دعوات تلقي المُساهمات

الذكرى العشرون للخطوط التوجيهية لإعمال الحق في الغذاء - دعوة لتقديم مدخلات بشأن إعمال حق الإنسان في غذاء كافٍ

 تأتي الذكرى العشرون لاعتماد الخطوط التوجيهية الطوعية لدعم الإعمال المطرد للحق في غذاء كاف في سياق الأمن الغذائي القطري في عام 2024.

الحق في الغذاء هو حق مُلزم قانونًا، مكفول في العهد الدولي الخاص بالحقوق الاقتصادية والاجتماعية والثقافية. ويتحقق ذلك عندما يتاح للجميع الوصول المادي والاقتصادي إلى الغذاء الكافي أو وسائل شرائه في جميع الأوقات، وذلك على النحو المنصوص عليه في التعليق العام رقم 12 للجنة الحقوق الاقتصادية والاجتماعية والثقافية.

توفر الخطوط التوجيهية لإعمال الحق في الغذاء إرشادات عملية للدول حول كيفية إعمال الحق في الغذاء الكافي من خلال وضع الاستراتيجيات والبرامج والسياسات والتشريعات. وقد أقرت لجنة الأمن الغذائي العالمي هذه الخطوط التوجيهية واعتمدها مجلس منظمة الأغذية والزراعة للأمم المتحدة في نوفمبر/تشرين الثاني 2004، بعد عامين من المفاوضات الحكومية الدولية ومشاركة أصحاب المصلحة المتعددين.

تتعهد الحكومات بتنفيذ التزامات قانونية بضمان الحق في الغذاء لشعوبها، بينما يحق لكل فرد التمتع به كحق عالمي دون تمييز. علاوةً على ذلك، نحن جميعًا أفرادًا أو جماعات، وكذا المسؤولون الحكوميون والمشرعون والمجتمعات المحلية والمنظمات غير الحكومية والأوساط الأكاديمية ومنظمات المستهلكين ومجموعات الشباب والشعوب الأصلية وأصحاب الحيازات الصغيرة والمنظمات النسائية ومنظمات المجتمع المدني، إلى جانب القطاع الخاص، جهات فاعلة حاسمة في إعمال الحق في الغذاء الكافي.

توقعت الخطوط التوجيهية الطوعية لدعم الإعمال المطرد للحق في غذاء كاف التحديات العالمية الأكثر إلحاحًا التي تعرقل تحقيق التنمية المستدامة اليوم، ومن هذه التحديات النزاعات وعدم المساواة والأمراض وتغير المناخ وفقدان التنوع البيولوجي. وفي عالمنا المعقد الذي تتزايد فيه التحديات المتنامية والمتغيرة، تثبت الخطوط التوجيهية أنها وثيقة الصلة كما كانت دائمًا، وتذكرنا بأهمية التعاون الدولي والتعاون من أجل الصالح العام الجماعي المتمثل في القضاء على الجوع وسوء التغذية بجميع صورها والفقر وعدم المساواة. ويسهم التنفيذ الكامل لهذه الخطوط في دعم جهودنا نحو خطة التنمية المستدامة لعام 2030 وأهداف التنمية المستدامة، التي ترتكز في حد ذاتها على حقوق الإنسان.

شهدت السنوات الخمس الماضية صعوبات خاصة بسبب جائحة كوفيد-19، وزيادة الجوع وسوء التغذية بجميع صورها، وزيادة عدم المساواة، وأزمة تكلفة المعيشة. وقد نفذت الحكومات والجهات الفاعلة الأخرى على مستوى العالم استجابات مبتكرة لمواجهة هذه الصعوبات. وبعد مرور 20 عامًا، حان الوقت لتقييم التقدم المحرز والنظر في النتائج الرئيسية.

أخبرنا برأيك في الأمور التي تراها مهمة!

مع اقتراب الذكرى السنوية العشرين للخطوط التوجيهية لإعمال الحق في الغذاء، ستساعد نتائج هذه الدعوة في إثراء الجهود المبذولة لإعمال الحق في غذاء كافٍ على المستوى المحلي أو الوطني أو الإقليمي أو العالمي، وتوفير فرصة كبيرة لتقييم البلدان وشعوبها.

يدعو فريق منظمة الأغذية والزراعة المعني بالحق في الغذاء ولجنة الأمن الغذائي العالمي أصحاب المصلحة إلى:

.1
تبادل الخبرات والممارسات الجيدة بشأن إعمال الحق في الغذاء للجميع دائمًا.
 
.2
تحديد أي فجوات وقيود وتحديات تعرقل إعمال الحق في الغذاء أو تنفيذ الخطوط التوجيهية لإعمال الحق في الغذاء.  
.3
مشاركة أية دروس مستفادة واقتراح توصيات لتحسين إعمال الحق في الغذاء الكافي.
 
