全球粮食安全与营养论坛 (FSN论坛)

意见征集

如何把农业粮食体系的隐性成本和效益有效纳入转型决策?

农业粮食体系向社会提供至关重要的效益,不仅仅是因为它们能够生产食物用以喂养我们,为10亿多人提供就业而且塑造文化认同。但转而言之,它们又加剧气候变化、自然资源退化和生物多样性丧失,同时未能为人人确保提供健康实惠的饮食。农业粮食体系的复杂性和相互依赖性使决策者们在力图把它们产生的成本和效益纳入决策当中时不乏挑战。

        2023年版的粮农组织旗舰出版物 《2023年粮食及农业状况》  (SOFA 2023)主题为“核算粮食真正成本促进农业粮食体系转型”。通过引入农业粮食体系隐性成本和效益的概念并提供可以对此加以评估的框架,该报告的目的是展开一个进程,帮助决策者做好更妥善准备,采取行动推动农业粮食体系实现环境、社会和经济可持续性。该报告介绍了154个国家开展的国家级真实成本核算 (TCA) 评估的结果;报告估计农业粮食体系2020年全球可量化隐性成本高达10万亿2020年购买力平价美元以上(约为全球国内生产总值的10%)。这凸显了把这些成本纳入决策过程,促进农业粮食体系向可持续性转型的迫切需要。

        《2023年粮食及农业状况》报告还指出,尽管报告中列举的量化隐性成本全球估算结果有助于提高对这一挑战严峻程度的认识,但仍需更多研究和证据来设计和实施具体行动和投资,应对农业粮食体系的隐性成本问题并增强农业粮食体系的效益。这应通过以真实成本核算为基础的有针对性的评估来实现,兼顾当地具体情况细化国家估算数字并考量不同转型路径的成本。

        鉴于该主题的相关性,粮农组织自1947年《粮食及农业状况》出版物创刊以来首次连续专辟两期论述这一相同主题。《2024年粮食及农业状况》将展示真实成本核算应用于各种范畴的灵活性,从整个农业粮食体系一直到某个单一产品。它将借助一系列个案研究来说明把隐性成本纳入决策、从而评价推动农业粮食体系优化转型的不同政策和管理方案的重要性和挑战所在。其最终目的是帮助决策者做好更妥善准备,采取行动推动农业粮食体系实现环境、社会和经济可持续性。

 

 

        《粮食及农业状况》团队邀请利益相关者们分享对农业粮食体系隐性成本和效益的已有或正在开展的评估的说明性范例(个案研究),确保对全球各地和各领域的大范围覆盖。我们也鼓励投稿,说明这种评估以何种方式被用于帮助决策者和其他利益相关者采取转型性行动推动农业粮食体系可持续性。

        投稿可以包括(但不限于)对《2023年粮食及农业状况》中介绍的初步隐性成本评估的证实、对如何根据不同具体情况下政策制定者优先重点定制真实成本核算方法的评估以及对进一步分析领域的确定等。认识到覆盖所有隐性成本维度的复杂性,本征集通知也包括考查环境、社会和健康类别下两个或以上方面的隐性成本的投稿/个案研究。这可以包括某个国家/区域的某个具体地方的隐性成本来源,例如水稀缺、温室气体排放、不健康饮食方式的健康后果,或社会后果(包括贫困和营养不良)。

        最终目的是采集相关意见和建议、主要讯息及国际层面的个案研究,供《2024年粮食及农业状况》编写进程参考(将于2024年11月出版)。《粮食及农业状况》团队将根据每个个案的相关性和多样性因素对相关个案研究进行评审和筛选,以供报告采用。

        本征集通知截至2024年1月29日。

 

如何参加本次征集通知

        要参加本次征集通知活动,此前未注册者请在粮食安全与营养论坛上注册,已注册者请“登录”。请下载六种联合国语言中任意版本的提交模板(英文、法文、西班牙文、俄文、阿拉伯文和中文)并在网页“粘贴意见和建议”表框中上载填写完毕的表格。提交内容字数请限制在2,000字内,可以添加相关支持材料附件。获取任何技术支持,、下载或上载提交模板,请发送电子邮件至 [email protected]

 

        我们期待收到各位的宝贵意见和建议,这无疑将强化《2024年粮食及农业状况》的内容。

共同主持人:

Andrea Cattaneo,农业粮食经济司资深经济学家兼《粮食及农业状况》编辑

Aslihan Arslan,农业粮食经济司《粮食及农业状况》经济学家

Ahmad Sadiddin,农业粮食经济司《粮食及农业状况》经济学家

Theresa McMenomy,农业粮食经济司《粮食及农业状况》经济学家

Elisa Ranuzzi,农业粮食经济司《粮食及农业状况》实习生

 

 

*点击姓名阅读该成员的所有评论并与他/她直接联系
  • 阅读 70 提交内容
  • 扩展所有

Dear SOFA team,

We are happy to submit our contributions to the call. Please find our submissions attached.

