Forum global sur la sécurité alimentaire et la nutrition (Forum FSN)

Susanne Schmidt

The University of Queensland
Australia

Dear all

My comments are

  1. Move beyond the ‘4R’ as these represent an ideal framework only but are unrealistic with current fertiliser technology.
  2. Make regulating nutrient losses a priority as N2O emissions and water pollution are globally felt and pose strong risks. Develop a risk matrix with view of the risks of losing fertilisers with view of soil, climate, crops.
  3. Consider nutrients in a broader crop system context with mineral fertilisers, repurposed nutrient-rich wastes, N-fixing plants for a holistic approach to nutrient supply of crops and soils.
  4. Consider the benefits of improving soil with the addition of organic carbon bound to nutrients (soil biological function, improved root growth, building of soil organic matter etc).
  5. Consider amelioration of wastes: most are not ideal crop nutrients with to too fast/too slow release patterns, toxicity, unbalanced nutrient stoichiometry etc. mixing several wastes, adding sorbents (geosorbers, biochar) and other manipulations will be needed.
  6. Consider nutrients beyond NPK, as micronutrient deficiencies are more becoming more common and often the effects seen with higher NPK addition is in fact a response to micronutrient ‘contaminants’ in NPK fertiliser, such as Zn.
  7. Request more comprehensive testing and long-term experimentation, local farmers experimenting and involvement of the community to ensure knowledge generation with stakeholder involvement.
  8. Consider the circular nutrient economy to recycle nutrient-containing wastes at local and regional scales.
  9. Advance the next-generation fertiliser concept with aim to optimise nutrient source and release patterns driven by crops rather environmental conditions.

Best wishes

Susanne