.4
الخطوات التالية: هل هناك أي خطط واقعية لاستخدام الخطوط التوجيهية وتطبيقها؟

 

كيفية المشاركة في الدعوة لتلقي المساهمات

يُرجى مشاركة خبراتكم وتجاربكم باستخدام النموذج التالي:

رابط النموذج

يُمكن تقديم المُساهمات بأي من لغات الأمم المتحدة الست (العربية والصينية والإنجليزية والفرنسية والروسية والإسبانية). يُرجى الحفاظ على ألا تزيد المساهمات المقدمة عن 1000 كلمة. يُمكنك تحميل النموذج بعد تعبئته هنا أو إرساله إلى [email protected].

 

الدعوة لتقديم المساهمات مفتوحة حتى 17 ديسمبر 2023.

 

نتوجه لكم بجزيل الشكر على مساهماتكم القيمة، ونتطلع إلى الاستفادة من خبراتكم وتجاربكم.

الميسرون المشاركون:

  • ماري لارا هوبيرت شارتييه، أخصائية الحق في الغذاء
  • كلير ماسون، مستشارة الحق في الغذاء
  • سارة براند، موظف فني مشارك
  • كيارا سيرولي ، أمانة لجنة الأمن الغذائي العالمي

 

المراجع

تم إغلاق هذا النشاط الآن. لمزيد من المعلومات، يُرجى التواصل معنا على : [email protected] .

* ضغط على الاسم لقراءة جميع التعليقات التي نشرها العضو وتواصل معه / معها مباشرةً
  • أقرأ 112 المساهمات
  • عرض الكل

Rosemary Mpofu

the Consumer Council of Zimbabwe (CCZ)
Zimbabwe

Greetings



Please find attached the Consumer Council of Zimbabwe (CCZ) submissions

on the Call for inputs on the realisation of of the Human Right to

Adequate Food. The submission is made with the approval of the Executive

Director of the CCZ to whom this email is copied to.



Kind regards,



Selby Tapiwa Mutukudzi

INGRID JANETH AMAYA LOPEZ

la Procuraduría de los Derechos Humanos de Guatemala
Guatemala

Señores 

Organizacion de las Naciones Unidas para la Alimentación y la Agricultura (FAO)

Estimados Señores: 

Reciba un cordial saludo de la Procuraduría de los Derechos Humanos de Guatemala. 

Por este medio me permito hacer referencia a la solicitud para presentar contribuciones sobre la realización del derecho humano a una alimentación adecuada. De cara al vigésimo aniversario de las Directrices sobre el derecho a la alimentación.

Al respecto, me permito trasladar la contribución del Procurador de los Derechos Humanos de Guatemala, con base a las directrices brindadas para el efecto. 

Sin otro particular, me suscribo, atentamente,

 

Dedy Lalinka Gonzalez Herrera

Ministerio de Desarrollo Rural y Tierras
Bolivia (Plurinational State of)

Sr. Moderator:

En cumplimiento a la nota VRE-DGRM-USEC-Cs-59/2023 de Cancillería, le remito en versión digital, la Contribución del Ministerio de Desarrollo Rural y Tierras a las Directrices sobre el Derecho a una Alimentación Adecuada, en el formato establecido en su página web.

 Saludos

Bernabe Eddy Balderrama Calle
Planificación y Proyectos

Dirección General de Planificación

Ministerio de Desarrollo Rural y Tierras
La Paz - Bolivia
 

To whom who may concern,

You can find attached the contribution of the research group coordinated by Prof. Andrea Segrè, from University of Bologna, on the realization of the Right to Food.

Attached is also the document where the guidelines of the Food Policy of Bologna are explained, where the right to food has been set as a milestone.

For any clarification or need for more information we remain available.

Best regards,

Filippo Pini for the University of Bologna team

Research fellow

Department of Agricultural and Food Sciences, University of Bologna, Italy

Submission for the 20th Anniversary of the Guidelines on the Right to Food

Dear concern.

In commemoration of the 20th anniversary of the Right to Food

Guidelines, I am writing to provide my input and share valuable

information regarding the realization of the Human Right to Sufficient

Food. As an ardent advocate for food security and sustainable

agriculture, I believe that every person should have access to secure,

nutritious, and culturally appropriate food.

I have attentively perused and considered the United Nations'

guidelines regarding the right to sustenance, and I would like to

contribute my beekeeping industry-specific experiences and best

practices. Although I lack personal experience in this field, I have

compiled pertinent information and best practices that can assist in

the realization of the right to sustenance via beekeeping.

