Foro Global sobre Seguridad Alimentaria y Nutrición (Foro FSN)

Este miembro contribuyó a:

    • Institutional Mechanisms/Governance Arrangements:

      1. Agrifood Systems Task Force:
        • Formation of a task force with representatives from government ministries, farmer associations, academia, and the private sector.
        • Aims to facilitate coordinated efforts, ensuring a holistic approach to agrifood system challenges.
      2. Integrated Data Management Systems:
        • Development and implementation of a centralized data management system.
        • Enables the collection, analysis, and dissemination of information crucial for evidence-based decision-making in agrifood systems.
      3. Multi-Stakeholder Platforms:
        • Establishment of platforms bringing together stakeholders from various sectors.
        • Forums for dialogue, collaboration, and co-creation of transformative solutions in agrifood systems.
      4. Policy Coherence Units:
        • Creation of units within ministries to ensure coherence in policies across different sectors.
        • Identifies and mitigates potential conflicts, fostering an integrated and systems-oriented approach.

      Measures to Align Policies and Laws with Transformative Goals:

      1. Policy Impact Assessments:
        • Introduction of a systematic process for assessing the potential impact of policies on agrifood systems.
        • Focus on evaluating alignment with transformative goals, sustainability, and resilience.
      2. Regular Policy Dialogues:
        • Organization of regular dialogues involving policymakers, researchers, and practitioners.
        • Facilitates discussions on policy implications and identifies areas for improvement, ensuring adaptation to evolving agrifood system dynamics.
      3. Legislative Review Committees:
        • Establishment of committees to periodically review existing legislation related to agrifood systems.
        • Aims to identify outdated or conflicting laws and propose amendments for better alignment with transformative objectives.

      Budgeting and Financing for Cross-Sectoral Work:

      1. Cross-Sectoral Budget Allocation:
        • Development of budgetary mechanisms that allocate funds for cross-sectoral initiatives.
        • Ensures financial resources are dedicated to addressing interconnected challenges in agrifood systems.
      2. Incentivizing Private Sector Investments:
        • Implementation of policies encouraging private sector investment in agrifood systems.
        • Involves tax incentives, subsidies, or public-private partnerships attracting additional financial resources for transformative projects.
      3. Performance-Based Budgeting:
        • Linking budget allocations to performance indicators related to transformative goals.
        • Encourages efficient resource use and ensures funds contribute to measurable outcomes in sustainability, productivity, and resilience.

      Measures to Rebalance Asymmetries in Power and Decision-Making:

      1. Gender-Responsive Policies:
        • Implementation of policies actively promoting gender equality in agrifood systems.
        • Ensures women's representation in decision-making bodies and addresses gender-based discrimination.
      2. Empowerment of Smallholder Farmers:
        • Development of programs providing smallholder farmers access to information, resources, and decision-making opportunities.
        • Support for farmer cooperatives and participatory approaches in policy formulation.
      3. Transparency in Decision-Making Processes:
        • Enhancement of transparency in decision-making through accessible information.
        • Achieved through regular communication, public consultations, and the use of technology for information dissemination.

      Measures to Redress Inequities and Inequalities:

      1. Land Redistribution Programs:
        • Design and implementation of programs addressing historical inequities in land distribution.
        • Involves redistributing land to landless farmers or implementing land tenure reforms for fair and equitable access.
      2. Social Protection Programs:
        • Introduction of social protection programs targeted at vulnerable groups within the agrifood system.
        • Provides financial assistance, training, and support to marginalized communities.
      3. Fair Trade Certification:
        • Encouragement and support for agrifood producers to obtain fair trade certification.
        • Ensures fair wages and better working conditions, especially for farmers in marginalized or disadvantaged communities.

