全球粮食安全与营养论坛 (FSN论坛)

意见征集

从前瞻到实践:探索从区域和多方利害攸关者的视角开展农粮系统新兴技术和创新前瞻性研究

2023年,联合国粮食及农业组织(FAO)创新办公室(OIN)与法国国际发展农业研究中心(CIRAD)合作,发布了全球前瞻综合报告《收获变革:利用新兴技术和创新推动农粮系统转型》[1]。该报告探讨了技术和创新在农粮系统转型中的关键作用,以解决当前和未来挑战,该报告试图缩短研究和投资创新阶段以及技术和创新采用之间的时间差,从而提高准备并确保包容、有弹性和可持续的农粮系统转型。

该报告还探讨了2050年及以后农粮系统技术和创新的五个潜在未来情景。这五个全球性情景为农粮系统的未来提供了一瞥,它们取决于技术和创新以及其促进环境的出现。通过了解这些可能性,利益相关者可以就技术和创新的开发和使用做出明智决策,以创造更可持续、更公平的农粮系统。

为了加深对农粮系统转型潜在途径在区域层面的理解,OIN团队呼吁利益相关者共同完成对全面的前瞻研究报告,该报告将立足于综合报告,并进一步制定区域性转型途径。您的提交结果将会被分析并在全面的前瞻研究报告中予以肯定,但更为重要的是,它们将被用于区域和国家层面的预见性战略规划,为利益相关者赋能,这一能力不仅包括设想可能的未来情景,还可通过朝着理想的未来方向采取具体的行动以对它们产生积极的影响。

由于全球前瞻综合报告仅以英文发布,OIN团队已准备背景報告,可在六种联合国语言(阿拉伯语、中文、英文、法文、俄文和西班牙文)中获取。这可以作为完成提交模板的参考

提交的结论将在FAO的多利益相关者研讨会“未来食品-I实验室行动中:为农粮系统转型培育创新”(2024年6月,意大利)中展示。该报告的结果将有助于提高人们对预见性方法重要性的认识,并为全球关于技术和创新潜力如何转变未来农粮系统的讨论做出贡献。

本轮征集提交日期截止至2024年6月10日。

我们提前感谢参与者,并衷心希望您的贡献将为报告带来不同地区的宝贵见解。

共同主持人:

  • Nevena Alexandrova-Stefanova,联合国粮食及农业组织(FAO)创新办公室(OIN)农业推广官员
  • Zofia Krystyna Mroczek,联合国粮食及农业组织(FAO)创新办公室(OIN)农业推广和咨询服务专家

参与提交征集的方式

要参与此征集,请注册FSN论坛,如果您还不是会员,请“登录”您的账户。请下载六种联合国语言(阿拉伯语、中文、英语、法语、俄语和西班牙语)中的任何一种的提交模板,并在此网页的“发布您的贡献”框中上传完成的表格。如有任何技术问题或需要帮助,请联系 [email protected]  。


[1] 綜合報告和完整的前瞻性報告的工作是 OIN 多學科團隊在 OIN 主任 Vincent Martin 的指導下卓有成效的合作成果,其中包括 Nevena Alexandrova-StefanovaZofia Krystyna MroczekKacper NosarzewskiNorbert KolosJieqiong Wan以及CIRAD Nikola Trendov,即Patrice Djamen Sarah Audouin。 國際農業食品網絡以及來自世界各地的不同專家和利益相關者也對這項工作做出了重要貢獻。

*点击姓名阅读该成员的所有评论并与他/她直接联系
  • 阅读 52 提交内容
  • 扩展所有

Dear FAO Moderator,

I am writing to submit my application for the initiative combating desert locust infestations. Having a strong background in plant protection technologies, I am excited to bring forth cutting-edge solutions through the use of aerial robotics. Through the utilization of drones, my goal is to completely transform the way we conduct locust surveillance and control. Working together, we can minimize the effects of these pests on global food security. Thank you for taking the time to review my application.

Best regards,

J. Amin
Cukurova University, Faculty of Agriculture, Animal Science Department
Gültepe, Çukurova Ünv. No. 492, 01250 Sarçam/Adana, Turkey.

Here is my submission for the FAO OIN HLPE panel who are preparing the report on "From Foresight to Field: Exploring regional and multistakeholder perspectives to implement a foresight on emerging technologies and innovations in agrifood systems"

My response to "Anticipating approaches as well as contributions to a global discussion about the potential of technologies and innovations to transform agrifood systems of the future."

USAID has failed in their mission to show extremely poor people in underdeveloped countries how to have food security and make a living in their own country.  This is one reason for the border crisis in the US.  USAID is encouraging extremely poor people to plant the wrong crops.  Dr. Booker T Whatley informed the US public and the US Government what crops poor people should plant.  He made a huge improvement to the lives of small farmers in the US and especially black farmers.  USAID did not listen to his advice, but others did listen.  In particular, the former CEO and founder of Domino’s Pizza, Tom Monaghan, listened.  He created a statue for Dr Booker T Whatley to commemorate him and put it on the Booker T Whatley farm https://www.motherearthnews.com/homesteading-and-livestock/small-farms-zmaz88jazgoe/

and https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RLTTHXPnIZ

A copy of Dr. Whatley's book shows Dr. Whatley's statue and provides more information on Dr. Whatley’s food security and small farm development efforts. 