Through pollination and honey production, the beekeeping industry

plays a crucial role in food production, making it an essential aspect

of assuring food security and promoting biodiversity. We can

collectively improve the comprehension and application of the right to

sustenance if we share our experiences and best practices.

In my proposal, I have outlined key elements such as sustainable

beekeeping practices, capacity building, and knowledge sharing, access

to resources and markets, conservation of bee habitats, research and

innovation, policy support and advocacy, and the significance of

collaboration and partnerships within the beekeeping industry.

We can contribute to the realization of the Human Right to Adequate

Food, I believe, by incorporating these experiences and best practices

into our collective efforts. The beekeeping industry has enormous

potential to not only provide sustenance but also support beekeepers'

livelihoods and promote environmental preservation.

I expect that my submission will be considered and will contribute to

the larger discussions and initiatives surrounding the Right to Food

Guidelines' 20th anniversary. I welcome any additional conversations

or opportunities for collaboration that may result from this

submission.

Please find enclosed my detailed submission, which provides an

exhaustive overview of the beekeeping industry's experiences and best

practices in relation to the realization of the right to sustenance.

Please do not hesitate to contact me if any additional information or

documents are required.

Thank you for your consideration of this issue. I offer my fondest

regards for the success of the 20th-anniversary celebration of the

Right to Food Guidelines.



Yours faithfully,



Mr. Jaber Amin.

Pat Heslop-Harrison ([email protected]) on behalf of several members of the Institute for Environmental Futures, University of Leicester, UK including Beth Delaney, Hessain Ekkeh, Mateus Macul, Nicholes Nicholes, John E. Pearl and Emilio Payo 

RESPONSE TO UN FAO Right to Food Guidelines Consultation 

  We are happy to have the opportunity to celebrate and comment on the 20th anniversary of implementing the FAO/UK Right to Food Guidelines in 2024, in advance of the 2030 reviews of the SDGs and the 2030 Agenda. We are academic research scientists and PhD students from multiple disciplines working with the University of Leicester Institute for Environmental Futures, We have extensive interdisciplinary research projects, many involving PhD students, with a global reach, as well as University teaching roles.

  (i) Experiences and good practices 

The FAO Consultation was excellent as it allowed involvement of stakeholders globally in development and monitoring of the RtFG, encouraging discussions, and generating data or case studies about best-practice. With respect to 'lessons learned', our contributions would be in monitoring and investigations of approaches. 

 (ii) Gaps, constraints and challenges 

We feel there are three gaps and challenges that should be addressed, regarding Sustainability, Robustness, and Education: 

 A. Sustainability 

The Right to Food documentation has little in relationship to sustainability, which must be considered at levels of the individual, region, nation, continent, and globe. Current farming practices are generally able to produce enough food (with obvious challenges of availability, distribution and to an extent type of food) to meet the demand of the population. However, current practices are, firstly, using more resources from the planet than are being replaced; and, secondly, human activity is changing, and in many cases destroying, the environment producing food. Hence, 'business as usual' is not certain to continue production of sufficient food without substantial changes. Production of food should not impede the viability of areas in the future, whether with respect to water, soils, or crop protection and nutrition (eg Hunke et al., 2015; Lal & Stewart, 1990), while the increasing temperature variability and extreme weather events predicted will need improved genetics and potentially changes in areas and agronomic practices. Detailed monitoring and research at national levels, in all countries, will be required to recognize and avoid unsustainable practices and adapt food production systems to changing climates and environments. 

 B. Robustness and resilience 

The International Covenant on Rights obliges each party to take steps "to the maximum of its available resources" to achieve, among others, the Right to Food. Food supply has to ensure resilience as one of its cornerstones, and a system exploited to its maximum cannot provide that resilience. The scope of the resilience is twofold, and is linked to sustainability. Firstly, resources needed for food production must continue to be available. Secondly, the resilience of supply chains and the associated infrastructure including storage and long-distance transport to balance crop failures and crops from different regions, must be improved. Among other factors, 13% of food production worldwide is lost due to insufficient refrigeration (63% in developing countries; Wu et al., 2022); as well as cold storage, improvements in harvesting and transport through to sales predictions can reduce waste. Improvements need to consider too impacts on energy use, greenhouse gas emission and social structures. Changes in production patterns, availability of food items, and social structures (urbanization and aging of populations) all require adjustments to farms and distribution processes. Supply chain disruptions and the need for enhanced traceability and quality assurance are also significant concerns. 

These constraints and challenges show the tight links between food, health and environmental security, three of the main categories of human security threats (UNDP, United Nations Development Programme, 1994). 