      Concrete Means and Evidence of Impact Measurement:

      1. Establishment of Key Performance Indicators (KPIs):
        • Development of specific KPIs aligning with transformative goals.
        • Indicators include increased productivity, sustainability practices, income levels, and social well-being.
      2. Baseline and Impact Assessments:
        • Conducting baseline assessments before implementing interventions and follow-up impact assessments.
        • Involves collecting data on key indicators to measure the effectiveness and impact of governance measures.
      3. Stakeholder Surveys and Feedback Mechanisms:
        • Implementation of surveys and feedback mechanisms to gather input from stakeholders.
        • Provides qualitative insights into the perceived impact of governance measures, allowing for continuous improvement.
      4. Case Studies and Success Stories:
        • Documentation and dissemination of case studies and success stories.
        • Highlights the positive impact of specific governance measures, serving as tangible evidence of transformative change.

       

      1. General Feedback:

        • The inclusive and multistakeholder consultation process is a positive approach, ensuring diverse perspectives are considered during the development of the guidance tool.

      2. Relevance and Scope:

        •  The emphasis on raising awareness, addressing common constraints, and fostering multi-stakeholder engagement reflects a holistic approach to enhancing small-scale livestock productivity.
        • The global scope with a focus on low- and middle-income countries is appropriate, given the significance of small-scale livestock production in these regions.

      3. Potential Gaps or Omissions:

        • The document does not explicitly mention the incorporation of innovative technologies or digital solutions. Considering the role of technology in modern agriculture, exploring how digital tools can be integrated into the guidance tool could enhance its effectiveness.
        • Development Process:
          • The inclusive and participatory approach to developing the guidance tool is crucial for its success. I

      4. In summary, the proposed objectives, scope, and nature of the voluntary guidance tool for small-scale livestock productivity seem well-conceived. Addressing potential gaps will further strengthen the development process and the impact of the guidance tool.

    • FAO seeks to accelerate the transformation of agrifood systems to be more efficient, inclusive, resilient and sustainable as a mean to achieve the 2030 agenda. 
      What and how can CSOs contribute to such transformation to boost impact on the ground?  Please suggest concrete actions.

      Civil Society Organizations (CSOs) have a crucial role to play in driving the transformation of agrifood systems in the MENA region, including Jordan, towards greater efficiency, inclusivity, resilience, and sustainability. Their partnership with organizations like the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) and other stakeholders can have a substantial impact on the ground.

      One avenue for CSOs to make a difference is by bolstering Farmer-Based Organizations (FBOs). By supporting the establishment and capacity building of these grassroots entities, CSOs can empower smallholder farmers. These efforts include providing FBOs with access to resources, training, and technology, thereby improving farming practices and enhancing their ability to adapt to climate change.

      CSOs can also contribute to the promotion of sustainable agricultural practices in collaboration with local farmers and FAO. Initiatives such as advocating for organic farming, crop rotation, and agroecology can be advanced through training sessions and workshops. These educational efforts help farmers adopt more sustainable and climate-smart techniques.

      Addressing food security is another vital role for CSOs. Collaborating with FAO, CSOs can implement projects aimed at improving food security and reducing food waste within the MENA region. CSOs can also advocate for policies that ensure equitable access to nutritious food, particularly for vulnerable populations.

      Gender inclusion is a critical aspect of agrifood system transformation. CSOs can champion gender-inclusive policies and practices, ensuring that women have equal access to resources, training, and decision-making opportunities. These efforts extend to supporting women's participation in agriculture and entrepreneurship through tailored training and capacity-building programs.

      To build resilience against climate change, CSOs can partner with FAO to implement climate-resilient farming practices, facilitating communities' adaptation to changing climatic conditions. These collaborations also involve raising awareness about the significance of climate-smart agriculture and sustainable water management.

      Access to finance is often a bottleneck for small-scale farmers and agribusinesses. CSOs can assist in bridging this gap by helping these stakeholders access financial resources, including microloans and grants, which can be invested in improving operations and productivity. Establishing partnerships with financial institutions to develop customized financial products for the agrifood sector is another fruitful avenue for CSOs.

      Data and research are essential to informed decision-making. CSOs can undertake research and data collection to identify key challenges and opportunities within the MENA region's agrifood sector. By sharing research findings with FAO and other stakeholders, CSOs can contribute to evidence-based policies and programs.