The FAO may be able to help efforts to aiding extremely poor farmers in African countries in their quest to have food security and make a living in their own country by reviewing the seed policies that they have recommended to African countries.  The biodiversity of seed availability in many African countries is poor except in South Africa. Current policy has the appearance that Dutch South African garden hobbyists were instrumental in ensuring that a robust selection of seeds were available in South Africa and that Europeans do not care about the availability of Native African seeds that were grown locally in Africa or imported from Ethiopia and other African countries. For more information on the problems associated with the strict import requirements for seeds to African countries see  https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/14735903.2023.2210005 and https://www.thenation.com/article/world/new-colonialist-food-economy/

The FAO’s Office of Innovation (OIN) in collaboration with the French Agricultural Research Centre for International Development (CIRAD), needs to work with the Cameroon Government organizations MINEPAT, MINIRES, and MINADER to implement the ideas in the report “Harvesting change: Harnessing emerging technologies and innovations for agrifood system transformation”. In addition, the FAO and the French government working on the Emergency Food Crisis Response Project (Pulcca) and the Cameroon Rural Food Security Support Project (Secal) need to ensure that the proper seeds are available for implement my "Three Sisters Garden Food Security" project ideas as well as other food security food production resiliency, nutrition, biodiversity, and economic improvement concepts

The report explains the technologies that are emerging till though not disseminated to most of developing countries. I feel also that there might be missing how intermarrying is possible the local innovations with agrifood systems with these emerging technologies for better food production and food access.

Mycotoxins are the most notorious compounds contaminating food crops in the production chains, in which cereals
and nuts are primarily infected. The present study was aimed at determining multi-mycotoxins in maize grain samples
collected at post-harvest stages across the main maize producing districts of Ethiopia. Then, 80 maize samples were
collected from three districts (Bako, Ilu Gelan and Oda Bultum) and were analysed by LC-MS/MS. A total of 114
metabolites were with Penicillium and Aspergillus metabolites being positively identified in 26.3 and 18.4% of the
samples, respectively. Among the mycotoxins addressed by regulatory limits, deoxynivalenol was detected in 85%
of samples with the maximum level of 2,530 μg/kg, while zearalenone was detected in 81%, with levels as high as
3,750 μg/kg. A marked difference was observed across the study locations in the study areas, in which significant
difference (P<0.005) of mycotoxin contamination recorded. For instances, of the total sample, contamination was
detected on 78.1% in Oda Bultum followed by Ilu Gelan which was detected on 73.7% of the total samples with less
proportion of contaminated from Bako district (68.4%). Different mycotoxins of regulated, binding or masked and
emerging mycotoxin were also simultaneously detected in the samples. Intervention strategies which can reduce
mycotoxin contamination along the maize value chains are required to combat the mycotoxin problems. Further,
multi-season studies over multiple agro-ecologies are suggested for the county.
Keywords: multi-mycotoxins, secondary metabolites, maize grain samples, potential growing areas, post-harvest

La lutte contre l'insécurité alimentaire est primordiale. Pour parvenir à ce problème il sied de nourrir le biotope afin d'augmenter la production à l'hectare, Lutter contre les bioagresseurs pour éviter les faibles productions et mettre en place les méthodes les plus adaptées pour conserver les produits récoltés. Cela permettra de satisfaire les besoins croissantes des populations.

I could not think of any recommendation coming from FAO that is more antithetical to  food sovereignty where rural communities themselves decide the technologies most suited for their specific needs. Yes, an interface is needed with science, but ultimately it is the communities that know what level of complexity they can manage AND need for sustainability. Nothing wrong with learning from trial and error. Experts will most likely spoil the soup.

Climate change is leading to a significant scarcity of natural resources, which could worsen in the near future,
creating as consequence more significant conflicts over the struggle for any of its multiple uses, including food
production for a growing population of the planet. In the specialized economic literature, Elinor Ostrom defines
common use goods as those resources that present a high subtractability of use and great difficulty in excluding
potential beneficiaries. In addition, since they are everyone’s goods, but in their conservation, they are nobody’s
goods and can even reach extreme situations of depletion. Ostrom and other authors argue that common goods,
including water, continue to be managed within a dichotomous position between the State and the market, which
is inefficient in their management. Therefore, it is essential to strengthen institutions, cooperation networks, and
polycentric governance (that is, involving other actors beyond the State), in the face of climate change and other
problems affecting society. In this scenario, this study aimed to analyze the importance of transformations in the
food system and its resilience to climate change and other adverse events, considering polycentric governance in the management of resources, especially those of common use. The research is of a documentary nature, based on reviewing and interpreting the specialized literature on the object of study. Among the conclusions, the authors
highlighted the current demand for sustainable and increasingly resilient food systems to ensure long-term access to sufficient, safe, and nutritious food, prevent and absorb the unforeseen impacts of several phenomena. It also
stresses the need to take into account criteria of equity, inclusion, and responsible production and consumption
practices, rethinking the role of the State and the inter-institutional articulation of actors.