 C. Education 

Education about food and nutrition at the under-16 level has at least partially failed globally. Many populations, whether from less or more developed countries, show health and well-being issues resulting from a poor diet, while there are other challenges related to food safety, storage and waste. All impact on delivery of the Right to Food at the individual level. Nationally in the UK, we ask how 12 years of mandatory state education allows an 'obesity crisis', with a population ill-equipped to understand food and eating habits? Globally, how is the sufficient food that farms produce - at substantial environmental cost - not available deliver the aims of a 'Right to Food'? 

 Beyond the under-16 level education, University-level, tertiary, education has a major part to play in equipping people with the skills required to both develop and put into practice policies that enable the Right to Food to be achieved. Furthermore, through the research programmes associated with the training activities in most Universities, both globally novel, and regional applications, of the new approaches to achieve the RtFG. We therefore welcome the increasing quality of Universities globally, and increasing enrolment of students. We hope the teaching and research will underpin the development and implementation of the Right to Food. 

 (iii) Lessons learned and suggestions 

Our research and teaching have academic value but are not specific examples of implementation of the Right to Food guidelines. 

 (iv) Next steps: use of Right to Food Guidelines 

At a local University level, many of us will plan to incorporate teaching (undergraduate, MSc and within PhD programmes) about the Right to Food Guidelines, complementing the deep consideration of the UN SDGs already in many courses. 

o    Human Development Report 1994: New Dimensions of Human Security. New York.UNDP (United Nations Development Programme). 1994.

o    Hunke, P., Mueller, E. N., Schröder, B., and Zeilhofer, P. (2015) The Brazilian Cerrado: assessment of water and soil degradation in catchments under intensive agricultural use. Ecohydrol., 8: 1154– 1180. doi: 10.1002/eco.1573

o    James, S.J. and James, C.J.F.R.I., 2010. The food cold-chain and climate change. Food Research International, 43(7), pp.1944-1956. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2010.02.001

o    Lal, R., & Stewart, B. A. (1990). Soil degradation: A global threat. Advances in soil science, 2.

o    Reardon, T., Zilberman, D. (2018). Climate Smart Food Supply Chains in Developing Countries in an Era of Rapid Dual Change in Agrifood Systems and the Climate. In: Lipper, L., McCarthy, N., Zilberman, D., Asfaw, S., Branca, G. (eds) Climate Smart Agriculture . Natural Resource Management and Policy, vol 52. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-61194-5_15

o    Wu, J., Li, Q., Liu, G., Xie, R., Zou, Y., Scipioni, A. and Manzardo, A., 2022. Evaluating the impact of refrigerated transport trucks in China on climate change from the life cycle perspective. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 97, p.106866. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2022.106866

Kysseline Chérestal

Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Senegal

Dear colleagues,

We are hereby sharing with you a joint FAO - Pan African Parliament submission to the Global Forum on Food Security - 20th anniversary of the Right to Food Guidelines.

We thank you very much for your consideration and are looking forward to the opportunity to participate in the Forum.

Do not hesitate if you have questions.

Best regards,

Kysseline Chérestal, Esq.

Legal Officer

Development Law Branch, Legal Office

Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), Senegal

On behalf of Claire Ogley, Head of Campaigns, Policy & Research at The Vegan Society: 



"The Human Right to a secure supply of affordable, suitable food, which meets our cultural, religious and philosophical beliefs, has repeatedly been articulated. The Universal Declaration of Human Rights, the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, the Convention on the Rights of the Child, and many other treaties and laws clearly set out the right to suitable food.  This includes vegans, people holding and practicing the philosophical belief of veganism.

"We have set out in great detail how these Human Rights specifically apply to vegans, through our International Rights Network of legal experts, here: https://www.vegansociety.com/get-involved/international-rights-network/…

"Moreover, many experts have repeatedly presented evidence that plant-based biosphere and food system management – as well as allowing for the restoration and recovery of habitats for free-living animals – is a vital element in ensuring food security for everyone.  As just one high level example, "Food in the Anthropocene: the EAT-Lancet Commission on healthy diets from sustainable food systems.” Willett W et al. 2019 https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(18)3178… (Summaries in numerous languages also here: https://eatforum.org/eat-lancet-commission/eat-lancet-commission-summar…) sets out why and how a global transformation of the food system is urgently needed.

"As The Vegan Society set out in our COP27 briefing (https://www.vegansociety.com/get-involved/our-work-policy-makers/cop27-…) the Global North including the G7 countries have the greatest responsibility for the current global biodiversity, climate and hunger crises.    We set out what this might look like for a typical G7 country, the UK, in our Grow Green series of reports and research: https://www.vegansociety.com/take-action/campaigns/grow-green

"Therefore, the Global North has a global debt that can only be made good by the Global North leading a plant-based food systems transformation.  Only then can the Human Right to Food be realised for all, including all cultural and belief-based needs, at all times."