On behalf of Impact Institute we would like to submit the following publications:

  • External Costs of Animal Sourced Food in the EU

For any inquiries do not hesitate to contact us.

Kind regards,

Simone van Klaveren

Dear SOFA team,

We're happy to submit our contribution 'External costs of animal sourced food in the EU - Study on the externalities attributed to current value chains of EU production and consumption of animal sourced food – and opportunities for change'.

This study monetises environmental, health and social costs of current animal production and consumption in the EU, with an innovative methodology for including animal welfare under social costs. It was carried out by Impact Institute in 2023.

Please find our contribution attached.

Kind regards,

Camilla Björkbom

Political Adviser Food Policy

Eurogroup for Animals

Dear SOFA team,

We are happy to submit our contributions to the call. Please find our submissions attached.

On behalf of True Price we would like to submit the following publications:

  • The True Price of Climate Smart Agriculture
  • Final report True Price of CSA Coffee

For any inquiries do not hesitate to contact us.

Kind regards,

Claire van den Broek

 

Dear SOFA team,

We are happy to submit our contributions to the call. Please find our submissions attached.

On behalf of True Price we would like to submit the following publications:

  • The external costs of banana production
  • The external costs of banana production: A global study

For any inquiries do not hesitate to contact us.

Kind regards,

Claire van den Broek

Dear SOFA team,

Global Salmon Initiative (GSI), a leadership coalition representing over 40% of the global farmed salmon industry, would like to thank you for the opportunity to provide contributions about our ongoing work related to the hidden costs and benefits of agrifood systems. The farmed salmon sector supplies most of the world’s salmon, producing 70% of the global salmon harvest.[1] Given the continued growing demand for healthy protein, specifically aquaculture, Global Salmon Initiative was founded to move the industry towards more responsible, healthier and environmentally friendly farming methods. Our members are based in Chile, Canada, Australia/Tasmania, New Zealand, the Faroe Islands, Norway and Scotland. We appreciate that the 2023 State of Food and Agriculture (SOFA) report presents True Cost Accounting as a framework to assess the hidden costs of our food systems. We strongly believe that understanding these hidden costs is crucial to identifying gaps and strategically targeting interventions and investments that can transform our food system to amplify the many benefits and opportunities. Our contribution highlights two frameworks in development designed to help decision-makers in the salmon farming sector standardize accounting and data collection and identify risks in the supply chain, ultimately addressing the challenge of capturing more hidden economic costs in the global food system.

Salmon farming is one of the most technically advanced forms of protein production, partly due to continuing innovations and farming efficiencies in the sector. From reducing dependence on marine ingredients, lowering our greenhouse gas emissions, and improving fish health and welfare, we are continually working to improve industry performance and our members annually report on our progress via our public Sustainability Report.[2] Employing aligned metrics across companies and regions to monitor and report data on crucial environmental and social parameters enables us to pinpoint strategic areas of focus for further improvement where knowledge transfer between companies and regions can accelerate progress.

Through collective efforts in GSI, the industry has improved the feed efficiency ratio through reduced its fish in to fish out ratio and increasing use of industry by-products and novel ingredients, reduced the use of antibiotics by 50% in 7 years, and supported the uptake of the Aquaculture Stewardship Council (ASC) certification from 0-60% in 10 years. Measures like these will help aquaculture deliver on its promise, and GSI shares learnings so that others in and beyond the aquaculture sector can incorporate sustainable production efforts as well. More information on how GSI is using collaboration as a driver for industry transformation has been captured as part of a case study by World Wildlife Fund (WWF), “The Business Case for Pre-Competitive Collaboration: The Global Salmon Initiative.”[3]

Blue foods, including farmed salmon, are not only nutrient-rich, but they also have low GHG emissions relative to other animal proteins and present an opportunity to contribute to more sustainable, climate-resilient diets.[4] Aquatic foods are more efficient than terrestrial systems in providing protein; their impact on climate change and land use is in general much lower than terrestrial animal proteins and their production is not limited by suitable area available. Such benefits are highlighted by the research from the Blue Foods Assessment published in 2022.[5]

One vital way to improve production and consumption of nutrient-rich and sustainable protein is through aquaculture, the world’s fastest growing food sector.[6] The Ocean Panel documented the ocean’s ability to sustainably produce six times more food if better utilized and managed responsibly —and it could do so with a low environmental footprint.[7]

