(Joint FAO/Southland Government Team, 2002)
|
LAND OCCUPATION |
||||
RURAL ZONES |
LARGE & MEDIUM-SIZED FARMS |
PEASANT FARMS |
GRAZING LAND |
RESERVE LAND |
RURAL INDUSTRY |
NA 1 |
Generally land use is on a sustainable basis, favourable features being the role of tree crops, and that most farmers have the capital and education to practice adequate rotations and install approved soil conservation features. But the report has concerns about (i) pollution of water courses from intensive use of fertilizer and chemicals & (ii) poor management practices on some large farms, which include felling of tree plantations for grazing. |
Peasant farmed land in NA1 tends to have higher gradients than
large farms, with a higher risk of erosion from run-off. Nevertheless land
management is of a high standard with strong integration of cropping and
livestock, a major role for tree crops and, where necessary, well kept
terraces. |
not applicable |
not applicable |
not applicable |
NA 2 |
Land management is generally inferior to NA1 and gives rise to a number of concerns: (i) a third of the farmed area was observed to suffer from severely inadequate conservation practices and/or rotations; (ii) on farm woodland being felled for energy needs and insufficient new planting. |
A varied picture, exhibiting a spectrum of excellent
sustainable agricultural practices and some areas where severe environmental
degradation is occurring. |
not applicable |
not applicable |
The recent industrialization of the urban-rural fringe has
increased pressure on the environment in these areas, which encompass NAs 2, 3
and 4. Indeed, there is evidence that investors are not only attracted by the
lower taxes and cheap labour but also weaker environmental regulation in that
enforcement procedures appear to be more lax than in urban areas. |
NA 3 |
Relatively little cropping by large farms, but that which was
observed gave rise to considerable concern, as it consisted mainly of mechanized
land-extensive rain-fed production of coarse grains (largely sorghum) on land
cleared from bush without much regard for long-term sustainability. |
Much smallholder cropping in this zone is fairly recent, being
practised by in-migrants from better-watered but overpopulated areas. Because of
the uncertainty of rainfall, and poverty of farmers, very little inorganic
fertilizer is applied. Where spare land still exists, farmers respond to
declining soil fertility by clearing new land, leaving previously cropped land
with unsatisfactory cover and vulnerable to erosion. Little evidence of tree
planting by farmers. |
Smallholder grazing land is communal and increasingly
overstocked. Many tree species are being removed by stock pressure and household
energy needs. |
Reserve land is under increased pressure from the expansion of smallholder grazing and cropping. The area of indigenous bush-forest cover is estimated to have declined by 4.5% per annum over 1975-85. |
see above |
NA 4 |
not applicable |
The population derives most of its income from livestock products, and has not been very much supplemented by in-migrants. Traditional cropping with sorghum and millet appears to be sustainable, and only provides a major contribution to household food needs one year in three or four. |
Grazing land is communal, but with much lower stocking rates than for NA3. There are longer-term concerns about the expansion of the human population, and the ratio of cattle to humans, but, in the short term, pressure on the environment is not critical. |
Reserve land is as yet under moderate pressure, but there are locally acute conflicts between herders and the management of wildlife reserves. |
see above |
NA 5 |
not applicable |
not applicable |
With very low population densities, traditional grazing appears to be sustainable. |
Local conflicts between herders and the management of wildlife reserves, not yet as severe as for NA4. |
not applicable |