Previous Page Table of Contents Next Page


9. ANALYSIS OF CATCH PER UNIT EFFORT DATA


9.1 The Sherbro Division
9.2 The Senegal/Gambia area

9.1 The Sherbro Division

Data obtained from three different sources were compared by the group (Table 7). The first series (first column) of data were obtained from the annual reports of the Sierra Leone Fisheries Division. The second set were taken from the report of the Third Session of the CECAF Working Party on Resources Evaluation, Rome 1976. The third series is that of the Ivorian fleet operating in the Sherbro Division.

The high Ivorian CPUE may have two causes. It may be partly due to higher horsepower engines (400 HP) and may also partly be due to local trawlers underexporting their catches or discarding low valued fishes. It is also noted that the effort units are not directly comparable because the Sierra Leonean effort is expressed in days out at sea while the Ivorian effort is given in hours dragging.

The group was unable to estimate the total catch made in the Sherbro Division because of the complete lack of data from the Soviet fleet operating on the Sierra Leone continental shelf as well as vessels operating from Monrovia. As regards the Ivorian fleet, the group felt that the catch and effort data for the early years do not reflect exactly the stock abundance because of progressive changes in discarding practices. The catch and effort of the last three years (1974-1976) may reflect the current abundance of the stocks since the fleet do not discard any fish. More information on the evolution of catches per unit effort can be found in Appendix 10.

Although the fishing effort in this division has increased with the entry of Senegalese, Soviet, Liberian and Ghanaian fleets, the CPUE on the whole has not shown any marked decrease. It is possible that the stocks are not excessively fished as yet, though the increase in apparent efficiency resulting from learning and reduction in discards has certainly masked the actual decrease in stock abundance.

9.2 The Senegal/Gambia area

Evaluation of fish stocks of the Senegambia area is not easy because of the following problems:

(i) Seasonal migration of fish from Mauritania to Guinea Bissau

(ii) A very active artisanal component (about 6 000 canoes) contributing to about two thirds of the total demersal fish catch

(iii) Participation of foreign vessels in the fishery, performances of which are not well documented

(iv) Considerable quantity of discards at sea; data on discards are also not available

(v) Successive changes in the fishing pattern with the fleet shifting effort from one target species (shrimp) to others (finfish).

Table 7 Catch/effort data for the Sherbro Division of CECAF (34.3.3)

Year

Sierra Leonea
Kg/day fishing

CECAFb
Kg/day at sea

Ivory Coastc
Kg/h (400 HP)

1960




1961




1962

1249



1963

1214



1964

1100

1950


1965

1330

1450


1966

1600

1830

204

1967

1248

2370

-

1968

1436

1460

267

1969

1245

1770

236

1970

1171

2290

193

1971

1063

2560

234

1972

1074

134O

225

1973


1220

192

1974


1670

246

1975



235

1976



278

Note: Italian vessels operating from Freetown have 250 HP engines while Ivorian vessels operating on the Sherbro Division have 400 HP engines


Source:

a Fisheries Division, Sierra Leone



b Report of 3rd Session of CECAF Working Party on Resources Evaluation, 1976



c CRO, Abidjan


Analysis of catch/effort data for the period 1960-1965 (considered as the stable period) shows a decline in yield from 300 tons per year per boat to 100 tons per year per boat. The period 1965-1968 corresponds to the transitional phase. However from 1969, more precise data have been collected by CRODT. For the principal species these CPUE are believed to provide a reasonably good index of abundance but these data are probably less reliable for the less important species.

Pagellus coupei -

An estimation of the discards has been made for P. coupei by comparing the length frequencies of catches made by research and commercial vessels operating at the same area and season. This study indicates that about 30-40 percent of P. coupei catch are discarded during the fishing season. Selectivity studies conducted on P. coupei shows that if fishermen abide by mesh regulation in force, this problem would be solved without much loss to the fishery. In the north zone P. coupei is more exploited by canoes. In the southern zone, trawlers, particularly the larger vessels with 1 000-1 500 HP engines, exploit P. coupei more than canoes. Between 1973 and 1976, the catch of this species (discards included) increased from 50° to 2 000 metric tons per annum for the southern zone. In the northern area, during the same period, trawlers caught (discards included) between 200 and 300 metric tons per annum while the canoes catch has been estimated at between 1 000 and 1 500 tons. The yield decreased from about 600 kg per day (for a standardized 250 HP trawler) in 1973 to about 300 kg in 1976.

Pseudupeneus prayensis -

The red mullet was exploited traditionally before 1965 but no investigations were conducted on it. Between 1965 and 1970, its exploitation was practically stopped. In 1971, with the arrival from the Mediterranean of 10-12 vessels specifically designed for catching red mullet, the exploitation of this species expanded rapidly. This was the beginning of a diversification period during which there was also rapid increase in the landings. It is possible that before this period the hard bottom grounds have been exploited seasonally (April to June) by Italian vessels, the size and the catch of which remain however unknown.

Analysis of available data show that landings at the port of Dakar increased from about 200 to 750 tons from 1971 to 1976.

Other species -

For the other species landed, the interpretation of the CPUE should be done with care. It is likely that because of changes in target species the specific variations in CPUE do not always correctly represent the variations in abundance. Appendix 9 further discusses these evaluations.


Previous Page Top of Page Next Page