Does the draft adequately explain the principal components of a sustainable food systems approach (section 2.1.) and put the latter in relation to the approaches discussed in section 3.1.?
I would expand the definition of Sustainable Food System to clarify the concept that "food systems" potential varies according to "ecological areas". An arid area will be able to ensure food security for LESS number of people that areas with fertile soil, abundant water, optimal min-max temperatures. I would also introduce and highlight the concept that a "Sustainable Food System" is a system not overly affected by the impending climate change.
Ecosystem approaches must much more clearly mention livestock. Keeping holstein-friesian cattle in a hot desert environment, something done commonly in many areas, is not an example of a sound ecosystem approach. In addition it must be stressed that for an "ecosystem approach" to be defined as good it must be able to cope with the temperature/rainfall changes imposed by Climate Change
Are the key concepts in relation to sustainable food systems in section 2.2. well defined and described, including their importance for this publication?
Concepts are well defined but again much more emphasis should be put that all key concepts MUST be capable to cope with climate changes: higher min-max temperatures, drought/irregular rainfall
Is the list of terms in chapter 4 complete, are any important terms missing (if yes, please submit together with the respective definitions) or do you think certain terms may be redundant?
List is not complete. Terms that are missing: Pastoralism, Pastoralist Food Systems, Nomadic Pastoralism, Transhumance, Arid Areas
Д-р. Maurizio Dioli