全球粮食安全与营养论坛 (FSN论坛)

Dear Mr. Jafari,

Thank you for introducing the perspective of Low Forest Cover Countries to the discussion. 

I believe most of the indicators are fully applicable to LFCCs – it is the interpretation of the results which will differ between countries.  In particular the results of the monitoring might be able to support a case for increasing forest cover in LFCCs. 

Trees outside the forest are especially important in LFCCs (although their importance is increasingly recognised elsewhere).  How do you think they could be addressed in the Global Core Set (bearing in mind the need for a streamlined set, and links to high level policy commitments)?

The Global Core Set has focused on monitoring policy commitments.  So while research must, of course, be the foundation of the measurement, and the methods used must be scientifically sound, guidance should come from policy makers as to priorities for monitoring.  So I see no need for extra information - in the Global Core Set itself - on links between the indicators and research.  Or have I misunderstood your concerns?

Thank you for your contribution

Kit Prins

Facilitator