      CSOs can also serve as advocates for policies that promote sustainability and inclusivity within agrifood systems at local, national, and regional levels. Engaging in dialogues with government authorities helps influence policy decisions to align them with the 2030 Agenda.

      Education and training are fundamental to capacity building. CSOs can offer training and extension services to farmers and rural communities, covering topics such as improved crop management, post-harvest handling, and marketing skills. Additionally, fostering knowledge-sharing networks among farmers enables the exchange of best practices.

      Collaboration is at the heart of transformation. CSOs can partner with other CSOs, government agencies, international organizations, and private sector stakeholders to leverage resources and expertise. Facilitating multi-stakeholder dialogues and partnerships promotes integrated approaches to agrifood system transformation.

      To ensure the effectiveness of their initiatives, CSOs must establish mechanisms for monitoring and evaluating their impact, ensuring accountability and continuous improvement.

      Lastly, CSOs can engage with young people to promote their involvement in agriculture and entrepreneurship. Supporting youth-led initiatives and providing mentorship and training opportunities contribute to building a sustainable future for agrifood systems.

      In sum, through these concrete actions, CSOs can collaborate with FAO and other stakeholders to accelerate the transformation of agrifood systems in the MENA region. This collaborative effort aims to make these systems more efficient, inclusive, resilient, and sustainable, ultimately contributing significantly to achieving the 2030 Agenda and reducing socio-economic inequality.

    • Addressing socio-economic inequality and working towards the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) is a complex and challenging task. Collaboration between international organizations like the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) and Civil Society Organizations (CSOs) is crucial to regain momentum and make progress, particularly in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region, including Jordan. Here are some steps they can take:

      1. Identify Common Goals: FAO and CSOs should identify shared objectives related to reducing socio-economic inequality and promoting sustainable development. This could involve creating a joint strategy or roadmap to align their efforts.

      2. Data and Analysis: Collaborate on comprehensive data collection and analysis to understand the specific challenges and root causes of inequality in the MENA region and Jordan. This can help in evidence-based decision-making and resource allocation.

      3. Policy Advocacy: CSOs can play a crucial role in advocating for policy changes at the national and regional levels. FAO can provide technical expertise and data to support CSOs in their advocacy efforts. Jointly, they can push for policies that promote inclusive and sustainable development.

      4. Capacity Building: FAO can provide training and capacity-building programs to strengthen the capabilities of local CSOs. This could include helping them acquire the skills needed for effective project management, data analysis, and advocacy.

      5. Partnerships with Governments: Engage with governments in the MENA region, including Jordan, to ensure they prioritize SDGs and take concrete actions to reduce inequality. FAO can leverage its relationships with governments, while CSOs can hold them accountable.

      6. Community Engagement: CSOs often have a grassroots presence. They can work at the community level to engage with marginalized and vulnerable populations, ensuring that their voices are heard, and their needs are addressed.

      7. Innovation and Technology: Explore innovative solutions and technologies that can help address inequality and improve agricultural practices. FAO can provide expertise in this area, while CSOs can help implement these solutions on the ground.

      8. Resource Mobilization: Collaborate on fundraising efforts. FAO may have access to international funding sources, while CSOs can tap into local and regional resources. Together, they can pool resources to implement projects aimed at reducing inequality.

      9. Monitoring and Evaluation: Establish a robust system for monitoring and evaluating the impact of joint initiatives. Regular assessments will help determine what works and what needs adjustment.

      10. Information Sharing and Transparency: Maintain open communication channels and ensure transparency in all activities. This builds trust between FAO and CSOs and fosters a productive partnership.

      11. Education and Awareness: Collaborate on educational campaigns to raise awareness about the SDGs and the importance of reducing inequality. This can include workshops, seminars, and public outreach.

      In summary, FAO and CSOs can work together effectively by aligning their goals, leveraging each other's strengths, and focusing on a collaborative, evidence-based approach. The key is to create a partnership that is mutually beneficial and results-oriented, ultimately contributing to the SDGs and reducing socio-economic inequality in the MENA region, including Jordan.