Improving Public Private Partnerships in Africa’s agricultural sector – the case of Zambia
Unleashing the potential for inclusive agricultural growth and transformation in Africa requires coordinated and strategic public and private investment in the sector. Against a background of limited government resources and expertise, public-private partnerships (PPPs) are increasingly being promoted around the world as a mechanism to pool resources, reduce risk, improve productivity and drive growth in the agriculture and food sectors. In line with this trend, many African countries have recently expressed an interest in further understanding the potential for PPPs in the agriculture sector (agri-PPPs) to deliver on these transformative goals. This interest is also reflected in the Sustaining Comprehensive Africa Agriculture Development Programme (CAADP) Momentum Results Framework 2015-2025. Pillar 4 of the Malabo Declaration of 2014 aims to halve poverty by 2025 through inclusive agricultural growth and transformation and foresees a clear role for agri-PPPs to contribute towards the achievement of this objective. By 2025, African Union (AU) member states have committed to “establishing and/or strengthening inclusive public-private partnerships for at least 5 priority agriculture commodity value chains with strong linkage to smallholder agriculture”[1].
It is within this context that the AUC partnered with FAO to work on improving understanding about the design, implementation and impact of agri-PPPs. The work involved an analysis of 24 agri-PPP case studies from eight African countries (Ethiopia, Rwanda, Uganda, Kenya, Ghana, Cote d’Ivoire, Zambia and South Africa). The findings from these studies were validated in a workshop in May 2018 in Nairobi, Kenya[2].
It is important that the knowledge from these exercises informs policy-makers to design and implement effective agri-PPPs in Africa. In this regard, roundtables are being convened with policy makers, private sector entities and other stakeholders in Cote d’Ivoire, Ghana, Uganda and Zambia to discuss the country context, and opportunities for promotion of agri-PPPs.
You are cordially invited to participate in this online consultation on agri-PPPs. This consultation jointly moderated by FAO and AUC, will allow a broad range of stakeholders to provide their experiences and insights on the development of agri-PPPs in Africa. An online consultation will be held ahead of each country roundtable. The consultation will serve to enrich the roundtable dialogue, provide additional insights for policy makers and expand the inclusiveness of the exercise. This particular consultation focuses on agri-PPPs in Zambia.
We would appreciate your comments on the draft Guidelines for the design and implementation of effective Public Private Partnerships in the agriculture sector (agri-PPPs) which can be accessed here.
Please refer to the guiding questions below.
GUIDING QUESTIONS
- With reference to the attached guidelines on agri-PPPs, how important is each Principle in the Zambia context?
- Do any of the Principles need to be adapted/modified to suit the Zambia context? If so, how?
- Are there other Principles that should be included in the guidelines?
- Can you share examples/good practices from Zambia to illustrate any of the Principles?
We look forward to receiving your comments.
Stephanie Gallatova, Agribusiness Officer, FAO
Mark Kofi Fynn, CAADP Advisor Agribusiness, African Union Commission
![](https://assets.fsnforum.fao.org/public/files/images/dot_line_column.png)
[1] https://au.int/sites/default/files/documents/31250-doc-the_caadp_results_framework_2015-2025_english_edited_1-1.pdf
[2] This workshop was supported by AUC, FAO and GIZ
Temas
- Leer 15 contribuciones
Dear PPP moderator,
I find the proposal interesting. The approaches listed exists in many parts of SSA where i gathered localised perspectives while conducting field based people centred community research on Forests and Community Foods.
Community-based-institutions at the community and village levels are still in existence in many parts of Africa. Those community institutional laws provide governing principles on all aspects of natural resources and population settlement and movement management in the lands they occupy (Kenyan constitution 2010/2012].
The draft FSN Forum presentation is interesting in view of its leaning upon public institutions of agricultural development of commodity crops like tea, coffee and sugar. Agriculture for growth as a topic is challenged by decreased useful edible diversity. When more than 80% of a regional population focuses on consuming a few crops,commodity prices fall whilst food prices rise.
Perhaps there maybe a need to find methods "other new commodities"and approaches for broader essential commodities so as to increase effective Public-Privte-Patnership in the agricultural sector for all concerned and affected.
Monica Opole
Senior consultant
Forests, trees, diverse edible diversity and people.
@ Getaneh Gobezie
Dear Getaneh, thank you for the valid points you have raised. The issue of affordable finance for the agricultural sector is a long-standing one. We need financiers who understand the agricultural sector and can analyze agricultural business plans. The issue of incentives vis-à-vis measures is well noted – it is fine line to draw. This will be raised at the roundtable dialogue.
Dear colleagues
Thank you for this very important Agri-PPP Guide. I strongly believe this will help plan effective collaboration.
I think there are two key issues for further discussion or elaboarion.
1) Since the participants can involve those from private sector (profit motivated) and those in Government, NGOs (often socially motivated), we need to decide the level of ''profit'' (and risk taking) that can be attained by those especially in the private sector, and to reach a concensus or mutual understanding on that level.... One challenge that we face in ruralfinance is the level of microcredit interest to be charged by banks and microfinance institutions (MFIs). As far as I know, so far, there is no consensus on a ''reasonable'' interest rate that need to be charged (though the components that should go into the computation are quite clear). Indeed, there are also those who strongly argue against ''any interest'' on credit delivered to businesses owned by poor people..... The confusion often gives rise to difficulties on collaborative efforts!!
2) How can we balance between ''INCENTIVE'' and ''MEASURES'' on those who fail to deliver as per commitments (see Box on page 11 on the Guide), especially for the private sector. May be the only MEASURE we can do on the private sector who fail to deliver is to remove the so-called incentive? What are the strategies to avoid potential crowding out of private sector actiors while doing so?
I think these are some of the key issues that need further discussion on the guide.
Getaneh ([email protected])
@ Olga Gwanda
Dear Olga, thank you for your valuable comments. Indeed, an exit strategy is critical for sustainability but it is not always well thought through in the design of the PPP. More thought needs to be put into how the public sector can exit after a set period.
From my own point of view, all the principles given in the guidelines are important and are relevant to the Zambian context and to me the most appealing principle is Principle 11- Exit strategy. The main challenge we face in Africa is that of unsustainable development programs. If the benefits from agri-PPPs should continue past the period of public-private involvement, then sustainable development would have been initiated. When it comes to sustainability of development initiatives, we can think in terms of the relationship between a Venture Capitalist and an entrepreneur. Venture Capitalists are not permanent equity holders; they usually exit the venture at the end of the initial high growth phase, without jeopardizing the entrepreneur’s interests. In the same way, the public and private institutions should not be permanent equity holders in development initiatives that are meant to benefit smallholder farmers. As was in the case of the Zambian Kaleya Smallholders Company Ltd, after being integrated in the development initiatives, smallholder farmers should also be given the chance to be equity stakeholders, so that when the time comes for the government and the private companies to exit, the initiative will continue (as a private company) under the governance of the smallholder farmers.
Esta actividad ya ha concluido. Por favor, póngase en contacto con [email protected] para mayor información.