As noted within the 2023 SOFA report, GHG emissions are a large contributor to the environmental hidden costs of our food system and need to be reduced by 80% by 2050. And progress is still needed to further reduce emissions within the farmed salmon industry. We are collaborating with WWF to implement a standardized GHG Accounting Framework for the farmed salmon sector, with the eventual goal to expand it across the aquaculture sector. In partnership with IDH, The Sustainable Trade Initiative, and Blonk Sustainability, we're testing a data collection tool aligned with this framework to make it easier for companies to collect aligned data points for their product footprint. Using standardized accounting and data collection, the tool will support greater opportunities to pinpoint mitigation opportunities, then employ GSI's pre-competitive model to quickly disseminate best practices and insights for faster emission reductions across the global salmon-farming sector. This framework will launch in mid-2024.

We also are working with WWF to develop an Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) Risk Assessment Tool to holistically assess feed ingredients across ESG indicators. This tool will make it easier to collect and share information between feed companies and suppliers, help identify hidden costs and risks, and will act as a starting point for continually increasing transparency across supply chains. It will be ready to launch in Q1 2024.   

GSI members are committed to sharing their knowledge to help other aquaculture sectors evolve responsibly and support seafood’s important role in providing a growing population with access to safe and nutritious food. We believe that the adoption and use of the standardized GHG Accounting Framework and the ESG Risk Assessment Tool will provide valuable estimates of the costs and benefits of salmon production and will enable greater transparency and better decision-making. 

Thank you for your leadership on this important dialogue, and for this excellent opportunity to provide comment. On behalf of GSI, I am very keen to assist in the development of the 2024 SOFA report and would be open to connect and support however required.

Sincerely,

Sophie Ryan, CEO, Global Salmon Initiative

Dear SOFA team,

We are happy to submit our contribution "Case study on hidden sustainability performance and hidden positive externalities in agriculture in Germany – pilot project in Lower Saxony".

Please find our submission attached. For further inquires as well as the full, unpublished version of the report, feel free to contact us.

Best regards

SOFA Hidden Costs

Though there is no recorded case of use as a TCA methodology, the market systems development (MSD) approach is a potentially useful tool that can be used to identify and understand the underlying causes of the hidden costs in agrifood systems. While the approach largely lends itself to the development of interventions to promote the inclusion of marginalised people in market systems; its focus on addressing the factors that influence outcomes of relationships and transactions between people, organisations, and institutions in the market system makes it a suitable approach to identifying the hidden costs. Furthermore, by placing the value chains at the centre of the framework of the approach, it can apply to a range of scopes which include the global, sectoral, and single-product scopes. The SOFA 2023 already had tenets of the approach when considering the markets, institutional and policy failures in the agrifood system but what may be required is to analyse the root causes of these failures which is what policy can try to address.

Dear FSN Moderator:

Please include the following contribution on the above topic.

"The hidden costs of agri-food systems transformation are related to making the foods safe and nutritious. In contrast to the cold chain that has been used for decades to minimize nutrient losses and improve food safety of high moisture content products, the dry chain was realized and proposed recently in 2018 for low moisture content seed/food/feed products.  We have previously elaborated on the need to implement the dry chain at farms to make low moisture content seed/food systems sustainable and safe.  In addition, we have gathered and produced research evidence including through a research project in collaboration with UNICEF-Nepal. 

Here, we would like to share the link by USAID Agrilinks that has embraced and appreciated the dry chain to reduce food losses in the developing countries “Cold and Dry Chain to Reduce Food Loss and Waste”. Since dry food losses in the developing countries are associated with infection by toxic molds and insects, and nutrient decline in the storage, there is an urgent need to embrace and disseminate novel intervention soon after harvest to enable dry seed/food/feed systems to be safe and sustainable.

Peetambar Dahal and Krishna Belbase (Formerly with UNICEF, New York)"

Subject Matter Expert (Food Loss and Waste Cohort 5)

Seed Scientist (Retd.), University of California, Davis, USA

Former Coordinator of NRNA Americas to Agri Promotion Committee; Asta-Ja RDC-USA; Nepalese Agricultural Professional Association  (NAPA)

Dear SOFA team,

We are happy to submit our contribution "Revealing data gaps in True Cost Accounting of European diets" to the FAO SOFA 2024 report. This contribution is part of the PLAN'EAT project, a Horizon Europe project funded by the European Commission and aiming at transforming food systems and food environments towards healthy and sustainable dietary behaviour. 



Please find our submission attached. For further inquires as well as the full, unpublished version of the report, feel free to contact us. 



Kind regards,

Siranush Ghukasyan