1. Is the FAO definition on primary forest (FAO, 2018) adequate to your national/regional/global assessment and reporting purposes? If not, what criteria would you like to add/remove from the FAO definition? No. All the relevant criteria are probably inccluded in the definition, but the definition is not operative
2. Perhaps not fully missing but species composition and dynamics is poorly discussed, as compared to canopy cover, for example.
3. NFI Field observations
4.In our case we should combine Remote Sensing data with the field data to consider spatial issues
5. By providing regionally more concrete criteria and thresholds
Dr. Kari T. Korhonen