); and agreed to a number of new provisional methods and to covert one method from provisional status to recommended (paras 106-107);
  • agreed to consider at the next session whether to initiate work on additional appendices to the Guidelines for the Establishment of a Regulatory Programme for Control of Veterinary Drug Residues in Foods to address the control of veterinary drugs in specific groups of animal products other than milk and milk products (para. 125); and
  • agreed to discuss at the next session mechanisms which would facilitate progress in the decision making by the Committee (paras 143-144).


Previous Page Top of Page Next Page